User talk:MaybeMaybeMaybe/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MaybeMaybeMaybe!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Splitting per year

Hi!

I am not sure I see any compelling reason to split Category:Milo_Ventimiglia per year, given the number of files present in the category. Thoughts?

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to make sure you saw my message. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi sorry I had missed it for the ones below. I feel by year is easier even with smaller numbers as it lets you find images appropriate for certain articles like if i was editing an article relevant to season one of heroes and I was looking for an image as he was then. Also his look varies a lot between years and roles like with the latest film where he has buffed up for the nude scenes. I should be getting more images from flicky also which should bring up the numbers in the various years.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:I am pictured here with Austin at BJs Nxs~Dallas on 5-16-12 (7238044974).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I am pictured here with Austin at BJs Nxs~Dallas on 5-16-12 (7238044974).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:HOLLYWOOD GOES PURPLE~THE FINALE (7752036772).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:HOLLYWOOD GOES PURPLE~THE FINALE (7752036772).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Steven Ponce @ Drama Room in Dallas on 4-20-12. (6963257976).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Steven Ponce @ Drama Room in Dallas on 4-20-12. (6963257976).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Sexy Evan Mercy pictured here at Tin Room Dallas on 5-18-12. (7244644914).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sexy Evan Mercy pictured here at Tin Room Dallas on 5-18-12. (7244644914).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Last Splash 2012 (7941329642).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Last Splash 2012 (7941329642).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Spencer Reed, Jake Bass, Lionel Galvan & Seth Knight (7852913312).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Spencer Reed, Jake Bass, Lionel Galvan & Seth Knight (7852913312).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Sexy Dancer @ BJs NXS (7871880232).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sexy Dancer @ BJs NXS (7871880232).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

High Contrast (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I have blocked you in order you have the time to read the Commons regulations, I have listed above. Thank you for a positive support. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Celebrating 10 years, 6 million men, 7 continents and ONLY ONE MANHUNT. AYE MIRA!! (6278916355).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Celebrating 10 years, 6 million men, 7 continents and ONLY ONE MANHUNT. AYE MIRA!! (6278916355).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Are you uploading my entire Flickr photostream to Commons?

?! Is it worth it?! I can't stop you but... you know! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry if it is a problem but I was looking for a few large batches of cc images to try the commons transfer things with and yours were good and well labeled so they mostly went into proper categories. Your animal and bird works espcially are great as they are clear and always have the latin names. Your pride pics are also great as the uk prides aren't as well covered on here over all.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. No it's fine, it's just that every time I look there seems to be more! I want to tag them all as being by me and put them in my category, then add them to my watchlist and put them on my userpage, so as I do that I will correct the categories where it's needed - for example Singer Corportation is a company that makes sewing machines, so the singers have come out of there, and Fairlands is a town in some other part of the country while Fairlands Valley Park is the park in Stevenage where I took the pictures. I'll get through everything eventually! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh yes and I've tagged some for deletion because I actually didn't mean to use CC licences for pictures of my friends! A lot of my pics are already up here so there might be some duplicates - I already found one. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Apologies if I have accidentally put your private ones on here. The duplication checker is quite good but a couple may slip through. The commons transfer thing is sometimes better though as it copies in the flickr number and location info for where the images were taken as well as description text given.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC) If you want them all in your category have you tried using HOTCAT to batch copy?MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk)

Not your fault, I should have made sure I changed the licence on those photos when I uploaded them! Hotcat, I use that on Wikipedia, I suppose I need to get using it on here too. Though also I want to edit the pages anyway so they link to my Commons userpage rather than my Flickr page, so people can contact me on Commons about my photos on Commons if they need to. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Just realised I can probably use AWB to do a big batch... AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Cat-a-lot sorry it was this I meant rather than hotcat but both would probably have uses here.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:55, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll check that out. I can't use AWB here because I'm only approved to use it on en-wiki. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:DSCF0294 (244425058).jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

Senator2029 12:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:DSCF0293 (244424003).jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

Senator2029 14:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Karen Gillan (5922089585).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karen Gillan (5922089585).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Senator2029 04:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Uploading Flickr photos

I can see that you are prolific in copying photos from Flickr to Commons, and your enthusiasm to make contributions is certainly welcome and appreciated. However, one has to think that it is of little lasting value if the photos aren't properly named, described, and categorized. Additionally, the indiscriminate uploading of all photos that are acceptably licensed does not benefit the purposes of Commons. For starters, we are not meant to be a mirror of Flickr. I would ask you to be more selective in your choice of photos you transfer. One or two good photos of a subject are better than uploading a dozen of mediocre quality. I'd like to thank you in advance for your cooperation. Senator2029 04:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

I am going through the batches as the come in and using hotcat and catmore to better categorize them and sort them out.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 09:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
I have to agree about being more selective! I've found loads more of my photos now on here and I'm wondering why Commons would need photos of a house I moved out of, or some of my lower quality photos of unidentified spiders, or hair samples, or my personal book collection, or test shots of bubbles, or low quality macro shots, or experimental shots out my front door, or my actual back door. Also loads are already on here! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Not to mention screen caps from Flickr videos! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
For the most part now I have the hang of it I am looking for and adding free use images of notable people who are poorly covered. I am checking more and removing pics with dsc names and reviewing and removing genreally in the preview things before uploading.At the start a few probably got caught with the batch but I am using the tag sorting functions and deselecting everything and picking out things one by one when working with mixed bag photos.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok then. To be honest, I wasn't bothered about using a Commons-compatible licence for lots of pictures on Flickr because I never thought they'd make it onto here! But now they have. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
By the way I'll soon have some pics of Kitty Brucknell and Aleks Josh ready, taken with Wikipedia in mind! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Cool. It will be good to get pics of them on here especially when someone good with a camera has taken them. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Well it was dark and they were performing on stage so not all the pictures are brilliant, especially the singers who were moving around a lot (Aleks used a mic stand so was easier to photograph) but I'll select the best. I did meet Aleks after they performed (it was Stevenage Christmas Lights again) so got a proper face shot of him then, which will definitely be uploaded. But I'm still working through a backlog of photos so have a lot of earlier photos to sort through first! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Getting a proper face shot at least is great:) So many pics on here look strange when they are all cropped down and thin to remove the fan standing next to the person.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk)
That's exactly what I didn't want. There were loads of girls getting pics like that, but I didn't need to be in a photo with him. I look terrible in photos anyway. I'm a photographer, not a subject! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Aww I'm sure you don't look that bad in photos :) I do find those pics are entetaining though as once they are shared further than the one who takes them the fans get cropped out in no time bar disembodied body parts etc so they just end up like thing from the Addams family.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Yeah! Oh yes, Brian Capron was there too, so I think I got one decent photo of him. There were professional photographers at the event who got really good pics (as seen in this gallery), but mine are the best I can do (which is good enough), I don't have a massive camera like they did - plus they had the privilege of standing next to the stage, whereas I was behind a barrier (although at the front!) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Hope so about Brian Capron, a good quality photo would be great in his article. I hope it OK but I added some more of your animal photos that I liked. They are really good and close up and mostly totally cute too:)MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Yeah no problem at all about the animal pics, I'm just having trouble finding them. I guess they won't show up in searches yet if you've just added them (I search for either "photos/anemoneprojectors" or "58414938" to find my photos (text that appears in my Flickr url) though I just started a search for "getting through the backlog" as that's in my current Flickr name! I can see from your contributions some of my pics, so hopefully later I'll find them in my own searches. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
I think the search engine takes about 12 hours to catch up. I use the "search not in in this category" function to help populate categories and the ones I uploaded yesterday were showing up 12 hours or so later.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:H2O:_Just_Add_Water

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:H2O:_Just_Add_Water has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

AussieLegend (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Mensmagazines.JPG (7677547400).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mensmagazines.JPG (7677547400).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Wrong categories

Hello! You're uploading a series of photos relating to Phoenix Comicon, and many of the photos are being added to incorrect or very broad categories.Danrok (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi some of the wording in the flickr tags mean they are going into the wrong cats. I am moving them to better categories in batched at the moment I am going through the ones that ended up in the phoenix category.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 19:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Alan Light images

