User talk:Mattbuck
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:St Pancras railway station MMB E0 395028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Sheffield station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB B4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:King's Cross railway station MMB 38 43299 43296.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Harringay railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Support OK --
 |
Congratulations! File:Gloucester railway station MMB 52 158887 43071.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Byland Abbey MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Filton Abbey Wood railway station MMB 33 150249.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Derby railway station MMB 76 158813.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB S1 Chemistry.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham to Grantham Line MMB 01 158788.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
Re: he won't persecute the next until he's busy with the last[edit]
Or "as long as he's busy"? Thanks for letting me know, and feel free to correct my English mistakes any time. ;) --Nemo 13:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
photos of Phil Craig[edit]
Hi Matt, the photos I uploaded of Phil Craig, I do indeed have permission to use them. The black and white photo is his former official promo photo, for which Phil owns the copyright, and the colour photo was taken by me. Phil is a good friend who lives around the corner and all photos and material I've uploaded about Phil have been approved by him. Do not delete either photograph. If you have questions or concerns contact me direct at
John Cannon
- OK. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Northampton railway station MMB 06 350264.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Brimham Rocks MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Charing Cross station MMB 21 376036 375713.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Worcester Foregate Street railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Edgware road kearney tube[edit]
Hi, I understand the reasoning behind the deletion of Edgware road kearney tube.jpg. I only added this because there is precedent- there are several files like this which escaped deletion over the years, so I'm disappointed that mine was singled out while the others live on. What is to be the fate of en:File:Brixtonrailmap.png, en:File:Denham Map Mockup2.png, en:File:Northern Heights Map Mockup.png and others like them? All clearly derivative of the Tube map! Cnbrb (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- I did look through Commons's category of LUL maps, and I picked out those that I thought contained sufficient LU intellectual property. I agree with you on Brixton and Northern Heights, and have nominated those at en:WP:PUF, but File:Denham Map Mockup2.png is simple enough to get away with - the only bit of the LU map on it is a red line, a circle and "West Ruislip". You can't copyright the idea of making a tube map, only the map itself. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
-
- OK, I understand. One thing though - the trouble is that the deletion log doesn't provide any notification on the Wikipedia pages where these images are actually used. It's really a fault in WP systems, but it means that image deletions are exclusively discussed on Commons and are not noticed by WP editors (who are generally not as active on Commons). The Edgware Road image deletion took me by surprise and I only discovered when it was a fait accompli. Not your fault of course, but I wish the deletion alert could feed into relevant article talk pages too.Cnbrb (talk) 09:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
 |
The Barnstar of Peace | |
| I wanted to say that I really appreciate that Commons has administrators like you. Thanks! Sinnamon Girl (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Ooh, cool. Now to go burn some heretics. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Stafford railway station MMB 03 221133.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wolverhampton railway station MMB 14 390044 221117.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB «57 National College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:St Pancras railway station MMB D9 395028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Long Eaton MMB 06 River Trent.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Westbury railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:West Ruislip station MMB 20 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Grantham railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Newton-le-Willows MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:York MMB 45.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
2011 Deletion[edit]
I... have been putting off for quite a long time dealing with this because I saw the deletion too late and didn't feel like getting into a mess of requests and policies, and I must confess I was and still am completely baffled. So that means I have to contact the protest organizers who produced this leaftlet, which is by the way an historical record of one of the means used to pass the message, so they can confirm that it is okay to reproduce it? Well, thankfully they are actually easy to reach and so I've just done exactly that, and hopefully they will be kind enough to clear things up sometime soon. But... this is a pamphlet. Announcing a public protest. Which was *supposed* to be copied over and over and spread to as many people as possible. In my opinion, this was a bit of an overzealous deletion request.
Anyway, let's hope they can clear this up, and sorry for the two-year delay in actually saying something about it. - Ana Sofia Paixão (talk) 02:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back on this. I accept your reasoning, but I'm afraid copyright doesn't work that way - we need an explicit statement that the author released it under a free licence (or it needs to be uncopyrightable), otherwise we can't keep it. When you get permission, forward it to the OTRS team who will handle it. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Sheffield station MMB 03 150148.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Dudley Port railway station MMB 07 323243.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Cardiff Central railway station MMB 26 153362.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Starbeck railway station MMB 21 150118.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wirksworth railway station MMB 04 101XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Comment a bit dark --
Done.
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB M2 University of London Institute of Education.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Frank Hornby 150th anniversary materials[edit]
Hi Matt!
Regarding the "Frank Hornby 150" project poster and logo, they're uploaded with the permission of the Museum - we're required to share these graphics under at least the "CC BY-NC" licence so that other organisations can reuse them on their own materials to celebrate the anniversary, as part of our agreement with the Heritage Lottery Fund (who are funding the project). I should really also upload the bare logo, as a separate .SVG . I'm the FH150 Project Officer (you can confirm that my name's at the bottom of http://www.hlf.org.uk/news/Pages/FrankHornby150thanniversary.aspx ).
