User talk:Pasicles

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pasicles!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 19:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

File:All out of horse burgers - Tesco supermarket - 8 February 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:All out of horse burgers - Tesco supermarket - 8 February 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LGA (was LightGreenApple) talk to me 00:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

File:The Flying Dutchman by Charles Temple Dix.jpg[edit]

Hallo, here is the painting in large (2000px) from this source. Your other Charles Temple Dix - painting is verry blurry in the second version. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the sothebys link. Yeah I know that other Charles Temple Dix picture (here) is blurry in the second version - but there was apparently some sort of hidden digital watermark in the first one and I thought it prudent to replace it, even though the replacement is poorer quality. Pasicles (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
I can‘t see a watermark. Or you mean the Exif-data? --Botaurus (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The long and pompous EXIF data of the original image states: "This image is protected with a secure invisible digital watermark that allows the Public Catalogue Foundation to identify unauthorized use of the image." It all sounds pretty stupid to me - it's only an 800x520 pixel image afterall. There's no overt indication on the BBC's website that their paintings might be protected in this way. But since a "secure invisible digital watermark" might I suppose be under copyright, I thought I'd better use the blurry alternative. Pasicles (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

File:All out of horse burgers - Tesco supermarket - 8 February 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:All out of horse burgers - Tesco supermarket - 8 February 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)