User talk:Mattbuck/Archive14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents


Quality Image Promotion

Wirksworth railway station MMB 05 101XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 05 101XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «95 Narroways Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «95 Narroways Junction.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:London_2012

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:London_2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Flickrworker (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

North Yorkshire Moors MMB 03 Fair Head Lane.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 03 Fair Head Lane.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 51.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 51.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Otterington railway station MMB 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otterington railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bedford railway station MMB 22 150109.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedford railway station MMB 22 150109.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Euston station MMB 05 313109 350235.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston station MMB 05 313109 350235.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 01 350248.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 01 350248.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pateley Bridge MMB 03 The Bridge Inn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pateley Bridge MMB 03 The Bridge Inn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Worksop railway station MMB 05 144010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 05 144010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bolton Abbey MMB 16 River Wharfe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolton Abbey MMB 16 River Wharfe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London Bridge station MMB 08 465188.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bridge station MMB 08 465188.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bethnal Green railway station MMB 03 317883.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 03 317883.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Just wanted to say hi …

… when I saw we could almost have met at Grosmont station – you took a picture there on July 7th and I did so on July 11th. Maybe next year :-) --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

oops sorry, you were there two years earlier. Anyway … --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
If it's any consolation, I was also there in September 2012. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Sea Mills railway station MMB 31.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB W5 International House.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB W5 International House.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «O7 Cabot Circus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O7 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

North Yorkshire Moors MMB 11 Hole of Horcum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 11 Hole of Horcum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB K5 Tower Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB K5 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 67.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 67.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brimham Rocks MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pickering MMB 12 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (Newbridge level crossing).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pickering MMB 12 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (Newbridge level crossing).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 78 170523.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 78 170523.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Retford railway station MMB 09.jpg

Hi, I've make a test (and also a big hell, take a look at the QIC page for this picture) and uploaded it, revert if you don't like, but if you do it you must improve your version, you can do it, I have been too faster to decline --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

QIC

Hello Mattbuck, Even if QICbot is stalled at the moment (I asked Dschwen for help), would you please have a second look on File:01 Florac Vibron.jpg nominated as QIC on August 10? It has been edited as suggested in your first review. Thanks and regards, --Myrabella (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the version you've edited. Bolder and better enhancement than mine! Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 08:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot)

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AFBorchert (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB I5 Russell Square.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB I5 Russell Square.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Beeston MMB 08 Humber Road South.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston MMB 08 Humber Road South.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB S2 Canary Wharf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB S2 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 06 377201.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 06 377201.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Open University MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open University MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB X4 Canary Wharf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB X4 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 37 57302.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 37 57302.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Idridgehay railway station MMB 02 101XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idridgehay railway station MMB 02 101XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 44 175115.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 44 175115.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanway House MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Castle Combe Circuit MMB D2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB Z3 Ancaster Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB Z3 Ancaster Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gospel Oak railway station MMB 09 172005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gospel Oak railway station MMB 09 172005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cleethorpes railway station MMB 04 185104.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 04 185104.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston-super-Mare MMB 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 34.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rowsley South railway station MMB 02 68013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rowsley South railway station MMB 02 68013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 71 156408 153XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 71 156408 153XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wolverhampton railway station MMB 12 221111.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 12 221111.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Westbury MMB 01 Fairwood Junction 43003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westbury MMB 01 Fairwood Junction 43003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Worksop railway station MMB 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough railway station MMB 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

University Park MMB O5 Science City.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB O5 Science City.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leicester railway station MMB 10 222022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 10 222022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reading railway station MMB 60 166218 458006 43131.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 60 166218 458006 43131.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB C6 395028.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB C6 395028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 83 M5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 83 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tulse Hill railway station MMB 12 319382 319373.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulse Hill railway station MMB 12 319382 319373.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rievaulx Abbey MMB 36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

West Ruislip station MMB 27 1992-Stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 27 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 54.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 54.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Runswick Bay MMB 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marylebone station MMB 26 165020 165031.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 26 165020 165031.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Derby railway station MMB 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB V3 Millennium Dome.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB V3 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Staithes MMB 43.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staithes MMB 43.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gloucester railway station MMB 05 170511.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 05 170511.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 61.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 61.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB U3 Derby Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB U3 Derby Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oakleigh Park railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oakleigh Park railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stratford station MMB 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grosmont railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosmont railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Courtesy deletions

I noticed your comment on a recent DR. I understand this page was intended to be a help page for newbies. I have no problem with that. Perhaps the concept of courtesy deletions can be first amended into the deletion policy which links to this information page (essay?). I am worried about it turning into a rivaling new deletion policy that has a vaguely defined morality and ethics at its core. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Conflict

As an active participant, you aren't allowed to close it, especially considering your relationship with the incident. You were involved in the discussion. The copyright claim is outstanding and part of the matter. You really should know better. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I made 3 comments before closing, those were:
  1. Informing Amadscientist about the erotic media available on Commons;
  2. Correcting you when you claimed that a file has to be used to be educational;
  3. Complaining about people trying to turn Commons:Courtesy into a proscriptive policy.
Not one of these is a comment about the subject of the DR, and I only have a relationship if you consider having an opinion about something a relationship. The image was within scope, and if there are copyright issues which apply to the source photo they would be better discussed in a DR of that source image, where the level of drama will be lower. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Being actively involved and having an opinion are clear denoters of a conflict of interest. You knew that there were plenty of other admin that could have closed it yet you didn't let it happen. There was also clear policy for a deletion without there being any for keep, which suggests that bias definitely played a roll. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I must agree with Ottava Rima: there are plenty of other admins who could have closed this and who did not even participate in the discussion. As a discussion participant (and also being involved in other related discussions), the conflict that arrises from your closing of this deletion request is concerning. Tucoxn (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I would have closed this the same way, but he beat me to it. --O (висчвын) 04:51, 21 August 2013 (GMT)
11 deletes with strong rationales, and no keeps with a legitimate rationale (there are only 10 keeps). Pointing to an image being kept isn't a policy based rationale especially when the image was kept because it could have been used on an article. The scope policy, which Mattbuck pretends doesn't exist, makes it clear that theoretical use is not enough to claim it is educational, and that educational does require use. That use was put in to keep porn as educational. He can't then claim that educational isn't attached to use. A lack of understanding our policies is why Russavia is being removed from a Crat, and you two are just giving evidence as to why you shouldn't be allowed to close any image related discussions. We have policies for a reason. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
It says theoretical use does not necessarily make something educational, but it nowhere states that use is required. If you required that images be used on WMF projects, we'd likely nuke about 90% of our collection. To quote:
A media file which is neither:
  • realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor
  • legitimately in use as discussed above
falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.
Note the neither/nor - if either criteria is satisfied then it is within scope. And I believe that a notable painter painting is within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I question your ability to read the English language. There was no possible way to say that this was realistically useful in any kind of way. I would think that your mere attempt to claim such is so laughable that if one was to treat it as serious that you should be immediately desysopped and banned for disruption. The mere fact that it says "In the sections below, any use that is not made in good faith does not count." makes it really clear that use is necessary. Then there is this "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons", which makes it clear that not only is use necessary for it to be educational, not all uses count as educational. Your statements are so incredibly outrageous that I hope a passing admin blocks you for disruption. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
For the record, I am not interested in debating issues about nudity and sexual content (apart from illegal stuff, obviously). I just execute based on community consensus, mostly enshrined in policies and guidelines. Deletion requests have never been and will never be vote counts. That is all I will respond; do not expect me to continue conversing about this on this user talk page. If you would like to have policy/guideline interpretations clarified, you'd best go on the talk pages of those individual policies/guidelines. For what my uninvolved self is worth, mattbuck's interpretation of our project's scope and the arguments in relation to that DR are pretty reasonable. --O (висчвын) 08:35, 22 August 2013 (GMT)
" been and will never be vote counts" Yep, and that is why this was a clear delete. The opposes point out lack of use which is necessary for sexual content like that. There clearly was none and none of the supporters provided a policy based reason. Administrator tools require actual upholding of our policies. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
O, thanks for taking the time to review Mattbuck's actions as an admin in this case. I doubt that you could add anything more here and based on Ottava Rima's statements above, he is unlikely to find anything else but a block or ban for Mattbuck and the others on his declared target black list as sufficient. Thanks -- (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Without commenting on whether the closure was correct or not, it is quite obvious that Matt shouldn't have closed it. As one of the most vocal and opinionated supporters of the pricasso thing, he should have recused himself. Do you not see how it puts yourself into a position that could have been avoided? Rather than the closure decision being reviewed on purely procedural grounds, it gets personal. Matt's post at AN/User to ask for OR to be blocked is also inappropriate. Again, I'm not judging here whether OR has "gone beyond the pale" but whether Matt should be the one calling for his head. You guys are fighting, so really the most I'd expect Matt to do is find some detached wise owl and ask them to review and suggest what should be done. Please take this as good-faith advice, that your wiki-friends should be offering you rather than than leaping to defence. Admins should be working hard to be seen to be impartial and fair, not just being impartial and fair, and avoid personal or conflicting situations when someone else could handle it. Colin (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Colin, that was well-expressed, especially the part about the detached wise owl. Mattbuck, It looks like another user agreed about the closing, here. Perhaps it would be a good idea to find a way to get this misstep behind you. Maybe a detached wise owl will have some advice on how to do this. Tucoxn (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't claim to be an uncontroversial admin, I tend to take action where other people might not, and yes I get involved in some high profile cases. However in regards to Ottava I don't see why I shouldn't have been the one to request he be banned. In fact, as one of his more frequent targets, it seems perfectly sensible for me to request it. If someone else had brought it up I would not have closed it, as yes that would be a conflict of interest, but someone needed to bring it up and frankly Ottava hates me anyway so this way he doesn't spit his venom at anyone else.
As for the closure, I am happy with the way I acted. Admins cannot be impartial on DRs, they have to make a decision, and that means they end up having an opinion on it. Frankly I'm a bit ambivalent about the whole thing, and if it were for instance Russavia who was videoed making the picture I would delete that as Russavia is not a notable painter. But, like it or not, Pricasso is. A video of a notable painter painting is without doubt within our scope - ask yourself, were this a painter who painted using brushes, would we be having the slightest controversy? Clearly no, it would be snow-closed as within scope. The same applies here in my view. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
That is a good argument, but entirely besides the point. The issue is that you are seen as heavily involved in the whole "porn on Commons" issue, as you are very active on most discussions regarding it. Thus, you should not also be the person to close contentious discussions regarding the same issue. --Conti| 21:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
While I understand your point, I don't quite agree. If I'd seen the DR when it started, I would have closed it immediately on the grounds that nothing had changed since the last DR and there was no point rehashing. I tend to be proactive and make the decisions other people won't. To some that can seem like being involved, but I tend to believe that someone has to make the decisions, so why not me. Would you argue that because I am involved in "porn on commons" issues I shouldn't close a nudity DR as delete? Most people I think would say no, I'd quite possibly be the perfect person to close as delete because I have more knowledge about the repository we have. In that case it seems an unusual contradiction in that you can only ever delete that which you consider important, and people with little to know knowledge of the subject are the only ones who can choose to keep things. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't say you should keep out of nudity DRs entirely, no. More often than not, they is a very clear consensus to either keep or delete the image, and so it would not be at all controversial if you would close the discussions correspondingly. However, in this case, the DR was clearly going to be controversial, and it would have been best to let an entirely uninvolved admin close the discussion. There is no cost in doing so, and it easily avoids further potential controversy. --Conti| 23:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Matt, I think you've made the mistake lots of people get into (at work or in a club for example) when people become so involved they think they are indispensable, of thinking their experience and knowledge makes them the best person to do something, and to over-rate how important and how much Commons needs you to be the one closing or opening, etc. Your "I'd quite possibly be the perfect person" is an example of this thinking. It is the sort of thinking that makes people reluctant to retire as a club secretary long after they should have, for example, because they can't see how anyone else in the club could do their job as well. But when they do, they realise the world doesn't end and the club carries on and the new guy grows into the job just like they did. I'm not at all suggesting you retire or trying to silence you but I do think you perhaps need to realise that Commons doesn't need you (or any one person for that matter). Rather than the (positive sounding) "I tend to be proactive", what comes across is more "I tend to think my judgement is required in many situations", and "I tend to act before thinking of how it might look". Your experience here is valuable and you (unlike some) aren't just a windbag. If you let other admins close in situations where you personally are strongly involved or you have strong opinions (like pricasso) then you'll find they are capable too. To consider otherwise is rather insulting to them, is it not? If you have strong opinions, make a comment at the discussion rather than close it. I don't think you are quite right about admins/opinions/closure -- for example an admin should be able to close a discussion in a way that their opinion disagrees with. An admin should be able to say "Personally, I'd keep/delete this, but the community has argued otherwise and their argument (while I disagree with it) has merit". Remember, an admin is not a more important person and their opinion is not more important than that of the plebes. I'm not arguing whether the closure was correct or not, but just that you shouldn't have done it. I'm not suggesting you steer clear of all porn DRs, but with the pricsasso video, you are possibly (with the exception of russavia) the least appropriate admin to close it. Colin (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
I have to concur with Colins statement above. I could not have written it more precisely myself. I am sure that both you, I and many other are sick and tired of the ever relentless polarized 'cabal' claims, which pop up following these incidents, but you are not helping by doing these kinds of closures, knowing your view points on the balance between the value of having media in scope and the possible harm by hosting them. Actually, the more times this happens, as this is certainly not the first time that you are to a small or larger extent involved or have a very strong opinion of the discussions you close, I am beginning to doubt myself if you are actually capable of making the right decisions in these kinds of closures. That said, you are a valuable and hard working contributor, but maybe you should have more confidence in that actually, one of your fellow admins will eventually stand up and make the controversial closures and fill the gap - even if it takes a little longer time than you would have originally hoped for. --Slaunger (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
You may be right, I shall try and refrain from such actions in future. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
That is great to hear. Thanks for listening. --Slaunger (talk) 07:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Clevedon MMB 90 Pier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 90 Pier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB V1 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB V1 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hornbeam Park railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornbeam Park railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine

hello! i am really glad that you have decided to join our jury. thank you very much! i would need your e-mail for contacting you. just drop me a line or two, ok? --antanana 21:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Wraxall 2010 MMB 25 Smudge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2010 MMB 25 Smudge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wessex Main Line MMB 02 159003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wessex Main Line MMB 02 159003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thirsk MMB 01 A170 Sutton Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thirsk MMB 01 A170 Sutton Road.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «P7 Cabot Circus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «P7 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Staithes MMB 42.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staithes MMB 42.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 79 170523.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 79 170523.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham MMB I4 Meriden Avenue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I4 Meriden Avenue.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Camden Road railway station MMB 19 66501.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 19 66501.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

You and Ottava Rima

Hi Mattbuck,

I just want to caution you about certain comments with regards to Ottava Rima. Edits like this are simply going to make him angrier and your tag teaming on IRC to get him to lose his talk page and email access was not your finest moment. I know you mean well and don't intend harm, but it doesn't take much more than a sarcastic comment to enflame him. I tried to help on his talk page, but he continued his anger there. I will comment at here when I get a chance, but just be cautious and let me know if anything else occurs, albeit you probably can handle it yourself :) Happy editing, Mattbuck. --WorldTraveller101  T  C  G  E 01:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

m:Requests for comment/Global ban for Ottava Rima

(Copy of the message sent by email out of laziness now that I'm done with the steps per policy; I'm busy today and won't be online for a while.)