Regarding the museum map, that was created by me last year as a volunteer for the museum's use, and it's now in use within the museum as our standard public-facing map. The Museum's happy for it to be released to Wikimedia Commons, and so am I. I'll trudge off and send a couple of confirmation emails, as requested. ErkDemon (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC) (Eric Baird)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Montpelier railway station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Taunton railway station MMB 12 66721 221131.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB T0 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:York railway station MMB 14 43238.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Patchway railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 03 350267.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Test on your picture[edit]
Hi Mattbuck,
You say you don't understand what I mean so I did a test on your picture (File:University Park MMB «04 Rutland Hall.jpg).
You can download it at http://we.tl/bSXs2YYHFb
Friendly
Christian Ferrer.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Sutton Bank MMB 18.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 76 170108 158796.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Beeston MMB 82 Marlborough Road.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Harrogate MMB 02 Spa Lane.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham MMB B4 Middleton Boulevard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Harringay railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Hillingdon tube station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Weston-super-Mare MMB 57.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Clevedon MMB A0 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «M7 Bristol East Junction.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Waterloo station MMB 13 450XXX 450028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Aysgarth Falls MMB 83.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 02 350248.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:London Bridge station MMB 13 376021 465237.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB Q3 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Gloucester railway station MMB 28 43070.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:West Croydon station MMB 11 378136.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB K9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stapleton Road railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Hawnby MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:St Pancras railway station MMB F5 395027 395005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 01 G-CDMC.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Undelete[edit]
You have deleted these 1 2 3 4 5 images without legitimate reasons, The file-image Zarb-e-Sukhan here, in this case all information and permission was provided to User:Sreejithk2000 in May 2012. I consider that all as a bad faith contribution. I ask you to undelete, if you require your concerns, I can discuss.Justice007 (talk) 16:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- The blog didn't say that the images were licensed as such. There was no OTRS template or other proof of licence. Whatever Sreejithk2000 was told, it was never added to the file pages. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Feedback[edit]
Hi Matt, how are you doin'? I still miss your feedback o my 2 pictures from April 29th. I fixed them 9 days ago but haven't got yet any feedback from you. Cheers, Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm stuck on an open wifi connection for the next few days, so I can't download photos really. Or at least not very fast. I'll look at them by this time next week, will bump for now. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality images of rolling stock[edit]
User_talk:Jtcurses#Quality_images_of_rolling_stock
Question[edit]
Hi, an issue was recently brought to my attention, and I'm curious if you see a way to address it within Commons policy. I'm sure you're familiar with the "toothbrush" search issue; this is similar. The first result for this search, which an external site has linked as part of its information about stroke (the medical condition), is a bit of a shock to most viewers. I thought I'd ask you because you're the only person who's put this image anywhere, and because I know you have a lot of experience managing files that involve nudity and sexuality. It seems to me that we would do better in fulfilling our educational mission if people could search our site for a word like "stroke" with reasonable confidence that they would not run into something that would surprise or offend them. I know that addressing that general principle is a big and complex issue, but do you think there is anything to be done about this particular instance? -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Matt, I've handled this. I've also taken it to DR, I think it's a useless file given we have videos, etc available. russavia (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Swindon railway station MMB 05 43168.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Scarborough MMB 43.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «K6 The Galleries.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «O2 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Llandudno Junction railway station MMB 04 175103.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Beeston MMB 16 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «F2 Lamplighters Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Lydney railway station MMB 04 150227.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB «99 The Downs.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Runswick Bay MMB 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Yatton railway station MMB 30 153361 150127.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Highbury and Islington station MMB 21 378144.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Lincoln Central railway station MMB 08 153358.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:York MMB 44.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Question about scope[edit]
Hi Matt, question for you here in case you miss it. I was intending to ask you this anyway on your talk page, because I'm really struggling to see how Commons defines the word "educational". When I saw the issue raised there, I posted the question there instead. Hope that's okay. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I was actually answering that when you interrupted me. *grumbles* -mattbuck (Talk) 14:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Derby railway station MMB 73 222XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Kentish Town West railway station MMB 04 378213.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 12 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:York railway station MMB 38 185103.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Ebbsfleet International railway station MMB 06 395004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Aysgarth Falls MMB 50.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Derby railway station MMB D4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 35.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Aysgarth Falls MMB 76.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «I3 Bristol East Junction 43122.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Railfest 2012 MMB 73 57308.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Leyburn railway station MMB 03 20166.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Fountains Abbey MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Fountains Abbey MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Railfest 2012 MMB 55 55002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Richmond railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Scarborough MMB 25 Harbour.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB X5 Café Aspire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB B7 SS Great Britain.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! File:Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 18 221139.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
Removing illustration for misogyny[edit]
Why did you remove the .jpg for the depiction of mass media misogyny of a music album picture of a woman being lynched? Why do you want to censor a definition of misogyny? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeth1848 (talk • contribs)
- An image like that might be acceptable under fair use rules on en.wikipedia, but it is most definitely not acceptable on Commons. On Commons we accept only images which are freely licensed, meaning people are granted the right to use them for any purpose, including making derivative works or commercial uses. A Kanye West music video is definitely not freely licensed, and so any images derived from it are copyright violations. Whether it depicts misogyny is neither here not there. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for having restored my UserPage ![edit]
Hello dear mathematician fellow ! Thank you for having restored my UserPage ! :-)
London 70 meetup[edit]
Hello,
You recently expressed interest in attending meta:Meetup/London/70. Just so you know, following a brief talk page discussion, the meetup has been moved a week later to the 16th June to avoid a clash with WikiConference UK 2013. CT Cooper · talk 10:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Mi photo[edit]
Copyright violation. Who do you think is the author of the portrait of Joan Garces, if not me?
