User talk:Lewenstein

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lewenstein!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:Taborturm.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

removing cat.[edit]

Hello, please explain, why You did remove the category Category:Signs in Austria from file such as here. The category is completely correct. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Reicht es nicht aus, die Datei unter Signs in Burgenland zu kategorisieren? Schließlich ist das Burgenland ein Bundesland Österreichs. Oder gibts vielleicht irgendeine Richtline, die hier eine doppelte Kategorisierung vorsieht? Grüße lewenstein (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Warum nicht in beiden, schlieszlich stehen sie dennoch in Österreich. Gibts vielleicht irgendeine Richtlinie, die hier eine doppelte Kategorisierung verbietet? Gruesze, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 18:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Na ja, wieso nicht? Machs, wie Du willst. Ich hab's eben nur spontan als Redundanz empfunden. Schöne Grüße, lewenstein (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Ich sehe das anders, ich suche hier oft Bilder fuer Eintraege, es ist sehr muehsam die einzelnen Unterkategorien zu durchsuchen, dort hat man keine Vergleiche und es ist extrem unpraktisch. Nicht falsch verstehen, aber ich denke, dass das Entfernen von sinnvollen Kategorien nicht sehr konstruktiv ist. Ich habe die Kategorie wieder reingegeben. Gruesze, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 05:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Do not remove valid relevant information from image description pages[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMontaignes_Motto.png&action=historysubmit&diff=24348282&oldid=19926171 -- AnonMoos (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Ich habe meine deutschen Kommentare anfangs mit dem Programm Babel-Fish ins Englische übersetzt. Allerdings garantiert eine fehlerfreie Rückübersetzung vom Englischen ins Deutsche noch nicht die Richtigkeit des übersetzten Textes. Irgendwann entfernte ich diese Übersetzungen wieder, da sie schließlich (für mich nicht überprüfbar) sachliche Fehler oder blanken Unsinn enthalten könnten. Sind diese englischen Beschreibungen allerdings korrekt, sollten sie wieder eingefügt werden. Schöne Grüße lewenstein (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
A Wikimedia Commons image description page is not solely your personal playground, and you do not have responsibility for what is on the page (even of an image you uploaded) or authority to exclude valid relevant information added by others. AnonMoos (talk) 23:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Lewenstein,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Betreff Steyr Schnallentor[edit]

Hallo Lewenstein, habe heute den Text zum Schnallentor in Steyr geschrieben, meine Frage bzw. Bitte wäre, ob es nicht besser wäre dein Bild von der Südfassade zu zeigen, da es meiner Meinung nach wesentlich aussagekräftiger als jenes der Nordfassade ist (photographisch ist die Südfassade meiner Meinung nach auch besser als die Nordfassade mit den vielen Verkehrszeichen). Vieleicht könntest du, wenn du meiner Meinung bist, ja das Bild ersetzten. Liebe Grüße aus Steyr Bodory Thomas (talk) 19:57, 18 December 2011

O. k., ich habs ausgewechselt. Schöne Grüße lewenstein (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Danke, sieht toll aus, liebe Grüße aus Steyr Bodory Thomas (talk) 16:48, 19 December 2011

Category:Heinrich Lautensack (Schriftsteller)[edit]

Hallo!

Ich habe gerade veranlasste, dass die von dir geschaffene Kategorie "Category:Heinrich Lautensack (Schriftsteller)" nach "Category:Heinrich Lautensack (writer)" verschoben wird. Grund ist die Tatsache, dass auf Commons nicht Deutsch, sondern Englisch "gesprochen" wird. Im speziellen die Kategorienamen müssen in Englischer Sprache sein. Ich bitte dich in Zukunft darauf zu achten. Bei weiteren Fragen bitte an mich auf meiner Diskussionsseite wenden. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Liliana-60 (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Lewenstein,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 16:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tür-Relief am alten Herrenhaus, Schmiedleithen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tür-Relief am alten Herrenhaus, Schmiedleithen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Peter Stevens - On the hut terrace.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peter Stevens - On the hut terrace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The deletion request also covers the derived files:

--Avenue (talk) 12:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:The Preaching of St. John the Baptist (Pieter Bruegel the Elder) / Wikidata[edit]

Hallo Lewenstein, Du hast hier einen Baustein zu den WP Artikeln gesetzt, der im Hinblick auf die Infos in der linken Sidebar doppelt und deshalb überflüssig ist, s. Template:On Wikipedia/doc#Usage Kennst Du Dich auf Wikidata aus? Gruß --Oursana (talk) 17:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Ist die linke Sidebar nicht grundsätzlich für WP-Kategorien reserviert? lewenstein (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Ja, und das ist besser als on WP. Die Verbindung habe ich auf Wikidata gemacht. Da geht es ganz einfach. Man muss zu den verbundenen WP. Artikeln nur die Verknüpfung zu commons herstellen, und dann erscheinen alle in der Sidebar. Gruß und eine schöne Woche --Oursana (talk) 06:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Mir ist bewusst, dass es jetzt Wikidata gibt, aber du hast meine Antwort missverstanden. War es nicht irgendwann einmal so gedacht, dass in der linken Sidebar einer Commonskategorie nur Kategorien verlinkt werden und auf Commonsseiten nur die dazugehörigen WP-Artikel, also gleiches mit gleichem? Grüße. lewenstein (talk) 07:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Entschuldige, jetzt habe ich erst richtig gelesen. also ich kenne nur links auf WP Artikel in der linken Sidebar von Commonskategorien, sowie auch umgekehrt auf WP ANR der Link auf commonscat erfolgt. Ich wüsste auch gar nicht, wie man dazu WP Kategorien auf Data verlinkt. Gruss --Oursana (talk) 11:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Ich habe mal gesucht und ein paar Beispiele für Kategorien in der linken Sidebar gefunden: Category:Germany, Category:United States, Category:Italy; Category:Literature, Category:Painting, Category:Theatre; Category:Science, Category:Philosophy, Category:Religion. In fast alle diese Commonskats sind Commonsseiten einkategorisiert, die in der linken Sidebar auf die Artikel verweisen. Also so ganz unüblich scheint meine Auffassung nicht zu sein. Schöne Grüße lewenstein (talk) 13:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Ja Danke, sagt nur das es geht, nicht das es vorbehalten ist. In dem Punkt finde ich auch den Template text verwirrend, er hat sich glaube ich, durch die Verknüpfung von commons auf Wikidata jetzt eigentlich überholt. Außerdem gibt es hier keine äquivalente WP-Kat. GrußOursana (talk) 23:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Wir könnten weiterdiskutieren, aber das führt wohl zu nichts. Abschließend: Das "überflüssige" Template war als kleiner Service gedacht, um die Verlinkung eindeutiger zu gestalten. Den Links in der Sidebar sieht man ja, im Gegensatz dazu, erst beim Mouseover an, wo sie genau hinführen. Ob Wikidata (ich editiere dort auch gelegentlich) die bisherigen Probleme löst, wird sich zeigen. Schöne Grüße lewenstein (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Lewenstein, d:Wikidata:Requests for comment/Commons links habe ich gerade gefunden. Vielleicht interessiert es Dich. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Defekten Link gefixt. lewenstein (talk) 15:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Grüße lewenstein (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kremser Schmidt - Christus am Oelberg.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kremser Schmidt - Christus am Oelberg.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Lewenstein,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Lewenstein,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo