User talk:Materialscientist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Arms of the Qing Dynasty.svg[edit]

I would like to make a few pointers in response to your edit summary. Regarding "file is heavily used", the reason the file is heavily used is because people think it is the real coat of arms. Keep in mind that people on, say, the Korean Wikipedia may have a really poor grasp of English, and never read English file descriptions. The file is used on those projects because of the misunderstanding. Regarding "it does not say "official"", then why isn't it obvious enough so that people don't use the image? I've had to remove the image from en:Emperor of China literally 8 minutes ago. You cannot deny that the image is a hoax - the original creator of the image has specifically said so, and the image description says so. People using this image as the official coat of arms is a significant problem. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 03:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Such problems should never be solved by one-person rename on Commons - you have to seek consensus for a change. Your speculation on wide use might be plausible, yet it is a pure speculation. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 03:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
The author noted it was made from File:Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary b15 462-3.jpg. However, if it was never actually used, I second Benlisquare's concerns. The title calls it "Arms of the Qing Dynasty". Despite it not saying "official", there is the heavy implication that it is the arms the Qing Dynasty used, and thus that it was official. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

A comment on 2 images[edit]

If this image above is passed, (I chose not to mark it), I would urge that it be renamed to something more appropriate.

Secondly, for this: File:Como Diego Minonzio direttore giornale La Provincia.jpg, is flickr owner Sesaab probably the author POZZONI CARLO named in the camera metadata?

The second one is a hard decision sadly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : It would appear that Sesaab is a flickrlaundering account. I just noticed that this second image uploaded from this flickr account by the same uploader here: File:Direttore Eco di Bergamo.jpg also has clear camera metadata...and the author's name is Fabio Toschi. So, how can Sesaab be Pozzoni Carlo and Fabio Toschi at the same time. Perhaps the Sesaab flickr account should be added to a list of 'suspect' flickr accounts. But of course, it is your decision. The camera models are the same strangely. As for the images, in this situation, its hard to see how Commons can keep them now without COM:OTRS from both authors. Best Regards from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

On this image above, I notice the uploader never gives the online flickr source for images which he uploads here. I have given the online source for 3 of his uploads today. The first is OK but this one above might have some issues. Why? Because the flickr copyright owner says "Do not harvest my images to sell in any way," but of course Commons cannot control what people do with images that are licensed freely. I don't know what Commons policies here are but maybe you do...whether to keep the image since it is licensed freely or to delete? This is the problem with copyright owners who choose licenses that allow people to sell their images for a Profit. And they don't place a Non-Commercial restriction on their pictures. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I am using summer time for writing on en.wiki (later, vandalism will kick in and take most of free time) and am spending a few minutes/day on Commons, but I check my talk several times/day. The top was clear laundering. The bottom I leave untouched: the author says no commercial redistribution, but puts the CC-BY license, and this is what matters most. It is quite common to have the © All rights reserved sign under a flickr image, yet we follow the license sign (my understanding is that uploaders may and do change the license on the right side, but might not be able or willing to edit some posts on the left side in flickr image pages). I saw all that story with the middle image, and my feeling is Sesaab belongs to some organization (TV, press, or such); the Nikon D700 camera is likely the same by chance (e.g. several cameras bought by that agency). Thus permission will be needed, I guess. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • OK its clear then. Its the flickr license that is key...and not a copyright owner's statement not to market their photos. Thanks for clearing this up. As for the Sesaab photos, I see someone else has marked them. I have the same impression that Sesaab belongs to a media organization but its strange the metadata names different photographers. OTRS is still preferable I suppose but I cannot be sure. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Уважаемый Materialscientist, у меня есть просьба к вам. Можете удалить мою пользовательскую страницу обсуждения: User talk:Vaga-am? Заранее благодарен. -- Vaga-am (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Мы обычно не удаляем страницы обсуждения из базы данных. Однако вы всегда можете удалить любое сообщение со своей страницы обсуждения. Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Deleted pictures[edit]

What is your problem? Did you see that those pictures are awating for OTRS confirmation? Just see the template before delete pictures. +PrinceWilly 01:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Restored, despite your tone. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 03:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Oh, sorry if I was a rude. I was angry with something else on ptwiki. Apologizes.Hum.png+PrinceWilly 12:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
By the way, I changed you user rights for autopatrolled user at ptwiki. +PrinceWilly 13:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File move question[edit]

I noticed today that there are quite a few rename requests like File:Parametros Fisico Quimicos en Estero La Catedral de Las Peñitas.jpg where the requester User:McZusatz is requesting a change of file extension from jpg to pdf and png to pdf. How would this be done? Also, after seeing these requests and others, I asked this user if they wanted the filemover right. Let me know if you think that would be a good idea? Thanks. INeverCry 03:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

To change extension: check that the extension is actually wrong (wikisoftware indicates that under the image), then ignore the template and click "move" on top of the page, then manually remove the template. Note that CommonsDelinker will not substitute an image that was renamed into an svg image - such substitutions have to be done manually after rename. Changing user rights is a matter of knowing the user or analyzing their edits, I have no experience with that. Materialscientist (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this. I really appreciate it. You've told me all I needed to know. The fact that the move requests were completely valid is enough for me to give this user the filemover right if he wants it and thinks he can use it. Thanks again. INeverCry 04:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

The uploader, I mentioned, who doesn't give the exact online source uploaded 3 more photos today. He/She seems to be French. Anyway, I gave a source and ordered a flickr review on one of the pictures. Another one is here: File:Lepilemur ankaranensis1.jpg and the flickr source is this And there is one final image with no online source: File:Lepilemur ankaranensis2.jpg

Perhaps, you know a code to tell this uploader to give the online flickr source? Finally, he/she seems to have uploaded some new images incorrectly as you can see here Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


File:Handcuffs Lincoln assassination.jpg[edit]

I can't see any evidence that the photo dates from 1865. And the Lincoln claim is in any case doubtful[1].Geni (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I copied the date from the source [2] and added circa - this is all I know about this case :-). Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Why you delete File:Ingrid Mattson.jpg  ?[edit]

