User talk:Marcok

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Marcok!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Serliana[edit]

A me paioni archi a tutto sesto a colonne binate... Una serliana è questa Image:Palazzo Te Mantova 2.jpg o questa Image:Diocletians mausoleum-Split.jpg.

Quando metti una serliana accanto all'altra hai una successione di archi a colonne binate, non di serliane :-) Non sono un esperto, ma io per serliana ho sempre sentito intendere un'apertura isolata, non una sequenza. Ovviamente posso sbagliarmi, cmq nel caso di dubbi, su Wikipedia si usa chiedere il parere di terze persone per dirimere la questione. Nessuno di noi è perfetto. Tu prova a chiedere ad altri che si occupano del progetto architettura, e vedi cosa ti dicono loro, e decidi di conseguenza. Se non se ne viene a capo, si può provare a chiedere al bar. Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 02:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Decisione salomonica. Oltre tutto ho visto la galleria con le tue foto: decisamente di qualità molto alta. Complimenti. --User:G.dallorto 20:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Chiesa[edit]

Ok, grazie! ;) --Ginosal (User talk) 21:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikiraduno[edit]

Non mi ci si vedi proprio per nulla, perché sono mi sono convinto del fatto che il modello Wikipedia ha dei limiti molto più gravi per quanto riguarda la condivisione di testi che per quanto riguarda la condivisione di immagini, quindi lavoro su Commons. Ma l'idea di venire m'interessa, tanto più che l'incontro si svolge comodissimamente nella mia città. Purtroppo però il link che mi indichi è rotto. Ce ne è uno funzionante? Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 01:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Immagini videogiochi cancellati[edit]

Amministratore, perche' cavolo hai cancellato le immagini che avevo uploadato, eh?! Erano completamente free/gratis, scaricabili ed updabili da/su numerosi siti, quindi esigo l'immediato ripristino delle immagini.

User talk:Karl90 14.33, 8/02/2008

Image:VillaTrissinoFromQuatgtroLibri.svg[edit]

You are right, I just checked and it is the project of villa Mocenigo. (Two sources - quattri libri itself among them). I don't know where I got the missinformation from any more. The picture should be moved I suppose. Good catch. Thanks. Haros 15:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Michael Jackson[edit]

But it was free image on flickr... So why ? Jamcib 20:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 4a7b74e0ecbafd56a7f31e941614ca6a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--84user (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Emo Fanzolo giardino retro 2009-07-18 f01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo giardino retro 2009-07-18 f01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Emo Fanzolo fronte 2009-07-18 f05b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo fronte 2009-07-18 f05b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rocca Malatestiana Cesena 2006 pano.png
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocca Malatestiana Cesena 2006 pano.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Barbaro Maser viale 2009-07-18.png
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Barbaro Maser viale 2009-07-18.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Tempio di Zeus Olimpo apr2005 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio di Zeus Olimpo apr2005 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Emo Fanzolo loggia 2009-07-18 f02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo loggia 2009-07-18 f02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

San Marino statua della libertà.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Marino statua della libertà.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Villa Pisani[edit]

I almost have an ok picture here: http://picasaweb.google.no/hans.a.rosbach/VillaPisani# Unfortunately I did not take yet another picture to the left. But next time :-) Haros (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Well done. :-) Haros (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Castel del Monte giu06 004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel del Monte giu06 004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Thank you![edit]

Thank you Marcok for promoting my Quality Picture Candidate and especially for your suggestions. Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trulli Alberobello09 apr06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello09 apr06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vicenza Basilica Palladiana 14-09-08 f07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicenza Basilica Palladiana 14-09-08 f07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trulli Alberobello07 apr06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello07 apr06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trulli Alberobello11 apr06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello11 apr06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Trulli Alberobello08 apr06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello08 apr06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Palazzo Te Mantova 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Te Mantova 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Villa Pisani Bagnolo wiki 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pisani Bagnolo wiki 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Trulli Alberobello20 apr06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello20 apr06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Palladio pducale.JPG[edit]

Salve, what kind of source are you missing? The source is Palladio's book, the autor of the foto is me or my camera! Please be so kind and give a more detailed information. Salve, --Warburg (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Segnalazione[edit]

Ciao, scusami l'OT qui su Commons. Ti volevo solo segnalare questo tipo di modifica fatta a tappeto su tutte le voci "Nati il..." e "Morti il...".--Trixt (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Re: [1]:

  • What is the point of adding a category that is not in the hierarchy?
  • The English-language plural of "thief" is "thieves".

Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

The thing is, any text in a description is just as searchable as category text. The whole point of using categories is to hook something into the hierarchy. - Jmabel ! talk 21:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Ma anche no dai, è solo un modellino --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File:WELCOmE.jpg[edit]

Ciao, ho messo in cancellazione immediata questa immagine, in quanto evidentemente fair use: è uno screenshot da un videogame e come tale non può essere rilasciato in cc-by se non da chi ne detiene tutti i diritti.--Nanae (talk) 09:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Chapels o Orartories?[edit]

