User talk:Olaf Simons

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File tagging File:Henry de Groux.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Henry de Groux.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Henry de Groux.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--:bdk: 22:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 22:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Olaf Simons!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

File:2009_new_novels_in_a_Berlin_bookshop.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2009_new_novels_in_a_Berlin_bookshop.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

...hm, answered there. --Olaf Simons (talk) 14:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 91c308ff43b1743101fac5a29b215bce[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year


File:2009 stapelweise Neuerscheinungen im Buchladen.JPG[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:2009 stapelweise Neuerscheinungen im Buchladen.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

KTo288 (talk) 02:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2009 Bestseller im Supermarktregal.JPG This one too.--KTo288 (talk) 02:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:David Bardens.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:David Bardens.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin K. (talk) 15:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Martin, what kind of proof would you accept. I spoke with Bardens [1], the Wikipedia-Article is explicitly addressed. In the facebook chat that went on between us I clarified that the image has to have his consent to gnu-licensing. He said "no problem". Is my word that he agreed enough? Shall I put a postscript under the interview? Let me know what would help. --Olaf Simons (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I just added a Licensing statement at the bottom of [2], that should solve the problem if I got it correctly. --Olaf Simons (talk) 23:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
(bk)Hi Olaf! Da die Veröffentlichung unter einer freien Lizenz einen erheblichen Eingriff in die Urheberrechte darstellt, benötigen wir immer dann, wenn die Werke Dritter hochgeladen werden, eine ausdrückliche Freigabe des zugehörigen Urhebers (=Fotografen) oder des Inhabers der vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte (hier wahrscheinlich David Bardens selbst) für genau diese Lizensierung. Entsprechende Textvorlagen findest Du unter WP:Freigabe - geschickt werden sollte sie an permission-de@wikimedia.org. Vielen Dank im voraus! // Martin K. (talk) 23:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Also oben im Textbaustein lese ich "Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information" genau das habe ich jetzt getan, das Link geliefert in eine Seite mit der Copyright-Notiz zu diesem Bild. Bardens hat einen Autorenaccount bei dieser Seite. --Olaf Simons (talk) 09:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Habe gerade die Bildlizensierung für Bardens, der eine Woche fernab vom Netz ist, doch mich bat, das für ihn alles in seiner Abwesenheit zu handhaben (so ganz sahen wir nicht ab, welche Schwierigkeiten entstehen, gingen davon aus, das die vom Betroffenen mitverantwortete Seite die beste Quelle ist...) direct unter dem Bild angebracht. Das müsste eigentlich die oben im Textbaustein geforderten Klarheit bieten. --Olaf Simons (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok, angesichts der CC-Attribution in der Quelle sollte das akzeptabel sein - ich habe den Problembaustein daher entfernt.
Grundsätzlich sollte eine Freigabe Dritter (also von Personen, die hier keinen Account besitzen) von diesen per Mail an das WP:Support-Team geschickt werden. Auch die anderen oben angegebenen und mittlerweile gelöschten Dateien könnten wiederhergestellt werden, sobald eine entsprechende Freigabe vorliegt. // Martin K. (talk) 10:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Danke. Ich lasse den Link auf diese Disku David Bardens in seiner Abwesenheit zukommen. Gruß --Olaf Simons (talk) 10:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)