User talk:Lewis Hulbert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
If you leave a message on my talk page, I will reply here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will reply there. If you have a problem with anything I've done, please leave a message here.


Thanks for thanking me.[edit]

You're awesome. :D

DunDunDunt (talk) 01:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Michael and St Mary Magdalene's Church, Easthampstead.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael and St Mary Magdalene's Church, Easthampstead.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brookwood Czechoslovakia Military Cemetery.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brookwood Czechoslovakia Military Cemetery.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stained glass window in St Nicholas's Church, Compton 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass window in St Nicholas's Church, Compton 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Gabriel's Church, Popley, Basingstoke.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gabriel's Church, Popley, Basingstoke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yateley War Memorial 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yateley War Memorial 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yateley School.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yateley School.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yateley War Memorial.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yateley War Memorial.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Church of St Mary the Virgin, Beech Hill from the road.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Beech Hill from the road.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Holy Trinity Church, Hawley from the road.jpg[edit]

File:Holy Trinity Church, Hawley from the road.jpg is an excellent picture, can I convince you to nominate it as a Valued Image? Nev1 (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nev1: You can, and you have! I have just nominated it now. I probably have a few more images that could be VIs but I never get around to nominating them. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Marvellous :-) Hopefully there'll be a steady stream of UK photos at Valued Image Candidates – we've got a long way to catch up with France which has thousands of them! Nev1 (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Michael Rosen recording Listening Lions (17) (14310753767).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michael Rosen recording Listening Lions (17) (14310753767).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I intentionally didn't notify myself because it was my own upload. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Holy Trinity Church, Hawley from the road.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity Church, Hawley, England (exterior) NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

StarFox 64 screenshot[edit]

Would it be possible for me to change the license, or should I re-upload?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinium (talk • contribs) 00:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

No, it is a copyright violation. You don't own the (c) to the graphics and fair use is not allowed on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper-scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Lewis Hulbert, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!    FDMS  4    01:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Pterois volitans 400.jpg and QI updates[edit]

Hi. Sorry for opposing due to zombie pixels after you'd fixed them. In future could you please leave a message along the lines of {{done}} once you've corrected issues reviewers have identified? It makes life a bit easier. Thanks! -mattbuck (Talk) 09:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

No worries, it's my fault. I usually leave a message but I'm not sure why I forgot in this case. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HMS Warrior 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HMS Warrior 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pterois volitans 400.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pterois volitans 400.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued image candidate?[edit]

File:Farnham Castle keep.jpg must easily be Commons' best picture of Farnham Castle's keep. I see it's already a Quality Image candidate, can I convince you to nominate it as a Valued Image as well? Nev1 (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for suggesting that I nominate it. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Portsmouth Cathedral 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portsmouth Cathedral 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Farnham Castle keep.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farnham Castle keep.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Farnham Castle keep.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farnham Castle keep, Surrey, England (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Square Tower, Portsmouth.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Square Tower, Portsmouth.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green) 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over the River Wey, Tilford (north east side of green) 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Geranoaetus melanoleucus, Hawk Conservancy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranoaetus melanoleucus, Hawk Conservancy.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Michael's Church, Basingstoke.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael's Church, Basingstoke.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Church of St John the Baptist, Puttenham, Surrey.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St John the Baptist, Puttenham, Surrey.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St Michael, Camberley.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Michael, Camberley.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Mary's Church, Norney, Shackleford.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary's Church, Norney, Shackleford.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St Mark, Binfield.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mark, Binfield.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014[edit]

I see you added images (e.g. File:Reflections at St Pancras Railway Station.jpg) to both Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2014 and Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. Only the former is required as it is a sub-category of the other. -- Colin (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

@Colin: It does seem strange, but it was done that way last year too. Maybe it should've never been done like that, but I'm only doing it the same way as it was done last year (and as how Richard Nevell (WMUK) was doing it before I joined in) --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
See COM:OVERCAT. I think you are just making work for yourself (and for someone else should they decide to eliminate the duplication). -- Colin (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
When I started out, the images had categories for both. There is a little bit of overcategorisation for WLM, so Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 has all 107,000 images so far and they also have categories for the countries. I assumed the QI categorisations followed the same pattern but at the moment only the UK and Ukraine seem to have those subcategories. I don't have strong feeling either way as if you want to know a headline figure such as how many Quality Images there are from a particular edition of WLM you can run CatScan or GLAMorous. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
If anything, I don't really believe there needs to be a "Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2014" category, since it can easily be found out using the suggestions by Richard Nevell and most countries seem to do fine without them. There seems to be lots of redundancy in hidden categories wherever I look, I was never sure if COM:OVERCAT didn't apply to hidden categories or if just nobody cares. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality image???[edit]

Hi. Many thanks for letting me know that there is a system for doing this! It does, however beg the question: how on earth did [[File:Windsor MMB 03 King George V Memorial Fountain.jpg]] receive a quality image badge?!! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

It might be an uninteresting shot, but images don't have to be impressive or eye catching for quality image status. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St Tarcisius, Camberley.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Tarcisius, Camberley.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass window, St Bartholomew's Church, Wanborough 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Church of St Bartholomew, Wanborough behind gate.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Bartholomew, Wanborough behind gate.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St. Mary, Herriard.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. Mary, Herriard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Portsmouth Cathedral 2014 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portsmouth Cathedral 2014 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of St Martin, Ellisfield.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Martin, Ellisfield.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Portsmouth Garrison Church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portsmouth Garrison Church.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapel of the Holy Ghost, Basingstoke.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Holy Ghost, Basingstoke.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosedene, Eversley.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosedene, Eversley.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Portsmouth Cathedral 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portsmouth Cathedral, Hampshire, England (exterior) South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.