Ciao, come credo tu ricordi mi sto divertendo con la fotografia e la categorizzazione di chiese, oratori, chiesette, cappelle, capitelli e via via verso il sempre più piccolo e popolare. Tralasciando gli ultimi mi trovo alle volte perplesso per la differenza che abbiamo in it.wiki tra it:Oratorio (architettura) e it:Cappella, presumo anche per l'"evoluzione" temporale degli edifici religiosi che negli anni hanno visto aggiungere a quelli a semplice pianta una serie nicchie laterali, vedi it:Cappella radiale, che sostanzialmente inglobavano i culti popolari per i vari santi all'interno dell'edificio religioso principale della zona, presumo per richiamare più facilmente i fedeli (se dico delle stupidaggini porta pazienza, correggimi, le mie sono solo deduzione logiche). Ritornando a noi qui in Commons abbiamo due categorie "italiane" IMHO sovrapponibili, la Category:Chapels in Italy e la Category:Oratories in Italy, che credo sia il caso di unificare in qualche modo, mi rimetto quindi alla tua cultura architettonica nel ragionare se una Cappella gentilizia di un palazzo o villa padronale (vedi File:Villa Pisani Montagnana by Marcok 2009-08-08 f03.jpg) sia da considerare o l'una cosa o l'altra o, come io credo, si debbano infilare nella stessa categoria mettendo un disclamer multilingua in testa alla cat per far capire agli utenti di lingua straniera che in Italia la definizione è simile e/o sovrapponibile alle loro "Chapels" create magari con un altro iter religioso. Tra l'altro, come credo tu ben sappia per aver parlato con i responsabili dei Beni culturali delle diocesi, negli annuari diocesani queste sono indicate come oratori, cosa che aumenta la confusione dell'utente non esperto che si approccia al problema. Che ne pensi? Scusa del pippone, se ti va si potrebbe anche ragionarne per altre vie telematiche (un sms e ti chiamo). :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Wow, altra carne al fuoco ;-) Così ho una cat, Category:Churches in Costa di Rovigo dove si può trovare la qualunque, la chiesa parrocchiale Category:San Giovanni Battista (Costa di Rovigo)‎, la ex chiesa parrocchiale prima della riunificazione, ora considerata oratorio Category:San Rocco (Costa di Rovigo), una cappella gentilizia di un palazzo rurale ora scomparso Category:Oratorio di Ca' Michiel (Costa di Rovigo) (nella cat degli interni si vede l'accesso murato riservato ai proprietari), un classico oratorio/cappella campestre (che nell'Emilia-Romagna settentrionale chiamano chiesolini) Category:Madonna della Salute (Colombano, Costa di Rovigo) e più di un oratorio popolare Category:San Giovanni Decollato, detto San Giovannino (Costa di Rovigo), per non parlare del sacello ai caduti ex oratorio Category:Oratorio Santa Maria Assunta (Costa di Rovigo). Mi sa che ho fatto filotto, manca altro? :-)))))--Threecharlie (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Ancora sull'architettura religiosa[edit]

Ti chiedo una nuova cortesia benché presumo non esista una netta differenza tra i termini: resto ancora dubbioso sull'attribuzione di una foto ad un it:Abside, qui Category:Apses, ed un it:Presbiterio, forse perché popolarmente è chiamato abside anche la parte interna della chiesa che occupa il retro dell'altare maggiore, almeno nelle strutture non rotonde. dato che mi trovo in difficoltà potresti per cortesia fornirmi degli esempi eclatanti in modo da non potermi confondere?. Grazie ancora :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Porta pazienza se non è argomento commonaro...[edit]

...ma mi riesce più facile arrivare a te da qui. Visti i recenti scambi di idee mi sarebbe molto utile (ma sarebbe utile a tutta ala comunità) una traduzione da qui inserendola come è ovvio come sottopagina di quel wikiprogetto in lingua italiana ma che sarebbe fondamentale linkare anche qui in Commons, inoltre l'immagine della pianta della chiesa divisa per "settori" è intuitiva e non abbisogna di faticose traduzioni e discussioni multilingua. Sai chi se ne potrebbe occupare? Grazie :-)))--Threecharlie (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Marcok,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File tagging File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AVRS (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiGita[edit]

Ciao Marco, qui trovi alcune foto scattate da me oggi, se utili per il futuro o una breve gallery sulla WikiGita. --Pottercomuneo (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Vista panoramica[edit]

Ciao Marco, Grazie per l'informazione; la cosa un po' mi stupisce e un po' mi fa arrabbiare, ma soprattutto mi pone tante domande.

  • Che cosa significa architettura contemporanea? L'età contemporanea - in storia - inizia con la rivoluzione francese ma, al fine di cui parliamo, il periodo è più ristretto? Ad esempio, le immagini del cimitero maggiore, costruito nella prima metà dell'ottocento, possono essere pubblicate? Oppure, per restare alla pagina del borgo Berga, quelle dell'ex Gil o dell'Istituto Fogazzaro, degli anni trenta del novecento?
  • Che cosa si intende per architettura? Soltanto le opere di un certo rilievo come quelle che mi hai citato, oppure anche modeste costruzioni? Qualsiasi costruzione al giorno d'oggi ha un progettista.
  • Parliamo solo di nuove costruzioni o anche di restauri?
  • Non si possono pubblicare soltanto se la costruzione è il contenuto esclusivo o principale dell'immagine, oppure anche quando ne rappresenta soltanto una parte?
  • La cosa vale anche per i monumenti, ad esempio quello di Neri Pozza sul ponte San Paolo e la fontana di piazza delle poste?

A questo punto, che faccio: cancello le immagini? Intanto ti ringrazio e a presto Claudio

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Marcok,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)