Hi, MaybeMaybeMaybe. A lot of Alan Light's photographs are already on Commons. You might want to have a look at Category:Photographs by Alan Light to avoid uploading duplicates. Rrburke (talk) 01:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Flickr2commons does check for duplicates but I shall have a check of that category as well.:)MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:DSCN3188 (6017482936).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DSCN3188 (6017482936).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! ¿…? 09:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:DSCN3163 (6024773333).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DSCN3163 (6024773333).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Instagram 010 (6025778840).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Instagram 010 (6025778840).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:S7301450 (6024773875).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:S7301450 (6024773875).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:S7301533 (6024774145).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:S7301533 (6024774145).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:S7301541a (6029278595).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:S7301541a (6029278595).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Boys - Water - Action (6024787437).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boys - Water - Action (6024787437).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:S7301546a (6029279029).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:S7301546a (6029279029).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I have mentioned you on COM:AN

Please see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Concerns about COM:IDENT and children. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 06:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

In response to comments made by Russavia, I've posed a question for you in that discussion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Maybe3. Are you planning to categorize the thousands of pictures you're uploading? Thanks --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

The main thing i will be using is catscan and similar to searching for things with a phrase not in an existing category though I need to give it a day or so so they are logged in the commons search engine. I am moving items with catalot as I go where possible.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

File:John DiMaggio (3315082568).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:John DiMaggio (3315082568).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tabercil (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Billy West (3314257025).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Billy West (3314257025).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tabercil (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Please think carefully before transferring images from Flickr to Commons if COM:PEOPLE issues are involved. Images of identifiable persons are unlikely to be suitable if they were taken on private property. If in doubt, ask the uploader for permission.--Ianmacm (talk) 14:11, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I shall do. What I am mostly uploading are convention photos at the moment though which are celebrities in public places so should be fine.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 14:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | Català | Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

You keep uploading image of non-celebrities in an huge amount. I have deactivated your account for 3 days. Please read COM:SCOPE in order to learn the the media files on Commons must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Private holiday photographs of flickr users are not realistically useful for educational purposes. Thank you for realizing this. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

File:David Shankbone in Pinar del Rio, Cuba (2601180488).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:David Shankbone in Pinar del Rio, Cuba (2601180488).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

File:The Simpsons writers (3314260331).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:The Simpsons writers (3314260331).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tabercil (talk) 23:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Elton John 2011 Shankbone 2 (5641858665).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Elton John 2011 Shankbone 2 (5641858665).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Catherine Zeta Jones VF 2012 Shankbone 2 (7089463283).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Catherine Zeta Jones VF 2012 Shankbone 2 (7089463283).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Austin Pride 2012 (7941575218).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Austin Pride 2012 (7941575218).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 14:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:GLOW PARTY (7843962482).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GLOW PARTY (7843962482).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(talk) 14:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Faux Fox - with guardhairs and base coat (8182917074).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Faux Fox - with guardhairs and base coat (8182917074).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kürschner (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

this is not an advert the user of the flickr account is a teddy bear maker and they msde the photos themselves and added text to show their own craft materials to people.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thepeachpeddler/sets/72157632001522376/with/8182916560/ they lso show their creations in progress. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waiting_for_Toes_-_and_a_name_)_(8212962724).jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Basil_is_finished,_and_hell_be_on_his_way_home_Monday_)_(8215564864).jpg MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
image as kept.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked

I have unblocked you as the reason for blocking was not strong. You have been responsive to questions raised so far, and I can attest myself, and others can see for themselves that files are NOT being picked up by flickr2commons as duplicates (e.g. File:Elton John 2011 Shankbone 2 (5641858665).jpg was not picked up as a duplicate), and in some cases is uploading duplicates in the same batch upload errenously. This is NOT the fault of you, but an obvious problem with the tool. You should not, and will not, be penalised because the tool that we make available to our editors, and somewhat encourage them to use, is problematic. The categorisation is a problem, but again, this is an issue with the tool in that it adds junk categories; again something that I can attest to by testing the tool for myself.

There is an issue that you have uploaded out-of-scope images (such as holiday photos), and I see above that you are mindful of that; and I would expect you to be mindful of this in the future and, as we all should, use common sense as to whether an image is in scope. Also be mindful of other policies such as COM:DW, COM:IDENT, COM:FOP, etc. Also be mindful of choosing descriptive file names before you upload.

A category has been created at Category:Uploads by MaybeMaybeMaybe -- all images so far uploaded by you using the tool will be placed in this category. I would expect you to also this category yourself to any future uploads you do using the tool. This will enable you to browse through them, and fix categories, descriptions, etc as well. You may want to change the category to "Category:Uploads by MaybeMaybeMaybe (checked)" on images as you check them. I would also expect you to continue to be responsive to concerns brought to you by other editors.

