User talk:Norro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
archive 2005 archive 2006 archive 2007

Shakedown_2008_Figure_1.jpg on FPC[edit]

Hi, Just a friendly mention that I've uploaded a better version (Alternate 2) with some correction of the file. You'll maybe consider support it instead of the original here. Have a good day. --Acarpentier 03:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission[edit]

Hi!

Can I get your permission to use an edited version of the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Epipolar_geometry.svg in my master thesis?

I'll include a reference and a thanks in the report!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.239.40.125 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 15. Jan. 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you have my permission. If you get an account here on commons, you can write me an email to get an official permission per mail. norro 20:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello now i have an account! Gasol (talk) 08:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Good. Now you can send me an email (here) and I will send an official permission in return. Regards, norro 15:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello from Buenos Aires - Argentina. Can I get your permission to use an edited version of the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Remote_Center_of_Compliance.svg in my master thesis? I'll include a reference and a thanks in the report! thanks

Yes, please use it. Cheers, norro

FP promotion[edit]

The Neck Bruny Island.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Spit Bruny Island.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Spit Bruny Island.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--D-Kuru (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:NYC_Panorama_edit.jpg[edit]

I have uploaded a restitched version of Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:NYC_Panorama_edit.jpg with more width and quality, please take a look and vote if you like. --LiveChocolate (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

danke[edit]

für dies hierfür. Hab es gerade erst entdeckt und eingebunden. Jedenfalls danke vom Hauptautor. --91.37.183.239 09:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Gern geschehen :) Gruß, norro 10:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Translation possible removed[edit]

Sorry, I removed it by mistake, I only meant to move the file to Category:Crystal radios. I have restored it already. Sv1xv (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. --norro 06:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

FP bot[edit]

Hi, in April 2008 I saw you mentioned that you were thinking about a bot for FPC closure. Did it get any further with that ? I have been thinking if I should start looking into it. /Daniel78 (talk) 10:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Retina[edit]

Hi Torro, I saw that you have File:Fig retine.png on your todo list. Apart from conversion to SV graphics I see a need to clarify the direction of light travel, e.g. by indicating curvature of the eye ball as in File:Fig retine bended.png. Obviously non-expert readers get easily confused because traversion of the nerve layer seems quite absurd at the first glance, see also the discussion at de:WP:Redaktion Medizin#Netzhaut - Einfallsrichtung des Lichts.

Unfortunately graphics design is really not my field of expertise, so I can't do it myself. Therefore I am trying to find someone willing to take this task, see also de:WP:Grafikwerkstatt#Netzhaut. What do you think? Maybe File:Retina.jpg could also serve as a starting point for conversion. Regards, --Burkhard (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Norro!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Norro style icons[edit]

Hello. I create few month ago Category:Flat round icons by Norro, and Category:Round icons by Norro to merge all icons look like that same. I create a lot of categories by "theme", because i like to see all icon look like the same together, it is usefull to select/compete a theme. And now i often use the author name into the category name, because identifying a "style" with only words can create a very big category name (i dont know... "bordered round icons with shader at the right", it became ridiculous).

But i have got problem Commons:Deletion requests/Norro categories, then do you have an idea for the category name? Or a name for your styles?

Maybe the problem is not the author name but the "by", because a lot of people create icons using your style, and with the "by Norro" we can understand you create the file. Then, maybe "Norro round icons", and "Norro flat round icons" can be better. Here, "Norro" is used as a common noun, and not as a proper noun.

As you see, someone rename one of this categories, and we have another discussion at Category talk:Round voting icons.

Thanks a lot. ~ bayo or talk 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Students_demonstrating_in_rostock_2005.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

malo (talk) 01:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

SSW Wahldiagramm[edit]

Hallo Norro. Da du schon die Landtagswahlergebnisse des Südschleswigschen Wählerverbandes in eine so ansprechended Form gebracht hast (File:SSW Landtagswahlergebnisse.svg), wollte ich dich bitten, dir auch mal diesen Pixelsalat vorzunehmen. Und eventuell könntest du auch die Landtagsreihe mit den Ergebnissen von 2009 aktualisieren? Das wäre sehr nett. De728631 (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Current source schematic symbols[edit]

I'm wondering if you know about the usage of the last two symbols in your figure "International_graphic_symbols_of_current_source.png‎".

Internationally, physicists like to use the last two. I know the last one is an american/international standard. The second to last one is also used, and is often preferred by physicists because it doesn't look like a voltage source (which is a single circle), and instead looks like two linked circles. You have this title "nicht DIN" or "not DIN" for that one but it seems like it also must be a standard symbol for usage somewhere. Do you know where? Do you know how the usage of 2 circles started? Also, sometimes I've seen 2 opaque overlapping circles for a current source. Any information that you have on this would be appreciated.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Betonpumpe.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Betonpumpe.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Betonpumpe.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Unimate.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Unimate.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Unimate.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Request to extend permissions[edit]

Hi,

Im currently writing a thesis for my master in medical imaging. I would've liked to use your picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Epipolar_geometry.svg to illustrate epipolar constraints in stereovision, but you published it under CC-BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), and my thesis is writen under CC-BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which prevents me from using your image because of the "Share alike" clause.

However, I believe the intent behind those two licences are essentially the same, and I therefore ask you your permission to use this illustration in my thesis under the CC-BY-NC-ND licence. Would you agree to let me do so?

File:Buttons_5a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Buttons_5a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mathonius (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Bändchenmikrofon.svg[edit]

Text should read "gefaltetes" instead of "gefaltenes". Joachim Schnitter 11:45, 13 May 2012 (CEST)

File:C-Rohrweiche.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:C-Rohrweiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--MGuf (d) 10:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Rotorpumpe.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rotorpumpe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--MGuf (d) 10:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Blossfeldt 71a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blossfeldt 71a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Blossfeldt 148a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blossfeldt 148a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Blossfeldt 94a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blossfeldt 94a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Blossfeldt 96a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blossfeldt 96a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Konzerthaus-photo[edit]

Hallo, Ich bin per zufall auf die Seite vom Konzerthaus-Berlin gestolpert, wo ja Ihr photo vom Facade erscheint... Ich würde sehr gerne ein 'gscheites Foto vom grossenn Saal dazu haben. Aber extra hierfür noch ein Foto einzusetzen fände ich blöd; Daher habe ich Ihr Foto, mit ein Saal-Foto zusammengelegt: http://s2.postimg.org/v23ctinuh/Konzerth_Berlin2.jpg Am besten Sie entscheiden, ob Sie es auch so benutzen wollen. (Im übrigen war Ihr photo gewiss mit eine schöne grösse, aber eigentlich viel zu gross für Wiki-infos, finde ich...).

Danke