User talk:Multichill/Archives/2012/October

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File tagging File:Blanke Kussen.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blanke Kussen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Blanke Kussen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vera (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Blanke Kussen.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blanke Kussen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Multichill (talk) 16:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lotte.JPG

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lotte.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Issue solved. --Jarekt (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Unused WLM files

Hi, Maarten. As unused files on cawiki are up to date, it will be helpfull if you can include as well the table fr_(ca). I have renamed ca:Portal:Wiki Loves Monuments/Imatges per utilitzar Andorra to "Viquiprojecte:Monuments/Imatges per utilitzar d'Andorra", although empty and not used so far, so if a new page is needed for French ones it could be created at "Viquiprojecte:Monuments/Imatges per utilitzar de França". I appreciate very much your help in WLM stuff. --V.Riullop (talk) 07:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Dupe finding tool

Can you tell me if this tool is still working, or maybe i have problem because when i open it, it says "Access denied". --Smooth_O (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Coronal Mass Ejection Las020.gif

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coronal Mass Ejection Las020.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Packed to the Rafters poster.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Packed to the Rafters poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 10:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:FEMA - 825 - Photograph by FEMA News Photo taken on 08-18-1998 in District of Columbia.jpg

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:FEMA - 825 - Photograph by FEMA News Photo taken on 08-18-1998 in District of Columbia.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:UserDaanschrOctavianus.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:UserDaanschrOctavianus.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tiger66 (talk) 13:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Fungus Guy#Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Canada

Only bunnies are allowed to hop here ;-)

See User talk:Fungus Guy#Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Canada. No talk page hopping please. Multichill (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

HPC

Hello. I'm just wondering what prompted this change? I can't find an explanation anywhere. Maybe I am overlooking it. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

BotMultichillT emptying "Historic buildings in"

It looks like BotMultichillT has recently been changing file categorizations from "Historic buildings in" to "Buildings in". I'm assuming this is because of Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/01/Category:Historic buildings in the United States -- if so, it would have been nice to have a link to that in the edit summary, which had me scratching my head until I started working up the category tree. However, this has also resulted in duplicate categorization. For example, this replaced "Historic buildings in Michigan" with "Buildings in Michigan", but the file is already in the child category "Buildings in Ypsilanti, Michigan". Will another sweep of the bot remove the unnecessary parent category, or is this going to require manual cleanup? cmadler (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Well done, however, for finally killing the "historic buildings" categories. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Please give guidance

Greetings O' Multichill: I saw that you made a change to the category structure such that you have added Category:History of Humboldt County, California containing only an empty category for California historical markers. We already have Category:Plaques in Humboldt County, California which has some of those markers inside. However, the directory structure you have created doesn't seem to fit in with the structure that was there before. E.g. Is your new category "history" supposed to hold all the plaques? It doesn't in other counties in California unless you are making a whole new system? Also Category:National Register of Historic Places in Humboldt County, California is a sub-category of the county as it is in the rest of the state. But under your new system it seems to be a subcategory. I am sorry, but I am confused and since I'm the one taking most of these photos, I ask for your help unconfusing me. I thought we had a workable category structure and I'm at a loss how to put all this together. Please help. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Looking forward to your help sorting out how to rearrange pictures since the creation of an empty category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Multichill/Archives/2012. You have new messages at Category talk:Cultural heritage monuments in Portugal#Needs to be sorted out.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Circus elephant

Hello. Could you please upload the elephant section of File:Scenes in the arena, 1874.jpg by itself. I haven;t had any success. Thank you. Bobisbob (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Template:NRHP

Is there any chance of making Template:NRHP look like Template:Historic Places in Canada? See NRHP example and HPC example.

  • the color scheme of HPC fits better in the template
  • HPC works both outside and within the infobox
  • HPC places the icon to the left of the text, in the section part of the template, rather than jamming up readable text

The official NRHP list sucks vacuum so the number-to-website link is unneeded, but the format would be wonderful. Thundersnow (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Category:Heritage sites in Israel

Only bunnies are allowed to hop here ;-)

See User talk:Ynhockey#Category:Heritage sites in Israel. No talk page hopping please. Multichill (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)