User talk:McZusatz/Archive/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Holiday greetings

Christmas Barnstar2.png Wishing you the happiest of holidays
and the best new year!
Vera (talk), December 2012

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | +/−

Cfry Holly.svg
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Qc-baleine.ogg

Can you remove the noise in the file File:Qc-baleine.ogg please ? 65.94.78.146 00:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Прошу Вас разобраться

Уважаемый McZusatz, я создала страницу моего отца в Википедии. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Быструшкин,_Бронислав_Дмитриевич Проиллюстрировала её фотографиями его творческих работ (фотографировала и сканировала сама), и фотографиями из семейного альбома (сканировала сама). Но фото были дважды удалены. 29 декабря 2012 года я отослала письмо на permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, с просьбой разрешить мне публиковать фото папиных творческих работ и фото из семейного альбома под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. Сегодня я исправила страницу. Загрузила изображения под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0, но изображение bistrushkin.jpg Вы стёрли... Будьте так любезны, поясните мне, пожалуйста, в чём моя ошибка. Почему файл из моего личного архива я не могу поместить в Википедию?

File:Bistrushkin.jpg was successfully confirmed by OTRS. --McZusatz (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Re:Große Dateien hochladen

Hallo McZusatz,
erstens, vielen Dank für Deine Fragen; und zweitens, ich möchte mich bei Dir entschuldigen für beantworten auf Englisch, aber meine Deutchkentnisse verschlechtert sich von Tag zu Tag und es ist viel einfacher für mich, in dieser Sprache zu schreiben.

So, getting back to English :-) I believe that you can upload files up to around 150 MiB with the UploadWizard without getting any problems—at least I haven't been able to upload files bigger than that for a while now—but for files bigger than those, especially as big as 1 GiB or more, you need to request help from a Wikimedia developer with shell access, and they can do a server-side upload for you.

I have been requesting uploads of such big files for more than a year now; the only things you need to do is to: (1) upload the file onto a publicly available server (if it's not accessible on-line already, that is), (2) create a .txt file with the desired file description, (3) fill a bug on Bugzilla, categorising it as Wikimedia, General/Unknown and (4) assign it either to Roan Kattouw or Sam Reedy — they are both very helpful with such requests.

Also, here are some past bugs for you to have a look at as examples: 32236, 32793, 34771; I hope that helps. Thanks, odder (talk) 22:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Danke für die flotte Antwort. --McZusatz (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

No problem

I will have to read up on what it is though. I wouldn't want to abuse it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Have a look at Commons:Patrol#Autopatrolled. --McZusatz (talk) 17:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I just read it. Anything that saves burden on the system is fine with me. I may have to curtail some of more humours edits in the future though.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Mimar Sinan

If someone would not rename all of my Turkish images, this wouldn't happen. - Darwinek (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

This had nothing to do with the rename. Do you still have a copy of the image? It would be great if you uploaded this file again. Sorry for the inconvenience. --McZusatz (talk) 10:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have it, but on an external disk. I will have access to it over this weekend, so I will re-upload the image. What caused the loss of the file? - Darwinek (talk) 14:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
It was some clumsy code snippet which cause the loss. It was fixed already in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/30750/ . --McZusatz (talk) 14:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Asphaltfräse

upload fertig. --McZusatz (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt den Film (ca. 660 MB) und eine Textdatei (mit information template und Lizenz) bei dropbox platziert (kannte ich noch nicht). Der Link zum Film ist: [1], der link für die templatedatei ist [2]. Du wolltest jetzt den Rest bei Commons für mich erledigen. Und falls es klappt mir danach die e-mail-Adresse und das Verfahren mitteilen, damit ich esnächstes mal eine Schaffe. Du hast echt Ausdauer, das gibt mir Kraft durchzuhalten. (Commons bietet doch tatsächlich keine fertigen Tilden für die Signatur an. Komisch!) Bin im Garten (talk)