If you have any questions, you know where my talk page is. russavia (talk) 03:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I saw fae had made that category so I am finishing a batch of doll and teddy making photos i had started uploading and as a test I am adding them to my category also. Thanks for the idea about the checked category I think I will do just that.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 04:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi MMM - I have been taking a little look at some of the files and, as I have run into problems with large Flickr uploads myself, there is a simple tip I would like to add to the above. As well as your own upload user category, it is a rather good idea to create a photo owner {{user category}} for any particular large upload from a single Flickrstream (remembering to double check if it already exists). If things do go wrong, such as the stream owner raising an objection, the licences on Flickr turning out to be incorrect or you want to re-process the descriptions using a batch tool or bot request, then having these categories in place saves time all around. As an example, I have just created Category:Photos by Isaac Ben Sanchez who happens to be a Flickrstream owner you have uploaded from in the past. I have added some of his files (not all yet) to that category and I'm in the process of uploading some of his Austin Pride photos to the category of the same name. I did spot the posters below which I have raised for review as these are unlikely to be under the right choice of licence on Flickr. Flickr is a good source for Wikimedia Commons content and I have managed some great batch uploads from Flickr (see a sample at User:Faebot#Batch_upload_log), so I hope you will take the reviews and feedback in good faith and carry on by learning to dodge some of the pot-holes you have stumbled into. If you have any questions or would like something tidied up in a big batch (Faebot might be able to help) then do ask on my talk page, though it might take me a few days to get back to you! Cheers -- (talk) 14:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for all your help Fae :) I will see how I get on and will probably contact you about getting your bot to make a couple of "photos by" categories.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Any admin watching this who can delete all the dupes uploaded by this user? Tons of them, as far as I can tell. Nymf (talk) 22:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Gypsy 2.25" tall (8051809741).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gypsy 2.25" tall (8051809741).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.2.57.253 20:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154409257).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154409257).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154432012).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154432012).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154406973).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8154406973).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8151094348).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8151094348).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8147952948).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St Andrews Church, Much Hadham (8147952948).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Dressed Up (253698786).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dressed Up (253698786).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Dressed up (253698789).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dressed up (253698789).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Alan Light with Patrick Stewart (2081407633).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alan Light with Patrick Stewart (2081407633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

not an exact duplicateMaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 00:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Snow, november 2010 024 (6538155149) (2).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Snow, november 2010 024 (6538155149) (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Snow, november 2010 022 (6538158841).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Snow, november 2010 022 (6538158841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Snow, november 2010 027 (6538157565).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Snow, november 2010 027 (6538157565).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Snow, november 2010 021 (6538154601).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Snow, november 2010 021 (6538154601).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Michael Rosenbaum & Ben Ayres (4995576519).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michael Rosenbaum & Ben Ayres (4995576519).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Nymf (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:D23 EXPO 125257 9582 (6066022465).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:D23 EXPO 125257 9582 (6066022465).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Couple outside my window (4904452799).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Couple outside my window (4904452799).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Couple outside my window (4905041136).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Couple outside my window (4905041136).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Another suggestion

I trust that you are now not using the bot to upload images from flickr, until recent uploads are sorted out. As you go thru your uploads, which I hope you will make an ultimate priority, can you please take this suggestion on board.

Please review each image for it's usability on this project. For example, File:Alexis birthday (2105820213).jpg (and the others in that mini-set), File:Arm 3 (8135433106).jpg (and others from same guy), File:Bandit & Sparky Christmas (6550067823).jpg, etc are probably out of COM:SCOPE. Even File:Barbra Streisand (210266217).jpg and File:Barbra Streisand (210266216).jpg are likely out of scope, and unusable files. Instead of others going thru your images, perhaps are you go thru these, you can add these to a category Category:Uploads by MaybeMaybeMaybe to delete (user request) (or other similar such name), and I will take your addition to this category as an alternative to using {{speedy}}, and they can be deleted in bulk. Simply use common sense and ask yourself whether there is really any possibly use for them? Such photos as I linked above would not have any such purpose, realistically speaking. You could also add to such category any images which are derivative works of copyrighted materials (such as photos of movie posters, photos of photo collages, etc).

