User talk:Martin H.
|
|
Archive Note [edit]
Archived this page on April 7 2013. --Martin H. (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Questions [edit]
Hello. Please help me find answers to my questions.
How can you tell if an image is free use? If I find a picture on commons in another language, how can I put it on this English commons? Are images on flickr.com free use? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 01:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- A file is free if the copyright holder voluntarily realeased it under a free license. So files on Wikipedia are free if the copyright holder uploaded them under a free license. Or if the uploader proved that the copyright holder released them under a free license. Files on flickr are free if the copyright holder uploaded them to flickr and published them under a free license, see Commons:Flickr. --Martin H. (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
-
- What about photos on Commons in other languages? There are photos in the Russian Commons I want to move here. How can I do that? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
-
-
- I said something about files in other Wikipedia projects already. --Martin H. (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- But I have a hard time understanding how files here work. Please explain again how I can copy a picture in another language Commons to here. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 19:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I said something about files in other Wikipedia projects already. --Martin H. (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- There is no "English Commons" or "Russian Commons." Unlike Wikipedia (the free encyclopædia), which exists in many different language editions, there is only one single Commons project. Wikimedia Commons is a multilingual repository of free media, and files hosted here on Commons can be used directly by all the different language editions of Wikipedia and all other projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation. Files hosted on Commons but used on Wikipedia projects can have localised file description pages, which might make it appear as though they reside on that project unless you look closely. For example, en:File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg looks like a page on English Wikipedia, but all the information is grabbed directly File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg on Commons.
- Some Wikipedia projects also allow files to be locally uploaded to that particular project. In some cases, they also allow non-free files to be uploaded. For example, en:File:ACDC-TNT.jpg is a locally hosted, non-free file. It cannot be transferred to Commons, since it's not free. See Commons:Moving to Commons for more. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
File:John-xxiii-2.jpg [edit]
Hi Martin, I've seen that you objected the source information provided in this file. However, I can't see how the source information available right now is enough for supporting any claim. What do you think? --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 06:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- The original of this work contains Conroys signature. Conroys photographic work is described in books. --Martin H. (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
TIBEAN-Bilder gelöscht [edit]
Hallo, nach der Ankündigung, dass für die von mir hochgeladenen Bilder (file: TIBEAN Polycon.jpg, file: TIBEAN Polycon submerged.jpg und file: TIBEAN Polycon Anlagenkomponenten.jpg) die entsprechende Freigabe fehlt, habe ich die geforderten Nachweise (wie bereits beim Hochladen) an 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org' geschickt. Ich bestätigte die Freigabe der Bilder deren Erstellung von der Firma für die ich arbeite bezahlt wurde, welche auch schon lange für jeden frei verfügbar auf unserer Homepage (http://www.polycon-gmbh.de/cms/polyplan/de/cms?cms_knuuid=a5040ae1-ae7d-4098-bf2e-b619bb61ea67 bzw. http://www.polyplan-gmbh.de/cms/polyplan/de/cms?cms_knschluessel=schwerpunkte) sind. Trotz allem wurden sie ohne weiteren Kontakt gelöscht. Auf meine Anfragen wurde bisher nicht reagiert. Da der Artikel "Tiefenwasserbelüftung" ohne diese Bilder wenig Sinn macht, bitte ich um eine umgehende Wiederherstellung der Bilder bzw. endlich mal eine Erklärung, warum sie gelöscht wurden!
Danke.--PolyHB (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Vermutlich hast du dich in deiner Freigabe nicht auf die Dateien (in Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einverst.C3.A4ndniserkl.C3.A4rung_.28Rechte-Inhaber.29 der "Objektname") bezogen. Oder die Freigabe ist unzureichend, für jeden frei verfügbar ist nicht das Gleiche wie unter einer freien Lizenz. --Martin H. (talk) 19:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Kirankasve86 (talk · contribs) [edit]
why you deleted that photo, it was free to use everyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirankasve86 (talk • contribs)
- Visible for free on a website does not mean that you can use it for free. Nor does it mean that ANYONE can use it for free. See Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms. --Martin H. (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
OTRS permission [edit]
Many days ago, Fundación Ecuador Libre/Fundación del Barrio had send by mail to OTRS the permissions to use in Commons the photos I uploaded. In Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mabel Velástegui is the list of the images requested for undeletion. Please check in the inbox of OTRS. --Mabel Velástegui (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Im not an OTRS volunteer. There is a backlog in OTRS ( i guess ), once they found the permission they will handle it. --Martin H. (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
User JoséContreras12 continues to violate the rules [edit]
Hello Martin! Some time ago I wrote requesting blocking the user account JoséContreras12. You blocked the user by the time a month but the user have returned to commit violations of the community rules. The user commits serious violations of copyright and licensing supplants of the files that he take online, making a fraud.
Please corroborate what I write, checking the user contributions.
Obviously, the user does not learn his lesson and does not want to work with the community because he violates the rules constantly. For this reason I request permanent blocking of user account.
I appreciate your attention and I hope that you make the best decision for the good of our beloved community.
