User talk:Nandaro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello Nandaro,

I am Asami Koguchi and I sent mail to you before. I apologize you for not writing the reason why I wanted to contact you. I hereby explain what I wanted to talk to you. I work at Japan Society for Advancement of Inventions which is Public Interest Incorporated Foundation.(http://www.jsai.org/ E-mail: hatsumei@jsai.org)We are making science trumps for educational use these years. The aim of this trump is to understand sciences while playing trump. DNA trump, Periodic law trump, Electric trump and Plate tectonics trump are completed and used in educational organization. We are now making Newton Mechanics trump. In this trump we regard the force, mass, length, energy as four suit of trump. In the trump card heart 10, we want to show that Niagara fall’s energy is big and fall energy change into heat. We find your following picture is quite suitable picture to our new trump. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Niagara_Falls_006.JPG#file So would you please permit us to use your picture in our trump? If you accept, we refer to your name in treating paper. So please tell us how we can write your name. I sincerely expect your warm consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koguchi a (talk • contribs) 02:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Hello Nandaro,

My name is Koguchi from Japan. I'd like to make a contact with you about the photo-Niagara Falls. Please contact me. guguchi98@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koguchi a (talk • contribs) 01:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Nandaro,

My name is Karla Linder, and I work at Adventure Publications in Cambridge, MN (www.adventurewithkeen.com). We’re currently working on a book called, “Wildflowers of Southern California Quick Guide” which is due out Fall 2017.

We’re writing because we’d like to use your image of the following species in both books:


Species Name: Opuntia littoralis, Coastal Prickly Pear Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Opuntia_littoralis_Upper_Newport_Bay_(Feb_2014)_08.jpg


As we understand it, you’ve shared the image on Wikipedia and it is Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. We’d like to ask for your permission to use the above image in this book.

If you grant permission… 1) Please let me know how your photo credit should read. 2) We’d like to send you a free copy of the book. What is your mailing address?

Please let us know what you think, and thanks.

Karla Linder Production karla@adventurewithkeen.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlaadventure (talk • contribs) 18:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nandaro!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beware of Hawks (Enoshima).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 21:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your messages. I have no intention of violating anyone's rights and have no objection if my photos are determined to be inappropriate for Wiki use. I'll stop uploading for now and read some guidelines. --Nandaro (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. whym (talk) 07:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

Usurpation Request[edit]

I hereby confirm that I've made this usurpation request. --Nandaro (talk) 07:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Cherry blossoms in California has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Bronze[edit]

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Salton City shore (March 2014) 04.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Surface textures, in March 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Hello Nandaro,
while I'm glad you found the new subpage, the page isn't really in use yet (I now added a template to hopefully clear that up). But perhaps you could participate in the vote? I'd really like some opinions if we should separate the threads or not...
best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anna reg, thanks for everything. I haven't decided whether to vote pro or contra yet, but I'll comment. Nandaro (talk) 17:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gull idenitities[edit]

Hi Nandaro - European Herring Gulls don't occur in California ;-) Your photos File:Redondo Beach CA (Feb 2014) 02.JPG and File:Goleta Beach (2013) 07.JPG show Western Gulls, the commonest coastal species in that area. Are there any other gull photos you have added which might need checking? - MPF (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MPF, thanks for checking and correcting. Seriously, what would Commons do without you?! I think I have some where I've classified gulls as California Gulls or just Birds of x County, California, where I could use your help. I also have some that I haven't uploaded yet where I have trouble identifying species. I am hesitant to upload them unless I'm reasonably sure about the species (or at least the genus), but the dilemma is that no one can really help/correct me without looking at the photos. I think of your name every time I hit a road block, but I didn't want to keep bothering you. Let me review what I've already uploaded and get back to you. Thanks again. --Nandaro (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here they are. Gulls in some of these photos are so small or blurry we probably don't even need to identify them, but I'll leave the judgement up to you. Thanks. --Nandaro (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  1. File:Upper Newport Bay (20140217-0160).JPG (uncategorized for gulls)
  2. File:Upper Newport Bay (20140217-0165).JPG (uncategorized for gulls)
  3. File:Salton Sea Beach (Jan 2014) 13.JPG (uncategorized for gulls)
  4. File:Salton Sea Beach (Jan 2014) 12.JPG (uncategorized for gulls)
  5. File:Salton Sea Beach (Jan 2014) 11.JPG (identified as California Gulls Larus californicus in description but uncategorized)
  6. File:Salton Sea Beach (Jan 2014) 10.JPG (categorized as California Gulls Larus californicus)
  7. File:Salton Sea Beach (Jan 2014) 09.JPG (categorized as California Gulls Larus californicus)
  8. File:Salton Sea (Jan 2014) 03.JPG (uncategorized for gulls)
  9. File:Salton Sea (Jan 2014) 01.JPG (categorized as California Gulls Larus californicus)
  10. File:Goleta Beach (2013) 17.JPG (unidentified birds - one of the 3 birds might be a gull? The other two are black-necked stilts Himantopus mexicanus, right?)
Thanks! ;-) I'll go through them soon - MPF (talk) 19:38, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Category Barnstar
Thanks for helping categorize the American places uploads. (talk) 11:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uwajimaya[edit]

Re this edit, etc., I strongly disagree with adding Category:Uwajimaya to an interior shot that merely happens to be in a building that at an earlier point in its history housed Uwajimaya. I urge you to roll back this and similar edits you may have made. - Jmabel ! talk 23:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad & fixed. I mistakenly thought that the gallery was part of Uwajimaya when it was still there. Thanks for pointing it out. --Nandaro (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reversions. And, sadly, Ming's itself is now gone from there as well (moved to the East Side). - Jmabel ! talk 16:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:20140801-0090 Olympiad Park.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

And also:

-- Hahifuheho (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!![edit]

Thank you for updating categories on my photos! Much appreciated. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Your beautiful photo of double rainbows in Ferndale led me to the other photos from the city and Humboldt County as a whole. All I've done is tweak the categories a little to make the (already available) photos more accessible. If I've succeeded, I'm happy. Nandaro (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aww, thank you! That double rainbow picture was my first-ever cellphone photo! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese community in Los Angeles area (Torrance and Lomita in particular)[edit]

Are you interested in photographing sites that may be important to the Japanese community in Los Angeles area (Torrance and Lomita in particular, plus maybe a bit in Little Tokyo)? WhisperToMe (talk) 11:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image Use Request[edit]

I am interested in discussing this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mammoth_House_(Replica).JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webandladder (talk • contribs) 22:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

--Ralth Galth (talk) 09:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20140828-0006 House Foods.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mammoth_House_(Replica).JPG - Image Permission[edit]

Dear Nandaro,

I am a retired proffessor and currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mammoth_House_(Replica).JPG I kindly ask for your permission and infomation about terms and conditions of using your image. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part.

Yours Sincerely
Prof. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustidede (talk • contribs) 14:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salton City shore (March 2014) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Poco a poco Thu, 03 May 2018 18:45:56 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:20140909-0253 Costa Mesa Mitsuwa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Birds of California in water has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Boylarva99 (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Birds of California in flight has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Boylarva99 (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ramen shops in the United States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--トトト (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]