User talk:Nachosan
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
TUSC token 34121867fc6477bcbbd883e60c014a70[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 68522242c6a6b31fb010496804e1eadf[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token d5efe8be626e377ef48ad4c36c7f82ef[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Deprecated License[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Flotationmachine.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 23:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Maeshowe2.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Stenness flier.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Breves apuntes sobre algunos objetos prehistóricos de la provincia de Santander. Marcelino Sanz de Sautuola.jpg was uncategorized on 18 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lava Fork lava flow.jpg[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lava Fork lava flow.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 18:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Ansel-Adams-tif-file with enourmous name "File:"Onyx drapes in the 'Papoose Room,' Carlsbad Caverns National Park," ..."[edit]
Hello Nachosan,
You asked this file to be rotaded by 180degs -- Done! 
If the LZW-compressed version is ok, please remove the still existing entry "rotate-template" on the files' page.
Otherwise you may want to restore my first unzipped (but still 180degs-rotated) tif-version there?
Finally you could rotate once again the "strange" jpg-version ... ?!
This one seems to have it's own rotating-life ... maybe a zombie-file?
• Jaybear • ...disc. • 20:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Problematic Rotation Candidates ...[edit]
Once again Hello Nachosan,
this one is now rotated too ... but it has gotten ... how should I say?
The two black dog-ears below dont lessen the basic information of the image, I think.
At the other side: If they would be cropped, a good part of the image-info would be lost ...
So please, crop at your own will!
- - This file is using a "bad" category: "Category:Flowstone" ...
- - Unfortuneally the "Category:Flowstones" does also exist !
I've uploaded a derivative image:
Please take the best fitting part of it for replacing the other (distorted) version.
• Jaybear • ...disc. • 21:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- And after fixing the catregories you can also delete the template-entries "rotation-needed" from both files.
- • Jaybear • ...disc. • 21:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, "... catgorize it in "dogs" ;-)" -- good idea!
- "... categories ... using plurals in all of them." -- Very good idea, I think!
- • Jaybear • ...disc. • 21:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, "... catgorize it in "dogs" ;-)" -- good idea!
Hello Nachosan,
I've nearly forgotten to inform you about my last edit from yesterday.
I've improved the lower black corner a little, I hope
• Jaybear • ...disc. • 13:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Permiso para las fotos de Altamira[edit]
Hola!
Te informo que he añadido el permiso a las 18 imágenes del Museo de Altamira según el permiso que nos has enviado al sistema OTRS. Ha quedado archivado con el nº 2013031810013815
Un saludo y gracias por tu contribución y mediación en este asunto. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Entiendo con esto que el problema se arregló. Si no es así, me dices y miro en OTRS. Un saludo, --Lucien (es·m·com) 17:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Si deseas borrar alguna imagen que comprometa a menores como este caso, por favor considera usar subir una nueva versión de la imagen y usar {{Speedydelete}} para borrar la versión anterior. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 |
File:Cart plan 400.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— billinghurst sDrewth 09:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
|
File:IPN east wheel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Denniss (talk) 17:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to say 'thanks!' for tidying this, and several of my other images, into categories. Next excuse I get to tour the museum, I want a film crew with me. ;) Then I can get the curators to show-off the interactives — which would be far better than just stills. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Dunbar panorama[edit]
Your panorama of Dunbar has been one of the most entertaining images I've come across on a Wikipedia page after exploring it with the the zoom facility. So much clear detail. I loved discovering the two almost silhouetted figures on the bench with the harbour behind them. Nice one! Kim Traynor (talk) 10:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
|
File:Clava cairn (Balnauran of Clava) 02.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
|
File:Clava cairn (Balnauran of Clava) 08.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
|
File:Clava cairn (Balnauran of Clava) 11.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Helictites at Jenolan Caves .jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helictites at Jenolan Caves .jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leyo 08:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Marxfigures.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vikiçizer (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Mugil cephalus[edit]
Hi Nachosan I think that the fish is M. cephalus not C. labrosus because the thick lip is not covered with rows of papillae, because the eye is covered by an adipose lid (that is barely visible in the photo) and because the pectorals have no greyish tinge. The image came from the FishBase project and the photos in FishBase are carefully studied before publication in the site. Best regards.--Etrusko25 (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Fotos del gobierno de Cantabria[edit]
Hola Nachosan, cuando subas fotos del gobierno de Cantabria, que parecen tener una licencia compatible, no olvides incluir también la plantilla {{LicenseReview}} para que alguien pueda validar la licencia. Mañana pueden cambiar la licencia y, si no la hemos validado aquí a tiempo, podría ser borrada. Gracias --Discasto talk 09:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Si lo has hecho "manualmente", me temo que sí. Si has usado flickr2commons o la opción de subir fotos de flickr en el formulario de subida, no. Un bot se encarga de validarlas automáticamente. Un saludo --Discasto talk 13:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Jean Clottes images[edit]
Hi, would you please correct the source links on your Jean Clottes uploads (or otherwise have the photos deleted)? czar 03:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! Could you also update them to use {{Cc-by-3.0-es}}, per the site's license? The current license doesn't use