Best
rw
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 12 220030.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 35.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Montpelier railway station MMB 17 150221.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:St Andrews Road railway station MMB 13 66109.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 15 G-CEKS G-CERC G-BZVU.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Retford railway station MMB 01 180101.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB N8 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wraxall 2012 MMB 78 Smudge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Newport railway station MMB 43 170101.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Clevedon MMB 74.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB V5 Sherwood Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB E0 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 15 4160.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB N7 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham Autokarna MMB 07 Subaru Impreza and Ford Escort.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Low quality genitalia[edit]
Matt, I notice that you have made a number of recent deletion requests with statements like "low quality genitalia". While I think you mean that the images are low quality, not the genitalia, it would be nicer to the image subjects if you specified that explicitly. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Tamworth railway station MMB 21 170103.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stratford International station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 01 170630 350262.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Congratulations! File:Pickering MMB 01 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (Newbridge level crossing).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:King's Cross railway station MMB 87 365511 365504 365530 365523.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Coventry railway station MMB 12 390014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Russell Square tube station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Stratford station MMB 19 321365 321427.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Peterborough railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Cleethorpes railway station MMB 10 185123 144006.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:King's Cross railway station MMB 35.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Bonner Münster QIC[edit]
Hello Mattbuck, I uploaded a new version of the image. Maybe you would like to change your voting? Thanks and regards, -- Wolf im Wald (de) 01:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Normans Bay[edit]
This image seems to be dated incorrectly
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Normans_Bay_railway_station.jpg
This line is meant to have been electrified by 1935. So this image must be post 1935 not 1900. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Coastway_Line#Electrification
Regards Harveyqs
- I wasn't the uploader, so you should probably talk to them, or you could edit it yourself. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Highbury and Islington station MMB 10 378015.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Gloucester railway station MMB 53 43071 158887.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 22 185135.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 04 139001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB Y5 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Gloucester railway station MMB 32 43301.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wraxall 2011 MMB 33.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Cleethorpes railway station MMB 03 185104 144006.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bolton Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
File:Clevedon Court.jpg[edit]
 |
File:Clevedon Court.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jezhotwells (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Guildford railway station MMB 18 455725.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Aysgarth Falls MMB 46.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Retford railway station MMB 12 66088.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Toddington railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Avonmouth railway station MMB 23 150261.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wolverhampton railway station MMB 17 158820 158829 390044.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Rejection of Wendy Maltz photo[edit]
Matt,
Regarding the Wendy Maltz photo that I was notified as having "missing permission information," I have asked her to send an email directly to the "permissions" email address to verify that she is the owner of the photo of herself.
I hope her email will suffice to allow her photo to appear on her Wikipedia page.