Please add to the first section
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_ban_for_Ottava_Rima

Nemo

--Nemo 10:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Marylebone station MMB 08 168216.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 08 168216.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 69 Pier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 69 Pier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Northampton railway station MMB 04 350266.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northampton railway station MMB 04 350266.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stratford station MMB 17 378XXX 378219.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 17 378XXX 378219.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redland railway station MMB 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redland railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

CA ?

Hi !
I'm french and I don't know what is CA... Bourgeois.A (talk) 09:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Aberration chromatique (en: Chromatic Aberration, CA). -mattbuck (Talk) 12:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I understand, but I do not know how to fix them. Bourgeois.A (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Photoshop has a function called "Lens Correction" which I generally use as the first thing to do when editing a photo. That does a fair amount of fixing of CA. Any more has to be done manually by painting it out or desaturating the area using the sponge tool. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
OK thank you, I'll test it. Bourgeois.A (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 11:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Sexuality user galleries

Please see Commons:Village_pump#NSFW_-_unexpected_inclusion_of_images_in_a_user.27s_sexuality_gallery.3F. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Limehouse station MMB 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wraxall 2012 MMB 43 Smudge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 43 Smudge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB 45 395018 395017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 45 395018 395017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham MMB 93 Goose Fair.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 93 Goose Fair.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rievaulx Abbey MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Castle Combe Circuit MMB C6 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C6 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

University Park MMB »24 Unilink 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB »24 Unilink 34.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Retford railway station MMB 02 180101.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 02 180101.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sutton Bank MMB 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Train image category vandalism

I see you've been reverting a lot of anonymous vandalism recently. File:Helensburgh Central 334020 334030.jpg has been done twice this week so I've been reverting a few of these edits myself. Geof Sheppard (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

To make your job easier, you now have rollback and filemove rights. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 April 1-10

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 April 1-10 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Civility Barnstar Hires.png The Civility Barnstar
For all your stomaching. -- Tuválkin 21:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Doncaster railway station MMB 04 185136.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doncaster railway station MMB 04 185136.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tamworth railway station MMB 54.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 54.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Patchway railway station MMB 32 150120.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 32 150120.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lily Allen gig Nottingham 2009 MMB 26 Professor Green.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lily Allen gig Nottingham 2009 MMB 26 Professor Green.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB U8 River Thames.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB U8 River Thames.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough MMB 44.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 44.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Pont Maréchal Foch, Sète, Hérault 04.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, I don't understand why you not promote my picture, you say 'Needs perspective correction on left' but the background, the bridge and all the rest are straights, please add notes but if your reference is the fence, it is not good because is leaning in all directions, for prove take a look at this File:Sadi-Carnot Bridge, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg it is the same fence in foreground --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Removal of thousands of sorted photos from Scottish counties

I spent many months sorting out tens of thousands of photos that were placed in Scottish counties and conducted this laborious sorting with the knowledge of a wikimedia.commons Administrator. Then that Administrator decided that he didn't want the photos to be sorted into Scottish counties and tries to convince people that Scottish counties now do not exist. They do. They are used for Land Registration purposes, maps have been made of their boundaries as noted in Acts of Parliament, there are Lord Lieutenants of those counties, there are Chambers of Commerce for those counties, there are several Country Women's Associations in each county with their county name, etc. etc. Now there has been widespread vandalism of Scottish counties both on wikipedia and wikimedia.commons where whole county categories have been deleted. You can say I am more than hopping mad, and it does not help when this situation of widespread vandalism is occurring and seemingly condoned. It makes a widespread mockery of both wikipedia and wikimedia. Scotire (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Maps of county boundaries noted in Acts of the Scottish Parliament 2009 - the counties are not "former"

  • The Scottish Government CAN authorize county maps, and they CAN be purchased. The maps of the boundaries of the Counties or Shires of Scotland are recorded in the 2009 Acts of the Scottish Parliament, Scottish Statutory Instruments 2009 No. 171. Registers and records. The Fees in the Registers of Scotland Amendment Order 2009. Made 29th April 2009. Coming into force 31st May 2009. Registers of Scotland. Data set of registration county boundaries. 150 pounds. http://www.lawalphabet.com/document_ssi-2009-171 Scotire (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Local Government areas have changed with changes to Local Governments

The Local Government areas have been changed a number of times during the last 100 years. By placing the photos in the Local Government areas, those areas probably will be changed in the future, and those photos will be in the wrong place. The PLACE is where the photo should be, and that place is the COUNTY. Those people that are vandalizing wikimedia.commons by removing photos and categories from Scottish counties should be blocked. Instead, you say that I should be blocked for pointing out this vandalism. By blocking me from any input in the discussion page, it was similar to gagging the press. Scotire (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You were only blocked for three days. You could have asked to be unblocked on your Talk page, and/or asked for comments to be added to the RFC. As it is, you continue to raise this issue almost anywhere but in the RFC, which is still open for community discussion, and has about a week to run. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Need help

