User talk:Napoleón333~commonswiki
¿De dónde sacas que El Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad de Chile es un archivo de imágenes de domino publico? Willy 12:39, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
En el sitio de la Universidad de Chile, propietaria, supongo, del Archivo Fotográfico si bien se dice que los contenidos son libres y gratuitos especifica que el uso de los contenidos para uso comercial no se podrá realizar sin permiso, es decir, son libres y gratuitos para fines educativos o uso personal, dicho sea de paso las legislaciones de propiedad intelectual, entre ellas la chilena, ya suelen permitir el uso de materiales protegidos sin permiso del autor en el ámbito de la enseñanza y es común aceptar que al exponer contenidos en la red se está, de hecho, permitiendo el uso personal de los mismos. Pero ni uno ni otro es el caso de la wikipedia que además de redistribuir los contenidos (uso no personal) no impide su explotación (uso comercial) y bien podría hacerla en el futuro la propia fundación WikiMedia. Son multitud los sitios en las que se dan las mismas restricciones: páginas gubernamentales de muchos países, portales educativos de universidades y centros de enseñanza, asociaciones profesionales, páginas personales, etc...
Yo creo que en tales condiciones no se pueden traer aquí esos contenidos. Es un fastidio, es un engorro, es lo que quieras llamarle, pero es lo que hay y no debe olvidarse el hecho de que wikipedia nació con el ánimo de combatir ésta situación, si nos aplicamos las mismas restricciones la situación no hará mejorado mucho.
De lo que sí estoy seguro es que ninguna ley chilena te permite licenciar un trabajo ajeno, por favor te ruego encarecidamente que no hagas cosas como la que sugieres de colgarle el cartelito {cc-by} u otro similar a ninguna foto que no sea tuya, salvo que lo lleve la original, claro. Si te das cuenta las únicas imágenes que no llevan cartelito de licencia son precisamente las fair use, si wikipedia (o tú) no posees los derechos de reproducción de la imagen dificilmente podrás exigir a nadie cómo debe hacer dicha reproducción. Willy 11:07, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) Recuerdo que en la wiki se habló en alguna discusión de un sitio chileno y Cinabrium dijo que las imágenes eran de dominio público, pero no recuerdo cual, veré si lo encuentro. Willy 11:07, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Images to be deleted[edit]
A total of thirteen of the images you uploaded has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Please leave any comments you have there. Thuresson 10:54, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC) oye wili , eres un idiota, solo son fotografias,
untagged images[edit]
Hi - several of the images you uploaded are listed on Commons:Untagged_images#M, because they have no license info. Please add the appropriate Commons:Copyright tags to the images description pages, as images without license info will have to be deleted. Please also add the author, source and date of creation if applicable. Thanks! -- Duesentrieb 13:08, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Castro Khrushchev.jpg[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Castro Khrushchev.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili 08:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
| Pay attention to copyright | Image:PedroDeValdivia.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license[edit]
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
|
File:Jose Joaquin Prieto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 19:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Napoleón333. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Napoleón333~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
04:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)