Ich glaube es gehen mindestens 2 GB, aber TMH hat Probleme solch große Dateien in kleinere webm und ogg derivate zu wandeln. Also so bis ~800MB sollten idR ok sein. Ich schreibe gerade eine Anleitung für dich auf deutsch. Lass mich einfach wissen, wann der neue Link erreichbar ist. --McZusatz (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Der Link für den Film ist jetzt da (oben). Wofür steht TMH? Ich brauche eine feste Grenze, an die ich mich halten kann. 800 MB wäre schon traumhaft (soll ja kein Spielfilm werden). Ich habe noch Material aus deinem Dentallabor, einer Müllsortieranlage, Straßenbahnen in Sofia und dann habe ich verschiedene Straßen in Sofia aus dem Taxi abgefilmt. --Bin im Garten (talk) 08:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
mw:TimedMediaHandler erstellt die kleineren Vorschauversionen und bei richtig großen Dateien (größer ~1GB) schlägt das manchmal fehl. Wie gesagt, falls du irgendwann einmal eine 2GB Datei hast, kannst du die trotzdem hochladen, aber ich würde Dateien bis ~800MB empfehlen, um die Performance zu erhalten. (Ich melde mich übrigens sofort bei dir, falls der Upload auf den Server fertig ist). --McZusatz (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Super! --Bin im Garten (talk) 16:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Das Video findest du oben als thumb. Auf Help:Serverseitiger Upload kannst du nachlesen, wie du das selber anfordern kannst. Falls auf der Hilfeseite noch Rechtschreibfehler oder Unklarheiten sind, bitte benachrichtige mich oder besser selber aus. Viel Spass damit. --McZusatz (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! Na, dann lege ich mal los. --Bin im Garten (talk) 20:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Fragen

  • 1: Nächse Frage: Auf Commons werden immer mal wieder reihenweise Bilder wegen fehlender Panoramafreiheit gelöscht (z.B. Category:SS. Cyril and Methodius National Library oder Bilder aus Moskau oder Washington - [3], oder de:Mini-Europa - dort hat man mir vor 5 Jahren 200 Bilder wegen fehlender Panoramafreiheit in Belgien gelöscht). Zu unterscheiden ist sicherlich auch zwischen Gebäuden und Denkmälern (letztere werden sicherlich auch in der de:WP nicht genommen). Diese gelöschten Bilder sollten auf die de:WP gerettet werden. Wegen des Schutzlandprinzips (de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Schutzlandprinzip) werden diese Bilder in der de:WP problemlos genommen. So haben wenigsten deutsche Wikipediaartikel ein Bild (und sind über andere Sprachversionen zur Ansicht zu finden), auch wenn sie Commons (sowieso) nicht mehr hat. Ich vermisse einen organisierten Prozess für diese Bilderrettungen. Ich wünsche mir eine Liste oder Spezialseite, auf der ich regelmäßig zur Löschung vorgeschlagene Bilder aus Bulgarien und Russland überprüfen kann - speziell wegen fehlender Panoramafreiheit (die Überwachung aller zur Löschung vorgeschlagenen Bilder überfordert wahrscheinlich meine Kräfte).
  • 2. UND: Gibt es eigentlich eine Möglichkeit mir die gelöschten Bilder der Kategorie Bulgarien aus den letzten 6 Monaten zwecks Rettungsaktion wieder herstellen zu lassen (oder irgendwo auf meinen Webspace überspielen zu lassen), so wie ich gelösche Artikel in der de:WP auf Antrag wiederherstellen lassen kann?
  • 3. UND wenn wir schon mal bei meiner Wunschliste sind: Sicherlich nicht nur ich (sondern auch andere) haben Bilder deren Schutzrechte in absehbarer Zeit (2-20 Jahren) ablaufen werden. Bilder von alten Briefmarken, Fotos aus alten Büchern und so, die die 70-Jahres-Grenze noch nicht erreicht haben (dazu lebt der Mensch zu kurz). Diese Bilder würde ich gerne in ein gesperrtes Archiv hochladen. Dann können sie nach Ablauf der Schutzfrist online gestellt werden. Bis dahin kann man nur die Bildbeschreibung und Bilddaten einsehen (das sollte eigentlich noch nicht gegen irgendein Copyright verstoßen - schließlich werden die Bilder noch nicht öffentlich zugänglich gemacht). So ein gesperrter Archivbereich fehlt mir in Commons, denn auf meinem PC hält sich so was nicht über mehrere Jahre. Gruß --Bin im Garten (talk) 16:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Die Fragen sind jetzt nicht direkt mein Spezialgebiet, aber ich versuche trotzdem Antworten zu geben.
(Unterschrift nachgereicht). --McZusatz (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Super Antworten. Ich musste nur erst mal darauf kommen die richtigen Fragen zu stellen. Ich wusste gar nicht, was es auf Commons alles gibt. Wo macht Wikipedia und Commons richtig Spaß. --Bin im Garten (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

A Philippines Light for you!