Hi Mattbuck, can you help me please? You have put to my talk page an archive, but I don't know what to do, I've renamed my current talk page in 'User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive2' and now I am lost, take a look please. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You need to modify the Abox template to add the new archive. I've done that. The steps for doing it all are:
  1. Move talk page to /Archive9 or similar.
  2. Recreate User talk:Christian Ferrer with {{User talk:Christian Ferrer/Abox}}
  3. Update User talk:Christian Ferrer/Abox to add the new archive page.
-mattbuck (Talk) 14:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Chartreuse de la Verne 2013 01.JPG

Hi dear Mattbuck, you have decline this file, I've tried to improve it, can you take a look please? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

About Ohmi Railway logo deletion

Hi, Mattbuck.

I am writing you to ask about the deletion of the Ohmi Railway logo I realized for Wikipedia. I guess I cannot consider myself an expert Wikipedia user, however it wasn't the first time that I realized by myself a corporate logo to put it into Wikipedia commons. I know that it is forbidden to upload into commons copyrighted pictures and logos found in the internet. In fact I tried to draw it by myself by referring to the original, as I did also in other occasions.

If you could suggest me how to do in order to keep the logo I would be glad.

Thank you!

--Dabikun (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dabikun. I checked your other logos, and judged them to be {{PD-ineligible}} due to simplicity. However, this one looked more complex than most. If you drew it yourself, I'm afraid that doesn't make things better as it's then a derivative work of copyrighted work, rather than just a copyrighted image to begin with. Think of it like taking a photo of a photo. I'm not sure that this one can be kept on Commons, though if you want a second opinion I'd be happy to undelete and send it to a deletion request instead. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB «45 Melton Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «45 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Shottle railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shottle railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ealing Broadway station MMB 04 360204.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ealing Broadway station MMB 04 360204.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 80 M5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 80 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 49 185101.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 49 185101.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough MMB 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 21.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB F8 Mathematics and Physics Building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB F8 Mathematics and Physics Building.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grantham MMB 01 Nottingham to Grantham Line 158847.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grantham MMB 01 Nottingham to Grantham Line 158847.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dudley Port railway station MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Croydon station MMB 06 171801 377XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 06 171801 377XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «H1 Clifton.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H1 Clifton.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sheffield station MMB 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Byland Abbey MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tamworth railway station MMB 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Long Eaton railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Eaton railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 18 158799.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 18 158799.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please be respectful to uploaders

Mattbuck, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Freshly shaved and powdered pussy.jpg you gave the deletion reason as "Low quality genitalia". The images may be of low quality, but you are not in position to make statements about the genitalia themselves. I have asked you once before to stop doing this and I assumed you had. This behaviour is inappropriate for an admin. Please stop. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Wraxall 2013 MMB 63 Bonfire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 63 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sutton Bank MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Netherfield railway station MMB 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Matlock Riverside railway station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matlock Riverside railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

DR

You may wish to comment on this one as well from the same uploader. Fry1989 eh? 00:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Starbeck railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rievaulx Abbey MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham Autokarna MMB 08 Ford Escort and Vauxhall Chevette.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 08 Ford Escort and Vauxhall Chevette.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

about deletion

Hi, Mattbuck !

I could see that all my pictures are under control for eventual deletion !

1st - I noticed that I cannot make a picture that contains others, because of the copyright problem and I understand that you removed them. OK.

2nd - some old pictures (postcards) are not mine (see Category:Ocna_Sibiului_de_altă_dată) and I now understood how to change the licence ; I wrote

Public domain This file is in the public domain, because anonymous old postcard (over 70 years)

In case this is not legally possible:
The right to use this work is granted to anyone for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.


Dialog-warning.svg Please verify that the reason given above complies with Commons' licensing policy.

I hope, it's OK. If not, please tell me.

3rd - I did'nt know about the "watermark" problem in wikimedia. So you can delete the "watermarked" pictures from
- "Category:Anonymous people of Paris" (number 02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-13-16-19-20-22-30-33-36-40-48-49-54-71-74-93-94-96-97),
- "Category:People at the Champ-de-Mars" (pictures number 11-12-23-24),
- "Category:Rue du Commerce (Paris)" (number 23 and 33),
- "Category:Square Saint-Lambert (Paris)" (number 15-16-17-18),
- "Category:Allée des Cygnes (Paris)" (number 09).
I can upload them again without watermark ; just tell me about it. I look further for other "watermarked" pictures and then, I'll tell you.

I think that pictures of my own are'nt a problem for wikimedia, are'nt they ?

Thanks for your help, and excuse my english !--Martin Greslou (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Thirsk railway station MMB 03.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, I've edited your file, what do you think? (if you manage to open it, me only with ZoomViewer: flash) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Sexuality categories

In order for the bot to continue creating the sexuality galleries, please tell me that you agree to the TOS at User:OgreBot/gallery/warning. It comes down to: 1) they're your responsibility to monitor, and 2) if someone removes an image because it is miscategorized, please don't reinstate it.