Also, I gather the teddy bear files are now uploaded, and you will refrain from using the f2c for the time being? There is simply too many problems with the tool as it stands at the moment for it to be viable for use. If there is a particular set of photos which you think should be uploaded to Commons, drop me a line, and we can ask a bot operator to look at the request. Deal? russavia (talk) 01:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Good idea. I have made a delete catery here Category:Uploads_by_MaybeMaybeMaybe_(delete)MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
And a short comment from me: I see you uploaded a number of images from the Flickr account of David Shankbone and Gage Skidmore. It should be noted that both are active Wikipedians (User:David Shankbone and User:Gage) and there's a very good chance that you've accidentally uploaded duplicate images. You might want to double-check your uploads to see which are duplicate, and tag them for speedy deletion. Tabercil (talk) 04:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to echo the advice russavia and Tabercil gave you, but I'd also like to applaud your desire to scout out free images and bring them to us. It's grueling and tedious work, and highly valuable. But perhaps you could be more discerning (there really was no need for a low resolution File:David Shankbone in Pinar del Rio, Cuba (2601180488).jpg, appropriately deleted. Also, any photograph by Alan Light, Gage Skidmore or me is probably already here. I started out here and Commons has even more work of mine than Flickr. But don't stop looking, downloading and organizing and categorizing your downloads! You just don't want to waste your time doing work you don't need to do. Thanks for the effort you are putting in. --David Shankbone (talk) 05:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

MMM, I see that you are fixing some of the uploads from your previous uploads (almost 8,000 of them), but there are still many to fix for scope, copyvios, etc, etc. We seriously can not, and will not, expect the community to fix all of these. I suggested that you stop using f2c until these issues are fixed, and perhaps ask someone with a bot to do any uploads you want done in the meantime. But I see you are now using f2c again, while those issues are still outstanding. I am now asking that you stop using f2c until such time as your other uploads are rectified, otherwise I can imagine another admin blocking you, and I would not be as sympathetic to an unblock as I was the other day. russavia (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok I shall stop there for the time being until the previous batch sorting is finished. There are a couple of things I might ask fae to upload then if that is OK?MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
I have absolutely ZERO problem with you asking Fae to upload; he will be taking responsibility for them. Whether he does or not, is up to him. russavia (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Flooding Recent Changes

Hi. Just thought I would ask you if you would be kind enough to apply for a for yourself please - I've just gone to look at Recent changes, and most of the last 500 or so are yours, and since the limit is 500, I can't see anybody else's work. If you apply for a bot flag, others can hide your edits so other people's work will show up. You might want to ask about this on the Village pump. Thanks. BarkingFish (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Sure I will look into that and see how it works as I haven't heard about it before.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 21:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:2pac (6909086524) (2).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2pac (6909086524) (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rrburke (talk) 23:07, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rrburke (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

--Rrburke (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

I have mentioned you on COM:AN/U

Please see thread here. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

User:DmitryBorshch

I would like to keep all my uploads in Category:Dmitry Borshch. Please do not remove them from there. Category:Works by Dmitry Borshch is redundant since all my uploads, including photographs, are my own work.

Dmitry

I have put them all back in there. I hope you don't mind if they are in others as well though?MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
PS you can also find all files uploade by you here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/DmitryBorshch MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


Thank you! Excellent work. Category:Works by Dmitry Borshch should be under Category:Works by artist by name, not Category:Works by artist.

DmitryBorshch (talk) 21:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Cool i have popped in there instead.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


Thank you.

DmitryBorshch (talk) 21:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

deleting images

Can anyone who wants one of my flickr transfers deleted please let me know here first as with duplicates etc I can just move them to my folder for deletion and they will be gone much quicker than if they are put in a deletion request. Thanks. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 14:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Faebot suggestions

Hi, a search through Category:Uploads by MaybeMaybeMaybe has highlighted the following table of duplicates where the image checksums are identical. As part of your care-taking, I suggest you have a look through and make sure the duplicates are marked and categorized for deletion by an administrator. Do also use the "more" links, this can highlight additional problems such as can be seen in this example. Cheers -- (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

