User talk:Mateuszica

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Family photos[edit]

According to Commons:Criteria for inclusion images uploaded to WikiCommons must be useful to a Wikimedia project. Which is the intended use of the photos of friends and family you uploaded today? Thuresson 09:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Image:Daniel.jpg
  • Image:Danielcontt.jpg
  • Image:Fredprim.jpg
  • Image:Fredprimcontt.jpg
  • Image:Isis.jpg
  • Image:Isiscontt.jpg
  • Image:Junior.jpg
  • Image:Juniorcontt.jpg
  • Image:Marian.jpg
  • Image:Mariancontt.jpg
  • Image:Mat88.jpg
  • Image:Mateu93.jpg
  • Image:Mat 94.jpg
  • Image:Mateus96-2.jpg

sorry i did not know it, i though wikipedia have no restriction to pictures, sorry

how can i delet this pictures you listed ?

Mateuszica 23:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

First, this is not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a web service available at www.wikipedia.org. Secondly, WikiCommons has a lot of rules. You are not allowed to upload anything you find on the Internet, you can only upload images with permission from the photographer, to put it simply. Every image must have a copyright tag and a source who can verify the copyright status. Only administrators can delete images, although administrators work for free on their spare time, so they shouldn't be given more work than absolutely necessary. Thuresson 16:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

pictures[edit]

I tought wikipedia was the owner of wikicommon , and the rules about pictures on wikipedia were the same on both. I know about copyright. And now i know about personal pictures.

Thanks a lot about your explanations.

Mateuszica 18:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Missing sources[edit]

I must remind you to add sources to every single photo you upload. Other people must have opportunity to check that you really have permission to upload the images. If you are the photographer, please say so explicitly, eg. "I took this photo".

Images with missing source information may be deleted. Thuresson 16:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

License problem[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you downloaded Image:PPlaquecloseup.png from NASA and licensed it under GFDL/Creative Commons. Material from NASA are in the public domain and you can't claim that you own the copyright on NASA's works. You seem to have the habit of taking other people's works and claim you own the copyright, is that correct? The images listed below were uploaded by you without sources. Please add information to verify that the photographer have licensed these photos under GFDL. Thuresson 20:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Image:Sant44os.jpg
  • Image:Teresina424.jpg
  • Image:Vitoriagif243.jpg
  • Image:Maringa444.jpg
  • Image:Campo grande2342.jpg
  • Image:Goiania244.jpg
  • Image:Goiania3234.jpg
  • Image:Guaruja23423.jpg
  • Image:Ilheus2342532.jpg
  • Image:Guaruja4543.jpg
  • Image:Goiania234534.jpg
  • Image:Florianopolis24234.jpg
  • Image:Curitiba345345.jpg
  • Image:Saojose4545.jpg
  • Image:Recife43434.jpg
  • Image:Portoalegre345.jpg
  • Image:Portoalegre34324.jpg
  • Image:Ouropreto234234.jpg
  • Image:Vitoria43252.jpg
  • Image:Saoluis067677.jpg

Image:Junior.jpg[edit]

Hi! Nice to see that you appreciate that photo. Is it so lovely, isn'it? Greetings from Italy :-) --Kal-El post here! 14:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rel exp diagram.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Pashupati.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


File:ProconsulZICA.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ProconsulZICA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 17:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


File:CapaExperienciaReligiosa.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CapaExperienciaReligiosa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Mateuszica!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)