User talk:M0tty/archives 2

Vectorisation propre

Salut,

J’ai eu moi aussi l’idée de corriger la vectorisation de File:Maket icon.svg mais tu m’a pris de vitesse. Du coup, j’ai quand même travaillé et j’ai nettoyé ton fichier .

Si tu veux des conseils sur le nettoyage de SVG, n’hésite pas à me demander. Rapidement, le truc qui m’a le plus choqué 1. tu n’as pas « Nettoyer les Defs » (du coup, le fichier garde en mémoire tout les essais de dégradés), ça prend deux secondes 2. tu travaillais avec des dimensions bizarres (100 % par 100 % d’une ViewBox, c’est pourquoi File:Maket icon.svg était perdu et indiquait « 512 × 512 » comme dimension) et j’ai l’impression que tu t’es perdu dans le resize. Ceci dit, le fichier était globalement assez propre (j’ai déjà vu des milliers de fois pire).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 07:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheniscus humboldti in the London Zoo (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear M0tty, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

suppression d'images

Bonjour. J'avais signalé que des images récemment importées depuis Google Art Projetc était des duplicate exact voir de légèrement moins bonne qualité que des images précédemment importées (par moi en l'occurrence). Je les avais donc signalé comme des "duplicate". Le problème est que vous venez de supprimer justement ces images au profit des derniers imports google art project. Résultat, certaines images avec des bordures de cadre alors que les autres n'en avait pas, disparition des images sur les wiki car la plupart de ces images étaient reliées, ce qui n'est pas du tout le cas de celles actuelles, mais surtout une perte de plein d'infos mises dans la description de l'image (comme ici)et qui ne s'y retrouve plus dans l'image actuelle : si j'avais indiqué le duplicate dans ce sens, c'était tout à fait volontaire !! Maintenant comment fait-on pour retrouver ces infos ? Les administrateurs effectuant ces suppressions ne sont pas sensés fusionner les données ? J'attends votre réponse. Merci d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour votre réponse rapide. Si l'erreur peut être corrigée, c'est très bien, pas de soucis : voici les fichiers concernés, s'ils pouvaient donc être rétablis : File:L Annonciation.jpg, File:Les Très Riches Heures du duc de Berry mai.jpg, File:Mariage de la Vierge - Heures d'Etienne Chevalier - musée Condé.jpg, File:L'Amante inquiète - Watteau - Musée Condé.jpg. Merci d'avance.

A l'occasion, j'en profite pour vous signaler d'autres fichiers "duplicate" signalés par moi et tjs en attente : celui-ci et celui-ci ou encore celui-ci car comportant un cadre 3D contrairement à l'autre de la même taille, celui-là et celui-là car l'autre est plus complet dans la desc et plus reliés à des pages wiki. Pour tout vous dire, ces images que j'ai importé viennent du site officiel du même musée qui a transmis par ailleurs ces clichés au Google Art project, autrement dit ils ont vraiment la même provenance et sont strictement identiques.

Mel22 (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Blason de la ville de Inswiller (Moselle).svg and File:Blason de la ville de Insviller (Moselle).svg

These two files are identical, do you know the right orthography for the village? I'm writing you these because File:Blason de la ville de Inswiller (Moselle).svg is pending for deletion for nearly a month.

Sincerely Yours, --Topographie (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Concours Wiki Loves Monuments Belgique et Luxembourg

Bonjour MOtty,

J'ai bien reçu ton message adressé via mon site et t'en remercie. Par la présente je te confirme ma participation à la cérémonie de remise des prix du 30 novembre. Je serai heureuse de rencontrer l'équipe organisatrice du concours et les autres lauréats.

Avec mes cordiales salutations,

Marie-Claire

Ligne T1

Pourquoi as-tu détruit mon travail ? J'ai ajouté les nouvelles stations.Hektor (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Church-Saint-Jacques-du-Haut-Pas (rue saint-Jacques - Paris Ve arrondissement).JPG

I noticed that this file says it is a retouched version of File:Rue Saint-Jacques Eglise saint Jacques du haut Pas.JPG, but that page now appears to be a redirect to the retouched version. I saw your name in the edit summary of the redirect (the history has only one edit with no other history). Do you know where the original is? and what happened to its history? Thanks. --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

In this case neither of the criteria you cite (a duplicate or scaled down version) appear to apply to the original upload. The original file was a photo uploaded by the photographer who granted the license (20:07, 7 May 2008 FLLL). It seems to me that an original photo uploaded by the photographer should not be deleted, if it is an upload of a notable and suitable image. The user who uploaded the newer image claimed it was an altered version of the original: "This is a retouched picture, which means that it has been digitally altered from its original version. Modifications: Correction contraste, netteté et perspective. The original can be viewed here: Rue_Saint-Jacques_Eglise_saint_Jacques_du_haut_Pas.JPG. Modifications made by Gilles MAIRET." However, if this is untrue and the newer upload was indeed identical (perhaps uploaded in error), then the newer one should have been deleted, not the original. However, I notice that user MAIRET first uploaded newer versions on the original file page. Perhaps these are the versions which should have been deleted. --Robert.Allen (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

I do not have access to the original upload, since I am not an administrator, but of course I have no reason to disbelieve you. However, I still feel it would have been better to delete the new uploads, leaving the original file page in place, so the history of the page created by the photographer would remain intact. Then there would have been less confusion. Best regards, --Robert.Allen (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

The files are not identical. The metadata of the current file dates from 22 April 2009, which means the file was modified on that date, after the original image was uploaded on 7 May 2008. If possible, I would like you to restore the original file page and images. Thank you. --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:29, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring the original file page. It turns out the original uploaded photo is much higher resolution than the adjusted versions. This gives us the opportunity to redo the adjustments to the full resolution version. I was beginning to feel like a nuisance to little purpose, but at least now I feel like it was worth pursuing. Thanks again for all the help and your patience! --Robert.Allen (talk) 03:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Nouvelle année 2013

Bonsoir MOtty,

Tous mes meilleurs voeux pour l'année nouvelle.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

BSicon renaming

Hello, M0tty. You have new messages on another wiki at Talk:BSicon/Renaming#BSicon uCONT-f.svg & BSicon uCONT-g.svg. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

#REDIRECT[[]]

Hi M0tty, please, can yor redericted this:
File:Carl Gustav Carus 003.jpg to File:Carl Gustav Carus - Fenster am Oybin im Mondschein.jpg and
File:Carl Gustav Carus 001.jpg to File:Carl Gustav Carus - Blick auf Dresden von der Brühlschen Terrasse.jpg?
thanks --Botaurus (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)