-esczar 13:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Cruz de los martires Consuegra Inauguracion low.JPG[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cruz de los martires Consuegra Inauguracion low.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Cruz de los martires Consuegra Inauguracion low.JPG]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Discasto talk 09:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Perdona[edit]
Hola Nachosán, perdona por no haber respondido antes. Vi tu mensaje pero he estado con muy poco tiempo y no llegué a responder. En el caso que nos ocupa, el problema estaba en que, en general, para poder presuponer que algo está en el dominio público en España, deben haber pasado, al menos, 80 años (no 70) tras la publicación (luego hay que ver cuando murió el autor y otras cosas así, pero lo mínimo es que hayan pasado 80 años y no 70). Las reglas de copyright por territorio están en Commons:Copyright rules by territory. En este caso, no se cumplía esa condición y el borrado es correcto. Pero sí, tienes toda la razón al estar disgustado por mi falta de respuesta. Eso ha sido culpa mía y te reitero mis disculpas. Espero que puedas aceptarlas. Un saludo --Discasto talk 12:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hola, he visto que en es:Cueva del Mirón está la misma foto duplicada. Quizá esta foto te parezca interesante. Un saludo --Discasto talk 13:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Nachosan,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Callanish II rockdetail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_02.JPG){kind=link}
_08.JPG){kind=link}
_11.JPG){kind=link}
,_1933_-_1942_-_NARA_-_520041.jpg){kind=link}
_02.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.JPG){kind=link}
_08.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_08.JPG){kind=link}
_11.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_11.JPG){kind=link}
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vallina Estalactitas banderolas helictitas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Hola Nachosán, ¿me puedes confirmar que son restos de Mammuthus meridionalis? La dentición es de elefante, tiene colmillos (se ve al menos uno) y M. meridionalis es el elefante identificado en el yacimiento. Un saludo, --PePeEfe (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Bueno, no hace falta, ya lo has puesto en w:es:Yacimientos de la región de Orce. --PePeEfe (talk) 07:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Yacimientos arqueológicos de la región de Orce[edit]
Hola Nachosan, creo que sería mejor denominar al conjunto de yacimientos como "Yacimientos arqueológicos y paleontológicos de la cuenca de Guadix-Baza", reflejaría mucho mejor el contenido. Por un lado la cuenca está muy bien delimitada, es una auténtica cuenca sedimentaria (hay subsidencia y además endorréica). Por otro lado hay acumulación natural de restos debida a carnívoros y por muerte natural, por lo que no todo es arqueológico, más bien una pequeña parte, que se limita a cierto carroñeo y despiece. Por otra parte los yacimientos están por toda la cuenca, no solo en los alrededores de Orce (Baza-1, por ejemplo). Tengo fotos para subir que chirrían con la denominación actual y sin embargo encajan muy bien paleontológicamente con el resto (misma cuenca, edad similar, mismo equipo de trabajo ...). Un saludo, --PePeEfe (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sí, debemos ser los únicos colgados ;) He modificado algo el nombre de la categoría, pero esa era la idea. Ya he añadido alguna foto. Verás que sobre Fuente Nueva 3 han construido ¡¡la ópera de Sidney!! los que vayan allí a trabajar supondrán que eso de excavar un yacimiento es un lujo oriental, sin calor, lluvia ... Un abrazo, --PePeEfe (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
La Vanguardia[edit]
Tienes alguna foto publicada en La Vanguardia. DPC (talk) 06:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
|
File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-28-00 2044x1816.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.
And also:
- File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-30-00 2521x3223.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-32-08 2160x3695.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Australopithecus africanus 29-04-2012 11-32-46 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo ergaster 29-04-2012 11-37-14 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo georgicus 29-04-2012 11-35-22 2372x3863.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo habilis 29-04-2012 11-34-40 2050x2916.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo habilis 29-04-2012 11-50-21 2320x2980.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo heidelbergensis 29-04-2012 11-38-20 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo heidelbergensis 29-04-2012 11-38-49 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo neanderthalensis 29-04-2012 11-39-17 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Homo rhodesiensis 29-04-2012 11-39-42 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Paranthropus boisei 29-04-2012 11-33-51 2157x3508.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
- File:MEH Paranthropus boisei 29-04-2012 11-50-46 2592x3888.JPG ( Nominator : Dunkleosteus77 - Reason : reason=FOP Spain does not include interiors of buildings )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Paranthropus boisei 29-04-2012 11-50-46 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Paranthropus boisei 29-04-2012 11-33-51 2157x3508.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo rhodesiensis 29-04-2012 11-39-42 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo neanderthalensis 29-04-2012 11-39-17 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo heidelbergensis 29-04-2012 11-38-49 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo heidelbergensis 29-04-2012 11-38-20 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo habilis 29-04-2012 11-50-21 2320x2980.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo habilis 29-04-2012 11-34-40 2050x2916.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo georgicus 29-04-2012 11-35-22 2372x3863.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Homo ergaster 29-04-2012 11-37-14 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Australopithecus africanus 29-04-2012 11-32-46 2592x3888.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-32-08 2160x3695.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-30-00 2521x3223.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MEH Australopithecus afarensis 29-04-2012 11-28-00 2044x1816.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:The Forbes skull, viewed from the side. George Busk papers, Royal College of Surgeons London hr.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:The Forbes skull, viewed from the side. George Busk papers, Royal College of Surgeons London hr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