GLFjf1462 01.JPG Belated congratulations to our newest admin! If you come to one of the most beautiful country,[4] never forget to take photos of the 2013 Festival of the Lights.[5]

. --Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

This image

This file now has a flickr source and an author. Maybe the npd tag can be removed by someone like you if you wish. It has a trademark tag on it, however, but the ticket's design may not be too complicated to copyright. Regards and Goodnight from Metro Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. --McZusatz (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:1. Villa Imperiale Pesaro.jpg

Hi, McZusatz. This user has lifted multiple files from a variety of different websites and falsely claimed them all as her own work. In at least two cases, she took the trouble removed the on-image credits and copyright notices that would have identified the files as copyright violations. In the case of File:1. Villa Imperiale Pesaro.jpg, the file has been take without from here without acknowledging the source and was, like the others, falsely claimed as "own work". To my mind, this satisfies the test of "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file," meaning that it should be deleted in accordance with the precautionary principle. Regards, Rrburke (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not check the talk page. Thanks for notifying me. --McZusatz (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:RUS Medal za podboj Czeczenii i Degestanu.JPG

Rotation of this file very necessary. Disposition of left(band of St. Alexander) and right(band of St. Georgy) half is wrong now. Example of proper disposition: File:George-Alex rib.jpg. Draa kul (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

bildverlust

das hätte ich gerne erklärt, wie sich ein "bug" (virus?) an ein einelnes bild macht, oder waren noch mehr betroffen? Sundar1

Betroffen sind alle Dateien in Category:Files with 404 errors. Es wäre schön, wenn du deine Datei noch hättest und dann nochmal hochladen könntest. --McZusatz (talk) 15:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
ich unterzeichne meine beiträge immer, aber finde auf deiner talk-seite weder die üblichen zeichen, u. a. Sundar1 (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC), noch das von dir angegebene icon (stift) zum unterzeichnen. Sundar1
ps: ich sehe gerade, die manuelle tilde funktioniert auch- muss ich mir merken, habe ich noch nie gemacht.Sundar1 (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Re-uploading

Hi!


If you want upload new version, DO NOT overwrite current ones, please! http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iznad_Lovi%C5%A1ta1121200.ogv


My uploaded videos were 480P , but you converted them into 360P!!Quahadi Añtó 13:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey,
I only converted the mp4 container into an ogv one. I did not change the resolution. Your video was [41 s, 480 × 360 (2,86 MB)] and mine is [41 s, 480 × 360 (8,34 MB)]. Nevertheless it would be great if you uploaded the 360p video also in 480p. Thanks. --McZusatz (talk) 13:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


I originally converted videos to mp4 and later simply changed extention into ".ogv". commons did accept them as such , so I thought, why not?? I had some problems with converting videos into ogv (image was too grainy! :( by miro converter) xmediarecode sometimes simply did not work ( :( ). Anyway, what is problem with mp4 as "non-free" format?Quahadi Añtó 09:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I am unable to play the mp4 in my browser (firefox, opera and chrome). I am only able to play the server generated WebM and OGG files. If you have firefox, you could try to convert your videos with Help:CV#Firefogg. (In this case you won't have to encode to mp4 first.) --McZusatz (talk) 11:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I have firefox and chrome and mp4 works in both cases. I don't know what is the problem??Quahadi Añtó 11:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

So you are able to play http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Na_barinama1061142.ogv directly in your browser? --McZusatz (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Strange, on that way-NO. It says that file is damaged/corrupt! however, if I go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Na_barinama1061142.ogv it works quite OK.ˇQuahadi Añtó 12:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

That's because you chose the "WebM 480P" option. (The wiki server provides a webm and ogg transcoded version of the video file) --McZusatz (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Orebić-marina1251210.ogv Quahadi Añtó 09:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Libertad

Your file Libertad.JPG is unusable in the English wikipedia as it clashes with other local files of the same name. Since Libertad.JPG and Libertad_2.jpg seem to be part of the same photoshoot sequence it does make sense to rename the image to "Libertad_1.jpg" (note the lowercase "jpg" too) Windroff (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. --McZusatz (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

McZusatz: Please note that this is not a valid reason for renaming files here at Commons. Rather then changing the file for hundreds of wikis, it should be fixed at English Wikipedia. --  Docu  at 03:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I am aware of this. Nevertheless one can say reason #6 applied in this case to harmonize File:Libertad 1.jpg with File:Libertad 2.jpg (There is no doubt they are from the same set of images). --McZusatz (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Which template would make use of this? --  Docu  at 10:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Mickey Teller

I saw you deleted his userpage again - I think I deleted it twice the other day. Nuke uploads? -mattbuck (Talk) 11:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Already done this morning: Special:ListFiles/Mickey_teller --McZusatz (talk) 11:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Morganlynn19988

Hi McZusatz. This user just came back from a block for uploading unfree files. When a user returns and immediately uploads more unfree files, they should be blocked again rather than warned. I've blocked the acct for 2 weeks and replaced the warning with {{Blocked user}}. INeverCry 21:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Viktor Denisov.jpg

License is OTRS|2012090110008862 X9 (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

File:The Europas' award.jpg

If this image is not copyrightable, please feel free to mark it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Someone else has marked it now. I assume the award is not copyrightable then. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I would also say that the design of the award is too simple to qualify for copyright protection. --McZusatz (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your reply. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

COM:OVERWRITE

Hi McZusatz, You left a message in my User talk:Donaldytong page, Please do not overwrite images. Concerning:. I am pretty sure I will not overwrite these images again because they have been updated by the new versions. Also do you mean these images are in the update processing at this stage? Donaldytong (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

No Flickrlink

Suddenly there are quite a several images in this category with no flickr sources and many are sourced to non-flickr account images. Just to let you know, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Just cleaned the whole cat some days ago. :-( .However I nominated the OSM-rips for deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Frank Treak --McZusatz (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I voted to delete in the DR. Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Flag of Tbilisi

If you’ll have time, please look at my answer. --149.156.172.74 14:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. --McZusatz (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Info - Video/Audio

hast du eigentlich die [Video/Audio Liste] aboniert? Ansonsten zu deiner Info: mp3/aac sind jetzt auf commons mögich. Und Michael Dale schreibt: "Worth noting we also recently merged improved firefogg support into upload wizard. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/39035/ So our instructions can be simplified a bit. Use firefox, install firefogg ( once ). Now you can upload your mp4 assets directly from your camera files and we will automatically convert them to the best format with the correct settings." Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Danke für die Hinweise. Die Mailingliste habe ich mal abonniert. Mal sehen was dort kommt. Und kannst du mir mehr infos/urls geben für den mp3/aac und firefogg upload, bitte? --McZusatz (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Das Archiv hast Du schon gefunden? Dann stößt man irgendwann auf den originalen Post. -- Rillke(q?) 21:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
$wgEnabledAudioTranscodeSet scheint noch nicht gesetzt zu sein, oder sehe ich die Änderungen noch nicht? --McZusatz (talk) 21:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, mehr ist mir auch nicht bekannt. Du könntest aber per Liste anfragen oder im Chat versuchen, jemand von der Technik zu erreichen. So ganz glücklich bin ich mit einer Festlegung auf Firefox zur Videocodierung auch nicht; es wird viele User geben, die nicht deshalb extra den gewohnten Browser aufgeben wollen. Und dann wären da ja auch noch einige hübsche Bugs z.B. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36587, die zumindest zur Zeit größere Uploads erschweren/verhindern. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Sunset 2011 ( HD ).webm

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sunset 2011 ( HD ).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pristurus (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Die anderen WebM files mit Audio im Hintergrund, die ich in Category:Video repair needed einsortiert habe, sind wahrscheinlich auch betroffen. Ich versuche das heute Abend zu richten. --McZusatz (talk) 12:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Freut mich, dass du das richtig verstanden hast, genauso war das auch gemeint. Ich denke mal bei Musik in der Audiospur sollte man immer von Rechten Dritter ausgehen, anderenfalls sollte die "freie" Quelle auch belegbar sein. Die Audiospur bekommst du mit ffmpeg ohne Neukodierung einfach weg: ~ffmpeg.exe -i ~quelle.webm -c:v copy -an ziel_ohne_audio.webm (oder in Batchdatei unter Windows für mehrfachen Gebrauch:~ffmpeg.exe -i %1 -c:v copy -an  %1_ohne_audio.webm) . Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 13:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Geht bei mir übrigens nur, wenn ich das -c:v ausschreibe: -vcodec copy --McZusatz (talk) 18:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Jau, das ist die ältere Syntax, die sollte auch noch funktionieren. Es kommt wohl drauf an, was für ein Build man benutzt, da sind ja die verschiedensten im Umlauf. Übrigens, wenn es beim Ton mit aac->vorbis Probleme gibt, hilft meist eine aac->wav->vorbis Wandlung. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

This DR

I think I found the correct flickr source for this image...and its from the City of Vancouver flickr account. The license is OK so it should be closed as keep since it passes {{PD-Canada}} too as an image created before 1949. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


  • As for this other DR, you must decide the solution by yourself. Whether the permission is OK or needs COM:OTRS. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Thank you for your help here especially on the first image. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, too! Great work with finding the original file. --McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Table_icon

Hello there McZusatz!

We have to pleasantness to inform you that your Table_icon file has been selected to be the official icon for our program: BasicTables. Respecting your license, the attribution for your production will be explicit listed in the Help menu on the program. Hope you can check it in https://sourceforge.net/projects/basictables/ cause it will be released shortly! Also you can email me at ramiroyaben@gmail.com

Greetings!

Looks fine. Thx. --McZusatz (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Girls Beware

You are welcome! Thank you for the changes!

What program do you use to convert it to Webm? Should I just upload it as a Webm?

There is another one with a HighRes MPEG4 and that is Strange Ones http://archive.org/details/strange_ones (Current file at File:StrangeOnesFullRez.ogv) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

My personal opinion is that WebM is superior to OGV. The VP8 codec of WebM seems to be more capable than Theora. I used com:firefogg to convert to WebM (please select "1080p 6Mbit connection") for conversion. And also please use the MPEG2 source. It seems this is the original and the MP4 is just a scaled down version of the MPEG2. --McZusatz (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! For the videos does it seem like all are MPEG2 originals? WhisperToMe (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
They say so: "If this is the case, download the original MPEG-2 to solve the problem." ( http://archive.org/about/faqs.php#Movies ) --McZusatz (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
I see. When I saw the "high res" I thought that the MPG4 was the highest quality version, but it seems like that's not the case. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

This user's uploads

Dear Admin McZusatz,

This user uploaded only a few images to Commons and the latest image is not free. But I noticed a strange thing. The other images he/she uploaded which have metadata all name different cameras. Are the images OK? I will have to sign off now as its 1:48 AM in Canada but just look at the image uploads and consider if it is 'own work' If it is not OK in your opinion, then feel free to launch a DR. I accept your opinion either way of course. I see the uploader's talkpage history is not great but I don't want to prejudge this person. Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I nominated two for deletion. The other could be nominated as well per COM:PCP. --McZusatz (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I will vote to delete in the 2 DR's you created. As for the rest, its hard to say since he/she has few images on Commons. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

File:FRQC-kilomètre.oga

Can you turn up the volume of the file File:FRQC-kilomètre.oga please ? 198.105.121.22 21:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 09:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:Use baseline

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Use baseline has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dschwen (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

User Kategorie für Bot?

