User talk:Mwpnl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you for your visit to my Talk page.
Please visit nl:Overleg gebruiker:Mwpnl for my talk page on the Dutch wikipedia or meta:User talk:Mwpnl for my meta-talkpage. Questions asked on those pages will be answered faster. Mwpnl 13:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Mwpnl, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

-- Cecil (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Gefeliciteerd: /me neemt een stuk taart en geeft de bus slagroom door... Ciell (talk) 08:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Gefeliciteerd, zie ook je email even aub :) Huib talk 08:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Cecil and thank you Ciell and Huib :-). And of course thanks to all the supporters ;-) MarkW (Mwpnl) (talk) 12:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

OTRS request[edit]

Hello, I would like to see the OTRS ticket:2009042310026941 as per which earlier version of this image File:Ashok banker and family.jpg were removed. Can you provide me with this or point me towards someone with an OTRS account willing to help? --Belasd (talk) 03:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

There has been a problem with personality rights, therefore the earlier version was deleted. For a quick reply, try Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard in the future: OTRS-ers watch this page. Regards, Ciell (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Ciell. This was indead the reason the earlier version is removed. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 12:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Will post on the OTRS noticeboard next time. --Belasd (talk) 16:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Erdincistanbul[edit]

Hi
User Erdincistanbul uploaded another one. Can you take care of it?
Thanks, Amalthea (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Thanks. I blocked him for 3 days. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 20:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Ooops, I just thought to tag File:Meturks2009.png myself since I thought you were offline, and recreated it. Could you ... :)
Thanks, Amalthea (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done of course :-) m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Mwpnl!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for uploading Copyrighted material.[edit]

Hi Mark :)

Kende jij user:Rama/copyvioblock al?

Ik gebruik altijd een indeff blokkade als een gebruiker na de eerste blokkade doorgaat met uploaden van copyvios, ik subst: dan dat template en unblock als hij heeft aangegeven de policy te kennen en geen copyvio meer zal uploaden. user:rama/copyvioblock

See ya, Huib talk 18:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't know about that template yet, quite handy! m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 20:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Sander-jan-klerk_bw.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sander-jan-klerk_bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

86.91.202.127 22:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token e2f320bc1eddddfaa1ca787e425eefc2[edit]

I forgot my password, oeps.

lol Huib talk 18:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Holliday[edit]

Hi Mark,

I will be out the country for a couple of weeks maybe 1 maybe 5 we don't really know a end date..

I have posted a note on my user page telling people to go to you or two other administrators when the need help and I am not there, I hope you enjoy may fan club that post topics daily :)

I will speak to you soon again... Wop Wop

Huib talk 18:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Huib, enjoy your holiday. I'll try to act like an answering machine for you: "Huib's not there, please leave a message and you might get a message back<beep>". ;-). I've but your Talk page on my watchlist. Cheers! m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 21:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


File:2238516206_6f4b275075_o.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2238516206_6f4b275075_o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Willscrlt “Talk” • “w:en” • “m” ) 10:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Related, see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Deletion review. - ALLSTRecho wuz here 20:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks it's weird. As I'm the one who uploaded the picture, I don't want to be the sysop restoring it, so I hope someone else agrees too. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 20:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I only nominated this photo for deletion because it looks suspicious, and there was no way for me to compare the photo with others from the Flickr user's other photos. It looks atypical of most Flickr photos--much more like something professional that was scanned (because of the yellow cast to the image). If you know more information about the photo or the Flickr user that tells you otherwise, that's great. Without evidence to show it wasn't a copyvio, it seemed safer to prod for deletion than risk keeping a copyvio hanging around here. My original deletion summary was quite brief, because I used a tool to do it, and I wasn't sure how long of a description I could leave, so I just highlighted the pertinent points that I had noticed. I should have explained my rationale a bit better. I don't blame Yann for deleting it, because it has the hallmarks of copyvio and Flickrwashing, and there was not enough detail within the photo itself to indicate otherwise. I wasn't aware that you, the uploader, were an admin (who presumably knows as well. or better than I do, what is permissable). No hard feelings, I hope. :-) —Willscrlt “Talk” • “w:en” • “m” ) 03:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Files still awaiting OTRS confirmation[edit]

Hello, Mwpnl. The file(s) listed below have been marked with {{OTRS received}}, but there has been no complete confirmation of its permission status in the last 30 days. From what I'm able to tell, you were the person who added this template. Would you mind taking a look at this again? If confirmation cannot be found, this file should probably be marked for deletion. This should be the only notification you will receive regarding this image, so long as the comment I added to the image description page is not altered. Thanks! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 21:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

If you are not an OTRS volunteer or did not add the "received" template to this file, it's possible I made a mistake identifying the correct user. I look for the most recent diff where the template was added, so if you reverted an edit where this template was removed, I can't tell the difference. If this is the case, please let my operator know at w:en:User talk:Hersfold. Sorry for the inconvenience!

The file(s) in question are:

Admin inactivity[edit]

Hello Mwpnl, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 18:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Young_man_taking_off_shirt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Young_man_taking_off_shirt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trycatch (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Mwpnl. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)