Why you delete File:Ingrid Mattson.jpg  ? I took it from ficker and verified the license. I have the right for share! http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/umarnasir/4768188031/

Thanks for clarification Vivaystn (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

See [3]. Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

clear now. thank you! Vivaystn (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Білоруська батлейка.jpg[edit]

Подскажите, почему удален файл "Білоруська батлейка.jpg"? Ведь он загружен с www.flickr.com. Какие тогда файлы с flickr можно загружать? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Смотрите таблицу [4]. Materialscientist (talk) 13:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Ha'Atzma'ut Street and all the others[edit]

Thanks very much . Orrlingtalk 16:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Удаление файлов[edit]

Здравствуйте. Можете удалить эти файлы: 3 файла и 1, 2 (буду стараться больше так не делать).--Shvann (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Liu Xiaobo-300.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Liu Xiaobo-300.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Anatoliy (talk) 22:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for ruining[edit]

Thanks for ruining the image File:Megarhyssa macrurus female.jpg with your "brightening." Do you have a calibrated monitor? No. The trouble is, you think everyone is looking at your monitor, which is obviously far away from proper adjustment (if you think the image now appears realistic). Bruce Marlin (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it was a crappy monitor, two years ago, when I didn't pay attention to that. I have reverted myself. Be friendly. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Vlasov, Zhabotinsky, Schemansky 1964 Tokyo.jpg[edit]

Добрый день. Вы уверены в лицензионной чистоте изображения? Почему не следует доверять указанию авторства на странице, откуда вы загрузили вторую версию файла (Author: RIA Novosti) и метаданным (Author: STF, RIA Novosti)? NBS (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

ANeFo утверждает что они договорились со всеми авторами их фотографиий [5]. У них 1269 фотографиий РИА Новости (т.е. ТАСС) [6], и часть из них дублирована на visualrian.ru. То есть это не случайная ошибка ANeFo, и я надеюсь какое-то соглашение с РИАН у них есть. Для сравнения, keystone - это частное агенство; ANeFo размещает 13,000+ их фотографиий [7] s CC-BY лицензией. Materialscientist (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
РИА Новости (ранее сокращалось как АПН) и ИТАР-ТАСС (бывшее ТАСС) - это две совершенно разные (хотя и обе государственные) организации. Если ANeFo указывает в качестве автора фотографии ТАСС, то какое-то соглашение у них наверняка есть. Но у этой фотографии ANeFo указывает в качестве автора Keystone, а РИА Новости - себя, что весьма странно. ANeFo утверждает: "Of the initially 150,000 photos in the Anefo set, all photos with an unknown creator or made in commission have been filtered out, resulting in more than 140,000 photos released as Open Data." - но при таком объёме работы всяко будет некоторое количество ошибок. NBS (talk) 06:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Достоверной информации мало. У ANeFo много опечаток в описании фотографии (имена итп) - это я могу проверить, однако, я не могу проверить их лицензионный процесс. То же самое относится к РИА (например в подписи к этой фотографии стоит Токио, Россия :-). Я также не понимаю такой факт: в http://visualrian.ru много пре-1941 фотографий (когда РИА/АПН еще не существовало), все защищищенные авторскими правами. Я почему-то думал что РИА имеет лицензионные права на фотографии ТАСС, это скорее всего не так. Materialscientist (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
РИА готовы предоставить эту фотографию в хорошем качестве и (за плату) в разрешении 3000×2421px; ANeFo - в худшем качестве и в худшем разрешении. Если бы возник подобный спор на удалении между рядовым участником Википедии и рядовым сторонним фотографом, какое бы вы решение приняли как администратор? NBS (talk) 05:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Я стараюсь сводить спекуляции до минимума, так что второй вопрос для меня смысла не имеет. Многие старые фотографии ANeFo (скажем 1950х-1960х) перепечатаны или пересняты с оригиналов (это часто указано в описании). Bысокoe разрешение пока что доступно только для части их коллекции с Nummer toegang 2.24.01.05 [8]. Для остальных фотографий (Nummer toegang 2.24.01.01 [9]) качество нереально плохое - по насыщению контраста, по разрешению и JPEG артефактам. Я думаю что это быстрый сброс чтобы заполнить всю базу данных, и они постепенно пересканируют их с высоким разрешением. Другими словами, я думаю что и РИА и ANeFo имеют схожие оригиналы, просто РИА гораздо оперативнее в плане сканирования. Materialscientist (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Вынес на удаление. NBS (talk) 21:40, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Klimuk and Hermaszewski 1978.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Klimuk and Hermaszewski 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 02:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Participants on Václav Havel Funeral.jpg[edit]

Dear friend, thanks a lot for having renamed the file based on my request, which resulted from the comments of other wiki user (new name of File:Participants on Václav Havel Funeral.jpg). I have apologized for the identity mistake. Please be informed that there is another photo, being a detail of that one, under the following name: File:Ivan Vyskočil (1929).jpg. I have proposed to delete this file (this request has been inserted into "Discussion page" relating to this file as I was unable (sorry) to find another way how to make a request). If it would not be possible to delete the file, I would recommend to change it at least to a neutral name, e.g. "A participant on Václav Havel Funeral" or similar, not to mistake the person with Czech actor Ivan Vyskočil. Thank you very much for your kind asistance. With best regards--David Sedlecký (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Possible copyvio[edit]

Hi, could you check this image: File:Pirro 01 original.jpg. It was taken from MotoGP.com so I think it's a clear copyvio. --95.252.41.154 18:28, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Agree, thus speedily deleted, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Could you have a look at this: File:Frontieramentone.PNG. It seems to be taken from Google Street View, on the street there is an unreal yellow line and I found the words (C) 2009 Google on the top of those purple flowers on the right side of the street. Regards, 79.17.83.80 12:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
I can't say for sure which Google application, but the watermark is clear (+no EXIF data, wrong date), thus deleted. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Изображения авторства ТАСС в коллекции ANeFo[edit]

