User talk:Pava/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image:Torre velasca dal metrò.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Torre velasca dal metrò.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Torre velasca 02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Torre velasca 02.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Torre velasca 01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Torre velasca 01.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Campionario panda 2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


Category:Villages in Alto Adige/South Tyrol[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Villages in Alto Adige/South Tyrol has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 08:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Pava!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––FAEP (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Please learn how to categorize files properly[edit]

Hello Pava, please take a look at Commons:Categories, especially Commons:Categories#Categorization_tips and Commons:Categories#Over-categorization.

For example the File:- 01 ITALY Fiat Grande Punto e Punto Evo in snow in Milan.JPG is sorted into the following categories: [[Category:Fiat Punto]][[Category:Fiat Grande Punto]][[Category:Fiat Punto Evo]][[Category:Automobiles in Milan]][[Category:Automobiles in snow]][[Category:Snow in Milan]][[Category:Snow]]. But hence the categories "Fiat Grande Punto" + "Fiat Punto Evo" are subcategories of "Fiat Punto" and "Snow in Milan" is a subcategory of "Snow" this show a massive and intetional overcategorization, done by you. Unfortunately this also shows that you're simply ignoring what the above inserted template should have made clear for you.

In the last few days I corrected many of the mistakes you made and solved some of the problems, thar you're way of categorization caused, but unfortunately I don't have time to explain the matter of categorization to you, so please read and understand what Commons:Categories says and act according to our rules. Thanks in advance --FAEP (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

in the image the subject are two models of "Fiat Punto" I therefore decided to categorize it in the general category, because it contains + models in the same image from one family car, but at the same time I specified models, I think it may be considered a case of "overcat". In addition you have been kind to show me the warning about how to categorize, but since I have shown notice to the second message is less than 24 hours, is not it a little time to warn? Also keep in mind that you're referring to images uploaded in the past--Pava (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Automobiles on holiday in Italy[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Automobiles on holiday in Italy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

.--FAEP (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Automobiles on holiday[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Automobiles on holiday has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

.--FAEP (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit war in File:Ochre Porsche 997 GT3 3.8 in front of the Lamborghini São Paulo dealership.jpg[edit]

Ciao. