User talk:P199

Welcome to the Commons, P199!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Slade ^[pics] 02:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Sources

Hi, please do not just copy files from one wikipedia to Commons without mentioning the source. Use CommonsHelper to take all data about the source here, otherwise your images will eventually be deleted... Thank you for your understanding and effort. Siebrand 15:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Velcro.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Velcro.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Spitfire19 (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Identification

Hello. Could you please add info to File:Historic Courtroom.JPG. For example, what country, what city is this in, if you remember? Thank you. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Mer Bleue Bog

I'm writing you seeking permission to use your image for educationla purposes (4 Types of Wetlands, habitat for rare species etc.) I realize this image falls under the creative commons licence, but I would much rather credit the image to you the photographer, not your user name P199. If you could please message me, I would very much apprecaite it. Thank You, Jeffpark (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Kidd Metal Plant.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Amoco Cadiz 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Amoco Cadiz 1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Rama (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Amoco Cadiz impact.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Amoco Cadiz impact.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Rama (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Amoco Cadiz 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Amoco Cadiz 2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Rama (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File:CEF map.jpg

Hello. I just noticed this old image of yours. Is this a photo of a map on a plaque? If yes, wouldn't that make it a derivative work? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Grottoes VA.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Bombay NY.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Quebec MRC Le Golfe-du-Saint-Laurent location map.svg

You've asked for "File:Quebec MRC Le Golfe-du-Saint-Laurent location map.svg" to be renamed. However, because you are asking for the file to be reverted to the old name, which is now a redirect, this can only be done by an administrator. I would suggest you leave a request at "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard". — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 08:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Caniapiscau River photos - response

Check [1] :-) Lkovac (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Aerial Photography

You seem to have a bunch of shots that indicate you were flying when you took them. Do you have any paticular tips for achieving clear photos from behind the window of an airplane? Cheers, Floydian (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Manual focus on infinite, and high shutter speed. And hopefully you have a clear window... --P199 (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Crossing Intl Date Line.JPG

You've uploaded a derivative work

We're sorry, but File:Crossing Intl Date Line.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.

みんな空の下 (トーク) 05:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

thanks! File:Zielfoto DM 2007 DKV.jpg

I was just about to go and search for the correct cat and by magic it was already fixed to the correct cat. Thank you! @File:Zielfoto DM 2007 DKV.jpg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 18:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

• You're welcome. --P199 (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Schoonhoven_wapen.jpg

File:Schoonhoven_wapen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arch (talk) 05:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Evanescence Oct 24, 2006.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Evanescence Oct 24, 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

RE rillke questions? 12:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Evanescence_Oct_24,_2006.jpg

File:Evanescence_Oct_24,_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 12:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Newport VT 2.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Crossing_Intl_Date_Line.JPG

File:Crossing_Intl_Date_Line.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

155.247.166.28 02:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Quebec category moves

Hello, P199. Some of the category moves you proposed on November 21 have me scratching my head, so I figure that you could probably clarify the situation. While the logic makes sense, why do you need to move the entire category so as to achieve a Category:Cities and towns of (administrative region) level of category? Why not just create a cities and town subcat and populate it as appropriate? A number of the subcats in each cat do not belong in the cities and town branch of the category tree, and as far as I can tell, you would just end up recreating the plain title cat for each region. You made a good catch when you noticed that the region categories were placed in completely inappropriate parent cats, but it would seem much more straight forward to simply change the parent cats than to rename the categories themselves. But maybe I am missing something here. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

• The only reason is that if the category is renamed, the files are automatically re-categorized (by a bot), so that saves moving the files one-by-one. It is probably easier to move just the subcats. --P199 (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I haven't carefully looked at each of the categories you've tagged, but it's not readily apparent that most of the files would go into a Category:Cities and towns of (administrative region) level category. By the way, if you go to your Preferences menu, and choose the Gadget tab, there is a great gadget called Cat-a-lot which will move large numbers of files. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