Da du dich ja auch so ein wenig besser auszukennen scheinst mit allem hier (zumindest besser wie ich) und ich nicht wieder das Risiko eingehen möchte das in der großen Runde die Diskussion daneben läuft frage ich dich mal direkt. Wie du ja viellecht weißt bin ich gerade dabei einen Bot zu schreiben der fehlende Thumbnails detektiert und ggf. später versuch die Ursache zu beheben (z.B. Konvertierung großer progressive JPGs). Aktuell läuft der Bot, ohne irgendeine Schreib-Aktion, täglich und sucht nach fehlenden Thumbnails in den letzten Uploads. Das klappt auch relativ gut, täglich werden ein paar gefunden. Da ich aber feststellen mußte das oftmals Thumbnails fehlen ohne das es einen sofort ersichtlichen Grund gibt bzw. auch einige False-Positive (sprich er meint das File hätte kein Thumbnail obwohl es eins hat) würde ich gern die aktuell gefundenen mutmaßlichen Files ohne Thumbnails erstmal in eine Kategorie packen wollen. Das würde mir es erleichtern eine Übersicht zu erhalten welche "Arten" von fehlenden Thumbnails es möglicherweise gibt. Erstmal im Schwerrpunkt für mich selbst, evt. falls nötig später als Mittel für ein humanoides Review bzw. weitere Analyse des Problems (iE. kaputter Upload/progressive JPG/zu großes PNG/...). Nun frage ich mich ob ich entweder eine (versteckte) Benutzerkategorie dafür anlegen sollte (so etwa wie "Category:Possibly broken thumbnails detected by Bot <USERNAME>" ) oder eine "öffentliche"? Wobei mir aber scheint solche Benutzerkategorien sind nicht erlaubt (weil ich sammel darin ja versch. Files verschiedener Nutzer) und andererseits würde ich aber ungern eine öffentliche nehmen, weil es eben aktuell mehr ein Test ist. Was würdest du mir raten? --Slick (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Ich sehe zwei Möglichkeiten:
  • Eine Kategorie als Unterkategorie von der bereits vorhandenen Category:Images without thumbnails mit dem Namen den du oben vorgeschlagen hast. hiddencat solltest du dann aktivieren. Und nur weil der Benutzername des Bots eventuell vorkommt, heisst das noch nicht, dass es eine Benutzerkategorie ist.
  • Eine Gallery in deiner Sandbox. (Bietet sich vor allem an, wenn du keine Änderungen an den betroffenen Dateien machen willst.)
Persönlich würde ich die erste Möglichkeit bevorzugen, aber lass mich wissen wie du vorgehst. Ich würde dann auch ab und zu mal einen Blick auf die betroffenen Dateien werfen. --McZusatz (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
OK, ich würde dann auch Variante 1 bevorzugen und werde das so machen. Bin mir allerdings nicht sicher ob ich das dieses WE noch schaffe, ansonsten wirds frühestens in einer Woche. Bin derzeit zeitlich etwas gebunden. Ich sag dir dann hier nochmal kurz Bescheid wenn ichs soweit habe. --Slick (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok, Category:Possibly_files_without_thumbnails_detected_by_bot ist jetzt "scharf" und die nächsten Tage sollte sich da vermutlich was tun. --Slick (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Do not overwrite files

Hi. Please do not overwrite files except for minor improvements.

See Commons:Overwriting existing files#Substantial crop or un-crop. Recomposition and substantial crop is not considered as a minor change. Please, upload such detailed files under a new file name. --ŠJů (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

What file(s) are you referring to? Category:ETA vacuum cleaners? --McZusatz (talk) 15:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 10:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

This uploader's images

This uploader uploads copy vios but he was warned (on his talkpage) to stop uploading copyright violations and still does so. It seems that it is not useful to tag all his images if he continues to do this without any sanctions sadly. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Thank you for taking some action. I know that Commons doesn't have Wikipedia's Newbie rules but when an uploader is warned Not to upload copyright violations....and still does so, than he/she just doesn't care about other people's copyright unfortunately. So, some kind of sanction should be enforced. I thought a 2 week block could be OK but it looks like this uploader will come back after that time and continue doing what he/she is doing so perhaps an indefinite ban was warranted. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
COM:BP says that punitive blocks are not endorsed. Also keep in mind that the uploader can still edit his talk page and request an unblock any time. --McZusatz (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: It is good that COM:BP says that 'blocking is designed to be a preventative measure and not a punitive one.' I did not know this. I knew an uploader could request an unblock any time but he/she should give a very good reason to be unblocked since this happens very rarely. But there was this massive Copy Vio case where Admin INeverCry was forced to blacklist a flickr account and ban the uploader. (I made some comments in the DR) I had to ask this Admin to do something to stop this massive copyvio. The uploader just stole images left, right and centre from an ARR German website and placed it on his own flickr account and licensed them freely. So, sometimes, one has no choice but to Act because there is no choice--as you know. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 10:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Lizenzverletzung.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lizenzverletzung.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 Diskussion/talk/diskuto 18:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 10:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Indocyanine-Green-Fluorescence-Imaging-for-Evaluation-of-Uterine-Blood-Flow-in-Cynomolgus-Macaque-pone.0035124.s001.ogv