Also, if you want to combine the galleries into one, that option is now available. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Tat's a redlink but fine, and yes, please do combine nudity and sexuality. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Er, User:OgreBot/gallery/notice. My preview button must be broken. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
They're now both at User:Mattbuck/Sexuality. If you want to put it in a different gallery name, change it at any time. Also, I think you won't find the disclaimer especially onerous; and if you find it really onerous anyway, the source code is available under a free license, and you can run it yourself and not worry about it. But really, the disclaimer is a good idea IMO so there should be no reason to go without it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Southampton Central railway station MMB 35 444003 444017 158881 444035 66124.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 35 444003 444017 158881 444035 66124.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Byland Abbey MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «E3 Lenton & Wortley Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «E3 Lenton & Wortley Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grantham railway station MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston Milton railway station MMB 06 150232.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston Milton railway station MMB 06 150232.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gloucester railway station MMB 07 170511.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 07 170511.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «F2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «F2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reading MMB 20 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading MMB 20 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reading railway station MMB 71 43032 221132.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 71 43032 221132.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Deletion of Abu Dhabi images

Hi!! why you request deletion of picture being shoot by our own works?--Neogeolegend (talk) 01:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Because there is no Freedom of Panorama in Abu Dhabi. Unless you personally took the photos that make up the poster, this is a derivatibe work of non-free content. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hola Hay imagenes mia de Abu Dhabi que estan propuestas para ser borradas, quisiera saber la razon de ello. Un saludo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto-g-rovi (talk • contribs)

Please see above - there is no Freedom of Panorama in Abu Dhabi, which means that if you take a photo of a building it is a derivative of a copyrighted work. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Sigh...

Hi Mattbuck, I'm sure you are already tired of this, but since your name was mentioned, just in case you want to add something, check this out Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Biographies_of_Living_Persons_and_Defamation. --Dschwen (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 39.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 39.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jervaulx Abbey MMB 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 18.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Can you change yours votes please ?

I have done the necessary work :

Bourgeois.A (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, on holiday, back Monday. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 10 D3462.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 10 D3462.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «I1 South Wales Main Line.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I1 South Wales Main Line.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham MMB I2 A6464 Woodside Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I2 A6464 Woodside Road.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wraxall 2013 MMB 86 Bonfire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 86 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 08 1995-Stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 08 1995-Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Birmingham MMB 02 Grand Junction 43207.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birmingham MMB 02 Grand Junction 43207.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

King's Cross railway station MMB 99.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 99.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tulse Hill railway station MMB 01 319375.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulse Hill railway station MMB 01 319375.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB P2 Riverside South.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB P2 Riverside South.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grosmont Depot MMB 08 30926.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosmont Depot MMB 08 30926.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB I9 Graduation.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB I9 Graduation.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Shadwell railway station MMB 07 378151.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadwell railway station MMB 07 378151.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fountains Abbey MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountains Abbey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

West Ruislip station MMB 04 165037.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 04 165037.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Croydon station MMB 20 2530.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 20 2530.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB A2 150221.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB A2 150221.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thomas

Thomas at Buckfastleigh railway station.jpg
D7612 at Buckfastleigh railway station.jpg

I've just uploaded the photos to right from the aftermath of a Thomas event on the South Devon Railway. However a few questions for someone more familiar with train categorisation:

  1. What locomotive is this Thomas - any idea?
  2. How to categorise this and other diesel locomotives, or for that matter, other rolling stock? Category:Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends (real steam locomotives) is obviously inappropriate; a broader cat might be useful.
  3. And an unpleasant thought... I wonder if FOP is an issue? After all these are in copyright (the original books don't become PD until 2067), and aren't permanent...--Nilfanion (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Steam locomotives are not my strong point, so no idea on that. For diesel stuff, just chuck it in via the standard {{ukt}} template and add the Thomas parent category, BR MkX stuff can be done by {{ukc}}, but I have nothing for other stock. FoP... hard to say really, I think we assume not until something else happens. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Generally for unidentified trains, I ask at en:WT:UKRAIL. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, think I will drop a line there, thanks.--Nilfanion (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 20 390046.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 20 390046.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Harringay railway station MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Beeston MMB 38 Fireworks.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston MMB 38 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB P4 River Thames.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB P4 River Thames.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI possibility

I see you're an active contributor to Commons:QIC, so I'd like to ask for advice. How do you think, if an image was prepared in film age, may it be QI? Let us take two examples: File:Pn-shilov-n-d-2001-02.jpg and File:Pn-borozdna-a-p-2001-gazette.jpg. Thank you. --Переславская неделя (talk) 00:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not impossible, but I'm not sold on that as QI - quite noisy, and blurred at the edges. That said I'm generally a very hard judge, so you might get lucky, and I'm not sure I'd decline that one, just wouldn't promote it either. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Second one definitely no - chromatic noise and noticable chromatic aberration. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Where did you find chromatic aberration? I will try to reduce. --Переславская неделя (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I usually do not interrupt running discussions between two persons but Переславская неделя, please keep in mind that the QI-guidelines require that the creator of an image must be a Wikimedian in order to be a possible QI-candidate. The images you present above are not a Wikimedian's work. As such there's no chance for a QI-badge. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for comment. This means, no film shot may become QI, for people who made film shots rarely become the WikiCommons users. Everything's clear now :-). But maybe something from this collection can award some other badge?--Переславская неделя (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol MMB «O5 Cabot Circus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O5 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Westbury railway station MMB 30 59203.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 30 59203.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Croydon station MMB 15 377514.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 15 377514.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «Z0 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «Z0 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scotire

Hi Matt. I've revoked talkpage access for Scotire due to some serious personal attack statements he made. I've reverted the last two and rev-del'd them. They concerned you and a couple others. It might be better to indef block his account now, especially with an edit like this but I'll leave that up to you. INeverCry 23:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

(Note) The IP 59.167.60.9 blocked by Hedwig is Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed to be Scotire. It's static, so should be watched for continued abuse after the month block is up. INeverCry 01:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, indefed. That behaviour is never acceptable. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
I've extended the IP block to one year. INeverCry 07:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Otterington railway station MMB 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otterington railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Parson Street railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parson Street railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB S9 Cripps Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB S9 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Westbury railway station MMB 36 158767.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 36 158767.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham Autokarna MMB 18 Routemaster RM108 (VLT 108).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 18 Routemaster RM108 (VLT 108).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 53.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 53.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Retford railway station MMB 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB B1 67024.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB B1 67024.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «I2 Bristol to Exeter Line 220004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I2 Bristol to Exeter Line 220004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wraxall 2011 MMB 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reading railway station MMB 49 220013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 49 220013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Amersham station MMB 11 5521.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 11 5521.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 58.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 58.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bethnal Green railway station MMB 01 317652 317664 90013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 01 317652 317664 90013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

NRM Locomotion MMB 04 "Light Engine".jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NRM Locomotion MMB 04 "Light Engine".jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Farringdon station MMB 11 C-Stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 11 C-Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Beeston MMB A9 Boundary Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston MMB A9 Boundary Road.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stockport railway station MMB 08 390028.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 08 390028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Castle Combe Circuit MMB D5 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D5 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Reading MMB 25 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading MMB 25 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Netherfield railway station MMB 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Natasha Falle

Hi Matt,

I noticed that you deleted the photos I uploaded of Natasha Falle. I just saw the messages from you saying that I need to send in the permissions to OTRS. I already sent the permissions to OTRS a long time ago. Were the e-mails not received? I am about to upload several photos of Tara Teng and had planned on sending the permissions to OTRS the same way I did before. Should I be doing something differently? Also, I have been trying to merge my Commons "Ambassador Neelix" account with my Wikipedia "Neelix" account, but that has not been working. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Ambassador Neelix (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

South Otterington MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Amersham station MMB 19 S Stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 19 S Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «A5 Canary Wharf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «A5 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «45 City Canal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «45 City Canal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «B1 Millennium Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «B1 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Clevedon MMB 99 M5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 99 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gospel Oak railway station MMB 21 172007.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gospel Oak railway station MMB 21 172007.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham MMB G2 Market Square.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB G2 Market Square.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rievaulx Terrace MMB 22 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 22 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 72.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 72.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «H7 Cross Country Route 43207.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H7 Cross Country Route 43207.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Parkend railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parkend railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

King's Cross railway station MMB 57.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 57.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB K2 Tower Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB K2 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «64 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «64 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 88.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 88.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sutton Bank MMB 23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 77.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 77.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hillingdon tube station MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB S7 Cripps Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB S7 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hucknall station MMB 01 156414.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hucknall station MMB 01 156414.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB «27 Westferry Circus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «27 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fenchurch Street railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fenchurch Street railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leicester railway station MMB 11 222010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 11 222010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Golden Gate Bridge File:Golden Gate Bridge in fog from Pier 39 2013.jpg

Hi Mattbuck! Thanks for your comment on the photo mentioned in the caption. IMHO perspective is a bit tricky here (the bridge is not straight), thus could you add one or more notes how the perspective should be. Thanks. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

I've uploaded a new version. Could you take another look? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

York railway station MMB 49 185120.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! York railway station MMB 49 185120.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 38.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 38.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Whitechapel station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Whitechapel station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Croydon station MMB 09 455841.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 09 455841.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «34 City Canal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «34 City Canal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Levisham railway station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Levisham railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB 61 222005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 61 222005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 60.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 60.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Clevedon MMB 37 Pier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 37 Pier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB R3 Docklands Light Railway.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB R3 Docklands Light Railway.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 47.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 47.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB V8 New Providence Wharf and Ontario Tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB V8 New Providence Wharf and Ontario Tower.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blackhorse Road station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cardiff Central railway station MMB 35 43017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 35 43017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

University Park MMB «D6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «D6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Deletion of a file