По моей просьбе был послан запрос в ИТАР-ТАСС о статусе изображений — вкратце, ответ «официальных договорённостей между организациями нет, и ИТАР-ТАСС публиковаться под свободной лицензией не планирует» (см.). Увы. NBS (talk) 12:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Walter Stoneman[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you've uploaded a number of portrait photos by Walter Stoneman (1876-1958) (e.g. File:Admiral Claud Barry.jpg), and tagged them as {{PD-UKGov}}. I wonder if you could explain the rationale for applying that tag to photos taken by Stoneman as I don't see any evidence that these photos were taken by Stoneman as "an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties". He took the photos for the NPG, but I don't think he actually worked for the NPG (I might be wrong), and according to the Crown Copyright article "[w]orks where copyright is assigned to the Crown by an author are subject to the normal term of protection for that particular type of work, for example life of the author plus 70 years for a literary work", which would mean that if he took the pictures as a private or commercial photographer and then assigned the copyright to the NPG then they would remain in copyright until 2028. BabelStone (talk) 21:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

A provisional answer is this: what you've said is correct for the works created after 31 July 1989. Prior to that, the Crown copyright applied to "any work first published by the Crown between 1 June 1957 and 31 July 1989 [or prior to that], no matter who created it or when it was created." [10]. Thus it does not matter who employed Stoneman, it matters that those photos were made for NPG and first published by NPG (this is not 100% clear, but I assume this from [11], I'll check his bio page on Monday - can't find much on free web). Materialscientist (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I am hoping that the {{PD-UKGov}} tag is valid as there is a Stoneman/NPG portrait I want to use for an article, but I don't want to upload it while I am uncertain of its copyright status. I'll wait to see if you can get a more definitive answer. BabelStone (talk) 09:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
I've expanded Walter Stoneman a bit (I thought I have access to http://www.oxforddnb.com/index/94/101094086/, but I haven't). Anyway, I don't have enough information for a definite answer. Stoneman's photographs were made for NPG, but he was not employed by the Crown. Thus to fall under {{PD-UKGov}}, they had to be first published by the Crown before 1989. NPG is unclear on that, and there is no definition of publication. NPG say the photos were made on personal appointment, specifically for record purposes, and stored in boxes at NPG. They were available for view at NPG upon appointment, and only in the 2000s became part of their public collections (which is what we copy :-). Some parts of the collections were exhibited and distributed by NPG all through the collection period, and this would constitute publication, as agreed before on Commons. However, I have no information which photos were sitting tight in the boxes since pre-1960s, and which were occasionally distributed or viewed. Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for following up on this. I do have access to ODNB so I have expanded the article a little bit more. As the copyright situation is unclear I won't upload any of the Stoneman photos I was interested in, but it really would be great if we could make use this treasure trove some time before 2029! BabelStone (talk) 22:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Nice expansion of Walter Stoneman's article. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 22:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Hydrogen atom.svg[edit]

[12] you are wrong. Read w: Bohr radius carefully please, especially around the reference [3]. But do not fix it now please, because the image has to be refurbished anyway. Currently it is full of path text and other Adobe crap, as well as x-typography, all that you did not fix. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

(i) There is no right or wrong here - there is a schematic drawn for one or another primitive model. As I recall, someone asked to correct numbers because 2.4 A deviated too much from any model. (ii) Yes, I did not bother with cleaning up svg code back then. Materialscientist (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
I know that there is no right here, but you were wrong. You stated that the diameter of the atom is equal to 2 Bohr radii, but the Bohr radius is less than the average electron distance in the Schrödinger model. Do you insist on your 1.1 Å, or I may change it to 1.6 Å (= 3 Bohr radii)? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Heck no, start a discussion at en.wiki article talk. As you said, "equal to 2 Bohr radii .. in the Schrödinger model". All started with 2.4 A being too much off, there was no proper discussion on what value to put in. All such diagrams are primitive, for school use, and thus should be as simple as possible, which is why I put 2aB, not 3aB. Materialscientist (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Dutch Anefo images[edit]

Hello Materialscientist,

Nice to see that you found this archive and are uploading images, there's a small problem (I did that wrong as well). Not all of the images on that site are free. You can see under "Auteursrechthebbende" there should be: "CC-BY-SA". If that's not the case they are not sure about the rights and the image is not released. (they only released images from 1959-1989). Another question: please add: the Images from Anefo category so that they are categorized together. Images which have to be deleted (if you agree please add copyvio tags to them)

I've only checked your images back to 31 october

In het Engels geschreven maar zie dat Nederlands ook goed is?

Greetz, Basvb (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Nederlands is inderdaad ook goed, maar ik schrijf beter in het Engels ;-). Yes, some Anefo images are not free, and I've learned that after I started uploading them (deleted a bunch), but I disagree about the above three. Those images are by Noske, J.D. / Anefo, and his images are partly tagged as CC-BY-SA [13]. The "CC-BY-SA" tag was added into their images files very recently (as I judge from my frequent uploads - their database is being updated apparently), and their database is full of human errors and omissions. Given their assurance that The copyright on the photos made by the photographers working for Anefo has been transferred to the Netherlands Government Information Service, and "The metadata of the photos isn't always complete", I'd think they simply haven't covered all photos yet. That said, I might be missing some obvious detail, and am not particularly concerned about those images. MVG. Materialscientist (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
They only released there images from 1959 to 1989 (dat staat expliciet in de vrijgave), so these might get released in a next batch, but aren't released officially yet. This photographer also made pictures after 1959 and those are probably free. That means that these before 1951 could be free, but I think they clearly stated that only the images after 1959 are released. Basvb (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Doh, this makes sense. I've deleted the images above. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, hopefully they release the older images soon as well, there are some images there I really like to put in articles. Basvb (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Вопрос[edit]

У меня к вам есть вопрос, раз мы уже раньше с вами стыкались по поводу лицензии на изображение различных персоналий, как думаете - это изображение можно загружать как свободное на Викисклад? Spillik (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Да. (И любые другие фотографии с этого аккаунта снятые камерой EOS REBEL T4i и лицензированные как CC-BY). Materialscientist (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Подскажите пожалуйста - в чём особенности данного пользователя и его камеры? --Spillik (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Ни в чем - это просто проверка надежности пользователя по наличию многочисленных снимков одной камерой, снимков характер которых (серийные сюжеты, композиция, разрешение, EXIF данные) предполагает что они не скопированы. Materialscientist (talk) 23:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Нашёл тут один файл и не думаю, что у него правильная лицензия . Посмотрите пожалуйста.Spillik (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
И еще один.--Spillik (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Удалил, спасибо. Materialscientist (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy[edit]

Hi Materialscientist. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, my PC at home broke down and I'm editing from odd terminals while fixing it. I hope I'll get to normal soon. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I've added the whole discussion in the Administrators' noticeboard. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Göran Claeson 1970.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ants Antson 1965.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ants Antson 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ants Antson 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ants Antson 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 06:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I see you had some discussion about these images with Basvb above as well. Note that the two images mentioned here have "nummer toegang" 2.24.01.01, while the released images have nummer toegang 2.24.01.05. I think there are a couple more of these among your uploads, I could dive into it if you wish. Perhaps we should not deal with all of them through DRs. Tell me what you think. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Here is a first couple I found:
How should we best deal with it? If you agree, I can simple delete them as copyvio, if you wish you can do so yourself as well or I can make a DR or so. Ik weet niet wat je het liefst hebt. Jammer hoor, al die mooie foto's weg :( Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Jammer genoeg, deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 00:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Lymantria (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

User talk:46.174.26.245 и Category:Dozhinki[edit]

Для статьи Дожинки я создал категорию Category:Dozhinki, куда помещаю связанные со статьей иллюстрации. Недавно анонимный участник User talk:46.174.26.245 из Польши стал усиленно удалять Category:Dozhinki из загруженных мною иллюстраций. Кроме того категории с региональными традициями праздника (Category:Okrezhne, Category:Zhniwniok in Silesia) также выставляет на удаление. От приглашения обсудить вопрос на моей или его странице отказался. Поведение достаточно деструктивное. P.S. К статье pl:Dożynki в Википедии ему же ограничили доступ (запрет на редактирование анонимов).
Можете помочь? С уважением, --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

User:Érico Júnior Wouters меня опередил и заблокировал этот адрес на 2 недели. Materialscientist (talk) 07:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Aleksei Gubarev 1978.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aleksei Gubarev 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Abraham Charité 1952.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abraham Charité 1952.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Aleksei Yeliseyev 1969.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aleksei Yeliseyev 1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Aleksey Vakhonin 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aleksey Vakhonin 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexei Leonov with wife and daughter 1965.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alexei Leonov with wife and daughter 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Anatoly Filipchenko 1974.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anatoly Filipchenko 1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Anatoli Blagonravov 1961.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anatoli Blagonravov 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:André Gide 1930.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:André Gide 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Albert Szent-Györgyi2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Albert Szent-Györgyi2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Antony Hewish.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Antony Hewish.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Belka and Strelka 1960.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Belka and Strelka 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Andrei Sinyavsky 1973.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Andrei Sinyavsky 1973.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Andrei Grechko 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Andrei Grechko 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Andrei Sinyavsky 1973b.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Andrei Sinyavsky 1973b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Abraham Charité 1952.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abraham Charité 1952.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 13:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Confusing Anefo[edit]

Hi Materialscientist, took a look at Anefo with someone from open culture data in the Netherlands. Only images that have an explicit release (example) can be used here. That might be a bit confusing. I'll ask Tim from the National Archives if he can make their documentation a bit more clearer about this subject. Multichill (talk) 10:12, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

File:André Gide 1930.jpg is irrelevant to Anefo (my mistake during the upload); the issue there is the country of origin and death date of the author, which I can't locate (image is old, 1930).
Can you ask Tim the following: Anefo announced that images taken by their photographers between 1959 and 1989 are released as CC-BY-SA, and this is so for images with Nummer toegang 2.24.01.05. However, there is a large group of images with Nummer toegang 2.24.01.01, taken by Anefo photographers between 1959 and 1989, yet carrying no CC-BY-SA license. Example. Why? Materialscientist (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Leo Esaki 1973.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leo Esaki 1973.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Claude Simon 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Claude Simon 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 21:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Odysseas Elytis 1979.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Odysseas Elytis 1979.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Jaroslav Seifert 1984b.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jaroslav Seifert 1984b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Mikhaylovich Komarov.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vladimir Mikhaylovich Komarov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Shatalov 1969.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vladimir Shatalov 1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Vicente Aleixandre 1977.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vicente Aleixandre 1977.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Leonid Rogozov 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leonid Rogozov 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Georgy Beregovoy 1969.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Georgy Beregovoy 1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Jaroslav Seifert 1984a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jaroslav Seifert 1984a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Yashchenko 1978.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vladimir Yashchenko 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexander Brailowsky 1965.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alexander Brailowsky 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:AlignedCNTs.jpg[edit]

Yes, flickr license was incompatible (NC). And because it hadn't been verified at the time of an upload (when maybe the license was different) - {{Flickrreview}}, it was deleted. Masur (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Rollback[edit]

Really sorry to bother you, but I know your name from en.wiki and I was just wondering if you could grant me rollback over here. I am a sysop on it.wiki and have rollback on other projects and sometimes I come across cross-wiki vandals here and [rollback] would just make it easier for me. Thanks a lot! --Mark91it's my world 19:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) --Mark91it's my world 16:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Pyotr Klimuk 1978.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pyotr Klimuk 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Shirali Muslimov 1970.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Shirali Muslimov 1970.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 09:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Valeriy Brumel 1964c.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Valeriy Brumel 1964c.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Vasily Alekseyev 1971.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vasily Alekseyev 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 09:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Mikhail Yakushin 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mikhail Yakushin 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Leonid Zhabotinsky 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leonid Zhabotinsky 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rudolf Plyukfelder 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rudolf Plyukfelder 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Soyuz 11 crew.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Soyuz 11 crew.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Christine Kaufmann and Tony Curtis 1963.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Christine Kaufmann and Tony Curtis 1963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Valeriy Brumel 1964b.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Valeriy Brumel 1964b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Valeriy Brumel 1964d.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Valeriy Brumel 1964d.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Komarov 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vladimir Komarov 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Galina Prozumenschikova.jpg[edit]

What was wrong with this image? There are a lot of images from that source: Category:Images_from_Anefo--Anatoliy (talk) 11:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

In the beginning, www.gahetna.nl vaguely said that all Anefo images have CC-BY-SA license, i.e. good for Wikimedia Commons. Then they clarified, that only images clearly marked with CC-BY-SA are Ok (they usually contain 2.24.01.05 in the file description), but others are not Ok (they usually contain 2.24.01.01 in description). This image was by TASS, not by ANefo, and had no CC-BY-SA license. Take one from Category:Galina Prozumenshchikova. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Egon Zimmermann 1964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Egon Zimmermann 1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Evsei Liberman 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Evsei Liberman 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Titov, Khruschev, Gagarin 1961.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Titov, Khruschev, Gagarin 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Timmietovenaar (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Thomas Willis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Thomas Willis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Friedrich K. (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Ivan Pavlov nobel.jpg[edit]

I am intrigued to see that nobelprize.org claims copyright for this image here:[14], with the statement "Photos: Copyright © The Nobel Foundation." Does this actually mean anything? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I haven't researched the history of this photograph. I assume that the Nobel Foundation claims copyright for the first publication of this photo, in their annual book Les Prix Nobel, which is quite possible (i.e. they either took the photo or it was given to them by Pavlov or someone else from a private collection). In other words, they state that they were the copyright holders, even though the copyright has expired according to {{PD-Sweden-photo}} - this is important for copyright matters. 13:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for the explanation. That sounds perfectly reasonable. I was just a bit surprised by their label. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
  • {{PD-Sweden-photo}} requires that the photo was made in Sweden, which is not proven.
  • And it additionally requires proof that the photographer is either unknown (extremely unlikely in that case) or died before 1944 (it is quite possible that the photographer still lived in 1944).
  • A copyvio is therefore possible, and unless the opposite is proven the image has to be deleted.
Adrian Bunk (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
No, as I mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Richard Adolf Zsigmondy.jpg. As to ".. unless the opposite is proven the image has to be deleted." - this mantra can not be applied indiscriminately; for example, we have many thousands of old images (engravings and such) without author/date, yet we do not delete them without a better reason. There must be a significant chance of justified copyright claims. Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
There must be a significant chance of justified copyright claims. Wrong you are. This is not about the probability of a lawsuit, this is about ensuring that an image is freely available.
  • You tagged it as PD-old. For PD-old photos you must name the author, or it is not proven that the photographer (who might have died 80 years after he took a photo) died more than 70 years ago.
  • If you want to tag it PD-Sweden-photo instead, you have to show that Swedish copyright law applies.
  • I've nominated it for deletion.
Adrian Bunk (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I even mentioned it now, MS. But it seems you are used to such challenges. I wonder if nobelprize.org has proof of where and when this image was made, and by whom. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

They very rarely mention the sources of their images, in any publications I saw (including their primary Les Prix Nobel). Materialscientist (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Richard Adolf Zsigmondy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Richard Adolf Zsigmondy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adrian Bunk (talk) 14:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Ivan Pavlov nobel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ivan Pavlov nobel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adrian Bunk (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:GavinSimonds.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GavinSimonds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 23:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kürzlich abgefackeltes Bundeswehr-Dienstleistungszentrum Kiel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kürzlich abgefackeltes Bundeswehr-Dienstleistungszentrum Kiel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Grazia Deledda Young jpg[edit]

Dear Materialscientist are you sure that picture is really of Grazia Deledda? [[15]]

The nose looks too thin in comparison with the photo's of her when she was older.

The provenance is not documented any where I can find online.

It's a while since I visited Nuoro and the Grazia Deledda Archive but I don't recall seeing it there.

The jpg appeared on-line in December 2012 without further explanation.

Around that time an anonymous user vandalised the Italian Grazia Deledda page by falsifying the date of birth and death - which spurs my suspicion.

I don't know.
I only looked at the source here and quickly tidied the image background. Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Kürzlich abgefackeltes Bundeswehr-Dienstleistungszentrum Kiel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kürzlich abgefackeltes Bundeswehr-Dienstleistungszentrum Kiel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:LandonCHaynesNARA525255-cropped.jpg[edit]

Would you mind editing this file? It accidentally has two "Summary" headers at the top, so one needs to be trimmed, and I can't because you've temporarily protected it. Nyttend (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Removed, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Изображение с неправильной лицензией нарушающие авторские права[edit]

Залитые одним и тем же участником файлы:

File:Мэри Винчестер.jpg
File:Бальтазар.jpg
--Spillik (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Удалил, заблокировал участника на 7 дней. Materialscientist (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Muqtada al-Sadr VOA.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Muqtada al-Sadr VOA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

2 изображения на Flickr'е[edit]

Здраствуйте! Я немного покопался на данном сайте и нашёл два изображения:

Там указана лицензия (CC BY-SA 2.0), которую можно использовать в Вики, но я немного сомневаюсь. Можете помочь?--Spillik (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Загрузчик честно пишет что фотографии не его (то есть нет никакой уверенности что автор согласился на эту лицензию), разрешение низкое, EXIF данные отсутствуют, копии гуляют по интернету. Всё это говорит о том что загружать на викисклад нельзя. Materialscientist (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Печаль, но спасибо за помощь. --Spillik (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Файл без соответствующей лицензии[edit]

File:Vikings TV.jpg - я считаю, что данный файл является несвободным, так как источник из которого он взять - это IMDB, а там, насколько мне известно все права защищены.--Spillik (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Udalil, spasibo. Materialscientist (talk) 22:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Коровин К.А. Портрет Анджело Мазини.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Коровин К.А. Портрет Анджело Мазини.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 10:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hi! I have contacted an Uzbek actress/singer personally on Facebook to get some photographs. She acted in a film together with one of my old acquaintances and that's why I was able to get in touch with her. She has sent me many very nice photos. She gave me full permission to upload them to Commons. How can I upload them without much hassle? I don't want to E-mail Commons admins because I haven't received a reply for my last E-mail that I sent months ago. Can I just upload the photos as my own work? She sent personal photos that were taken during her long career. They haven't been published anywhere. Nataev (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

See Commons:Permission (or "If you are not the copyright holder" in Commons:OTRS). You should have a written permission (per email or on paper) from her, and this permission should allow (i) non-commercial distribution and (ii) modification of the images. (Although I might sound like a robot in this reply, this is the correct, and maybe the only way to go). Materialscientist (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
One more question. I helped a lady draft and and send an E-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with three photos of the Uzbek actress Sitora Farmonova attached. She also send the E-mail to me. Will ORTS members upload the photos themselves? If yes, how will I find out when they do? Or can I go ahead and upload them? I'n not sure if ORTS volunteers will locate the photos if I upload them myself. Because the photos in the E-mail are not named properly, they're right from the camera. Thanks! Nataev (talk) 08:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Good. Now, follow the instructions from Commons:OTRS ("If you are not the copyright holder". #2, 3, etc.), namely, "upload the image to Commons, then tag the file {{subst:OP}}" - OTRS volunteers do not upload, they only check images via links that you send them, and they alter the license after that. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Can I rename the photos? To Sitora Farmonova (1), etc? How will OTRS volunteers find them? Nataev (talk) 08:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
OK, here we are: Category:Sitora Farmonova. Hope didn't mess up. Nataev (talk) 09:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Renaming you can - either tag the image with {{rename}} (but read the template documentation before using - the template won't work if you skip some parameters) or just ask me. OTRS people will find the images via redirects, which are automatically created during renaming. Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
I sent an E-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the URL links of the photos just in case. Nataev (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect print orientation of File:Lewis Wallace.jpg[edit]

Hi. I don't know if historical accuracy matters, but this image is incorrectly oriented by being printed on the wrong side of the negative. His photos in this article show the uniform coat opening on the correct (right) side, as worn by him and his fellow officers. In addition, he was right handed, as there is a photo of him writing in his garden, in the same article. Would I be permitted to flip it? — Ineuw 02:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Flipped, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Actually, I thank you for not considering me crazy, but it just looked odd. Now, I am smiling whether anyone will notice the change that he turned around to make himself more comfortable. :-) — Ineuw 07:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Easter[edit]

Hi,

I wish you Happy Easter! Cheers! DenesFeri (talk) 11:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Vikings logo.png и File:Darkangel logo.png[edit]

Здравствуйте! Сегодня я загрузил изображения, которые проходят по {{PD-textlogo}}. Хочу что бы вы проверили данные файлы. --Spillik (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Проверил. Проходят :-). Materialscientist (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Спасибо за сотрудничество. :P --Spillik (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Снова здравствуйте. File:Vikings logo.png был выставлен на удаление, как я понял, за какое-то несоответствие с какими-то законами, которые по словам номинатора являются разными в Канаде и Ирландии. Хотел бы посоветоваться с вами, так как я пока плохо разбираюсь в лицензиях.
    Elcobbola оставил очень граммотное замечание в дискуссии по удалению этого файла, так что мне пока даже и нечего добавить :-). Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
  • И ещё по поводу удалений: файлы File:Star Wars lll 2.jpg, File:Star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace-poster-2.jpg и File:Star Wars Vll 2.jpg являются не свободными, а лицензией обладает компания en:LucasArts.--Spillik (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Famille royale et chefs de Rimatara en 1889.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Famille royale et chefs de Rimatara en 1889.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Score Beethoven (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

It's me, again[edit]

Сегодня мои файлы были выставлены на удаление, так как по мнению участника они не соответствуют лицензии. Будьте добры, посмотрите пожалуйста: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wh13-logo.jpg и Commons:Deletion requests/File:Darkangel logo.png. --Spillik (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Sinhalese Man in National Dress.jpg[edit]

Good Day to You !!!

Dear Admin
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sinhalese_Man_in_National_Dress.jpg (An image uploaded by me from flicker) has been categorized under Flickr images from blacklisted accounts by FlickreviewR bot,I uploaded this to use in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinhalese_people ,This is not a flicker wash Photo,I am very sure about that,please consider about this and pass the Photograph under CC BY-SA-2.0,Thank you in advance.
NB - This is a Photograph of the Author,Mr Indi Samarajiva
Can you Remember this case,Same Account -> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Lakshman_Namal_Rajapaksa.jpg
MediaJet talk 15:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank You :) MediaJet talk 06:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Niteshift36 (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

EzAlbertan[edit]

Could you please revert this vandalism? Because I'm not a reviewer, I am being blocked. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 02:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Reverted, warned, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Lee Marvin 1980b.jpg[edit]

According to http://www.gahetna.nl/over-ons/open-data the CC-BY-SA photos can be identified in the field "Auteursrechthebbende". Thats correct for File:Robert Wyatt 1967.jpg (source) for example where the "Auteursrechthebbende" line can be found on the right side, but not for File:Lee Marvin 1980b.jpg (source). Aren't this files different in copyright? --Martin H. (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm not sure and thus deleted. CC-BY-SA in Auteursrechthebbende is a relatively recent addition - they used to have no license in image files. Some Commons user (who might be related to gahetna.nl) also mentioned that Anefo images with bekijk toegang 2.24.01.05 should be CC-BY-SA, but this is uncertain too. Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Leninportrait.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leninportrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

File:High resolution image of anterior view of foreskin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:High resolution image of anterior view of foreskin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alberto21 (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Télécom Bretagne, campus de Brest.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Télécom Bretagne, campus de Brest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Svenska arméns uniform, 1923 års modell, Nordisk familjebok.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Svenska arméns uniform, 1923 års modell, Nordisk familjebok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:WatNaCl.png[edit]