Thanks,
Todd Peterson
- What is needed is permission of the copyright holder, which would likely be the photographer. Ownership of the photo is not at issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:St Pancras railway station MMB H2 373231.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:North Yorkshire MMB 01 East Coast Main Line 185103.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stapleton Road railway station MMB 21 150221.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Derby railway station MMB 38.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB «04 National College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Stockport railway station MMB 04 221125 150215.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB C5 Business School South.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Matlock railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham MMB B5 Middleton Boulevard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB C1 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Clapham Junction railway station MMB 15 377155.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Westerleigh Junction MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:St Pancras railway station MMB 48.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Leicester railway station MMB 01 43045.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB «28 The Exchange.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Oakleigh Park railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nuneaton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Wensley railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Whitby railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Derby railway station MMB 47 170106.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB S8 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 30 507017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Tamworth railway station MMB 36 350108.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 51.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 75 156470.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB «37 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Leicester railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Beeston MMB 07 Humber Road South.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:University Park MMB «B0 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stapleton Road railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB F6 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB K5 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:King's Cross railway station MMB 46.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:King's Cross railway station MMB 88 365511 365530.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Stapleton Road railway station MMB 20 150221.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Hednesford Hills Raceway MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 33.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Starbeck railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 25 390026.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Tamworth railway station MMB 26 43062.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 68 170518.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
"Nudity"? O_o[edit]
Hi Matt,
Can you possibly explain why erroneous photos are appearing in your image feed, tagged as 'nudity'? For example, User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 June 11-20 contains this image of Eden Atwood that I recently uploaded. I can assure you she's fully-clothed in the photograph, and I find it more than a little disquieting to see a notable jazz singer surrounded by photographs of bored teenagers' penises (penes?) in various stages of arousal. Care to explain? Bot malfunction? - Alison ❤ 04:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- That didn't seem to do much to help :/ - Alison ❤ 09:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- The plural of penis is penises. As for why it showed up, I don't know. I will ask the bot's maintainer to come and tell us. The reason is because nudity is a parent category of one category you added to it, probably quite a few levels up. The bot is not able to actually recognise penises and only show those. If you have a way of doing that, please inform your local AI lab. As for your second point, I've seen many images with OTRS templates which never get filled for years - npd seemed prudent. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- To your first point, the English Wikipedia claims 'penes' to also be legit. Also, I never suggested for an instant that the bot actively recognized the male 'virile member', that would be your inference. The AI department is in the next building from mine, two floors down. And as for the final point, I'll assume you're just being diligent here and not being mean. The reason I bring this up in the first place is that the image subject is a notable intersex activist and having this happen here can be construed as egregiously offensive, as you can imagine. Hence my genuine concern here. I notice it's not just her image that's affected. Let's see what the bot owner has to say ... - Alison ❤ 09:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Category:Intersex activists -> Category:Intersexuality -> Category:Hermaphroditism -> Category:Genitalia by gender -> Category:Genitalia -> Category:Erogenous zones -> Category:Eroticism -> Category:Nudity or partial nudity. We should probably put a filter on one of the first three categories. I'll leave the decision up to you as to which. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. To be honest, everything from Category:Hermaphroditism up should go. None of these are nudity-related and, indeed, hermaphoditism shouldn't be included anyway as it relates to non-human animals these days. Thanks again - Alison ❤ 07:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Category:Intersex activists -> Category:Intersexuality -> Category:Hermaphroditism -> Category:Genitalia by gender -> Category:Genitalia -> Category:Erogenous zones -> Category:Eroticism -> Category:Nudity or partial nudity. We should probably put a filter on one of the first three categories. I'll leave the decision up to you as to which. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- To your first point, the English Wikipedia claims 'penes' to also be legit. Also, I never suggested for an instant that the bot actively recognized the male 'virile member', that would be your inference. The AI department is in the next building from mine, two floors down. And as for the final point, I'll assume you're just being diligent here and not being mean. The reason I bring this up in the first place is that the image subject is a notable intersex activist and having this happen here can be construed as egregiously offensive, as you can imagine. Hence my genuine concern here. I notice it's not just her image that's affected. Let's see what the bot owner has to say ... - Alison ❤ 09:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- The plural of penis is penises. As for why it showed up, I don't know. I will ask the bot's maintainer to come and tell us. The reason is because nudity is a parent category of one category you added to it, probably quite a few levels up. The bot is not able to actually recognise penises and only show those. If you have a way of doing that, please inform your local AI lab. As for your second point, I've seen many images with OTRS templates which never get filled for years - npd seemed prudent. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:P1080449 - Elena LENINA crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Starcross railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Camden Road railway station MMB 10 378230.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB «66 Si Yuan Centre, Amenities Building and Aspire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:London MMB I6 Birkbeck College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Retford railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «D8 River Trym.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Byland Abbey MMB 26.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «P8 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Quality_images_candidates[edit]
You wrote "arely above 2MP and rather dark. Could you brighten it please?" under my picture on page
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates
I uploaded a new version of the file...
- So I see. It still seems rather dark to me. Oh, and in future, add your reply at the QI page - that way it's easy for everyone to see you've taken on board the comments. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see you did. You need to be careful - anything after the 2nd | in a nomination isnt shown. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
 |
The Original Barnstar |
| Great contributions! Thank you! Brucebruce (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Congratulations! File:Wraxall 2012 MMB 74.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Nottingham railway station MMB 50 158777.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Jubilee Campus MMB W9 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Bristol MMB «79 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
 |
Congratulations! File:Gloucester railway station MMB 26 221132.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
