User talk:MJJR

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search



Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Varsenare Nieuwege R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varsenare Nieuwege R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB Loc 1876 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1876 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB EMU268 R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU268 R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB Loc 1924 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1924 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Dear MJJR,

the chair 'Entwerfen und Baugestaltung' at the Technical University in Darmstadt (Germany) of Prof. Johann Eisele would like to use for a publication with a publisher (2.000 copies and optional another 2.000 copies) your image of the scheepsdalebrug (File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg). The imagesize is approximatley around 10 x 10 centimetres. In the image index we would publish you by the following indication: MJJR, Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, URL: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brugge_Scheepsdalebrug_R01.jpg

Therefor I would like to get your permission. Please contact me via email: btrautmann@eub.tu-darmstadt.de

Thank you

Best regards

Benjamin Trautmann

File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg[edit]

Dear MJJR,

the chair 'Entwerfen und Baugestaltung' at the Technical University in Darmstadt (Germany) of Prof. Johann Eisele would like to use for a publication with a publisher (2.000 copies and optional another 2.000 copies) your image of the scheepsdalebrug (File:Brugge Scheepsdalebrug R01.jpg). The imagesize is approximatley around 10 x 10 centimetres. In the image index we would publish you by the following indication: MJJR, Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, URL: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brugge_Scheepsdalebrug_R01.jpg

Therefor I would like to get your permission. Please contact me via email: btrautmann@eub.tu-darmstadt.de

Thank you

Best regards

Benjamin Trautmann

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB EMU210 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU210 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB EMU597 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU597 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB EMU632 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU632 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Vivenkapelle R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivenkapelle R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Blauwe Toren Junction R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blauwe Toren Junction R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB Loc 2833 R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2833 R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB Loc 2806 R04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2806 R04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Brugge Carmersstraat R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Carmersstraat R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Brugge Speelmansstraat R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Speelmansstraat R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SNCB EMU632 R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU632 R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Averbode Abdijkerk R06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB Loc 2842 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2842 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Knesselarebrug R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knesselarebrug R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Knesselarebrug R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knesselarebrug R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB Loc 1857 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1857 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Retranchement Molen R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retranchement Molen R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brugge Leeuwstraat R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Leeuwstraat R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Brugge Bevrijdingslaan R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Bevrijdingslaan R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Brugge Smedenstraat R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Smedenstraat R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hoge Dijken R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoge Dijken R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rhodos Kameiros R11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kameiros R11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Brugge Groenerei R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Groenerei R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nijmegen Waalbrug R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Waalbrug R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Rhodos Kameiros R10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodos Kameiros R10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Station Brugge-Sint-Pieters R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station Brugge-Sint-Pieters R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Retranchement NHKerk R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retranchement NHKerk R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

A50 bij Woeste Hoeve R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A50 bij Woeste Hoeve R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nijmegen Waalbrug R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Waalbrug R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nijmegen Kerkboog R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Kerkboog R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

SNCB EMU604 R05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU604 R05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nijmegen Stevenskerk R10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Stevenskerk R10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nijmegen Markt 22-25 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen Markt 22-25 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Deelerwoud R12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deelerwoud R12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tillegem Kasteel R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Nieuwburghoeve R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loppem World War I Memorial R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klemskerke Geersensmolen R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wenduine Hubertmolen R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationaal Park Veluwezoom R08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Detmold[edit]

Detmold 01.jpg

Hallo Marc, dein Detmold-Bild ist sehr populär . Gestern war es sogar auf der Hauptseite der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia. Dieser Architekt nutzt es allerdings nicht nur lizenzwidrig, er hat gestern in einer Mail an das Support-Team behauptet, er habe es aufgenommen. Vielleicht möchtest du ihn ja wegen der fehlenden Lizenz abmahnen.

Gruß, Seewolf (talk)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oostkamp Rivierbeek R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Rivierbeek R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oostkamp Warande R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostkamp Warande R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anseremme Prieuré R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Prieuré R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Anseremme Prieuré R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Prieuré R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Anseremme Cimetière R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Cimetière R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Anseremme Spoorbrug R06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anseremme Spoorbrug R06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Givet Rue Oger R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Givet Rue Oger R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear MJJR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Givet Saint-Hilaire R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Givet Saint-Hilaire R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear MJJR,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

La Palma Los Cancajos R04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos R04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

La Palma San Antonio R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma San Antonio R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

La Palma San Antonio R03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma San Antonio R03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

La Palma Los Cancajos R07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos R07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

2014 ![edit]

Christmasornaments.png * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the European Parliament[edit]

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS Larkspur R06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Larkspur R06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS Aida Stella R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Aida Stella R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS Hamburg R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Hamburg R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

La Palma Los Cancajos Paseo del Litoral R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos Paseo del Litoral R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lissewege Toren R02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege Toren R02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hopper Barge DI-69 R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopper Barge DI-69 R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz de La Palma Street R05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Street R05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de Santa Catalina R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de Santa Catalina R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz de La Palma Plaza San Fernando R01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Plaza San Fernando R01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear MJJR,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vimy Memorial R01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vimy Memorial R02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vimy Memorial R03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)