• I have had Cat-a-lot activated for some time but never much experimented with it. This may be a good time for it then... Thanks! --P199 (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Same here. It actually took me forever to find some time to figure out how it worked. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

• Seems to work rather iffy. It only does about 50 or 60 % of the moves and then hangs until I refresh the page. Any tips? --P199 (talk) 15:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm. I don't have that problem. Could be the type/version of browser you are using. I have a version of IE on one desktop that does not agree with Cat-a-Lot, but Firefox on my laptop works smoothly. Occasionally, it will "miss" a file or two when one is moving very large number of files, but it doesn't freeze or anything. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

• Tried IE, Firefox, and Chrome. All 3 have the same problem! Must be a problem with the gadget or network traffic? --P199 (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

For what it's worth, that problem was fixed somehow a few months ago. For me, it went from failing nearly every time within 10 images, to working perfectly, and hasn't failed since. --Closeapple (talk) 07:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Canaan VT.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Stompwijk_1866.png

File:Stompwijk_1866.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Veur_1867.png

File:Veur_1867.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 13:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Voorburg_1866.png

File:Voorburg_1866.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lapu-Lapu Rizal Park.JPG

File:Lapu-Lapu Rizal Park.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Bridges between Canada and the United States

Hi. I've redirected Category:International bridges between Canada and United States to Category:Bridges between Canada and the United States; "United States" looked strange as a noun in the middle of a phrase without "the" before it. Also, I removed "International" from the category because it appears that all bridges between Canada and the U.S. must be international. (The new category is in Category:International bridges, of course.) I hope this is all OK. --Closeapple (talk) 07:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Zoeterwoude 1867.png

File:Zoeterwoude 1867.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Leiderdorp 1867.png

File:Leiderdorp 1867.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Warmond 1867.png

File:Warmond 1867.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loranchet (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Hahc21, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! — ΛΧΣ²¹ 02:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Please don't forget what I said: "You know that you aren't allowed to review your own uploads, right?" Trijnstel_talk 17:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

• Right. --P199 (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Good. :) Trijnstel_talk 18:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Would like to use your image of Kapuskasing in an upcoming book

Good Morning,

I am an image researcher working on a Terminator Vault, and we would love to use your image of Kapuskasing in the book, in the chapter that talks about James Cameron's early years. In exchange we would give you a photo credit and a complimentary copy of the book. Please contact me at karas@beckermayer.com if this sounds like something you'd be interested in contributing to.

Thanks so much, Kara Stokes

Highway11.ca

I'd like to use some of your images on my travel blog and would like to confirm how you would like the photo credit appear: to "P199" or "Wikimedia Commons User pp199" or to another name? Thanks Marc info@highway.ca

• Thanks for your interest in my pictures. Please attribute it to "User:P199 at Wikimedia Commons". Please provide me a link to your blog, I love to see the result. Regards, P199 (talk) 12:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you. As a dedicated backroads traveller, I'm impressed by the breadth of your photo collection, particularly the more remote locales in Ontario. My blog is highway11.ca, profiling communities that I've visited along Highway 11 in Ontario. I've taken my own photos in most of the towns but your photos are much clearer and better, and you have some photos of locations where I never got a chance to snap a picture. Thanks again, Marc.
    • You're welcome. I uploaded 2 more photos that may interest you: File:Jellicoe ON.jpg‎ and File:Thunder Bay skyline.JPG. --P199 (talk) 12:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for your concern. I duplicated the sunny and cloudy photos. May I take the opportunity to ask you to comment on this photo of mine. I put this photo on top of my 28,000 pictures here. I will be happy if you can objectively say a word on this Kawit Church sanctuary photo. Thanks and best regards.[2] -- re [3]--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 19:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

• Indoor photography is hard because it is difficult to capture the 3-dimentional "feel" of a room. Likewise, your photo doesn't have the right composition. The smoke is interesting but too much of it. --P199 (talk) 16:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)