That was quick - thanks! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 14:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Playing new version of video in full resolution shows old version

Hi McZusatz,

in IRC I was pointed to you regarding the problem in topic. I had uploaded a video but since it was partly really dark I enhanced these parts and uploaded the enhanced video as new version of that file. The problem now is: when the video is played in original resolution the old and dark version is shown: screenshot. Any ideas? -- malenki (talk) 21:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

There seem to be some problems with the varnish software on the wikimedia servers lately. I commented on an already opened bug ticket but do not expect sth. to happen today. --McZusatz (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I'll be satisfied as well when there will happen anything at all. :) --malenki (talk) 17:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:A-Single-Molecule-Investigation-of-the-Photostability-of-Quantum-Dots-pone.0044355.s004.ogv

Hallo McZusatz, dazu kurz 2 technische Anmerkungen, nur als Tipp gemeint. 1) Höhe und Breite von WebM und OGV-Videos sollten möglichst immer glatt durch 4 teilbar sein (=Mod 4). 2) Mit extremen Source-Frameraten scheint die commons-eigene Erzeugung von Formatvarianten überfordert zu sein; de facto sind Raten oberhalb der Monitorfrequenz auch nicht besonders sinnig... Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Gewusst habe ich das schon, aber dran gedacht wohl eher nicht. Dieses "avisynth" scheint ja recht hilfreich zu sein, aber für Linux gibt es das soweit ich weiß nicht. --McZusatz (talk) 19:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
jau, avisynth ist für solche Sachen gut zu gebrauchen, läuft nativ aber nur unter Windows. Wie weit die Portierung nach Linux aktuell fortgeschritten ist, kann ich (als Windows User) nicht sagen. Alternativ gibt es noch vapoursynth basierend auf Python, ist aber auch noch eher alpha.. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Videos without thumbnails

Ich habe gesehen du hast Category:Videos without thumbnails angelegt und ein paar Dateien einsortiert. Ich finde eine solche Kategorie durchaus sinnvoll, allerdings finde ich den Namen unpassend. Denn allein am Datei-Namen bzw. Extension kann man nicht zwangsläufig festmachen ob es eine Video- oder Audio-Datei ist (am Mimetype übrigens auch nicht). In der Kategorie liegen IMHO jetzt auch bereits Audiofiles wie File:Water frog croak.ogg. Von daher wäre ein Name wie "Multimedia files without thumbnails" o.ä. sinnvoller. Allerdings würde "Multimedia" rein vom Begriff thereotisch auch Bilder mit einschließen. Von daher weiß ich auch nicht so recht wie man es nennen sollte. Aber "Video ..." paßt IMHO definitiv nicht. Vielleicht fällt dir noch was besseres ein. --Slick (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Aber Audio sollte doch gar kein Thumb haben? (Den Frosch habe ich mir gerade mal angesehen. Ich weiß zwar nicht, ob das Audio zum Video passt, aber gewiss war beides in der Datei drin). Ich würde das so lassen, wie jetzt... --McZusatz (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hmm.... so gesehen hast du Recht. Da habe ich mich wohl vom passenden Dateinamen, dazu die Endung ogg, täuschen lassen. *grummel* --Slick (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

USMC pics

Warum machst du auf alle pics die Hauptcat der Marines drauf? Die werden dort nicht besser gefunden wenn da mehere 10000 pics in einer cat sind.--Sanandros (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Die waren alle noch nicht kategorisiert und jemand hat gebeten diese in die Hauptcat einzusortieren. Siehe auch: Bots/Work_requests --McZusatz (talk) 07:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: McZusatz (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Tech news: 2013-22