--—G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 19:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Probleme mit User Steindy [edit]
Hallo Martin, ich hoffe, ich bin hier richtig. Ein User namens Steindy hat mir einen Kampf angekündigt, den ich aber keineswegs führen möchte. Als erstes hat er meine Userseite verändert. Falls sich auf meiner Userseite tatsächlich unzulässige Inhalte befinden sollten, bin ich selbstverständlich gerne bereit, diese zu entfernen oder von einem Admin entfernen zu lassen. Meine Frage ist daher, ist es erlaubt, ungefragt die Userseite eines anderen Benutzers zu verändern? Und darf man auf seiner Userseite auf Webseiten außerhalb der Wiki-Projekte verlinken oder nicht? Danke für deine Hilfe, Manuela (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Den "Kampf" hast Du mir angesagt, werte Manuela61. Verdrehe also nicht die Tatsachen. Deine Benutzerseite hast Du als Werbeplattform für Deine Homepage und die Tatsache missbraucht, dass Du als Profifotografin arbeitest und engangiert werden kannst. Dies ist sowohl nach den Regeln von commons, als auch nach den Regeln der de.WP (Punkt 3) nicht erlaubt. --Steindy (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ihr wendet euch an den falschen, ich bin kein Diplomat. Ein so klar formuliertes Verbot gibt es nicht. An der Selbstbeschreibung mit Abschweifung zum Berufsbild ist auch nichts auszusetzen. Auch der Weblink geht auf eine eher persönlich gestaltete Webseite, nicht auf einen Verkaufskatalog. Kurzum, die Seite war in der alten Bearbeitung in Ordnung. Schade, dass ihr euch hier begegnet seit, währt ihr euch drausen beim Fotografieren begegnet, wäre der Kontakt sicher freundlicher verlaufen. --Martin H. (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This file is missing evidence of permission. [edit]
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Инвентарь_и_окно_персонажа_Diablo_3.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Интерфейс_активных_умений_DIablo_3.jpg
(Translation - Google) - You said that "This file is missing evidence of permission". I may not have the correct license type, and now I do not know how to fix it. These images - screenshots of the game Diablo III. I do not know how to fix the license. Can you indicate the type of license, and change the image information?
- You have no permission and no license to publish the files under a free license. You have to contact the copyright holder and ask for a license. --Martin H. (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
User:ChrisAnorthosis [edit]
Hi! You gave this user end of copyvios warning in October 2011[1], I also warned him several times both on English wikipedia and commons, but it seems that he doesn't want to stop and still uploading unfree photos under false self-made claim.[2]--Oleola (talk) 10:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Thumbnail [edit]
I have reverted this photo File:Mercedes Milá.jpg, but the miniature isn't reverted. Let's see if you can fix it. --Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 07:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
File:JJC.jpg [edit]
Hello:
This photo I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, gave me poet´s daughter to use it anywhere, in fact, already been used in this triptych. I have limited myself to scan it and upload it. I hope you can help me on this with the appropriate license. Thank. Greetings: Manrique1430 (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
-
- No, I tell you that I got the picture of the poet's daughter for publication in the triptych that I mentioned earlier. Please ask him to help me on this, and that way I can upload that photo to Wikimedia Commons. I'm trying to be nominated this article in Wikipedia in Spanish AB. I ask you to help me on this. Greetings: Manrique1430 (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Check [edit]
Would you like to check these images. Sie hat bestimmt aus Webseite geklaut. Danke.--R ašo
11:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
File:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg [edit]
| File:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Niteshift36 (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
CatScan [edit]
Hallo Martin H.
Letzter Zeit habe ich schwierigkeiten auf den Wikimediaserver zu kommen. Ich fühle mich verantwortlich für die Kategorie "Clock", die ich über CatScan erreichen möchte, damit ich die jeweilige Änderungen sehen kann. (https://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&basecat=clocks&basedeep=6&mode=rc&hours=100&go=Scannen&format=html&userlang=de). Als Antwort bekomme ich ständig (Database Error: User 'daniel_www' has exceeded the 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 15) on sql-s4/commonswiki_p) oder eine ähnliche Mitteilung. Leider weiß ich nicht was ich machen soll, oder auf wen ich mich direkt wenden kann. Nun habe ich es bei dir probiert, vieleicht kannst du mir helfen, oder leite meinen Frage an anderen Admin weiter. Danke!
Liebe Grüße --Karel K. (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Vom Toolserver bin ich auch nur Nutzer ohne weitere Kenntnis. --Martin H. (talk) 19:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
User:Pmotowa [edit]
Hallo Martin!
Es geht um o.g. Benutzer: Ich sah hierbei dringenden Handlungsbedarf und habe seine Dateien jüngst alle gelöscht. Grund für meine Entscheidung war nicht nur die Tatsache, dass es sich bei Dreien um offensichtliche URVs handelte, sondern auch die Tatsache, dass die Bilder unsinnige Dateinamen und noch weniger sinnvolle Dateibeschreibungen hatten. Sehr merkwürdig war die Dateigröße: Bilder mit Auflösungen von 800x1100 hatten Größen von über 25 MB (!). Sehr merkwürdig. Ich habe den Benutzer zusätzlich für 3 Tage gesperrt - reagiert zusätzlich nicht auf Nachrichten auf seiner Diskussionsseite. Kannst du bitte die Dateien überprüfen und ggf. Feedback geben, ob das Blockieren des Benutzers gerechtfertigt ist und was mit diesen Datein los ist/war. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Komm nicht dahinter, was da schief gelaufen ist. Vielleicht irgendein komischer Dateityp (Hörbuch, Ebook waren meine Vermutung) der eine Jpg-Vorschau generiert? Wie gesagt, keine Ahnung. --Martin H. (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
des photo supprimé pk ???!!!! [edit]
tout ces photo sont avant 1980 suivant cette date ces photo sont valable pd tunisia ok alors pourquoi suprrimé ??????
File:Béji Caïd Essebsi.jpg File:Habib Bourguiba jr.JPG File:Mansour Moalla.jpg File:Mohamed Sayah.jpg File:Abdallah Kallel.jpg
- "avant 1980": evidence? Also the required Information is not the assumed date of creation. The required info is the date of first publication. --Martin H. (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Abdallah Kallel.jpg look this link http://www.abdallah-kallel.com/intox/I4_Abdallah_Kallel_et_la_corruption.php
in 1978 so this correct date ok
loook the anther source so now????--Adnen1985 (talk) 16:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
toute les photos publier avant 5-7-1984 is pd tunisia ok
- That page describes an event in 1978. It not says that the photo is from 1978, and it especially says nothing about the publication of the photo. That website is a publication from 2011. You have to provide evidence of publication before 5-7-1984 in Tunesia. Not creation. --Martin H. (talk) 16:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
hhhh is not internet in 1978 how can prouved you dont understund any thaink of rules of tunisia pd loook all tunisian pictur in commons all from archive how can prouved !!!!????
- The internet is only one of various sources. --Martin H. (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Habib Bourguiba jr.JPG this picture Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News in 1961 so why you want delate this pic???--Adnen1985 (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- The Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News Archive is not part of the United States Federal Government (as you say). --Martin H. (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
so where ??? tel me the correct licence --Adnen1985 (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I dont know if there is a correct license. I see no reason for the photo to be free inside our requirements. --Martin H. (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
sorry but you dont know any thaink ??? you tell me how you prouve this before 1980 so how you prouve this pic????
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rebai_sayah.jpg
all my licence is correct licence but you want delete my work just this the simple raison all this picture before 1980 so is correct it simple ok you want more pic in commons prouve this???--Adnen1985 (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Adnan, the important word is photos publier avant 5-7-1984. If something is published you can refer to a publication by citing it. --Martin H. (talk) 17:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
this pic how you prouve befor 1980 i want clear response????
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mustapha_filali.jpg--Adnen1985 (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
all my licence is correct--Adnen1985 (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I said this alreadey: Provide the name of a publication before 5-7-1984. --Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
soo look the new name source ?? and now???--Adnen1985 (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
I just realized there was an error in the verbiage of the template, as the Tunisian law is stating that pictures protection starts from the year of their creation and not of their publication. SO NOW ???
PD-Tunisia verbiage [edit]
Hi Martin,
I saw your discussion with Adnen around PD-Tunisia. I just realized there was an error in the verbiage of the template, as the Tunisian law is stating that pictures protection starts from the year of their creation and not of their publication. That does not change much to the specific cases discussed with Adnen but I wanted to make you aware of this distinction. Moumou82 (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
SO now martin???--Adnen1985 (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- That does not change much. The country of origin is the country of first publication, not the country where the depcited person comes from. So far you quote books published in France by L'Harmattan and Karthala or websites published in France (Abdallah Kallel photo). The requirement on Commons is that a file is public domain in the country of origin and the US. If France is the country of origin the file is not free enough for Commons. See the first words of the template: "Cette œuvre a été publiée la première fois en Tunisie" --Martin H. (talk) 23:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Schnelllöschung von Dateien [edit]
Hallo, kannst Du bitte mal erklären warum Du bei folgenden Dateien Schnellöschungsanträge gestellt hast? File:Krupp_schiessplatz_meppen.jpg, File:Feldhaubitze k.jpg, File:Schiessplatz wahn geschuetz.jpg Arche-foto (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Bei allen ist die Behauptung "erreicht nicht die notwendige Schöpfungshöhe" (Template:PD-ineligible) Unsinn. Es fehlt also eine korrekte Angabe des urheberrechtlichen Status. Bei allen steht, der Urheber sei nicht bekannt, nach eigenem Erkenntnisstand mag das stimmen, objektiv ist es aber eine unbelegte Behauptung die mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit schlichtweg falsch ist. Der Urheber von File:Krupp schiessplatz meppen.jpg ist 1945 gestorben, die Datei ist nicht gemeinfrei. --Martin H. (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)