User talk:MGA73/Archive 33

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

File:Sharan-Rani.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sharan-Rani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hekerui (talk) 19:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Dreilini abandoned.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dreilini abandoned.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 07:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

This DR

I guess this DR is common. Feel free to make a comment. Who does one believe: The flickr source or the extended metadata? --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

  • By the way, you can close this DR here as delete per uploader request. I did not know about FOP in mid-2009 when I uploaded the photo. Thank You in advance, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Both issues have now been dealt with. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:48, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed these two requests a little to late... Good that it has been fixed. --MGA73 (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bismil Park2811.JPEG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bismil Park2811.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sitush (talk) 09:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Bismil Park2811.JPEG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bismil Park2811.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 13:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Daredevil Ram Prasad Bismil.GIF

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Daredevil Ram Prasad Bismil.GIF. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Daredevil Ram Prasad Bismil.GIF]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lovy Singhal (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I changed the "No permission" to a DR. --MGA73 (talk) 10:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Golf_courses_in_City_of_London

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Golf_courses_in_City_of_London has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cairns_in_City_of_London

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Cairns_in_City_of_London has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 12:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Barns_in_City_of_London

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Barns_in_City_of_London has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Quarries_in_City_of_London

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Quarries_in_City_of_London has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 12:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Greetings! Could you please explain, why these files:

are inappropriate? If you check the sources, all of them are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 license. What's the point in requesting the OTRS ticket? --Niklem (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Greetings to you too :-) Yes I can explain that. {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0}} is not a valid license on Commons. You added a dual license {{Cc-by-nc-2.0-dual}} that however is valid but that license also include {{GFDL}} and there is no proof that Flickr user agrees to the GFDL license (I checked before I tagged the files).
When you upload files from Flickr you can use tools to assist you and if you prefer to upload manually you should always add {{flickrreview}} to make sure that a bot or another user verify the license. You can read more on Commons:Flickr files. --MGA73 (talk) 07:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I see... Well, thank you a lot for that detailed explanation, but, uh, could you put the speedy deletion on hold for a while? I'd inquire the certain Flickr users for their willing to publish the photos under GFDL. --Niklem (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
I extended the time limit a few days. Hope that is enough. --MGA73 (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the belated reply. The {{flickrreview}} template is very useful indeed. I'll make sure to put it to good use in my further contributions. Thanks once again! --Niklem (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

DR of various Files uploaded by me

My dear Michael! First of all I must pay regards to you for providing help to such an old author like me who still types on computer a letter by letter and the gentlemen wiki-users put a tag thereupon even in the seconds. I appreciate your spirit. As suggested by you, I have this day edited some of my files accordingly. You are earnestly requested to see them & yet you find any mistake, kindly help me. Thanks a lotKrantmlverma (talk) 07:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nehru and Gandhi at AICC meeting, July 1946.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nehru and Gandhi at AICC meeting, July 1946.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nehru and Gandhi at AICC meeting, July 1946.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

License review

I have read your message about the license review. I will take your advise and I will introduce the license review in the following uploads from now. Thank you.--DSB1 (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for helping with my old uploads. I will see what I can do with that.--DSB1 (talk) 21:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Anyway, every image I have uploaded is obtained from the same page: [1]). In the main page of this website you can see that it is indicated that all the contents of this web can be exported to wikipedia and that all the contents are under the license Creative Commons CC-BY 3.0. Regards!--DSB1 (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I will try to suggest that on the wiki. Thank you for your reply.--DSB1 (talk) 11:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Migration review

I see your bot adds migration=review to the {{self}} template added by Special:UploadWizard. Does it not recognize CC-BY-SA or is there some other problem? I changed to =redundant (and to 3.0. not given as an option). --LPfi (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Hm, might have been a manual licence template, but I think it should be recognized. --LPfi (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
It was not a mistake. If the license is 3.0 or all the bot will ignore the file (or mark it as migration=redundant). The file was "just" 1.0 thats why the bot tagged the file. --MGA73 (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
OK. I thought all CC licences were X or later. --LPfi (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Flickr human review

I was thinking that there could be 2-3 images here that could just be deleted rather than face a DR or a npd like an album cover without an OTRS permission or an advertising image like this This is a separate DR by me in this category. But its your decision. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

File:M4A1 RRD.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M4A1 RRD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

D-M Commons (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Rejimen 22 GGK dgn M4A1dnM203.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rejimen 22 GGK dgn M4A1dnM203.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

D-M Commons (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Discussion on Danish author's rights law §63/§70

Hi MGA73, A discussion on Danish author's rights law §63/§70 in relation to portrait-photos have started on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aage Bohr.jpg. Given your good knowledge of Danish author's rights law, I would like to encourage you to participate. --heb [T C E] 07:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Plan of the mosaic floor of a Jewish Synagogue in Greece - 300 CE (1).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plan of the mosaic floor of a Jewish Synagogue in Greece - 300 CE (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Rahulbaba.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rahulbaba.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lovy Singhal (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Tcelle.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tcelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bomazi (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

This DR

Feel free to make a comment in this DR I filed. Its you decision if you have any opinion as an Admin. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

  • I asked Lymantria for his help on the issue of this image and other images of stadiums in Uzbekistan (from a 2009 category) and he decided to create a mass DR I have voted to delete them all. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Tyrosin.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tyrosin.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChemNerd (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Colonnes infernales.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Colonnes infernales.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

MGA73bot2

Hello Michael, welcome back at Commons. On Dec 30, 2011 you transferred images to the Commons, several hundreds within the range from U+2305.gif to U+23DA.gif. You set the category Unicode. Insertion into this meta-category is wrong and need to be repaired, the (finally) correct category for GIF images 2300 — 23FF will be Category:Miscellaneous Technical obsoleted by SVG replacement.
It would be very tedious to make such a lot of edits manually; can your bot be used for that? I will assist you if it helps, e.g. by creating a list of all affected files. Let us talk about it. -- sarang사랑 07:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I can easily move the files to that category. Any exceptions or is it all the files in that range? --MGA73 (talk) 17:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Great when you do it. As the name says, all U+ from 2300 to 23FF is Misc Tec, and obsoleted when GIF - even if not yet replaced. Thanx -- sarang사랑 20:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I ran my bot on the files I could find. Is it like you wanted it? --MGA73 (talk) 21:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Krantmlverma

Hellow Michael! DR of some of the files uploaded by me has not been fixed as yet. Since these files are still live on wikicommons and I re-uploaded some of them by mistake. Other administrators took it otherwise and they have blocked me to edit further on en.wiki for an indefinite period. I therefore request you to please FIX the pending issues so that I may proceed further. Thanks 14.96.205.42 11:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Reply on User_talk:Krantmlverma#Your_request_for_help. --MGA73 (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hellow Michael! Thank you very much for providing me an interim relief. As suggested by you on my user talk page I will try my level best to redress these problems very soon. Meanwhile you are very kindly requested to please see this, this, this and this file. With regards Krantmlverma (talk) 04:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hellow Michael! Kindly see amongst above this page particularly. It has been deleted yesterday by JuTa with the following reason:
Deleted: still no COM:OTRS release confimed. JuTa 20:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Not only this, he has also deleted some other files on the same day which were uploaded by me earlier. Would you please be kind enough to look into this matter? Your help is urgently required. With all regards & good wishes I remain, Your faithfully Krantmlverma (talk) 17:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Smaller images

A user has been replacing images with smaller images; see users edits. It seems that some of them have not been reverted yet. Snowmanradio (talk) 21:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Many of them was allready reverted and I reverted a few and asked the user to check and fix the files. If user does not revert very shortly you are free to revert any files you see. I'm just lazy and hope uploader fixes it :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. It looks like he knows what to do now. Snowmanradio (talk) 12:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:TravisWillingham.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TravisWillingham.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Funfood 23:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

...because someone broke the template. --MGA73 (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sxi12.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sxi12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sxi12.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

File:House at dusk, Bellevue Hill, New South Wales, Sydney - East0100.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:House at dusk, Bellevue Hill, New South Wales, Sydney - East0100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

110.33.204.106 08:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Father of Bismil1193.gif

Dear Sir! In reply to your questions raised on the captioned issue I have to submit that I have made this portrait. This portrait was also published in my book "Sarfaroshi Ki Tamanna" which was released by Atal Bihari Vajpayee. You can see this file photograph at wikicommons itself to verify the facts. Kindly see File:Release of Books By A.B.Vajpeyi.JPEG. Moreover I am the copyright holder of this book also. I think now, every thing is clear to you. Kindly FIX the problem at the earliest. Thanks Krantmlverma (talk) 07:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Dr.'Krant'M.L.Verma (talkEmail)

Hi. Sorry for the late reply. I voted keep on the DR + commented on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Release of Books By A.B.Vajpeyi.JPEG. --MGA73 (talk) 19:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
My dear Micheal! Regarding the File:Release of Books By A.B.Vajpeyi.JPEG, when this function was held at New Delhi on 19 December 1996, I myself and my full family was there, so many photographs were taken by my son and daughter. All of these photographs are still in my safe custody. Since this photograph was given to media hence I liked to upload only this one on wikicommons so that its authenticity may be ascertained from other sources; it appears as such on parichowk.com too as it was provided to them by me. Mr Shiju Alex - a volunteer from wikipedia organisation personally visited my residence to see my work and he was fully satisfied. He was also there in Wikiconference India at Mumbai last year. More than a dozen of books of mine have been published by reputed publishers. Mr Shiju Alex has also seen those books. The references of my books are also available on worldcat. Now I hesitate to upload any photo on wikicommons because a lot of questions and deletion tags are put here on my files and I answer them also as & when I get time. Even then if some body (not you) is not believing me then tell me what else can be done? It is only you who understood my grief. Thanks for the hearing. Yours Krantmlverma (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Dr.'Krant'M.L.Verma (talkEmail)

File:Test-hno3.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Test-hno3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Medical 07-04-~3 (2).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Medical 07-04-~3 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ices2Csharp (talk) 22:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File:YosriKapis.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:YosriKapis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (depan).JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (depan).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prof. Professorson (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (belakang).JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (belakang).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prof. Professorson (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (belakang).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (belakang).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 00:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (depan).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rantai kunci (keychain) Pusat Darah Negara untuk penderma darah dari Kumpulan Darah A (depan).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mill Chimney, Blackburn, UK.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mill Chimney, Blackburn, UK.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alice Mills Rubber Mfg. Plant.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alice Mills Rubber Mfg. Plant.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Art-top (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Alice Mills Rubber Mfg. Plant.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alice Mills Rubber Mfg. Plant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 15:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

File:प्रतापगढ़ में मोबाइल संस्कृति.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:प्रतापगढ़ में मोबाइल संस्कृति.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

—Bill william comptonTalk 03:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Fiat CR.32.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fiat CR.32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Nonsense classifications

Warning your bot reintroduces false categories

Your bot recently uploaded File:Adams Memorial Building, West Derry, NH.jpg, File:Boat Landing, Pass-a-Grille, FL.jpg, and File:Asa Waters House, Millbury, MA.jpg. Your bot included with all these images inapropriate classifications such as "Geographic information systems", "identifiers" and "encodings". In the last years, such erroneous classifications have been introduced frequently by bots. Despite my efforts to clean up these categories, bots such as yours keep introducing them erroneously. Please help finding the source of this error and help stopping this. KKoolstra (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Update: I found a lot more examples. It will take me a lot of effort to remove those by hand, so I expect that you fix this yourself. The catagories your bot added to all pictures concerned (and that should be removed) are:
  • cartography
  • encodings
  • geographic information systems
  • identifiers

