User talk:P e z i/Archiv 2014

January 2014

2014 !

Hi Pezi ! Thanks a lot for your reviews and translations at the end of 2013 and congrats for your recent POD on the French Wikipedia. Despite I'm currently having a "Commons break" I want to wish you all the best for 2014. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi JLPC! I have to thank you also for your translations, hints and helping me to feel comfortable in the fotographer's community on commons. All the best for the starting year and enjoy your "break" --P e z i (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014

Thank-you for participating in Commons:Photo challenge! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project. The December 2013 themes will close for submissions this weekend and be ready for voting from Monday 6th January: Coloured light and Silhouette. For January 2014 there are two themes: A bunch of stuff and January. I hope you are keen to participate. Please read the theme descriptions for full submission rules on each theme. -- Colin (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzenbergplatz 5-DSC 0628w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang Markt Kirchenplatz 5 DSC 5951a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but it is a little bit tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 05:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)  Not done  Oppose --Christian Ferrer 07:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment sorry, was on holidays. New version uploaded - second chance? --P e z i 00:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:33, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2346w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 15:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parvis des droits de l'homme, Les Fruits by Felix Desruelles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather extrem perspective but interesting and good qualtiy. --Tuxyso 23:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment thanks for review. For the perspective: Have a look at EXIF; this is the upper half of a 36MP horizontally taken. --P e z i 23:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC) no critic,just a comment. I like this shift look known from T&S lenses. --Tuxyso 23:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie d Wissenschaften Wien DSC1282w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postsparkasse-Coch-Platz-DSC1238w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 21:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plachutta Wien Wollzeile-DSC1272w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2344w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Assembly Hall (Old University, Vienna), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Marine Departement of the Ministry of War of Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope should be in English, so please change it to that language Halavar (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 Done --P e z i (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

• about the scope: in which country ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

 Comment added Austro-Hungarian Monarchy --P e z i (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tribunal de Commerce Paris-DSC 0811w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Brunnen Hauptplatz DSC 5995w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeindeamt Aspang Markt-DSC 5972w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Brunnen Hauptplatz DSC 5991w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Brunnen Hauptplatz DSC 5998w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Hexenturm (Jülich), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tribunal du Commerce Paris-DSC 0832w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 22:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldhaecksler bei Silofuttererzeugung DSC 0001w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Fountain

No secret : as the monument is symmetrical I copied the right side of the fountain, turned it and pasted it on its left side. Then I cut the greater part of the haloed details on file n°1, pasted them on file n°2, and adjusted the light and colour. I did the same for the roof on the left to suppress the round and iridescent part of the halo. Then I used the clone brush for problematical edges and to slightly modify the similar surfaces on the right and on the left. At last I changed the sky because it was too cyan, but I had to overexpose it to keep and "harmony" with the house.-- I'm glad to know you like it and I hope it will be assesed by someone ! -- Cheers. --JLPC (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Monument a Denis Diderot-DSC 1963w.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Panthéon de Paris, Monument to Denis Diderot.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gentianella germanica (Chiltern gentian), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Commentlooks formatting scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment thanks for review and correcting scope (I've only removed the extra space after opening brace) --P e z i (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz von Assisi Kirche-Fassadendetail-DSC 0006w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donaupark Geschichte DSC 4221w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Akademietheater-DSC 0654w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Akademietheater-DSC 0654w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetterhaeuschen Aspang Markt DSC 6005w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rickmer Rickmers (ship, 1896), Navigator's room.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea alba leaves ftozen-DSC 6036w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpening seems very aggressive to me, is the original too soft? --DXR 22:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC);  Support for me good QI --PetrVod 22:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)  Support too. As DXR didn't decline, I think it's OK. Correct me if I'm wrong. --JLPC 17:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC) It's alright for me, fair enough to take a softer stance on 1:1 detail when the image has 20+ MP --DXR 21:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks a lot. --JLPC 23:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks to all reviewers and supporters. For the sharpness: IMO this version represents the "ice cristalls" better. --P e z i 12:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - January - January

Thank you for your nomination on this Photo Challenge. Unfortunately it was taken before the challenge period and so is not eligible. This particular challenge theme had the restriction that photos must be taken during the challenge month. -- Colin (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Brunnen Hauptplatz DSC 6000w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opera Garnier facade detail DSC 0792w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive and good quality. --Cccefalon 11:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karner Bad Deutsch-Altenburg, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks! --P e z i (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universite de Paris Faculte de droit DSC 1945w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yeah, I thought so. Sharpness is a bit borderline, but still QI for me --DXR 23:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacre Coeur cor Jesu-DSC 1455w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantheon entrance ceiling DSC 1948w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support : good quality. --JLPC 17:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donauturm Restaurant DSC 4414w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Halavar 00:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibliothek Akademie der Wissenschaften DSC 6397w ps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraftwerk Freudenau DSC 5737w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Assembly Hall (Old University, Vienna), Library.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murtalbachviadukt DSC 0003w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murtalbachviadukt Schild DSC 0009w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibliothek Akademie der Wissenschaften DSC 6403w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but it's a bit dark--Lmbuga 22:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for review. Slightly brightened version uploaded --P e z i 10:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Geocode : done !

Hi, Pezi. Thanks a lot for the hint : I mixed yesterday's castle with the roundballs I nominated the day before yesterday. A kind of French marmalade of my own ! I've just had a look at both... and at the other ones around them.  Done ! Thanks again. --JLPC (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sacre Coeur cor Jesu-DSC 1455w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sacre Coeur cor Jesu-DSC 1455w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresianische Militaerakademie DSC 6487w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresianische Militaerakademie Wappen ueber Eingang-DSC 6508w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bezirkshauptmannschaft Wr Neustadt DSC 6557w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfangsportal Sambergtunnel-DSC 3820w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aigues-Mortes Tour de Constance DSC 0042w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)  Support Minor CAs (right upper side) but good quality--Lmbuga 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC) Done thanks for review. New version with removed CA uploaded --P e z i 21:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poilhes Ecole-Pierre-Paul-Riquet-DSC 0078w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboat Canal du Midi Poilhes-DSC 0082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capestang pont sur Canal du Midi DSC 0096w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Canal du Midi sur l'Orb Beziers DSC 0204w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Done thanks for review. DS removed --P e z i 15:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Gentianella

Servus! Ich hab gerade das Bild File:Gentianella germanica-DSC 5044w.jpg gesehen. Das ist zwar ein schönes Foto, aber leider falsch bestimmt. Auf der Rax kommt wirklich nur Gentianella austriaca vor. Auf dem Foto sind zwar die Bestimmungsmerkmale nicht gut zu sehen, aber doch so weit, dass man das Gentianella austriaca zuordnen kann. Von dieser Art gibt es eh keine typischen Bilder auf Commons. Die echte Gentianella germanica kommt in Österreich überhaupt nicht vor. Ein bisserl mehr Information zu den Arten aus dieser Verwandtschaftsgruppe gibt es hier - einfach auf die Fotos klicken. Grüße --Franz Xaver (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Servus Franz Xaver, danke für's Korrigieren der Kategorien; jetzt haben wir aber ein Problem mit der Beschreibung des Valued Image ... LG --P e z i (talk) 12:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Ja, schon. Aber das Bild wird ja nicht weniger wertvoll sein, nur weil es zu einer selteneren Art gehört? Grüße --Franz Xaver (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Das hab ich nicht gemeint; Aber bei einem VI ist ja eine Category zugeordnet und das ist in diesem Fall jetzt die Falsche. Da gibt's aber sicher eine Möglichkeit das zu reparieren - ich werde mich drum kümmern. Und bitte nicht falsch verstehen, nochmal danke für's Ausbessern - ich war mir eh nicht sicher, aber diesen feinen Unterschied habe ich nicht mehr erkannt. LG --P e z i (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: Superellipse

Hello, P e z i. You have new messages at Waldir's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesuitenkirche Seipel-Platz-Wien-DSC 4625w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage-ecluse de Vias DSC 0222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage-ecluse de Vias DSC 0233w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theresianische Militärakademie, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jesuit Church, Vienna, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope (I'd have chosen "facade" for the scope but there's not much room around this church and it seems hard to photograph it from another angle.) --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAK DSC 4989w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Keramik-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4999w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Bildhauerei-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4998w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Architektur-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4996w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 00:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Erzgiesserei-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4990w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelerkirche Wien-I Uhrturm DSC 4899w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Malerei-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4994w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegorie Goldschmiedekunst-Museum für angewandte Kunst Fassade ueber Eingang DSC 4992w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good work, next job with less shadows for FP! --Moroder 14:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ventenac en Minervois Canal du Midi DSC 0126w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnen Knabe mit Delfin alte Universitaet DSC 4627w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 02:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Österreichisches Museum für angewandte Kunst, mural art above entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erdberger Steg-DSC 0023w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support interesante para mi por el juego de las lineas internas--Ivan2010 13:01, 16 February 2014(UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capestang Canal du Midi DSC 0108w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No problem, okay now, imo. --DXR 16:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Amarok Austrian Police DSC 4672w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but the police men doesn't look very amused. --XRay 10:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Comment thanks for review. Nothing dangerous about the policemen - when I jumped off the street they smiled ... --P e z i 16:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Houseboat Canal du Midi Poilhes-DSC 0082.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Houseboat Canal du Midi Poilhes-DSC 0082.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schottengasse 1 Fassadendetail DSC 4639w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That seems ok, though I'd have cropped off a bit on the left. --Mattbuck 22:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpengasthof Enzian Moenichkirchner Schwaig DSC 5041w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranensee Wien-Aspern Seestadt-DSC 3676w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow, this colors! --Ralf Roletschek 14:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huette der Bergrettung-Moenichkirchner Schwaig-DSC 5034w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liebenberg monument, Vienna, Statue of Victoria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archiv 2014⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, P e z i. You have new messages at Lewis Hulbert's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Riksdag, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figurenbildstock hl Johannes Nepomuk DSC 6727w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figurenbildstock hl Johannes Nepomuk DSC 6725w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Brunsbüttel, Fähre Berlin NIK 3655.JPG

Danke für deinen Kommentar zur Kandidatur für "Qualitative Bilder"

Antwort

1. Du hast recht, da sind zwei Staubkörner. Meine alte Software kommt leider nicht mit den modernen exif-Dateien zurecht. Ich könnte zwar den Staub entfernen. Leider ist die exif dann fast leer. Kannst du mir ein kostenloses Programm empfehlen (für Win XP)?
2. Eine nochmalige Schärfung bring IMHO nichts, ausprobiert mit "NikonNX 2". Es sieht unnatürlich aus. Natürlich ist der Hintergrund unscharf, aber das Hauptmotiv sollte scharf genug sein.

Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Servus Nightflyer,

fürs Entfernen von Sensorflecken müsste eigentlich die Clone-funktion in z.B. IrfanView ganz gut brauchbar sein (gratis download hier http://irfanview.tuwien.ac.at). Das kommt auch mit den EXIF gut zurecht und kann auch sonst noch ein paar nette Sachen.

Mit dem Schärfen hast du wahrscheinlich recht, das kann man erst beurteilen, wenn mans probiert hat ...

LG --P e z i (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herz Jesu Kirche Wien DSC 6771w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwig von Tetmajer Bueste Hof TU Wien-DSC 6752w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Petzenkirchen Sgraffito Eingangsbereich DSC 6703w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job! --Poco a poco 19:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundesamt fuer Wasserwitschaft Petzenkirchen DSC 6698w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks good now. --DAJF 05:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EVN-Kraftwerk Akademie am Kehrbach DSC 7029w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Wr Neustadt Akademiepark Wr Neustadt Dejkoff Tuerl DSC 7158w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 23:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Petzenkirchen Eingang DSC 6701w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figurenbildstock hl Johannes Nepomuk DSC 6720w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Petzenkirchen, Saint John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think your other image File:Figurenbildstock hl Johannes Nepomuk DSC 6720w.jpg better represents the statue of this Saint. Halavar (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for review. I think you are right about the statue but IMO this image shows in better way the complete monument with the flower pots. Perhaps we should wait for another opinion. --P e z i (talk) 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I understand Halavar but I agree with Pezi, the complete view with the arrangements just around is more interesting IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Wien-Landstrasse), SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good and valuable! --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreifaltigkeitssaeule Unteraspang DSC 6950w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Eingang E-Werk DSC 7058fc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might be a bit sharper imo, but QI. --JLPC 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Wr Neustadt Dejkoff Tuerl DSC 7153w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cosmic Ray Sensor for soil moisture measurements-DSC 6642w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Unteraspang Dreifaltigkeitssaeule DSC 6935w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Rosenhuegel Verlobungsstein SW DSC 6962w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orientierungsplan Akademiepark Wr Neustadt DSC 7160w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Kirchenplatz 3-DSC 5965w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenze-Oesterreich-DSC 3625w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight at the bottom, but Good quality. --Cayambe 10:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark E-Werk Nebengebaeude DSC 7024w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 15:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Unteraspang Dreifaltigkeitssaeule DSC 6938w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But the bottom crop isn't that exciting ;-) --Moroder 18:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark E-Werk Isolatoren DSC 7039w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

March 2014

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Headquarters of Viennese Ambulance Service, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think that scope should be in English. Halavar (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Done You are right, think it's better this way. --P e z i (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Francis of Assisi Church, Vienna, NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Image needs description and scope in English language. Halavar (talk) 23:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for review. Description and Scope adapted. --P e z i (talk) 23:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 01:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Headquarters of city garden management, Vienna, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Image needs description and scope in English language. Halavar (talk) 23:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for review; scope adapted. --P e z i (talk) 23:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soviet War Memorial (Vienna), close up view of statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altenburg Abbey, courtyard and church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altenburg Abbey, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater im Rabenhof DSC 7268w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Silberer Hof Wien Kardinal Nagel Platz DSC 7219w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marokkanerbrunnen DSC 1820w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Reithalle Wasserturm DSC 6983w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It could be sharper and less noisy, but Good IMO--Lmbuga 12:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark Rosenhuegel Verlobungsstein south view DSC 6973w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kardinal-Nagl Platz 6-7 DSC 7234w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Januariuskapelle Wien Ungargasse DSC 7181w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiepark a herd of Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) DSC 7111w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rabenhof Zweigstelle Buecherei Wien DSC 7256w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Schau mal ...

... hier. War leider zu spät um einfach den edit zu revertieren. Gruss --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Info! LG --P e z i (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maroccan fountain in Vienna, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. I've modifed scope to more precise, hope you'll agree. Halavar (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for review and yes, you are right about the scope. Would be misleading without "Vienna". --P e z i (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Hauptgebaeude Turm DSC2496w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentianella Austriaca Rax Niederoesterreich DSC 5040w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum-Stockholm-DSC 0093w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo but a small tilt.--ArildV 22:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. You are right, new version uploaded. --P e z i 22:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Support--ArildV 22:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Stockholm Nordfassade DSC 0030w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but the shaded areas have too much noise--Lmbuga 16:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hjalmar Branting Denkmal Stockholm DSC 0005w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tessinska palatset Stockholm facade detail DSC 0223w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pano Grand-Hotel Nationalmuseum Stockholm DSC 0003w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good.  Comment Remove dust spot. See note --Rjcastillo 01:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Done thanks for the hint (there were even more of them ...) --P e z i 22:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Hjalmar Branting, Stockholm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good but tilt right, easy to fix :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks for review. In this case I don't think there is anything in need to be corrected: Please look at the socket of the monument, horizontals are horizontal and verticals are vertical IMO. --P e z i (talk) 09:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

 Support That is true. I let myself be fooled by the upper part of Monuement. But behind buildig is perfectly straight. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Der Hamburger und Germania Ruder Club DSC 0037w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finngrundet Decksbereich DSC 0133w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 20:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freihaus, Vienna University of Technology, SSE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tessin palace, baroque figures above entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 01:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Heumarkt 3 Wien Landstrasse DSC 7384w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:39, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heumarkt 7 DSC 7340w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frachtschiff Donaubruecke Hainburg DSC 0018w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood and good quality. --JLPC 09:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ViaDonau Bad Deutsch-Altenburg-DSC 0056w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is at the very low QI end. Barely QI imho. --Tuxyso 08:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Heumarkt 1 Hauptmuenzamt DSC 7408w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Lmbuga 21:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labetrunkbrunnen Stadtpark Vienna DSC 7389w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labetrunkbrunnen Stadtpark Vienna plaque DSC 7397w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAK Fassadendetail DSC 7442w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality is good for QI, but the perspective needs a re-adjustment. Please watch the gaps between the bricks; they are supposed to form a vertical. --Cccefalon 16:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 17:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality! --Cccefalon 17:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Heumarkt 7 Detail DSC 7346w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's wonderful; however yet tt's still inclinging inwards. --Cccefalon 19:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Done Only tiny, but you are right; new version uploaded. (Thanks for review) --P e z i 20:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Erik VHF marine radio DSC 0188w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Heumarkt 3 Wien Landstrasse DSC 7378w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Am Heumarkt 7, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Am Heumarkt 3, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labetrunkbrunnen, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 07:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrian Mint, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This one looks nicer, but for VI, I rather choose a color-neutral image like File:Hauptmuenzamt Vienna rectlinear.jpg. Yann (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. I don't agree ; I'm sorry for Gryffindor but I notice three flaws on File:Hauptmuenzamt Vienna rectlinear.jpg : slight barrel distorsion, tilt, and disturbing street-light on the right. This one is better imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
  • You are right that this image is of better quality, but VI is not only about the quality. ;oD Yann (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Erzherzog Ludwig Viktor, WSW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wechselbahn, Murtalviadukt, W view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : good picture, but could you add "NW (orSE...) view", as we usually do here, please ? --JLPC (talk) 11:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the hint. Scope changed. --P e z i (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funkturm Arsenal Wien DSC 7717w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear P e z i,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21er-Haus Arsenal Postturm-DSC 7580w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Eingang Stiege 2 Fassadendetail DSC 7817w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Funkturm Arsenal Wien DSC 7717w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Funkturm Arsenal Wien DSC 7717w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Stiege 2 Statue 1 DSC 7809w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 10:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Stiege 2 Statue 2 DSC 7807w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Stiege 2 Statue 3 DSC 7813w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Malchen53 08:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Stiege 2 Statue 4 DSC 7815w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Schönes Foto gefunden...

Ich habe mich aus Spaß mal durch deine Quality Images geklickt. Dabei ist mir

• dieses Foto der Praterbrücke und Donaustadtbrücke

besonders ins Auge gefallen. Falls du also mal wieder eine Nominierung auf FP starten willst, wäre das doch sicher ein "heißer Kandidat". Mir gefällt die Linienführung auf dem Foto besonders gut, die durch die silhouettenartig Erscheinung ja noch betont wird. Oder gefällt dir das Foto nicht? Grüße und weiterhin gut Licht! --Tuxyso (talk) 12:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Servus Tuxyso,

freue mich sehr über deinen Vorschlag.

Mir gefällt das Foto sehr gut; von der Nominierung haben mich bisher 2 Details abgehalten: Der dunkle Bereich links unten ist mir irgendwie zu dominierend und die Auflösung ist auch nicht wahnsinnig hoch. Daher hatte ich vor, das mit der D7100 noch einmal zu machen. Allerdings ist mittlerweile dieses Bild eine historische Aufnahme geworden, da rechts vom Pylon im Hintergrund jetzt mit dem DC1 ein weiteres Hochhaus steht (fast gleich hoch wie der Donauturm) und auch die restliche Skyline der "Donaucity" stark verändert ist. Denke, ich werde deinen Vorschlag aufgreifen und es mit ausführlicher Info einreichen. Liebe Grüße, --P e z i (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Das Bild kommt doch super an! Glückwunsch! --Tuxyso (talk) 22:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Ja, bin angenehm überrascht. Danke für den Tipp nochmal, manchmal unterschätzt man seine Werke selber :-) --P e z i (talk) 22:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Ich freue mich auch immer über Tipps. Es ist immer etwas schwierig seine eigene Arbeit einzuschätzen. Mir geht es manchmal auch andersherum: Ich bin von einer Aufnahme begeistert, die Begeisterung möchte aber nicht so recht auf andere überspringen (s. meine zwei letzten gescheiterten Nominierungen). --Tuxyso (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Goldenes Lamm, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Fassadendetail-DSC 7940w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Objekt 3 DSC 7902w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum-DSC 7920w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal-Heeresgeschichtliches Museum DSC 7914w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar unter den Weissgerbern-DSC 4123w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A dustspot easy to fix (see note, please). --JLPC 17:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 20:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC) OK now. --JLPC 21:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Fassadendetail-DSC 7923w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Fassadendetail-DSC 7930w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you enhance perspective? The verticals are visibly leaning inwards. --Cccefalon 05:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded - some more info at your discussion page --P e z i 12:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC) The issue is resolved. Thank you - good quality. --Cccefalon 13:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelophylax ridibundus DSC 7786w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Jose_Marti_Denkmal_Donaupark_DSC_8367w.jpg