Could you please add your sources? Thanks --Itu (talk) 11:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please see "Description". Materialscientist (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Book template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hi Materialscientist. Currently, there seem to be 14 of your uploads in this maintenance category. A common problem seems to be broken transclusions of Template:Cite book (that triggered the switch from Template:Information to Template:Book a few days ago). Could you please have a look? --Leyo 07:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Odd, none of these files reminds me anything, and I don't recall using "cite book" in my uploads (though I do use cite journal often). Can you point me to a specific example? Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
One example is File:Drawing of Lunalilo bw.jpg. Also check the initial version. --Leyo 10:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Ah, those are copies that I photoenhanced upon requests by user:KAVEBEAR at en.wiki graphics workshop (I used to be active there, and he often specifically requested to upload the result as a separate file). Please ask him. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
The source file, File:Drawing of Lunalilo.jpg in this case, looks correct. Hence, the problem arose when you uploaded your version. I am sure you are able to fix your uploads yourself. --Leyo 11:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I see. Sorry for being lazy about this case (I'll see what I can do later today). As I understand, the templates were broken by the global Commons script ("uploading derivative work") - I didn't type any of those templates when uploading. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 02:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the fixes. --Leyo 21:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Valentino Rossi 2011 Estoril.jpg[edit]

Hi, I need a help with this: another user twice replaced the original with images in copyvio from MotoGP.com; I restored the correct version of the picture, but a rollback is still needed in order to restore the license information, and I can't do it myself. Thanks, --Gpmat (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Deleted re-uploads, warned user. Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you restore also the Picasareview template that was present in this version of the page, if needed? I don't have the permissions to. --Gpmat (talk) 07:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure which version is the right one, I've reverted back to January 2013‎. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
It is all ok now, thanks again for your help.--Gpmat (talk) 10:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Помощь с размером изображения[edit]

Я вот сделал изображение Alaskan Malamute+Blank.png. Оно залито с высоким разрешением, а я бы хотел сделать штучку, как к примеру на этой странице, чтобы можно было смотреть остальные размеры. А также вопрос, при использовании уменьшенного изображения с помощью простановки параметра пикселей - размер и скорость загрузки изображения остаются неизменной?--Spillik (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Штучка создается автоматически для .svg картинок; можно обмануть операционку Commons и запихнуть jpg/png в svg (редактором svg картинок, простое переименование не пройдет), но я бы это не стал делать. Я точно не знаю как работает создание иконок в википедии. В моем понимании, размер и скорость загрузки уменьшаются с числом пикселей, kak в исходном изображении (сервер динамически создает иконки и тормозит на больших картинках), так и в конечном (иконка на 150px меньше чем иконка 200px, но разница в скорости загрузки мала, т.к. обе иконки достаточно малы). Materialscientist (talk) 01:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Я бы хотел использовать данное изображение для статей-стабов, но боюсь, что из-за высокого разрешения оно будет нагружать страницы. Примерный вес изображений для стабов 2-20кб - оптимизированный, встречаются и до 100кб, есть вообще Tank template.svg, который занимает 616кб, но он прогружается заметно дольше, чем остальные. Моё изображение занимает 474кб, что может, как мне кажется, оказать влияние на прогрузку страниц. Пробовал сделать изображение меньше, но там слишком ухудшается качество, в отличии от того, что здесь при изменении пикселей, даже на те же 48.Spillik (talk)
Wikipedia сильно ухудшает качество иконок когда создает их из png файлов, да и компрессия в png плохая. Поэтому я стараюсь использовать jpg, хоть jpg и не поддерживает прозрачность (делаю белый фон). Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Загрузил 3 версии: File:Alaskan Malamute+Blank1.png,File:Alaskan Malamute+Blank2.jpg,File:Alaskan Malamute+Blank3.gif, gif очень плохо выглядит, а png и jpg, как по мне, то идентичны.--Spillik (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Brent Smith .jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brent Smith .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 09:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Z8 GND 5296 CANDEL crop.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Z8 GND 5296 CANDEL crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rybec (talk) 02:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)


File tagging File:Brent Smith .jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Brent Smith .jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brent Smith .jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Zavarych (talk) 03:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Jacobi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jacobi.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.


English | മലയാളം | Русский | Svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:CNRrao2.jpg[edit]

Hi Materialscientist, can you please provide some more information on the date and circumstances of this image? It's a great joy to have a free image from a Bharat Ratna winner so we better make sure it does not look like something we have taken from a website. Thanks for the image and best regards Hekerui (talk) 14:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

The primary website is [18]. The photo is taken during the visit of Rao to NIMS. Other details might be confidential. Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bert Sitters 1982.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | suomi | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bert Sitters 1982.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

LutzBruno (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:IkeRobin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IkeRobin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Stefan4 (talk) 15:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Diem dead.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Diem dead.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Nguyen1310 (talk) 04:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Hermann von Eichhorn-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hermann von Eichhorn-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Cube00 (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Проверка изображений[edit]

Снова здравствуйте! Хотел вас попросить проверить загруженные мной изображения. Окажите такую услугу?--Spillik (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Я не очень понял причину удаления файла. На фликре, в лицензии написан CC BY 2.0, что позволяет его использовать. А насчёт панорамы: фото ведь сделано на конвенции Комик-кон. Или я что-то не понял?--Spillik (talk) 12:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cafe+co CEE.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cafe+co CEE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Offenbacherjung (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Feodor Lynen by maseltov.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feodor Lynen by maseltov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Maseltov (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Rick Wayne image[edit]

Hey, thanks for writing the bio on Rick Wayne! Im his son and just wanted to let you know that the photo on the page is not him, it is of someone else.

File:PDC.png[edit]

Hi Materialscientist. Your files listed above are in Category:Chemical images that should use vector graphics. Could you please check, if the tag may be removed (in the case of high resolution PNGs), if there is already an SVG version, or if you consider uploading an updated version of higher resolution/quality on top of the old? Thank you. Leyo 13:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Bill Russell in the Green Room.jpg[edit]

Hello! If you aren't familiar with these concepts (and I mean no offense either way), please see Wikipedia's articles about the rule of thirds, headroom and lead room. Thanks! —David Levy 05:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Familiar, but, the original image has poor composition in terms of perspective and angles, thus I think those rules don't apply and recropped from my feeling of proportions, which is off course arguable. The above rules are also arguable, and have been questioned by regulars at the en.wiki graphics lab. Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Certainly, it's erroneous to treat such guidelines as sacrosanct. Exceptions can and do arise, but I'm not seeing one here. Shall we request outside opinions? —David Levy 05:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Its entirely up to you - all crops are arguable. Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Подходит ли[edit]

Хочу посоветоваться, является ли это изображение свободным из-за своей тривиальности или всё же более сложное и защищено авторским правом.--Spillik (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Думаю что свободно, но я не очень силен в этой области. Materialscientist (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Можете тогда подсказать админа, который разбирается в этой области, пожалуйста? --Spillik (talk) 11:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Al-Hadba.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Al-Hadba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Francis William Aston.jpg [edit]

Dear Materialscientist, together with Thomas Prohaska (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna), Norbert Jakubowski (BAM Berlin), I am currently editing a book on 'Magnetic Sectorfield Inorganic Mass Spectrometry', which will be published by the Royal Society of Chemistry' this year. Within the scope of a chapter on the general history of sectorfield mass spectrometry we found the photo of FW Aston. Although you state, the picture is in the public domain, we would be very delighted if you agreed upon the publication of the picture in the above mentioned book, as a person actually providing us with the photo. Please let me know if there is more information needed by you to take this decision. Many thanks in advance and best regards from Austria, Ondrej

I am not the author or copyright holder of this image, I merely uploaded it to Commons with the given license(s). Thus you don't need my permission to re-use the image. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Possible duplicate[edit]

Hi Materialscientist. File:Bob King (athlete) 1928.jpg looks like a duplicate of File:Robert Wade King.jpg, though the crop is a bit differently. Maybe they should be merged or so? Could you look at it please? I think you have more experience with that. :-) With regards, Trijnsteltalk 16:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. One more question. How did you manage to download very high res pics (such as this one) from the website gahetna.nl? Trijnsteltalk 00:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I've asked Quibik to write a script, knowing his skills from our past interactions. See [19] and [20]. I use that script since then, but it is very slow on 64-bit Windows 7 and we don't fully understand why. No problem on 32-bit Windows, except for occasional outages at the Anefo site. Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll look at that script soon. Trijnsteltalk 19:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hello Materialscientist. I noticed this logo was uploaded to Commons and I very much doubt this is allowed under the "threshold of originality" rationale now used. The uploader has uploaded a whole lot of these type of comic book hero logos, with varying degrees of renown and recognizability, and I'm not sure about what to do with them. Do you have any ideas? Thanks, --Atlan (talk) 13:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

I agree that this one is certainly not a simple shape, and thus deleted, but I others might well be. You can nominate them for deletion (not speedy) individually if you feel like, I'm not much of an expert in this area of shape simplicity. Materialscientist (talk) 13:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

That seems like a hassle. I'll ask on the admins' noticeboard first before taking any action.--Atlan (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Batman-logo.png[edit]

Так в чём соль? Там есть какие-то сложные символы, которые находятся под авторским правом?--Spillik (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Не символы, а форма фигуры мыши - она там совсем нe тривиальна. Materialscientist (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Эм... Туц?--Spillik (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Аналогично. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Случайно не подскажите, где можно найти критерии или примеры, которые помогут мне понять, что является, скажем так, максимумом по порогу оригинальности? --Spillik (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Примеры здесь, но многие из них нестандартны, как и все в этой области. Порог зависит от страны, то есть двух стран для Commons: США и страны откуда произошло изображение. Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Как пользователь владеющий некоторыми навыками в редактировании изображений, могу сказать, что данное изображение является аналогичным летучей мыши по сложности создания.
Да, но его создатели отказались от авторских прав. Не читал почему, no возможно похожие листочки рисовали еще в средневековье. Batman это совсем другое дело. Materialscientist (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Всё же не могу понять почему это или это является свободным изображение, если у меня уже не раз удаляли подобные. Что-то я, кажется, ещё больше запутался >_< --Spillik (talk) 11:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
K фонтам и графике совсем разный подход в плане авторских прав - насколько я знаю, фонты защитить авторскими правами гораздо сложнее, но в этой области я знаю намного меньше чем в графике. Materialscientist (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Раз уж мы не оба, как я понял, не профессионалы в данной области, то возможно на следует куда-нибудь обратится за "консультацией"? --Spillik (talk) 13:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Шах и мат? Где-то слышал, если возможно сделать такое же изображение, то оно теряет свою оригинальность и переходит в общественное достояние, как-то так... --Spillik (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Это совсем не так. Нелицензионное копирование защищенного изображения запрещено, буде оно перефоротографировано или перерисованно, или итп. Насчет оригинальных перерисовок смотрите COM:FAN. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

-_- Хотелось бы узнать причину удаления файла, так как заявленная не является действительной. --Spillik (talk) 21:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Загрузка картинки защищенной в источнике (All rights reserved) с cc-by лицензией. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Что-то не пойму, у меня написано Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.... --Spillik (talk) 21:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
©2014 deviantART. All rights reserved. Materialscientist (talk) 21:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Вы не туда смотрите - справа, где More from deviantART, ниже Featured in Groups, Details, Stats и то, что нам нужно License. --Spillik (talk) 22:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
To есть bagera3005 создал "batman logo 1989" в 2009 году? Посмотрите [21]. Можно спорить что 1989 это перерисовка 1940, но ведь 1940 все еще защищено авторскими правами, по крайней мере в США Materialscientist (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Он создал логотип Бэтмена, который носил этот персонаж в том году. В 40-х был другой логотип.--Spillik (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)