Hello, can you please delete this file, I've uploaded a better png version. Thank you--باسم (talk) 22:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Delete an SVG for a PNG? No, not happening. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bethnal Green railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Runswick Bay MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Patchway railway station MMB 26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Byland Abbey MMB 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB T9 Pierhead Lock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB T9 Pierhead Lock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cardiff Central railway station MMB 22 153362 150127.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 22 153362 150127.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «71 River Thames.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «71 River Thames.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 98.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 98.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «77 Cabot Square.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «77 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Castle Combe Circuit MMB G8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB G8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

University Park MMB «F1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University Park MMB «F1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Railfest 2012 MMB 87 DR98923 92032.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 87 DR98923 92032.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Coventry railway station MMB 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coventry railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

North Yorkshire Moors MMB 12 Hole of Horcum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 12 Hole of Horcum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luton Airport Parkway railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pickering MMB 04 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (New Bridge Signal Box).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pickering MMB 04 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (New Bridge Signal Box).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Open University MMB 11 Alan Turing Building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open University MMB 11 Alan Turing Building.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston-super-Mare MMB 92 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 92 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Amersham station MMB 33.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 33.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grantham railway station MMB 56 91115.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 56 91115.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Victoria station MMB 02 455825 455838.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 02 455825 455838.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 06 365XXX 365529.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 06 365XXX 365529.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 41 185135.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 41 185135.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 98.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 98.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clifton Down railway station MMB 15 150221.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clifton Down railway station MMB 15 150221.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Liverpool Street station MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liverpool Street station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cum_pool video

Is that you? If so I would like you to know that I would love to suck you off and take in your whole load of cum.

It's not. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Gloucester railway station MMB 09 170511.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 09 170511.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

South Otterington MMB 06 Coverdale.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 06 Coverdale.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

South Otterington MMB 03 Station Farm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 03 Station Farm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough MMB 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marton MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marton MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

West Croydon station MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 62 Pier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 62 Pier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 09 390037 390046.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 09 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Cardiff Central railway station MMB 21 66086.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 21 66086.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough MMB 18 Harbour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 18 Harbour.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB 71 Polish War Memorial.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB 71 Polish War Memorial.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 39 43012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 39 43012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB Y9 City Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB Y9 City Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Limehouse station MMB 04 357021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 04 357021.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB 22 43047.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 22 43047.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paddington station MMB 31.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Carlton railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 22.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oxyman (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB C7 150106 153369.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB C7 150106 153369.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston-super-Mare MMB 93 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 93 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dudley Port railway station MMB 21 170506.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 21 170506.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB «65.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «65.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Charing Cross station MMB 13 375813 375808 465043 465008.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 13 375813 375808 465043 465008.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB A1 M5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB A1 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB «A9 Wood Wharf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «A9 Wood Wharf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB T8 Newark Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB T8 Newark Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wraxall 2013 MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Acton Works MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «D2 Cabot Square.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «D2 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB «51 The Atrium.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «51 The Atrium.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aysgarth Falls MMB 23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham MMB K1 Lenton South Junction 222008.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB K1 Lenton South Junction 222008.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leicester railway station MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leyburn railway station MMB 11 20166.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 11 20166.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Netherfield MMB 01 Meadow Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Netherfield MMB 01 Meadow Road.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paddington station MMB 89.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 89.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

London MMB «05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB «05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rievaulx Abbey MMB 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Glaisdale railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaisdale railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rievaulx Terrace MMB 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 18.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Staithes MMB 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staithes MMB 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 13 390037.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 13 390037.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «41 River Trym.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «41 River Trym.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB A6 319447.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB A6 319447.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 34 158864.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 34 158864.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Leicester railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clevedon MMB 82 M5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 82 M5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

WLM 2013 in Ukraine

Thank you for your work!--Anatoliy (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy to help. I do like how on the website I'm the only one whose name isn't cyrillic. It was fun, I should get in on more of these things. Where do I see the winners' page? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
We write your username instead of name and surname because you said that you prefer to use username, as I remember. The page with winners is not yet ready.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
I actually meant I wanted to be referred to as "mattbuck", but bit late now, so no worries. Just drop me a line when I can see the results. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Now I add finalists here (I shuffle the images there now, we will say real places for winners at the victory ceremony ;)). Later we will publish about them on the wlm.org.ua website.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati with his chess variants(Invented).JPG

Hi, I don't do a lot of work on Commons so please forgive me if this is a FAQ but why was this photo deleted? The reason given was "Contains identifiable personal information." but I'm pretty sure the picture was uploaded by the subject or his father. --NeilN (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm willing to accept it was uploaded by the child's father, but it seems to me that blasting the name, age, school, etc of your child over the internet is an incredibly bad idea. Beyond that, the whole series was pretty much an advertisement. -mattbuck (Talk)
The info is already out there (e.g., [1], [2]]). I agree the family goes overboard with promotion but I'm just looking to get the best pictures in the article. How can I get it restored? --NeilN (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
You're right, I overreacted. I have restored them and got rid of the War and Peace that made up titles and descriptions. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Matt! --NeilN (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Leyburn railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB L3 The Exchange.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB L3 The Exchange.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 37 43299 43296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 37 43299 43296.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Nottingham MMB K9 Lenton North Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham MMB K9 Lenton North Junction.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Railfest 2012 MMB 83 37419.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 83 37419.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Template:QICpromoted/layout

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted