User talk:Mosmas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

FP promotion[edit]

Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg, which was nominated by Amada44 at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Alvesgaspar 11:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

QI promotion[edit]

USA Arches NP Delicate Arch(1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USA Arches NP Delicate Arch(1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Jnpet 12:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 17:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Piet Program Hello World(1).gif[edit]

On the description of this image, you wrote that « Thomas Schoch put it under CC-BY-SA », so obviously you are Thomas Schoch... ;)

Problem is that on http://www.retas.de/thomas/computer/programs/useless/piet/explain.html, there is a « Copyright © Thomas Schoch 2006 », so it would be great if you said somewhere on your website that this image is CC-BY-SA...

Thanks ! /845/8.04.2007/17:59 UTC/

Done. --Mosmas 15:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much ! :) /845/20.04.2007/21:59 UTC/

copyvio by AOL?[edit]

see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#AOL_-_es_geht_munter_weiter : 88 is yours see also http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#AOL_.28erledigt.3F.29 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#wieder_AOL http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#S.C3.BCddeutsche.de Greetings, Martina Nolte 08:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Merops hirundineus 2 full.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Done. --Mosmas (talk) 15:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Acanthoplus longipes[edit]

I would say they are at least the same genus an possibly the same species so yes. --Kevmin (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Kestrel2.jpg[edit]

This picture, and possibly others, have been uploaded in your name. Could you please confirm that you took it and that you release it with the stated licence? Thanks in advance. --Eusebius (talk) 15:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

This picture was NOT taken by me, and I did NOT upload it. Strange! --Mosmas (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the confirmation. The uploader has done that several times, with several (random) users. I just have to check before I delete... Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 09:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

your photo in a article in Hebrew[edit]

the photo Piet Program.gif is in use at this article about programming languages. the credit was not given to you (they just wrote "wikipedia" and the licenses was not mentioned. if you want any help in talking to them in Hebrew please let me know. Hidro (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear Hidro, thanks for offering your assistance. Copyvios with this image are rather often, see [1] and [2] and [3] and [4] and [5], and so on. I think I have to shrug that. Shalom, --Mosmas (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
update:they fixed the problem after I sent them an email . Hidro (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! --Mosmas (talk) 21:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Dalit India.jpg[edit]

Please delete this file and upload it with a more neutral title. How do you know these are Dalits? The cast is nothing that you can just tell by outer appearance. The current file name gives exactly this impression, and I am probably correct when it is just based on your assumption, or did you interview these people? Tomeasy (talk) 12:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo - Psittacula krameri[edit]

Hello Thomas Schoch, My name is Rita Neves. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal. Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone. The photo we would like to use are the following:

Psittacula krameri

1 - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parrot_India_2.jpg 2 - 2 - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parrot_India_3.jpg


The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration - Schedules for species identification - Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? Thomas Schoch?

If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt Thank you very much. Our best regards

Rita Neves

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Mosmas!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Windtowers_Dubai.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Windtowers_Dubai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 18:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Leptoptilos javanicus Laos 2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt/Done. --Mosmas (talk) 11:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 18:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Tom Otterness The Real World 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tom Otterness The Real World 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 17:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Silk manufacture Myanmar 2.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Silk manufacture Myanmar 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 16:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Erledigt/Done --Mosmas (talk) 15:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shwedagon Pagoda Yangon 5.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Shwedagon Pagoda Yangon 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 17:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Erledigt/Done --Mosmas (talk) 15:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Kinder in Delhi[edit]

Could you please delete this picture. This pic on the German Wikepedia site generalises the childer/kinder in India. There are better pics available. And not all children in India are like the picture says. Or is it thats you didnt meet anyother children in India??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exofrog (talk • contribs) 2014-05-21 (UTC)

I don't agree. If you think the photo should be deleted, please post a Deletion request. If you think the German article should be modified, you can do the change or start a discussion here, I think English would be OK. Regards, --Mosmas (talk) 11:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Haubentaucher NSG E-011.jpg[edit]

Hallo, ein schönes Bild mit gutem neuen NSG-Artikel! Vielleicht hast du Lust mit dem Bild an Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Germany teilzunehmen? Du bräuchtest dazu nur den Baustein {{Wiki Loves Earth 2014|de}} in die Bildbeschreibung zu packen. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für das nette Lob. Ich halte das Bild aber für ziemlich dürftig und habe es nur deshalb für vertretbar gehalten, weil es tatsächlich in dem NSG aufgenommen wurde. Werde das Bapperl trotzdem mal hinein packen. Danke und schöne Grüße, --Mosmas (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

File:NSG E-006 Kamptal Filipendula ulmaria.jpg[edit]

Mich wuerde interessieren, was passiert, wenn du die gleiche Datei nochmal direkt von deiner Festplatte hochlaedst. Waere das moeglich? --McZusatz (talk) 13:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Habe ich soeben getan. Sieht nicht gut aus. Ich habe die beiden betroffenen Bilder mal im Original hierhin kopiert: [6] und [7]. Im Unterschied zu den querformatigen Bildern derselben Serie hatte ich diese übrigens mit dem <schäm>Windows-Explorer</schäm> um 90° gedreht, weil sie - im Explorer - als Querformate angezeigt wurden. Vielleicht hat der da was vermurkst? --Mosmas (talk) 14:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
PS: die Originale habe ich leider nicht mehr, sondern nur noch die mit Windows Explorer gedrehten Versionen ... --Mosmas (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Ok, kein Problem und danke fuer den Testupload. Ich habe schon vermutet, dass die Quelle der Probleme tatsaechlich die originale Datei war. --McZusatz (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Und watt nu? --Mosmas (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Inzwischen habe ich beide Dateien "repariert". Das geht z.B. mit jpegtran (verlustlos) oder GIMP (verlustbehaftet).
jpegtran -optimize  -perfect -copy all -outfile out2.jpg NSG_E-006_Kamptal_Filipendula_ulmaria.jpg
--McZusatz (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Dankeschön!! Worin bestand denn das Problem, und wie kann ich es künftig vermeiden? --Mosmas (talk) 14:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hier gibts aber noch immer ein Darstellungsproblem: [8]. --Mosmas (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Genaues kann ich auch nicht sagen, aber es ist wahrscheinlich, dass das Problem durch den Windows-Explorer beim Drehen entstanden ist. (Das verlinkte Darstellungsproblem wird nicht weggehen, da in der Dateiliste die Thumbnails der entsprechend hochgeladenen Versionen angezeigt werden.) --McZusatz (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
das werde ich künftig lassen. Nochmals vielen Dank! --Mosmas (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz

WLE-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Mosmas,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)