Guten Morgen :) Also mit der Schieflage im Uhrzeigersinn meine ich tatsächlich den Betonsockel. Der linke und der rechte Rand kippen beide nach rechts weg. Kannst Du Dir das nochmal genau anschauen? Ich bin mir 100% sicher. Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Servus Uwe,

du hast wieder mal recht - es war zwar nicht viel, aber durchaus wert korrigiert zu werden. LG --P e z i (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Military History, Vienna, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and best in scope. Halavar (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Question Should'nt there be the town in scope? I think there are more Museums of Military History in the world. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Good point, thanks for that. I've added name of the city. Halavar (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks to both of you for review and completing the scope. --P e z i (talk) 22:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)4promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue-socket Simon Bolivar Donaupark Wien DSC 8314w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Simon Bolivar Donaupark Wien DSC 8333w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower building Neue Donau, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Donaustadtbruecke-Praterbruecke-DSC 0024w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Donaustadtbruecke-Praterbruecke-DSC 0024w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Capital and caption

Thanks for your remark : I was absent-minded again and I made two mistakes (one in French, another one in English). I think it's OK now. Cheers. --JLPC (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bueste Don Jose de San Martin Donaupark Wien DSC 8110w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 03:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniende Mutter mit Kind Karlsplatz DSC 7797w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernesto Che Guevara monument Vienna DSC 8342w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jose Marti Denkmal Donaupark DSC 8367w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted cw. --Cccefalon 05:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review. Verticals of the pedestal are vertical. Please have a look at the close-up of the plaque; the inscription is not horizontal. --P e z i 09:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Done After a second look: New versio uploaded. --P e z i 09:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jose Marti Denkmal Donaupark DSC 8369w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for Qi. --NorbertNagel 19:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniende Mutter mit Kind Karlsplatz DSC 7804w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Fassadendetail-DSC 7931w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jose Marti Denkmal Donaupark Inschrift DSC 4218w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kneeling Mother with child, sculpture by Georg Ehrlich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolívar monument in Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 22:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

• • On April 16th, this photo will be POD on the French Wikipedia : congrats ! --JLPC (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Merci, ça me fait très plaisir! --P e z i (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Fassadendetail-DSC 8037w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Mittelbau-DSC 8010w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 20:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal HGM Mittelbau Balkon-DSC 7978w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Kuppel DSC 8099w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Tafel DSC 8916w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Wappen ueber Eingang DSC 8911w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 22:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Wappen ueber FensterDSC 8921w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 22:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Lampe rechts ueber Eingang DSC 8909w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 02:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Statue ueber Eingang DSC 8905w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Wien DSC 8900w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Little bit of denoising would be good IMO --Halavar 20:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review! New version uploaded. --P e z i 21:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Better. QI for me --Halavar 21:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Lange Nacht der Forschung 2014-DSC 8833w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 19:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Gusshaus Vienna-DSC 8930w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 15:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Tafel rechts DSC 8918w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Portal DSC 8914w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Wien DSC 8901w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Little bit of denoising would be good IMO --Halavar 20:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review! New version uploaded. --P e z i 21:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Better. QI for me --Halavar 21:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC) I disagree, image has the wrong aspect ratio, cars are distorted --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Done You are right. New version uploaded --P e z i 12:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzherrenhof Lampe links ueber Eingang DSC 8908w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU Wien Lange Nacht der Forschung 2014-DSC 8845w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzherrenhof, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Nev1 (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

• I made a little change at the scope, I think there was a small error --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support It's such a minor change, I probably don't need to reiterate my support, but just in case I still support the image. Nev1 (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzherrenhof, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuppelsaal TU Wien DSC 8691w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funkturm Arsenal Heeresgeschichtliches Museum DSC 7966w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good !--Jebulon 12:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen mit Doppeladler Fassade Objekt I Arsenal DSC 7954w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 07:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gusshausstrasse 4 DSC 8965w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichliches Museum Fassadendetail Tuerme DSC 8055w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Heeresgeschichliches Museum Fassadendetail Turm DSC 8051w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! George Enescu Gedenktafel Frankenbergg Wien DSC 8958w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Slightly tilted cw. --Jebulon 19:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear P_e_z_i! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos time to time accumulates on this page... --Bff (talk) 08:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Jarnac 16 Horloge Coutençon 2014.jpg

Hi, Peter ! I remember I already had some problems with the close-up of the upper part of this clock : I'm not superstitious, but some photos are very special :). Thanks one more time for your attention and help. --JLPC (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Paris DSC 0917w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame de Paris DSC 0846w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a minimal perspectiv correction (left side leaning inwards) and there is a slight CA fringe at top left tower and cloud. --Cccefalon 10:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review! New version uploaded. --P e z i 20:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you for the new version. Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame DSC 0903w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gusshausstrasse 14 DSC 8990w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support bad ultrawide-lens distortions on cars, nearly unavoidable, so imo OK for QI --A.Savin 10:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of Notre-Dame de Paris, daylight view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope in a very rich scope. Good work. Yann (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:TU Wien Lange Nacht der Forschung 2014-DSC 8845w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TU Wien Lange Nacht der Forschung 2014-DSC 8845w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresianische Militaerakademie Portal DSC 6511w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesgasse 26 Irakische Botschaft Fassadendetail DSC 9013w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:15,18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesgasse 26 Irakische Botschaft DSC 9001w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:39, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesgasse 26 Irakische Botschaft Fassadendetail DSC 9012w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franz-Silberer-Hof, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Adolf Ritter von Schenk spanische Botschaft DSC 9131w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Adolf Ritter von Schenk spanische Botschaft Portal DSC 9136w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:48, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Elisabeth Kirche DSC 9154w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Elisabeth Kirche Portal DSC 9158w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater Akzent Wien DSC 9272w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 11:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater Akzent Wien DSC 9279w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apostolische Nuntiator Wien DSC 9195w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Daniel Landstr Guertel 5 DSC 9081w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Daniel Skulptur Erwin-Wurm-Boot DSC 9082w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me once the dustspot removed (see note, please). --JLPC 16:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 17:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC) A funny QI !--Jebulon 19:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont du Gard-DSC 0015w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the best light, but OK for QI --A.Savin 09:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont du Gard-DSC 0011w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Komenský high school, Vienna, SSW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Daniel, Vienna, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of the Apostolic Nunciature, Vienna, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theater Akzent, Vienna, SSE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 12:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Elisabeth church, Vienna (4th), North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Jan Kameníček (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Larisch von Moennich in Vienna, East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 23:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apostolische Nuntiatur COA links DSC 9219w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support but CoA should be identified... ( Done, see new categorisation)--Jebulon 15:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apostolische Nuntiatur COA rechts DSC 9216w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support but CoA should be identified... ( Done, see new categorsation)--Jebulon 15:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Dobner-Dobenau Theresianumgasse 33 DSC 9203w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA left side. I would just crop left (and also right side to keep the palace centered) to get rid of the CA. --Cccefalon 05:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review and hint! Tried a new crop. --P e z i 18:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Boehler DSC 9173w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Maria-Kroenungsaltar DSC 9778w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Innenansicht DSC 9533w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. However, a slight perspective correction is still needed. Should be no Problem as there is enough space on top. --Cccefalon 06:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 08:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lighthouse Phare des Onglous, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Daniel Skulptur Erwin-Wurm-Boot DSC 9090w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment - Best if there were a freedom of panorama tag (Template:FoP-Austria) on the image page.Crisco 1492 15:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Done --P e z i 21:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Quality image to me, Crisco 1492 05:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von St Othmar auf Donaustadtbruecke u Ernst-Happel-Stadion DSC 9663w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 22:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von St Othmar auf Hundertwasserhaus DSC 9701w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but tilted cw. --Cccefalon 03:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 06:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC) QI now. --Cccefalon 07:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Dachboden DSC 9538w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Dachboden DSC 9539w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective yet to be done. --Cccefalon 04:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 05:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Ok for me --Cccefalon 07:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Orgel DSC 9769w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Cccefalon 06:21, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Dodekaederstern Inst Mathematik DSC 9829w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Univ Wien Eingang DSC 9864w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeindebau Czerninplatz 7 DSC 9817w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Dodekaederstern Inst Mathematik Infotafel DSC 9857w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Dodekaederstern Inst Mathematik DSC 9846w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Dodekaederstern Fahnen Inst Mathematik DSC 9834w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Othmar unter den Weißgerbern, organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 Univ Wien DSC 9843w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz, Vienna, Sculpture Dodekaederstern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : Good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von St Othmar auf Johann-Nepomuk und Spittelau DSC 9651w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Difficult. A little bit noisy, but IMO still QI. --XRay 12:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Othmar unter den Weißgerbern, Maria-Krönungsaltar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Othmar Johannes Statue DSC 9763w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von St Othmar auf Riesenrad und Donauturm DSC 9620w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Noise in image

Hi P e z i,

I would appreciate it if you could take a moment to read the discussion above your recent vote. The picture of the year from 2010 barely squeaked by when it was nominated to be a featured image, because of very similar concerns about noise. If you think it's a bad image, then I'd appreciate if you'd reject it for composition, or sharpness, or some other reason. But voting against it because the sky is full of millions of stars (aka noise) doesn't seem fair.

Hi Ckyba,

the sky is not the problem, you are right it is full of stars and looks like noise. But my comment is pointing to the noise in the foreground, especially in the lower left corner. And this is not really surprising with ISO 1600 and a 1/1.7" sensor ... (BTW it would be nice if you could sign your comments). Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fischer-Deponie, 1989.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortress Jülich, South gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
An der Obertrave 15.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Nice and  Best in Scope (imo). --JLPC (talk) 15:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vordere Zollamtsstraße 11, Vienna, main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Böhler, Vienna, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Österreichische Postsparkasse, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vienna State Opera at night, main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC) :

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

personality rights?

This is a puppet --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I think you saw the :-) in my proposal? --P e z i (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

sorry, didn't --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raiffeisen Zentralbank, Headquarters, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafel Lueger TU Wien DSC 6733w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel Franz von Toula Hof TU Wien-DSC 6755w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafel Vivaldi Grabstaette TU Wien DSC 6740w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Militaergeographisches Institut Globus Uhr Wien DSC 10058w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Militaergeographisches Institut Wien DSC 10059w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karl Lueger, plaque at birthplace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringturm Verhuellung Schleier der Agnes Arnulf Rainer DSC 9940w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosentraegerhaus Otto Wagner Wien DSC 9994w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosentraegerhaus Otto Wagner Wien DSC 9998w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosentraegerhaus Fassadendetail DSC 9987w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosentraegerhaus Fassadendetail DSC 9988w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Institute of Military Geography, Vienna, East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MUSA Vienna South view DSC 10153w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a bit blur at the left, but acceptable for me --A.Savin 11:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitaetsstrasse 10 Erker DSC 10008w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitaetsstrasse 10 Portal DSC 10010w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Official building Rathausstraße 14-16, Vienna, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Heumarkt 13 DSC 3608w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Militaergeographisches Institut Globus Wien DSC 10171w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Othmar unter den Weißgerbern, nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theresian Military Academy, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your FP candidate

