User talk:LoopZilla

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

f5de12da78854e4ad75d0d46d1f0dfb6

Abstract drawn in The GIMP

Wikimedia Commoner "LoopZilla" lives in the East End of London....

Contents

Image:Organic_Heinz_Tomato_Ketchup.jpg[edit]

Organic Heinz Tomato Ketchup.jpg

Hey! The photo you uploaded here from flikr has a terrible colour cast so I've created a copy with more accurate colours. It's here if you'd like to upload it in place of the old one. Obviously it's licensed under share alike. I'll put it under share alike 3.0 as creativecommons.org recommends me to. --Robhlam 03:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)robhlam Fair enough. Out of interest, what is it that you don't like about the new image? (So I don't make the same mistakes again!) BTW, thanks for uploading the photo in the first place. --Robhlam 14:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Le_Havre_St_Jospeh_int1.jpg[edit]

Please check that I have corrected your nomination as you would wish. Yes, it is perfect. Thank you very much.

Sorry I have made big mistakes this morning in the "Featured picture candidates". I wanted to correct them, but I guess that was not perfect. Thanks to corrected that. Kuxu76 14:09, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

No problem! LoopZilla 17:21:56, 2005-07-24 (UTC)

My photo in "featured picture candidates"[edit]

I am very thankful for your correction and nomination! On improving the image, I am however completely clueless. It isn't the original digital photo I uploaded, but will this be any better, since it is taken with an only 3 mpixel camera?

By the way, I have seen your photos on your userpage. They are very impressive! As an amateur, I am honored by a professional as you taking interest and time on one of my photos. Thank you very much! Please post your answer on my my talk page

Regards,

Dennis Nilsson 23:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Will reply on your talk page on Wikipedia (not Commons)! LoopZilla 10:00:12, 2005-07-31 (UTC)

Great meeting you too[edit]

Thanks for the message at ro.wp. It was great talking to you guys at Wikimania, and am looking forward to meeting you again in London. IulianU; 62.206.65.6 12:45, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

See you back in London! LoopZilla 14:52:07, 2005-08-07 (UTC)

Working on....[edit]

I am removing images from Category:Diagrams since...

This category is overpopulated.
Please move content to appropriate subcategories or pages.

LoopZilla 10:06, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

E. Pellicci[edit]

Is this in Hackney? I forget where the boundaries are around there. Just trying to get things out of Category:London into subcats. Very nice cafe. Justinc 01:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Bethnal Green LoopZilla 07:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Windfarm.jpg[edit]

GFDL needs the copyright holder to be complete, so please add your sources. Beside images without descriptions are of small use for an encyclopedia. --Saperaud 23:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Taken care of. LoopZilla 23:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

What is shariden?[edit]

Is that a real word? Cant find it on m-w.com or dictionary.com ... you use it on Template:Potd/2005-12-22 (en) --Spundun 05:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Featured picture nomination[edit]

Hey Gordo - have you seen an image of mine was nominated for Featured Picture? Cormaggio 00:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

bmi aircraft[edit]

Thanks for letting me know my bmi pic was Featured Pic today, I would not have known otherwise. I'm surprised it came out reasonably sharp because I have a cheapish Olympus digital and was using it at the extreme of its telephoto which is times 10. Thanks again - Arpingstone 17:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

It was "Picture of the Day" rather than "Featured Picture" but I think a very fine image, with all the detail as well. LoopZilla 13:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


Image:Tower_Bridge_London_Dusk_Feb_2006.jpg[edit]

I did take this image, why do you ask? The licencing states that I am the author, although it could be better spelt out in the summary. Diliff 00:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I would like the wording of the licence to be more explicit. Perhaps I should get the template changed! Thanks LoopZilla 08:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:All Saints, Poplar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:All Saints, Poplar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 03:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Kingsley Hall frontage.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kingsley Hall frontage.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kjetil_r 01:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning for Image:Piglit.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Piglit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Angr 12:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

POTD[edit]

Please do not add your picture to Picture of the Day if it is not featured like you did with [1]. If you want to put in a picture of the day please choose a Featured Picture that has not been POTD before. Thank-You. --Digon3 14:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Gosh, how unfriendly. Loop: nice rotoscoping on that photo (is that what it is?) +sj + 09:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Someone put a something on the english Commons:Picture of the day that said not to put non-featured pictures and made it sound like it was a rule. Since I am new I thought that was the rule. It has been removed and the non-featured picture issue is being voted on here. Sorry for the mixup --Digon3 14:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Nice to be clear Gordo 22:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

delineation[edit]

I see it is 'delineate' and not a rotoscoper that produced your photo :-) nice all the same. +sj + 16:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if the schmap folks would like having some of their material on the $100 laptops... there's a lot of great imagery and local info about continents they don't cover to be gained from the laptop users sharing with the rest of the world. +sj + 09:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, yes, why not! 11:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Piglit2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Piglit2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers 02:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]

POTY barnstar 1.svg
Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 21:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


Image:Nikon F-401.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Nikon F-401.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(fixed your request from 2006) --Deadstar 10:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


Category:Sketch diagrams[edit]

Image deletion warning Category:Sketch diagrams has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Ma-Lik 18:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


...

Image:222.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:222.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:223.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:223.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Ducks with Pigs.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ducks with Pigs.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. DENKernel 19:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Abbey Mills[edit]

Hi.

I noticed you have some great pictures of the Abbey Mills area. A note and a question, if I may. Firstly, I have deleted Image:Sewage Pipe near Abbey Mills.jpg as it was a poorer resolution copy of Image:Sprial Pipe3.jpg. I made the change to w:Greenway, London. The question is that I am working on w:Abbey Mills Mosque and I think it would really help the article if we could have a free-use picture of the proposed site to put into the lead. I've already used your Image:New abbey mills pumping station.jpg image in the article as well. Thanks again for your great work! -- Avi 17:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I have an enwiki peer review open on w:Abbey Mills Mosque now, and, quite soon, I'f like to send it to FAC, so if it is not too much trouble, if you could provide a free-use picture of the site, that would be FANTASTIC. Thank you! -- Avi 04:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:SS_Robin_Nov05.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SS_Robin_Nov05.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -Nard 18:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Superm401 - Talk 02:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:DSC09873.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:DSC09873.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Korax1214 10:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bulls_Head_Barnes.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bulls_Head_Barnes.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 09:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


Banksy graffiti[edit]

Image deletion warning Banksy graffiti have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


File:Athena_and_Phevos_2006.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Athena_and_Phevos_2006.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 16:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Your picture of Kusama's Tulips[edit]

Hi! I had to delete a file uploaded by User:AtelierJoly. As this account does not seem to be used any more, I'm writing to you. File:Kusama Tulips.jpg represents a sculpture still protected by copyright. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France: there is no exception for sculptures or buildings in the public domain. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

OK. Gordo (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Milk_Float_13-11-2004.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Milk_Float_13-11-2004.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, LoopZilla!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 18:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Transport in London [edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Transport in London has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Hi LoopZilla, we have been removing some of the ambiguity caused by the the London boroughs having the same name as their principle towns, therefore I am suggesting we improve the formate to the category name of “Transport in London” .--P.g.champion (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC) ...

File:Orange Flower 1444c o.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Image:Escalators_Canary_Wharf.jpg or Image: Canary_Wharf_Escalators_2.jpg[edit]

Hello LoopZilla,

this is Juergen from germany. I'm working in a institute named IQB (Institut zur Qualitätsentwicklung im Bildungswesen). We would like to use one of these images (Escalators_Canary_Wharf.jpg or Canary_Wharf_Escalators_2.jpg) for a comparing test in a mathematical context. The IQB isn't a commercial institute and there are no financial advantages. But we cannot use the images with the share alike license. Is there a possibility to get a special license? The image will only used in this test context. If you wish we can attribute your name.

Best regards, JR.IQB.Mathe (talk) 07:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Barges at Salmon's Lane Lock.jpg[edit]

Hi LoopZilla! Just thought I'd let you know that I've updated the description of File:Barges at Salmon's Lane Lock.jpg - the barges aren't passing, but instead are 'breasted up', and work as a pair - one towing the other. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Gordo (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token f5de12da78854e4ad75d0d46d1f0dfb6[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Brinjal_Pickle(Patak).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brinjal_Pickle(Patak).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 01:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Hot_chill_oil.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hot_chill_oil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 01:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Commercial use of a photograph authored by you[edit]

Dear Mr. Gordon Joly:

I am about to publicize a website containing a photograph of yours, obtained through Wikimedia Commons. The end result is the following:

http://sites.google.com/site/aldoloup/articulos/la-ruta-al-lejano-oriente

The same page in English, Portuguese and maybe other languages will follow. A printed version is envisioned too.

I want to be sure that you have no complaints about this use of your work. I really don't want to have problems over copyright issues down the road.

I want to thank for the opportunity to use your work in commercial ventures.

If you have any issue with this use of your work, please let me know it immediately.

I am acting in good faith, in the firm belief that the license for commercial use that appears in the Wikimedia Commons page of your photograph is completely valid, accurate and current.

Thank you very much.

Aldo Loup.

aldoloup@hotmail.com

All fine Gordo (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Regards Psychonaut (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Salmon Lane Lock 2011c.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Salmon Lane Lock 2011c.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 23:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Olympic Cafe.jpg[edit]

Hello Loopzilla,

Although you took the above photo seven and a half years ago, do you happen to have any recollection as to which street or locality in East London the Olympic Cafe pictured was? I've been searching around with the aim of updating the description and categorising the file accordingly (as it's currently in an "unidentified building" category), so any possible info at all would be most helpful. Alas, I've not yet been able to find any trace of this establishment on the web. Best Regards, Rept0n1x (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Rept0n1x (talk) 20:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Just to say, thanks again for the location identification, much appreciated. I have now moved the file to more specific cats. Based on the postcode (which I was subsequently able to find on your corresponding Flickr page), the site appears to be just east of the River Lea and therefore in the London Borough of Newham. Although if this is in any way wrong then please feel free to correct my changes. It seems it's on one of those streets the Google car did not get down, so the estimated geotag I have placed on the file is purely based on postcode rather than visual identification. Best Regards Rept0n1x (talk) 08:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for the more specific location. I had put it in Tower Hamlets originally, but that postcode then seemed to show a location on the other side of the Lea, causing me to change it. I've now corrected the estimated geotag to the vicinity of Twelvetrees Crescent and Maltings Close, clearly in Tower Hamlets. Cheers, Rept0n1x (talk) 08:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Excellent! Gordo (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Message?[edit]

Hi, your last edit to my talk page consisted just of your signature, did the message get lost? :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

...

File:Headaches.jpg[edit]

Hello again LoopZilla,

Trying to identify the location of the above photo. A few clues seem to point to the corner of St Leonard's Road and Bright Street E14? Although looks like there are terrace houses there now. If you happen to get a moment, would be very grateful if can confirm or correct my current thinking on this. It seems the locality has changed almost beyond recognition in recent years. Thanks again for any possible pointers, Cheers Rept0n1x (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I **think** this is Bright Street. The wall at the is the railway... DLR. Gordo (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Thank you again for the quick reply! Here are some of the clues which led me to Bright Street:-

  • From the sun angle and time of day, it looks roughly like a westerly view - which Bright Street matches well.
  • Tower blocks on the Lansbury Estate (Maidstone House with Osterley House behind and to the left according to Google maps I think). Bright street is the only street in the area I can match this exact viewing angle of these tower blocks from.
  • Google Street view at this point [2] appears to show the "School/children crossing" road sign and also the unique small red-brick wall next to it with darker bricks above - just about the only part of Bright Street in the photo which still appears the same now as it did then.
  • Using Google Earth (as opposed to Google maps), when I retrieve the satellite views for 2003, the terrace houses on the corner are replaced by buildings which appear to match the shape of the "Headaches" shop. Also planning permission for those houses was not filed until 2003, so likely not built until at least 2004 at the earliest.
  • Although the pavement has been re-laid, the slightly obtuse angle of the street corner on Google Street View, with respect to St Leonard's Road looks the same as on this photo.
  • Finally in the 2003 Google Earth Satellite view, there is a warehouse past the end of Bright Street, (in front of the tower blocks), with a shape and skylights that exactly match that shown in the background of yourr photo.

So I think we have nailed it, I will update the file's geographical co-ordinates soon. Certainly one of the most changed scenes I've yet dealt with!

Thanks very much again for your input. Rept0n1x (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Excellent! Gordo (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Also confirmed by local sources... Gordo (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Great stuff, thanks for the confirmation. There's certainly no substitute for local knowledge! Rept0n1x (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
All done now - I've updated the file. Again please feel free to correct any mistakes I may have made either with the description or categories. Cheers! Rept0n1x (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

WLM organization in the UK[edit]

Thanks for indicating your interest in this. I'd like to get some proper teams in place now, so we can decide who will be doing what, and I wonder if you could go to Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom/People and move your signature to the correct heading? Many thanks, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Tessellations[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Tessellations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Stannic (talk) 12:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:BORN TO RUN.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BORN TO RUN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File:CH - Community.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CH - Community.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nemo 12:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)