User talk:NatanFlayer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Commons-logo.svg
Soft redirect page


File:Atmos_romania.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atmos_romania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 00:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons[edit]

Hello NatanFlayer!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer any image from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool transfers all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.

For example this image does not contain enough source information according to licencing policy because "Hebrew Wikipedia" (or "English Wikipedia") is not considered a valid source.

Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

cropping[edit]

You have cropped many of my pictures - but the crop turned out to be a very small file and in low quality (probably due to croping software). A 3 Mega files came down to 100K (this is too small a file even after cropping, i.e. too much was lost in the way). You can upload new versions (derivative work) but don't rewrite the old versions (i.e. give new names to the files such as an ending "cropped" to each file name). Deror avi (talk) 09:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Arava-cockpit.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arava-cockpit.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Engelberg-Titlis cableway wallpaper.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engelberg-Titlis cableway wallpaper.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:LAR160_pack.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:LAR160_pack.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.102.13 21:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

There is an OTRS permission. Read carefully under the Summary section.
OTRS information for Wikimedia:
http://aick.livejournal.com/93795.html?thread=255587 Screenshot: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4025/4254140417_74054d6f1b_b.jpg
The author, aick from livejournal, gave me his permission. NatanFlayer (talk) 14:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

רובים ושושנים בצה"ל[edit]

שלום, תייגת את התמונה הבאה בקטגוריה של כלניות (ואני מניח שעוד תמונות שצה"ל שחרר). אתה בטוח שאלו כלניות ולא פרגים או נוריות?

I didn't categorize it as Anemone coronaria though. NatanFlayer (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

stop vandalism.[edit]

Categories are correct. --Starscream (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Stop pushing POV everywhere. NatanFlayer (talk) 20:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I can admit that the category "famous photographs," is currently a little abuse. But all the other categories are correct. This little boy is not old man. Shameles vandalism. --Starscream (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
all right! You win. Not famous. --Starscream (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Aiming - incorrect, the soldiers doesn't aim. Boys in Asia - too general, because hese are specifically children in Hebron. Toddlers - totally incorrect. NatanFlayer (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The weapon is targeted as a kid's face. This is fact. --Starscream (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The weapon isn't targeted at all. Educate yourself about perspective. NatanFlayer (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I see that finger is not on trigger. But barrel is oriented to kiddy face. This is fact. --Starscream (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The barrel isn't oriented to the kid's face. Educate yourself about perspective. NatanFlayer (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
No, barrel is oriented to the sky! This is not 3D photo. This soldier does not want kill but only show a peculiar sense of humor. --Starscream (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The barrel points to the ground. NatanFlayer (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I speak ironically. Anyway, the kid too close to recognize as not this a shameful act. Why not "toddler"? --Starscream (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
If you look at the "Toddlers" category, you can see that there are only toddlers there. No big boys, no soldiers, no street views, no graffiti... But this photo doesn't represent toddlers at all. You can always say "but there is toddler there!", but there is also some air there, would you add Category:Air ? NatanFlayer (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The kid is too important a character to ignore. This picture would be a lot less shocking if the victim was an old man. A large number of category for pictures containing a lot of people and objects is not unconventional. --Starscream (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
The kid is not a victim, because the soldier doesn't aim at him, The boy is just one of the objects of the photo. NatanFlayer (talk) 22:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
So to what aim this soldier? To ant? Think logically: If it were not the kid, then this picture would not be shocking. This is not a large crowd of people. Only three people. So adding a category that describes each of them separately is not problematic.
The soldier doesn't aim at anything, and the picture isn't shocking. NatanFlayer (talk) 23:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Picture say: Lying. --Starscream (talk) 23:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
If you hear voices in your head from any kind of picture, advice with your doctor. NatanFlayer (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Nice. Vandalism and personal attack. --Starscream (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
After calling me a liar a dozen of times, you have nothing to complain about. NatanFlayer (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
If you say that the picture is completely different than you see, I can say so without remorse. I say quite diplomatically. --Starscream (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I respect diplomacy, that's why I provide you again with a link to an article about perspective. NatanFlayer (talk) 23:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
This link is useless. Rifle barrel is just inches from kiddy face. --Starscream (talk) 12:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Rifle's barrel is also just inches from soldier's hand. NatanFlayer (talk) 12:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Enjoy your toddler here. NatanFlayer (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As a new comer to this discussion I am rather lost. I assume it is about File:05 10 05 soldiers in old city 1.jpg or File:Stroop Report - Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 06b.jpg or both. I personally never liked categories like Category:Aiming and was rather glad when user:Andy Dingley removed it from bunch or images (like this one. There are countless of images of people holding guns and those guns often point in someone's direction (either because there is a clear intent to shoot or gun just happen to point that way). Unless there is a clear intent to shoot I agree with user:Andy Dingley that is was not useful. But I am lost at the edit war at File:05 10 05 soldiers in old city 1.jpg. The kid in the picture I would guess is about 2.5-3 years old which qualifies him as en:Toddler and the image is famous - I have seen it before and just look at results of Google image or TinEye searches. Why are those categories controversial? I personally do not believe soldier is aiming at the kid or means him harm, but from the angle the picture is taken it definitely seems like soldier's gun is pointing at the kid. Also the similarity to the famous Warsaw Ghetto Uprising image makes it ideal for people who do not support Israel in Israel/Palestine conflict. I think people supporting both sides of this conflict should be able to agree on that. --Jarekt (talk) 03:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The soldier holds his weapon in the way he should hold it, regardless of the kid. The illusion of aiming is only a matter of the angle the picture is taken. The toddler is already categorized. If you compare the widespread use of the famous Warsaw Ghetto Uprising image with this photo, you see the difference between a famous photo and a photo that occasionally appear on Google? Tineye, or whatever searches. Obviously, the SS-man Josef Blösche is "aiming" to the ground. We shouldn't allow people to categorize photos according to their political agenda. NatanFlayer (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I agree that "The soldier holds his weapon in the way he should hold it" - other images from the same series show soldiers holding them the same way. I also agree that the image is not as famous as the Warsaw Ghetto one (by far), but it is well known. I just noticed File:05 10 05 toddler in old city.jpg. What is the purpose of it and how are you planning on using it? To me the central theme of the image is the interaction of the soldier and the kid, with their eyes locked on each other. Cutting the image in half makes no sense to me and seems like attempt to censorship it. --Jarekt (talk) 12:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I have no intention to use that image of the Palestinian toddler. Cropping the image was the only suitable way to adapt it to Category:Toddlers. The whole scene isn't appropriate to it. NatanFlayer (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
That is not how we do it on Commons. Commons is not censored so you do not need to cut images into pieces in order to make it "appropriate" for different categories. I will add Category:Toddlers. --Jarekt (talk) 13:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:05_10_05_toddler_in_old_city.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:05_10_05_toddler_in_old_city.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarekt (talk) 13:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Hezbollah_flag.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hezbollah_flag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Antemister (talk) 09:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Night Guides Squadron.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Night Guides Squadron.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yar (talk) 23:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:IAF squadron 253.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:IAF squadron 253.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yar (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:QassamsRange.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:QassamsRange.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:QassamsRange.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Widerborst (talk) 08:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

See also my comment in the edit summary. --Widerborst (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Goring Ram A-4 Hatzerim 201206.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Goring Ram A-4 Hatzerim 201206.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– JBarta (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:QassamsRange.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:QassamsRange.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

65.78.114.251 10:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)