User talk:MGA73/Archive 29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File tagging File:Laura Hay.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laura Hay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

|EPO| da: 20:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. OTRS was lost in transfer. --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flakesch2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flakesch2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Laurifindil (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Lactat.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lactat.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 17:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Kattandakudi massacre1.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kattandakudi massacre1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

This DR

Do you wish to make a response in this DR? I regret passing it so quickly in 2010 now. I should have filed a DR first and let the community decide. If it is deleted, the so be it. Maybe you have a panoramio account. I don't sadly. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Thanks for trying to reach the panoramio account owner. Its a good photo and it would be a shame to lose it but sometimes life isn't fair....if the permission isn't clear enough. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

File:ABJ_Beaufort_Bannen.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ABJ_Beaufort_Bannen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Rondp.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rondp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 20:23, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

A response

[1] I never said "your a pedophile".

The anonymous user in question said that Wikipedia should be used for children to explore their sexuality. The anonymous user also claimed that providing children pornography was healthy. Mind you, Denmark and every other country bans such behavior and Germany even bans the advocacy of giving children pornography. In Denmark, according to Wikipedia, "It is illegal to distribute photographic or video pornography of persons under the age of 18".

The reason why is this: "They may show pornography—videos or pictures—to the child, hoping to make it easy for the child to accept such acts, thus normalizing the behavior. They may simply talk about sexual topics. These are just some of the methods a child groomer might use to gain a child's trust and affection in order to allow them to do what they want."

I merely pointed out that the reason why is because it is a standard argument of pedophilia groups like NAMBLA and that pedophiles on Commons and Wikipedia made the same exact arguments, which they did. Even if I called him a "pedophile" that would be, at most, one incivil comment and not bannable. However, Sue Gardner and the WMF has made a clear no tolerance stance on the matter for both the individuals and advocates.

To say an individual is advocating the same thing as they are would not be incivil. It would be absolute fact, especially when every country has laws against the action for a reason. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Alexey_Lushnikov._Studia_VOT._2010.jpg

Dear MGA73, why have you deleted the files I uploaded? I 've removed the fast delete templates. I was going to discuss 'em. Best Regards, Doctor Zevago (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Doctor Zevago. I deleted the files because you added a {{delete}} on the pages. I asumed that that meant that you agreed that the file should be deleted. I just checked the file you mentioned and you added the "delete" at 02:00 and I deleted the file at 20:34. That was more than 18 hours after and it is normaly enough time to add a reason and a subpage (the subpage is where you tell why the file should (not) be delete).
I suggest than you go to COM:UDEL and add a request and the arguments why the files are ok at the bottom of the page. If you have good arguments then the files will be undeleted.
You can find more help about how to use the deletion template here Template:Delete/doc. I have a link to the left saying "Nominate for deletion" and when I click that I'm asked to add a reason and when I click ok the script does the rest for me. --MGA73 (talk) 07:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear MGA73, thanks a lot for the clear answer! I will follow your recommendations. Best Regards, Doctor Zevago (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

This photo

Is it worth it to ask this panoramio account owner (on the picture link) to see if he also allows derivative use of this picture..both on and off wikipedia OR if he will say on the link that he licenses the image copyright free as CC BY SA generic? I think its the only way this photo could be kept. If the permission is only for wikipedia, this image will be deleted. Its your call. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Sure. No harm done by asking :-) --MGA73 (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: The copyright owner made a response but he is unsure what license option to choose. Do you know how to change licenses to an acceptable one on panoramio? I haven't a clue on panoramio and on flickr its even harder to change a license with the new design, I notice. I tried changing a license on flickr and came up on making a picture 'public or private' instead. Eventually succeded but it was a hassle. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Just a note to celebrate that the license was changed :-) --MGA73 (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

These photos

All these pictures from this account have to be deleted. After you contacted him, he changed the license for all his panoramio photos from 'cc by nd 3.0' to 'ARR' right away which says something. Maybe you should tag them as copyvios or just delete them ASAP before he complains to Commons. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Well there is also a note (Google translation):

The Sir or Madam, You have the right settings in order to use this wiki
From the images under specific circumstances is acceptable and nothing should be written on them
The overall picture is that the mail box and water brands, and they are essentially the same for
Thread both he and I and all the people you take Halshv
:)

I'm not sure if it is a permission or not (from another user?). So we should ask someone that speaks the language what the meaning is. --MGA73 (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Its from another user, not Masoud Bahri. I marked several of his pictures like this as 'cc by nd 3.0' 1-2 days earlier and now they're all 'ARR.' I think that's clear enough. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: By the way, thanks for saving this picture. The copyright owner was willing to license it freely...but too many people have problems with licenses...even on flickr. On flickr, its easier to make a picture private than to change a license sadly. I think that the uploader, Glabb, would be happy if he wasn't away. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry about the late response. My plan was to wait a week and if nothing had happend on panoramio then all the files should be deleted. But it seems that they are allready deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:GFDL-Armenica

Hi Michael,

You have mentioned in the edit summery: if uploaded after 1 January 2007 then file should be deleted. So no new files should excist. Almost all the files the conected to this template shold be deleted? The template says: This permission only applies to images from http://armenica.org/ existing as of 1 January 2007. Any later images do not fall under this permission!. Some files that moved fron en.wiki uploaded in January 2007. They were more likley posted in Armenica site before 1 January 2007. Shold I made mass deletion to all the files? Geagea (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Well hm.. now that you ask I think this needs an extra check. It depends on how we shall understand the permission. Is the permission valid for files uploaded to armenica.org before that date or does the permission mean uploaded to Commons (Wikipedia) before that date. I'll have a look. --MGA73 (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I checked and fixed the template. Files have to be uploaded to armenica.org before January 2007 (not Commons or Wikipedia). However, we should be able to verify that the file actually excisted on armenica.org before that date. So if there is no link to the file or no way of telling when the file was uploaded I think it should be deleted. If file was uploaded to Commons or Wikipedia on or before January 1 2007 it should be safe. --MGA73 (talk) 06:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

MGA73bot2 operations in the big license migration

Hi

According to my watchlist:

  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial9.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-errata.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial8.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial7.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial6.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial5.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial4.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial3.djvu‎; 19:26 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial2.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-rozdzial1.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Zielinski Historia Polski-slowo wstepne+okladka.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - Sekcje koncowe.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R7.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R6.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R5.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R4.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R3.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R2.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R1.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - R0.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]
  • (diff | hist) . . mb File:Polacy ziemia zlotowska - Okladka Przedmowa.djvu‎; 19:25 . . (+23) . . MGA73bot2 (Talk | contribs | block) (Marking as not-eligible in the big license migration) [rollback]

I would like to say my intention was to put there dual (GFDL/CCBYSA3.0) license, as the heir of the author. After the bot operations these files have GFDL license tag only, what was not intended.

Regards, Julo (talk) 03:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh in that case this should fix it :-) --MGA73 (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I INFROGMATION HAVE OPTED OUT OF LICENSE MIGRATION

Re [2] Note that I already had "opt out" specified. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE I BEG YOU recognize that I, User:Infrogmation, have opted out of any involuntary change of licenses of my works on Wikimedia. I have stated this MANY times in pretty much any forum I thought might be relevant, and if you think I need to keep repeating it elsewhere, please suggest where else I should state this. (And as I have said repeatedly, I may be quite willing to change some of my licenses were anyone to ask me; I have never been asked and hence I must resist with vigor any and all attempts contrary to my frequently and explicitly expressed wishes.) This effort has taken months of my time (which I would rather have much been spending writing articles, removing vandalism and copyright violations, finding historic PD images to upload, taking photos of historic buildings and uploading them here under free licenses, etc etc etc) and thousands of edits by me. If you think anything I have done on Wikimedia has had any value, I ask for your help. Infrogmation (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi! The file you mention had a broken license template so the bot could not figure out what to do with it so it marked it for human review. If the license has been correct to begin with the file would not have been in Category:License migration candidates and the bot would never had edited the file. As far as I know then all your old uploads are fixed so the only "problem" may be new uploads. If you upload new files with cc-by-sa-3.0 (and the license tag is correct) the bot will not edit them. If you upload files without cc-by-sa-3.0 the bot will mark them as "not-eligible" (unless you have allready added a "|migration=opt-out" "|migration=not-eligible" - then the bot will not edit the files). --MGA73 (talk) 14:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I've been struggling with this thing for well over 2 years and was feeling greatly frustrated. Infrogmation (talk) 17:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Mizoën.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mizoën.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Les Meloures (talk) 16:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Ecluse_Chênée_ou_écluse_N°_2_Porte_avale_(1).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ecluse_Chênée_ou_écluse_N°_2_Porte_avale_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Les Meloures (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Nuetssender_vu_Maarnech.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nuetssender_vu_Maarnech.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Les Meloures (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Eisebunnsbréck_iwer_den_Albertkanal_zu_Gellik.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eisebunnsbréck_iwer_den_Albertkanal_zu_Gellik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Les Meloures (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Brigittedalesummer06.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brigittedalesummer06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 01:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Weesperflat.jpg

What would you do with this image? There are only 2 images from this flickr account. The image has not been marked for days now. Would you pass it or fail it? Just curious. From the image history Hongquan thought it was a copyvio but Logan thought it was own work. I think it may be own work...but I'm not certain. Need an expert here (like you) to decide. Uploader uploaded a second image which no one has marked either. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

It looks strange but I found no similar pictures on google search. So I passed the images. --MGA73 (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank You for making a decision. The other reviewers were clearly scared of touching it. I, too, was nervous. It clearly needed the attention of an Admin. This didn't seem to be an obvious copyvio at first glance. As you said, it was strange. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:42465-panel.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:42465-panel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mabdul 22:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your notice. I can see that the copyvio notice was removed by another user. I suggest a DR if you still think the file is not ok. --MGA73 (talk) 06:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Graveyard of the Hardwicke Settlement site.jpg

I cannot see Adrignola's pass in this image file (although it should have been marked by him). So, I decided to mark this photo a second time just to be safe. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Why do you think it should bave been reviewed before? Anyway it was right of you to review the file. Otherwise the file would have been unreviewed. --MGA73 (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Colwyn_bay.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Colwyn_bay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quadell (talk) 15:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Rebecca Breeds & Luke Mitchell.jpg

Does this image need a human flickr review when it was uploaded by the flickr upload bot? You can see the image history. I don't know why the uploader asks for one here. Can't we trust the flickr upload bot. What does one do? Strange. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Look at what the uploader is doing. He requests flickr reviews for images that were uploaded by the flickr upload bot. Does one need to send him a message. Maybe he doesn't trust the flickr upload bot. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
No need for an extra review. User is probably not aware that one review is enough. I wrote it in the edit summary and if user adds more requests it would be a good idea to leave a note on user talk. --MGA73 (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: OK. I left a message on his/her talkpage. Hopefully this user gets the message that whether a picture was passed by the flickr upload bot or flickr review bot makes no difference. It was free at upload. The only problem is if it was a copyright violation or a derivative work... where the uploader does not have the rights and the community will delete it eventually in a Deletion Request. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:42465-panel.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:42465-panel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mabdul 11:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Slovenia.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Slovenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Papua-new-guinea.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Papua-new-guinea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Co_khong_quan_oman_1995-nay.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Co_khong_quan_oman_1995-nay.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Co_khong_quan_Nicaragua.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Co_khong_quan_Nicaragua.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Co_khong_quan_Mong_Co.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Co_khong_quan_Mong_Co.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cờ_không_quân_Mali.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cờ_không_quân_Mali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Costa-rica.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Costa-rica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Brunei_2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brunei_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Benin.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Benin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Batmobile 2.jpg

Dear Michael,

I gave the flickr source for this image but don't know if its copyrighted...since this is not a general car like an 'Austin Martin.' Its a specialised design for the TV show. If you think its a general car, then feel free to order a {{flickrreview}}. If not, then please consider filing a formal DR. I lack enough experience on Batmobiles--and don't know if this picture is considered a derivative. I don't know if it even has an engine but there seems to be a category for it here. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I think it is ok. I reviewed the image so we are sure about the license on Flickr. --MGA73 (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • OK. Thaank you very much. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

File:New_York_Bike.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_Bike.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Icons of saints

This bot is putting modern people in the Category:Icons of daints.

Please stop this mistaken activity.

Regards--Szilas (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I just checked a random image File:2009 дек2 уменьш.jpg and it is in use in 2 pages ru:Паниотто,_Владимир_Ильич and uk:Паніотто_Володимир_Ілліч. I bet the problem is that one of the categories (or its overcategories) these 2 pages are in links to Category:Icons of saints via a {{commonscat|Icons of saints}}. That link should be removed. --MGA73 (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hm... It seems the link is very hard to find... --MGA73 (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
I think I found the error here: User_talk:Foroa#Category:Персоналии по алфавиту and Category:Святые по алфавиту. --MGA73 (talk) 18:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Kategorier med stavefejl

Hej MGA73

Kan jeg få dig til at tage hånd om kategorierne Category:Telefonhuset, Borups Allë og Category:Borups Allë? Gaden hedder retteligt Borups Allé (eller Borups Alle på Frederiksberg). I øjeblikket er der dog kun et billede af Telefonhuset, som så til gengæld ligger i begge kategorier, hvilket nok er lidt overdrevet. Så måske det vil være bedre bare at slette de to kategorier og så placere billedet i Category:Nørrebro eller Category:Streets of Nørrebro, Copenhagen.

Et andet problematisk billede er i øvrigt File:Frederiksberg - building and statues.jpg, hvor jeg er bange for, at statuerne i forgrunden fylder lidt for meget til at billedet kan komme under en fri licens. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Så er det fixet :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Honey_Fire_mustard.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Honey_Fire_mustard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 21:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:ChuhaiCan.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ChuhaiCan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 01:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Flickrreview category

Dear Admin MGA73,

Would you be willing to mark the Lady Gaga image files here...and maybe the Salome Juana image file too? They have been uploaded and have been waiting review since October 19/20, 2011 but its now October 23 and the flickrbot has ignored marking them. I marked a few but its better if someone else marks some of the other photos too...I think. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I marked the files. Funny that the bot did not work on those... Well. Strange things happens :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank You. There was also a few days old image I marked from the World Economic Forum here that the flickrbot ignored. The license was fine. The bot should have marked it but I guess these things happen. Anyway I'm applying the precautionary principle just to be safe. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Top of the Wall from Anting Gate, Peking..jpg

Hey hey hey, delete this, I raped the name. :(--俠刀行 (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

It would be easier just to add {{rename|new name.jpg|reason to rename}} and it would save space. --MGA73 (talk) 17:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
What? The name is incorrect and I wish to change it. Just delete so anything will be done. OK?--俠刀行 (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleting a file will not delete it - it will just put it in the archive. Renaming the file is better because it takes less space. You use the template I mentioned above to request a rename. --MGA73 (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • OK, look at what we have done. If I dislike the image which I uploaded, can I demand for deletion? Or I think the file is no longer need as same thing?--俠刀行 (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Is the new name File:Top of the Wall from Anting Gate, Peking.jpg not ok? If you do not like the file you uploaded you can request deletion or you could upload a new version on top of the old file if you have made minor changes (color, brightness, rotation etc.). If you make larger changes you could just upload with a new name and leave the original as the source of the file. --MGA73 (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)