That is brilliant thank you Fae :DMaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I have updated the logic a little, to check whether duplicates exist with the same title but without the flickr number. Some suggested further duplicates below for your review... More to come, and I will update this table later; it's slow running as there are a much higher proportion of files in the category that need checking and Faebot only got from A to C after several hours. Thanks -- (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Fae I will sort those ones out :) That is a really good function. Would be great on wider wiki too as it flickr2commons did seem to have troubles when file names didnt have the bracketed flickr number.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
I'll think about it. Faebot could churn through all 185,000+ images in Category:Flickr images reviewed by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) and create a running backlog report on-wiki, but it would take around a whole month. There might be a much faster way, and that's what I'd have to take a while to ponder. :-) Cheers -- (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for adding more Doubles to the list :) I will will sort those out. :) MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
It would probably be easier if Mediawiki software would provide an automated cat to place identical duplicates in. BTW is the batch uploader not able to ignore/cancel duplicate uploads ? --Denniss (talk) 10:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
It checks for uplicates and when it finds them the option of uploading them is removed and the previews of the images are hidden from the rest. Unfortunitely both Fae and I have found that Flickr2commons is not picking up some doubles. When uploading the all the files have checkboxes next to the previews for picking or removing them from the transfer (apart from the ones it knows are doubles).MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Dianna Agron (5864717345).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Dianna Agron (5864717345).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PierreSelim (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

It is not a screenshot. It is photo from the Glee concert tour.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 20:48, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi PierreSelim, there may have been some confusion as the intense back-lighting from a screen on stage has caused some blue colour fringe effects. I believe this is an upload from here. The image is available at a resolution of 1920 x 1080 and the background texture shows a level of detail that would be impossible for a screen capture. The EXIF data seems reasonable on Flickr with the camera shown as a Sony DSC-H50. The set it is from (Glee Live 2011) looks like a series of reasonable quality amateur photos that you might expect from an enthusiast with a camera capable of a 15x optical zoom and steady-shot features. If there is some other reason to think this is a copyright violation, perhaps this should be a Deletion Review as it might throw suspicion on the rest of vagueonthehow's Flickrstream. Thanks -- (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification, I've restored the pictures, perhaps it's a copyvio as being derivative work of the tv show, however as said by it's not a speedy delete, sorry for the mess. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Fae for the technical know-how and thanks Pierre for restoring it :)MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 11:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

My category

Hi, can I request that you don't add your uploads of my photos to my category Category:Photos by User:AnemoneProjectors? I'd rather do it myself using cat-a-lot, so that they are then added to my watchlist effortlessly and I can easily find the ones I didn't previously know were uploaded. I now have to do it all manually again like I used to! Thanks :-) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

I suppose for now I can remove the category, then re-add it! That'll get them on my watchlist at least. :-) Only I can't do it from the search resutls, only from the category itself! Damn. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
I figured it out - I made a new category for myself. But again I'd appreciate it if I can do this myself! :-) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Sure I am popping much of what I upload in author cats but if it easier for you that I don't then I won't add any there.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC) If you want them all on a watch list possibly the quickest way would be to copy them all to an empy/fictionl category an then out again using hotcat and them everything would be on your watch list? Just a thoughtMaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
You had the similar idea with categories anyway lolMaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Yeah I worked out what to do. This cat-a-lot thing is great, thanks for telling me about it! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. Commmons has some brilliant functions once people have been told about them.:) MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 05:33, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 05:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much :)MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 05:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Phoebe Tonkin On Set.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Phoebe Tonkin On Set.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Catwoman action figure (7584131142).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Catwoman action figure (7584131142).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

KTo288 (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Bane action figure (7584129894).jpg

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Bane action figure (7584129894).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

KTo288 (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent tagging

You recently tagged two files as possible copyright violations:

File:Drag Me to Hell ComicCon panel Alison Lohman cropped.jpg
File:Drag Me to Hell ComicCon panel Alison Lohman.jpg

Could you please explain how they are copyright violations? Viriditas (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

  • They were photos taken of projector screens so screencaps rather than actual photos of the people.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 09:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Brief Skinny Lad (5989161662).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brief Skinny Lad (5989161662).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Conti| 15:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Bert Convy (255761218).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bert Convy (255761218).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 15:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Drawing of Jim (251697543).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Drawing of Jim (251697543).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rrburke (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Jim_Turilli

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Jim_Turilli has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Rrburke (talk) 21:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rrburke (talk) 22:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Rick_Best

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Rick_Best has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Rrburke (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Peter Dinklage.jpg

Hi - you seem to have marked this one of my uploads for deletion. I can't see it now, as it's gone, but I'm pretty sure it passed Flickr review. May I ask your reasoning? --GRuban (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)