Hallo Pezi, ich glaube, du solltest das Bild etwas schmälern. Durch die Korrektion der Perspektive werden die körperlichen Proportionen IMO verändert. lg --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp! Während des Korrigierens wird man betriebsblind. Neue Version hochgeladen. LG --P e z i (talk) 10:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenktafel Opfer des Faschismus TU Wien DSC 9015w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 13:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Residential building Am Heumarkt 13, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Jean de Montmartre 2nd Horseman of Apocalypse DSC 1118w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Jean de Montmartre 4th Horseman of Apocalypse DSC 1111w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stella-Klein-Loew-Hof DSC 0300w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Marianne Hainisch Rochusgasse 7 DSC 0227w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Jura Soyfer Heinestraße 4 DSC 0294w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volksschule Czerninplatz 3 DSC 0343w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czerninplatz 3, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque at last residence of Jura Soyfer, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frieda-Nödl-Hof Wien-Landstrasse DSC 0226w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frieda-Noedl-Hof Wien-Landstrasse DSC 0623w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Frieda Noedl Hof DSC 0566w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pauluskirche Wien EingangDSC 0602w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeindebau Gredlerstrasse 7 DSC 0247w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs slight perspective correction on the left side. --A.Savin 09:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 12:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)  Support OK. --A.Savin 10:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schutzengelbrunnen, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 23:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Saint-Jean-de-Montmartre, The Fourth Horseman of The Apocalypse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 23:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean-de-Montmartre, nave and organ gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Saint-Jean-de-Montmartre, The Second Horseman of The Apocalypse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protestant church Pauluskirche, Vienna, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Saqib (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochuskirche Wien DSC 0632w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but even better with less noise in the sky.--ArildV 12:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review/promotion. New version uploaded. --P e z i 14:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frieda-Noedl-Hof Wien Beschriftung DSC 0232w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochuskirche Wien Türme DSC 0696w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochuskirche Wien Augustinus Statue DSC 0680w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontal tilt --A.Savin 10:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 14:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)  Support Good. --A.Savin 17:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schutzengelbrunnen Rilkeplatz DSC 0437w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frieda-Nödl-Hof, Vienna, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rochuskirche, Vienna, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fassadendetail ehem Finanzlandesdirektion DSC 0901w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeindebau Franzensbrueckenstr 19 DSC 0425w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The wires are pretty much disturbing. I think you could easily retouch them --Moroder 21:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review and for the hint. New version uploaded. --P e z i 18:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Good quality. Excellent --Moroder 19:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeindebau Pfarrhofgasse 14 DSC 0573w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pauluskirche Wien DSC 0587w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabrennbahn Krieau Stallungen DSC 1249w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus WU LC D1 TC DSC 1440w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some dustspots. I think, the sky could benefit from a partial denoising. Beside that: stunning photo, indeed. --Cccefalon 01:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 09:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Messe Wien Halle D DSC 1257w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals are leaning out (see my explanation in the annotation). --Cccefalon 04:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review; you are right: New version uploaded. --P e z i 08:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campus of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Library and Learning Center.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harness racing track Krieau, Vienna, place judge tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Aspang Eingang DSC 1752w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wuerfeluhr techn Museum-DSC 0255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harness racing track Krieau, Vienna, stabling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Campus WU LC D1 TC DSC 1440w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campus WU LC D1 TC DSC 1440w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt-Piesting-Wappen aus Blumen Seisermuehle DSC 1826w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeughaus FF Markt-Piesting DSC 1971w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen am Zeughaus FF Markt-Piesting DSC 1991w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen am Zeughaus FF Markt-Piesting DSC 1994w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Aspang DSC 1744w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality and QI: However, reduce top of the photo for 10px to get rid of the antenna parts left of the mast (see annotation). --Cccefalon 17:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review and for the hint. Cropped version uploaded. --P e z i 18:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Woellersdorf DSC 2030w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 17:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Woellersdorf Guetermagazin DSC 2035w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 11:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Woellersdorf Nebengebaeude DSC 2050w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Aspang DSC 1757w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabrennbahn Krieau Zielrichterturm DSC 1185w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is at the low end, but still QI imho. But there is a spot / dust (see note). --Tuxyso 06:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. Dust or flare removed and new version uploaded. --P e z i 08:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC) QI now. --Tuxyso 10:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabrennbahn Krieau Eingang Trabrennstrasse DSC 1150w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 20:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Seisermuehle Hauptschule Markt Piesting DSC 1961w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeughaus FF Markt-Piesting DSC 2003w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 05:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Woellersdorf DSC 2016w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Big dust spot, to the left from the mast. --A.Savin 13:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 14:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 12:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus WU SC DSC 1316w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station Aspang, Lower Austria, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station Aspang, Lower Austria, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former fire station in Markt Piesting, Lower Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Hauptplatz 4 DSC 1026w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Hauptschule DSC 1010w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a dust spot (see note).--XRay 16:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 16:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campus of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Student Center.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

VIC nom scope change.

