User talk:Lyzzy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Category:Turkish food[edit]

Done. Now we have to deal with Category:Turkish cuisine, which seems to be redundant. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

That's true and it's not the only case. There are similar things i.e. Category:Japanese cuisine vs Category:Japanese food and more. I think about it. --Lyzzy 14:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Admins can always use Orgullobot for requests... or you can always ask one of us more active ones to add the request modification... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Umgebung Image:Stadtgebiet Meerbusch.png[edit]

Hallo Lyzzy, hast du die Möglichkeit die Grafik im Rahmen der Lizenz ein wenig anzupassen? Im Artikel Meerbusch werden noch weitere umgebende Städte wie Willich, Duisburg und Kaarst genannt. Das würde gut zum Kontext passen. Gruß --Michael 08:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Gehen würde das natürlich, ob es notwendig ist, ist eine andere Frage. Genannt sind im Moment die wichtigsten Nachbarstädte, die Grenze zu Duisburg (da musste ich erstmal nachfragen, ob sie tatsächlich existiert) ist nur wenige hundert Meter lang. Ich lass es mal sacken. --Lyzzy 18:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Naja, die Frage die sich mir da aufdrängt ist natürlich, wer entscheidet welche Städte wichtig sind und welche nicht. Um Neutralität zu wahren wäre es meiner Meinung nach richtig sie alle zu nennen. Ich unterschlage ja auch keinen Stadtteil im Artikel von Meerbusch, nur weil er subjektiv "nicht wichtig ist". Ich habe gerade auf den offiziellen Seiten der Stadt Duisburg nachgesehen, [[1]] bei Rheinstromkilometer 760 in der Nähe des Krefelder Wendebeckens gibt es — wie du schon richtig sagtest — eine kurze Schnittkante von ca. 710m zu Duisburg. Und Duisburg ist sicherlich nicht unbedeutend. :-) --Michael 16:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Michael, dies ist eine Übersichtskarte, die bewusst sehr schematisch und reduziert ist. Wenn du das in dieser Karte für wichtig hältst, füge es hinzu. Eugen, der die Karte erstellt hat, hat dazu im Moment keine Zeit. --Lyzzy 19:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, ist erledigt. --Michael 21:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Danke MIchael, ich habe deine Version jetzt noch unter dem alten Namen hochgeladen, es ist ja nicht notwendig beide vorzuhalten. --Lyzzy 08:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Danke Lyzzy, ich bin leider aus den Manuals nicht ganz schlau geworden was speziell das Thema Ersetzen von Bildern angeht. Um nichts kaputt zu machen, habe ich es sicherheitshalber unter einem neuen Namen gespeichert. Aber so ist es natürlich besser. --Michael 12:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:Tezuka-osamu-clock-kyoto-stn.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Tezuka-osamu-clock-kyoto-stn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Lyzzy!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Lyzzy oder Alice Wiegand!

mein name ist natalia zimmermann, ich bin studentin der fachhochschule köln, wir machen zurzeit ein projekt das sich mit der problematik zwischen stadt köln und stadt düsseldorf beschäftigt. im rahmen dieser arbeit bin ich für das design verantwortlich, ich habe dein foto gefunden, und wollte dich fragen ob das ok ist, wenn wir das für unser projekt verwenden und im rahmen dieser arbeit im internet veröffentlichen, natürlich nur mit der angabe deines namens! meine email adresse ist: natasha.zimm@web.de ich freue mich auf deine antwort

Urheberrechtsverletzung[edit]

http://www.duesseldorf-reisefuehrer.de/kunstsammlung_nrw.html bzw. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:K21_Staendehaus.jpg, siehe auch http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#www.heidelberg-reisefuehrer.com --Johannes Götte (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Mutter Duesseldorf 2010 2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Erteilte Freigabe[edit]

Hallo Lyzzy, am 3. Juli 2011 habe ich das Bild File:Bescheinigung für Margarete Haeberlin.jpg hochgeladen und im Artikel de:Margarete Rudolphi eingepflegt. Dieses Bild – ein Zeugnis für Margarete Haeberlin von 1894 - ist nun leider am 2. Sept. gelöscht worden, mit der Begründung, eine Genehmigung zur Weiterverwendung sei beim OTRS nicht eingegangen. Vermutlich hat der Bearbeiter die Freigabe übersehen, denn der Rechteinhaber Joachim B. Rudolphi hat die Weiternutzung bereits am 5. Juli erteilt - steht auf dem selben Mailanhang mit der Freigabe für das Gemälde File:Wolfram Rudolphi.jpg. Würdest Du bitte noch einmal auf der Mail von Herrn Rudolphi nachsehen und das Bild „Bescheinigung für Margarete Haeberlin“ ggf. wieder herstellen? Danke, und lieben Gruß --Suse (talk) 12:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Suse, wird geprüft. --Lyzzy (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Ra'ike hat es wieder hergestellt. Vermutlich ist es einfach übersehen worden bei der Abarbeitung. Kannst du dich um die Wiedereingliederung im Artikel kümmern? --Lyzzy (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Danke Dir, Lyzzy. Das Zeugnis ist wieder im Artikel. LG --Suse (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Permission to use Kombu.jpg[edit]

Dear Lyzzy,

I am Joue Huey, I wish to use your photo Kombu.jpg. It will be use in a science textbook where I mentioned kelp contain high level of iodine. Please contact me at jouehuey.yeoh@pearson.com

Thank you.

Joue Huey

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RaR 2013 Fettes Brot 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Fettes Brot 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RaR 2013 Besucher.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Besucher.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RaR 2013 Leslie Clio 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Leslie Clio 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Austrian stamps[edit]

I left a message for you at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:150years-Austrian-stamps.jpg. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

note to self[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Lyzzy,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)