KKoolstra (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I think that the problem is that en:National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Rockingham_County,_New_Hampshire (where the image is used) is catgorized in en:Category:Geographic coordinate lists and that category is in en:Category:Geocodes. Because none of these have a Commonscat template the bot uses the next level of categories.
I can't think of a good solution but if there is still many files left I can remove the categories with my bot. Will that help? --MGA73 (talk) 12:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Yes, it would help to remove the categories by bot. Since the problem keeps reoccuring, is it possible to reprogram the bots to ignor the category en:Category:Geocodes when uploading images from en.wikipedia. It seems that many images are used there on pages with this category, resulting this error to reoccur frequently. KKoolstra (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Bot is running (exmple). I moved a few thousand files to Commons in 2 days. Normally only a few files is moved every day so I do not expect there will be a big problem in the future. --MGA73 (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
OK, thanks! KKoolstra (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vickers Vellore.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vickers Vellore.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Pixelito.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pixelito.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

El Grafo (talk) 12:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Hitchcock Leytonstone London.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hitchcock Leytonstone London.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Canongate plaque 1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Canongate plaque 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 02:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

User:MGA73/Possibly unfree

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:MGA73/Possibly unfree has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Bot still bugging out

[2]. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Hm... Perhaps I should just kill it... --MGA73 (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I've presented you with a baby, and some dirty bathwater. You do whatever you want to do. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:40, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Tryptophan.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tryptophan.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 10:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Michael Bentine.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michael Bentine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 13:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

About duplicate files

I recall we have discussed here that User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) does not detect all duplicates and so will it not give a warning every time for duplicate images, if not is was about other upload software or I am mistaken. Nevertheless, I am sure that "File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)" is not giving warnings about duplicates at the current time when files are uploaded from Flickr. I am having a discussion on my user page with an administrator, who did not merge categorisation details when he deleted files that I accidentally duplicated on Commons and this includes not adding the location categories when I prompted him. Perhaps, you will recall discussions with User:Dysmorodrepanis about the importance of location categories for bird photographs following which you asked me to focus on adding location categories, which I have done ever since. I have added the missing location categories to the retained duplicates, mainly because I do not want to see Commons degraded. Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates clearly states that information should be merged when duplicate files are deleted. I am not happy that the administrator did not merge location categories, and I would be grateful if you could watch he discussion and perhaps comment if you think it would be helpful. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll have a look and comment. --MGA73 (talk) 20:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Angående File:BBC.svg

Hej! Här skrev du att "Logos based on Gill Sans are ok to keep because Gill Sans was released about 1927–30 according to en:Eric_Gill#Typefaces (by Eric Gill and not BBC). According to Commons:L#Typographical_copyright protection period is 25 years". Är inte detta en feltolkning av COM:L#Typographical copyright? Min uppfattning var att Gill Sans var upphovsrättsskyddad i 70 år från det att Eric Gill dog och att den typografiska upphovsrätten varar i 25 år från det att en bok publicerats och att den typografiska upphovsrätten gäller den boken, till exempel antal ord per rad eller antal ord per sida. BBC-logotypen är nyare än 25 år, men den kanske ändå är för simpel för att den ska vara upphovsrättsskyddad. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hej! Ja du har ret I, at det måske var formuleret lidt forkert i konklusionen.
Per {{PD-font}} så betragter Commons en font som PD og derfor er logoer, der består af standardtekst {{PD-textlogo}}. Hvis der er tale om logoer og tekst, der ikke kun er standardfont så skal man vurdere om det er COM:TOO eller ej. COM:L#Typographical copyright gælder som du skriver nok kun størrer mængder tekst fx ved scanning fra bøger. Men ligesom med {{PD-art}} så er jeg ikke sikker på, at vi respekterer denne rettighed. --MGA73 (talk) 10:50, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Den nuvarande förklaringen låter bättre. Jag har ingen aning om huruvida en brittisk domstol skulle anse att File:BBC.svg skyddas av upphovsrätt eller ej. {{PD-font}} säger att "this may not apply in most jurisdictions outside of the United States". {{PD-textlogo}} nämner "enkla geometriska former och/eller text", men problemet är ordet "enkla" som definieras på olika sätt i olika länder. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Ja vi kan aldrig være 100 % sikre på hvad domstolene beslutter. I øvrigt så er det vel BBC der overtræder Eric Gills copyright hvis der er nogle problemer. :-D --MGA73 (talk) 19:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Gill Sans är {{PD-old-70}}, så BBC kränker åtminstone inte längre Eric Gills upphovsrätt. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)