User talk:Moala

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Roger Federer.jpg[edit]

Hi Moala,

can you please check, where on the source of Image:Roger Federer.jpg the licence cc-by-sa-2.5 is stated? I cannot find it. Thank you. --Raymond Disc. 17:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

A friend of mine made this photograph (source link mentioned in image info, i.e. Alvas); I asked him to release it under this (cc) license, and that's what he did, for me, for Wikimedia's projects, and for every human (great ideologies). --Moala 14:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


Hi Moala, as you may have seen, Image:Roger Federer.jpg has been tagged for deletion due to copyvio-suspicion again (not by me). That's hardly surprising with such a professional looking photo as there is no proof or evidence for the license by the original photographer, even not on the source website. Therefore, you should ask your friend, the photographer, for a written permission. Just take the permission text from Commons:Email templates (also available in french), fill in the image URL on Commons, add the license name, mail that to the photographer and ask him to mail it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
You might also add the standard description template to the image. Cheers --Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'm requesting it to my friend. Moala (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Was there any progress, please? This image is going to be deleted soon if not. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
No answer from him, no mean to contact him. Let's respect the guidelines :-( Moala (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Roger Federer.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Roger Federer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)