Hi, P e z i, please take time to review your vote for the VIC nom which you supported as the scope of the nomination has been changed. If you still support, please cast your support vote again to the nomination. Thank you. Regards, Joydeep _Talk 09:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for information. Hope the way I reconfirmed my vote is correct. --P e z i (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. The vote should be counted at the time of closure as you confirmed after the scope change. --Joydeep _Talk 16:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Seisermuehle Hauptschule Markt Piesting DSC 1891w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 11:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hl Florian Zeughaus Markt Piesting DSC 1988w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Woellersdorf Signal Ausfahrt Ost DSC 2057w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Secondary school Aspang-Markt, Lower Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportUseful--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Aspang-Markt, Hauptplatz 4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Apotheke hl Dreifaltigkeit Pfarrkirche DSC 1068w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptur Pfarrkirche Piesting DSC 1976w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt Piesting Schicksalslinde bei Seisermuehle DSC 1821w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pharmacy, Aspang-Markt, Lower Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Hl Leonhard Piesting DSC 1978w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photogrammetry, Airborne Laserscanning.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt Piesting Schicksalslinde bei Seisermuehle Detail DSC 1831w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Florian Kuntner memorial, Markt Piesting.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support :good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Leonard Church (Markt Piesting), portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Geniedirektion TU Wien DSC 2293w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exakta Varex Balgengeraet Diakopierer DSC 2568w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 08:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baofeng UV-5RA DSC 2497w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Geniedirektion TU Wien DSC 2300w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What happened to the sky? You forgot denoising? --Cccefalon 20:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review; you are right. New version uploaded. --P e z i 23:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality now. But please have a look on the four spots right third top side (perhaps birds). At the moment they look like film defects. --Cccefalon 09:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 09:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for for the hint. New version uploaded. --P e z i 09:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geniedirektion, Vienna, NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hill Arches Bronze-Plastik Henry Moore DSC 2434w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hill Arches Bronze-Plastik Henry Moore DSC 2441w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony ICF-SW55 DSC 2602w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the three crumbs (see annotation) --Cccefalon 05:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Cleaned version uploaded. --P e z i 08:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptur Pfarrkirche Piesting DSC 2013w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:00, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campus WU EA DSC 1571w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But please remove the two dust spots (see my notes) --Cccefalon 18:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 19:51, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untere Weissgerberstr 45 DSC 1113w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World receivers, portable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie der bildenden Kuenste DSC 2400w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Henry Moore Sculpture, Karlsplatz, Vienna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amateur radio transceivers, low power, portable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:42, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Geniedirektion TU Wien Fassadendetail DSC 2311w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Geniedirektion TU Wien Fassadendetail DSC 2316w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Geniedirektion TU Wien Fassadendetail DSC 2320w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie der bildenden Kuenste Fassadendetail DSC 2379w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie der bildenden Kuenste Fassadendetail DSC 2380w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie der bildenden Kuenste Fassadendetail DSC 2381w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademie der bildenden Kuenste Fassadendetail DSC 2422w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would accept a small perspective distortion due to the angle of photography, but IMO at least the lightning rod should be vertical. --Cccefalon 20:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review. This time I don't agree to your comment. The verticals of the wall are vertical and the lightning rod is just a piece of metal that can easily be bent. --P e z i 22:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC) That sounds reasonable --Cccefalon 15:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campus of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Executive Academy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main building of the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Rotundenbruecke SE DSC 1687w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit sharper (easy to fix). QI. --JLPC 15:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review and for the hint. Sharpened version uploaded. --P e z i 22:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 30 Steyr DSC 2798w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FH Oberoesterreich Campus Steyr DSC 2868w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 12 Steyr DSC 2764w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fachhochschule Steyr, SSW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steyr Gruenmarkt 8 DSC 2818w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 46 Steyr Fassadendetail Hl Florian DSC 2813w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 12 Steyr Fassadendetail Allegorie Gehoer DSC 2768w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 12 Steyr Fassadendetail DSC 2769w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 12 Steyr Fassadendetail DSC 2772w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 12 Steyr Fassadendetail DSC 2774w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 46 Steyr DSC 2815w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a magenta CA occurs on the left side, please fix it. --Cccefalon 11:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. Tried to remove CA and in the same step noise in the sky and lens distortion removed. --P e z i 19:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stadtplatz 30 (Steyr), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sternhaus (Steyr), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope (Natural deformation of the building is impressive) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antennen Bad Ischl DSC 3328w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepomukbrunnen Kreuzplatz Bad Ischl DSC 3342w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepomukbrunnen Detail Kreuzplatz Bad Ischl DSC 3347w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinkhalle Bad Ischl DSC 3230w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polizeiauto und Spielpostkutsche vor Ehemaliger Trinkhalle Bad Ischl DSC 3207w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolfdenkmal Bad Ischl DSC 3392w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolfdenkmal Bad Ischl DSC 3395w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Σπάρτακος 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudolfdenkmal Bad Ischl Inschrift DSC 3388w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal bei Bahnhofstr 1 Bad Ischl DSC 3410w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal bei Bahnhofstr 1 Bad Ischl DSC 3409w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steyr Stadtplatz 46, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 10:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steyr Grünmarkt 8, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Tuerme u Ziergiebel DSC 3147w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Fassadendetail DSC 3158w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but a lttle bit too bright compared to the rest of the pictures --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review and for the hint. Brightness reduced. --P e z i 22:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Fassadendetail DSC 3161w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Fassadendetail Turm DSC 3160w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Ziergiebel Christus Statue DSC 3155w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Ziergiebel DSC 3151w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetterhäuschen Alter Markt Salzburg DSC 3194w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rechensteg Bad Ischl DSC 3330w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliges Feuerwehr Zeughaus Aspang Markt Fassadendetail DSC 4152w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliges Feuerwehr Zeughaus Aspang Markt DSC 4147w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:48, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Congress and Theater building Bad Ischl, East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial, Bad Ischl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rudolfdenkmal, Bad Ischl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rechensteg, Bad Ischl, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trinkhalle (Bad Ischl), NNW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nepomukbrunnen, Bad Ischl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wetterhäuschen, Salzburg, NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wetterhäuschen, Salzburg, SSE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apotheke Aspang-Markt DSC 1070w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetterhaeuschen Aspang-Markt Hauptplatz DSC 1057w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspang-Markt Brunnen Hauptplatz DSC 1036w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polizeiboot Wolfgangsee DSC 3547w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Dr Ralph Benatzky St Wolfgang DSC 3451w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepomukbrunnen Detail Kreuzplatz Bad Ischl DSC 3345w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steyr Zwischenbrücken 4 DSC 2736w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former fire station in Aspang-Markt, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain at Hauptplatz, Aspang-Markt, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelerkirche Steyr Portal DSC 2726w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment This picture is a little bit rotated (the balconny is not horizontal): QI when corrected --Démosthène 23:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC). Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 11:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)  Support --Stegop 04:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelerkirche Steyr Giebelfresco DSC 2723w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetterhäuschen Alter Markt Salzburg DSC 3187w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wetterhäuschen am Hauptplatz, Aspang-Markt, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wetterhäuschen am Hauptplatz, Aspang-Markt, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zwischenbrücken 4 (Steyr), South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Maybe he should be one category for the scope. Or two nominations for the same image. Why not? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Done I agree. Scope changed. --P e z i (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelerkirche (Steyr), Western clock tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelerkirche (Steyr), Eastern clock tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hahnbaum Bad Ischl DSC 3245w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelerkirche (Steyr), pediment fresco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 18:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michaelerkirche (Steyr), portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz-Karl-Brunnen Bad Ischl DSC 3261w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz-Karl-Brunnen Detail Bad Ischl DSC 3252w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz-Karl-Brunnen Detail Bad Ischl DSC 3254w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz-Karl-Brunnen Detail Bad Ischl DSC 3255w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz-Karl-Brunnen Detail Bad Ischl DSC 3257w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirer-Denkmal Bad Ischl Detail DSC 3319w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirer-Denkmal Bad Ischl Detail DSC 3324w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 22:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirer-Denkmal Bad Ischl Rueckseite DSC 3310w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Minor disturbting antennas at the top, but IMO good quality. --XRay 17:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirer-Denkmal Pferdekutsche Bad Ischl DSC 3314w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hahnbaum, Bad Ischl, weathercock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franz-Karl-Brunnen, Bad Ischl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wirer-Denkmal, Bad Ischl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There seems to be a small problem with the head that is too stretched vertically. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for review. You are right! I think it was a problem of perspective correction. New version uploaded. --P e z i (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
• Perfect  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariensaeule Aspang-Markt Sockel DSC 4171w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariensaeule Aspang-Markt Inschrift 1888 DSC 4189w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariensaeule Aspang-Markt Inschrift DSC 4162w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirer-Denkmal Bad Ischl DSC 3312w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals are leaning out. --Cccefalon 06:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 17:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariensaeule Aspang-Markt Sockel DSC 4163w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Column to Maria Immaculata, Aspang-Markt, Lower Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betriebsfunk-Antennen ehemaliges Feuerwehrhaus Aspang-Markt DSC 4156w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Boring, but according to Poco's presentation today, that's what QI was meant to be all about! --Mattbuck 21:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelerkirche Steyr Ostturm DSC 2722w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michaelerkirche Steyr Westturm DSC 2720w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo P e z i,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holstentor, West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question You confirm that the building is very distorted in reality? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, I agree. The problem concerning perspective correction was discussed at QIC also. --P e z i (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
• I do not go very often in QI; your opinion is enough for me.
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Question I doubt whether it’s the best in scope. File:Holstentor_April_2009.jpg may be a bit less detailed but shows the object in much better lighting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 11:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laxenburg Denkmal Kaiser Franz I DSC 4374w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filmarchiv Austria Laxenburg DSC 4727w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej P e z i,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laxenburg Denkmal Kaiser Franz I DSC 4377w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altes Schloss (Laxenburg), NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emperor Franz I monument (Laxenburg).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnierplatz Schloss Laxenburg NO-Eingang DSC 4547w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnierplatz Schloss Laxenburg NO-Eingang DSC 4551w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franzensburg Schlosspark Laxenburg Faehre DSC 4410w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filmarchiv Austria Laxenburg Uhr DSC 4717w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg Europapassage-Blick-NW-DSC 0255w.jpg

And also:

• File:Hamburg Europapassage-Blick-SO-DSC 0251w.jpg

Yours sincerely, Krd 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Laxenburg grosse Felsenkaskade DSC 4627w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franzensburg Schlosspark Laxenburg Uhrturm DSC 4449w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Große Felsenkaskade (Laxenburg, Lower Austria).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franzensburg, ferry across the castle pond.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franzensburg Schlosspark Laxenburg Detail DSC 4455w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top slightly leaning to the right. --JLPC 08:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 17:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)  Support : good now. Sorry for the delay. --JLPC 13:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 28 Steyr DSC 2793w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 26 Steyr DSC 2793w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:02, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bummerlhaus Stadtplatz 32 Steyr DSC 2800w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 20-22 Steyr DSC 2781w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But did this image have perspective distortion in it's original form? --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review/promotion. To your question: Slightly leaning in of verticals was corrected. --P e z i 10:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtpfarrkirche hl Aegidius u Koloman Steyr DSC 2808w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz 34 Steyr DSC 2803w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blumauerhaus (Steyr), NNE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bummerlhaus, Steyr, Upper Austria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ennsthalerhaus, Steyr, Upper Austria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stadtplatz 28, Steyr, Upper Austria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stadtplatz 34 (Steyr), Upper Austria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzigungsscene Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4834w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Livioandronico2013 19:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4847w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putti Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4862w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments you should remove the dust spot,see note --Livioandronico2013 19:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 19:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC) Perfect,nice. --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariae Geburt Frauenkirchen DSC 4831w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariae Geburt Frauenkirchen DSC 4871w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalvarienberg Detail Frauenkirchen DSC 4855w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

RAW?

ich hab mir das hier mal genauer angschaut und festgestellt, dass ich es deutlich verbessern könnte. Nämlich vor allem das eliminieren der Probleme die immer entstehen, wenn man durch Fensterscheiben fotografiert. Wenn du es als Raw hättest dann könnte ich es direkt machen. Hab keine mailadresse von dir, sonst würde ich dir das bisherige Ergebnis schicken..--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank für das Angebot. Durch eine Fensterscheibe fotografiert ist dieses Bild allerdings nicht, es ist von der Aussichtsterrasse am Donauturm fotografiert; zwischen den Gitterstäben durch :-). An dem Tag war aber irgendwie dunstiges Wetter. RAW file gebe ich dir gerne - ist in einer Mail an dich unterwegs. LG --P e z i ([[User talk:P e z i#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Bitte schau dir das Ergebnis an. Liegt als jpg in deinem Postfach.--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Notre Dame cathedral in Paris

Sorry P e z i! "Roof of Notre-Dame de Paris DSC 0899w.jpg" is OK?--Paris 16 ([[User talk:Paris 16|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

That's perfect! Thank you very much. Cheers --P e z i ([[User talk:P e z i#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Done! Thanks P e z i!--Paris 16 ([[User talk:Paris 16|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

November 2014

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

File:Österreichischer Nationalfeiertag 2008 - Ballhausplatz Heldenplatz.jpg

Hallo P e z i,
Du hast vorhin eine neue, aufgehellte Version dieses Bildes hochgeladen und damit meine Originalversion überschrieben. Die Intention, das Ganze heller zu machen, kann ich schon nachvollziehen, aber das Ergebnis ist mMn zwar heller, aber nicht besser. Vor allem die zuvor sehr dunklen Bereiche haben jetzt einen ausgeprägten gelb-grün-Stich. Hängt wohl auch vom Monitor und dessen Kalibrierung ab, wie das Bild angezeigt wird.
Jedenfalls wollte ich Dich um Eines bitten: Wenn Du Bilder Anderer nachbearbeitest, gib ihnen doch einen neuen Namen und überschreib bitte nicht die bestehenden Versionen. Normalerweise lade ich in solchen Fällen (da geht es meist ums Zuschneiden) einfach meine Originalversion wieder hoch. In dem Fall ist das Bild so oder so nicht besonders gut, weshalb ich es jetzt so lasse und nach Möglichkeit mal ein ganz Neues aus der selben Perspektive hochlade.
lg, Tsui ([[User talk:Tsui|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Hubertl hats auch noch probiert...

Servus Tsui,

sorry für meine "Nacht und Nebel Aktion". Normalerweise halte ich mich eh zurück beim Überschreiben. Falls dir die Originalversion besser gefällt, steht einem revert nichts im Wege.

Einen weiteren Versuch habe ich auch noch anzubieten; falls dir das besser gefällt lade es einfach hoch.

LG, --P e z i ([[User talk:P e z i#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Tsui: Wie ich schon schrieb, ich habs auch probiert... Falls der Himmel etwas freundlicher und vor allem nicht so ausgrissen sein soll, müsste ich micch etwas mehr spielen. Mit dem Vorhandenen (besser dem Nichtvorhandenen) ist auch am Staatsfeiertag kein Staat zu machen. Falls gewünscht, dann bitte sagen, man müsste ja auch die Spiegelungen vom Luster noch rausstempeln, schaut ja fast aus als ob das eine Übung unserer Luftwaffe ist (Drohnen im Formationsflug).--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Kommentar, Tsui??--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Wie schon eingangs geschrieben, das Bild ist ist so oder so kein wirklich gutes. Deshalb hatte ich das oben v.a. als sanften Hinweis bzgl. des Überschreibens von Dateien hier gemeint. Wenn Ihr andere/bessere Versionen dieses Bildes hinbekommt habe ich in dem Fall kein größeres Problem damit, wenn es überschrieben wird. Im Allgemeinen finde ich es halt einfach besser wenn Derivative eigene Namen bekommen (auch wg. der Urheberhinweise für daran interessierte Betrachter).

Hochgeladen hatte ich eine bereits stark nachbearbeitete Version, aus der nun für Euch wohl nicht mehr wirklich viel herauszuholen ist. Das Original ist sehr dunkel und wurde schnell, also ohne besonders auf Belichtung usw. zu achten, und ohne g'scheiten Weißabgleich (ein RAW gibt es davon nicht) durch das Fenster im BKA aufgenommen; es mischten sich also das Kunstlicht im Inneren mit der Tönung durch das Glas und mit dem Tageslicht draußen; keine gute Mischung.

Hubertl, die Spiegelung des Kronleuchters könnte man schon rausstempeln (mich lässt sie ja immer an UFO-Beweisfotos denken, zusammen mit dem Zeppelin-Ballon ergibt das fast eine Steampunk-Szenerie ... aber ich schweife ab). Besser wäre es mMn, einfach ein neues Foto der Aussicht hochzuladen. Am letzten Nationalfeiertag habe ich wieder ein paar solche Bilder gemacht die ich noch aufarbeiten muss - da könnte was dabei sein. --Tsui ([[User talk:Tsui|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

PS: Sorry wegen der Länge, die diese Diskussion hier annimmmt, P e z i. Eigentlich wollte ich nur eine kurze Bitte bzgl. des Überschreibens notieren. --Tsui ([[User talk:Tsui|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

VIC

Talking about File:서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg, VICbot has problem on reading Korean text, and this should be done manually. (FYI, see here). Thanks! — revi_msg 10:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. Cheers, --P e z i ([[User talk:P e z i#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP

I you really like this picture [1] you can vote on it here [2]. --Jacek Halicki ([[User talk:Jacek Halicki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Already done on 10th of November :-) --P e z i ([[User talk:P e z i#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted