User talk:Michiel Hendryckx

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Michiel Hendryckx!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Bevestigen identiteit[edit]

Beste Michiel, bedankt voor je uploads. Ik heb alleen een verzoek. Iedereen kan natuurlijk zeggen dat hij Michiel Hendryckx is. Zou je ter bevestiging van je identiteit een mailtje vanaf je @michielhendryckx.be emailadres naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org willen sturen? Iets in de trant van http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Michiel_Hendryckx ben ik is voldoende. Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Bedankt voor je mailtje. Als iemand er ooit nog aan twijfelt dan kan je ze verwijzen naar OTRS #2010070310021743. Multichill (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Jan hoet2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Michiel Hendryckx!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please categorize our images !!![edit]

You already have been asked by a bot to categorize your images. Therefore I don't understand why you keep on uploading images without categories. Uploading images without categorizing them doesn't make sense. Only categorized images can be found! -- Ies (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Proper werk[edit]

Dag Michiel, 't doe wel ne ki deugd vô nen ôop sebôorte pertretten te ziene iere. Oat er meserie es vô de category, vult de noame in van den typ ip de foto. Zelfs oat'rôod es, es den bot content. Wulder goan da loatr wel reegln. --Foroa (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Van_istendael675.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Van_istendael675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Deadstar (msg) 15:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Michiel, deze vraag om verwijdering berustte op een misverstand: Deadstar dacht dat het beeld kapot was, maar dat bleek niet zo te zijn. De "deletion request" werd dezelfde dag nog afgesloten, en het beeld is dus helemaal veilig. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

De Keersmaeker[edit]

Hi,

Great picture, thanks for uploading. Do not hesitate if you have more photos of dancers and choreographers to share them on Wikipedia. At the end of the day it's a mutual benefit. Sincerely.--LPLT (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

and I would add that elpi' wrote a wonderful page about the work of ATDK ! thank you both ! and pitibizou ! --Mandariine (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bende wim31.jpg[edit]

Bij het bestand File:Bende wim31.jpg staat vermeld: 'Own work'. Ik vroeg me af of je die foto werkelijk zelf hebt getrokken, aangezien je ook op de foto te zien bent. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Ik heb jouw reactie op mijn talk-pagina hier naartoe gekopieerd voor de duidelijkheid
Beste Donarrreiskoffer, Inderdaad. De foto is op mijn nauwkeurige aanwijzing gemaakt door de vrouw van die booteigenaar. Hoe dan ook, zijn de rechten in mijn bezit. En ik zie ook dat u dat dubbelportret van Mark Eyskens en zijn echtgenote hebt versneden tot een banaal pasfotootje. Mag ik u vragen die verknipte foto uit Commons te verwijderen. U ontneemt me alle zin om hier nog aan mee te werken. Met groet, M.
Beste Michiel, Alvast eerst bedankt voor de uitleg ivm de foto van 'Bende van Wim'. Trouwens ook heel erg bedankt voor alle prachtige professionele foto's die u al hebt vrijgegeven onder een vrije licentie.
Toch moet ik u teleurstellen wat betreft de uitsnede. De foto's hier op commons zijn vrij voor iedereen om de kopiëren, en te wijzigen zolang de nieuwe foto's ook onder een gelijkwaardige licentie worden vrijgegeven en de auteur van de oorspronkelijke foto duidelijk vermeld blijft. Ik kan begrijpen dat het voor jou niet gemakkelijk is de mooie kadrering te zien te verdwijnen door een 'pasfoto'-crop. Toch kan het zijn dat zo een crop voor bepaalde pagina's in wikipedia nuttiger is dan jouw oorspronkelijke foto. Kijk bijvoorbeeld naar de pagina en:Prime_Minister_of_Belgium, waar alle foto's, al dan niet banale, pasfoto's zijn. Daar past dan toch geen foto van Mark met zijn vrouw? Daarom heb ik mij de vrijheid genomen om jouw foto te bewerken.
Ik hoop dat deze teleurstelling u niet zal beletten nog foto's vrij te geven in de toekomst. Dat zou ik spijtig vinden wat het zijn prachtige foto's. Maar ik zou het wel ergens kunnen begrijpen dat u het een moeilijke stap vindt om te zien dat deze foto's van u ook mogelijks bewerkt zullen worden door anderen.
In elk geval geval nog veel fotografeerplezier.
Met vriendelijke groeten, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Ik kan eventueel wel de gecropte foto verwijderen uit de categorie (Photos by Michiel_Hendryckx). Dan breekt hij jou reeks mooie foto' sniet zo. mvg, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Corbu675.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Corbu675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Groucho NL (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Photographs by Michiel Hendryckx[edit]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, uit de deze categorie blijkt dat heel wat afbeeldingen baat zouden hebben bij een renaming. Als auteur van deze foto's lijk jij de geknipte persoon. Bedankt Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


Gedag![edit]

Hi Michiel,

Blij je hier ook te treffen! Topfotografen bij een project als wikipedia, ik word er helemaal filantroop van. Eindelijk een portret bij mijn wikipedia-pagina :-). http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Lieven_scheire676.jpg

Groeten, Lieven Mushlack (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Users in Belgium[edit]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, jouw naam vind ik niet terug onder deze category. Wanneer je {{User Belgium}} op je User page zet, kom je in deze category terecht. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Als ik zo arrogant mag zijn even voor de gehele Wikipedia-wereld te spreken: oprecht bedankt voor uw prachtige fotografische bijdragen. Een staaltje onzelfzuchtigheid dat respect verdient. Jellevc (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Flor Grammens 675.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flor Grammens 675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Milow image[edit]

You added a nice image of Milow, which was used in Milow. His management company has provided a more up-to-date image. Of course, it is the editorial judgment of Wikipedia editors to choose which image should be used. I uploaded the recent image, and replaced in the Wikipedia article (I did not make any changes to the German or Dutch articles. If you think this issue should be discussed, feel free to bring it up on the talk page, I have no opinion on the artistic merits of either image, other than the simple observation that a 2012 image of an active performer would be better than a 2008 image, all other things being equal.--Sphilbrick (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Bart De Wever[edit]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, beschik jij over een recente afbeelding van Bart De Wever? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Magritte675.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Magritte675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy she.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vimy she.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Vloeken zaltbommel675.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vloeken zaltbommel675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Bart De Wever[edit]

Dag User:Michiel Hendryckx, beschikt U over een recentere file? Die is wérkelijk outdated. Lotje (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)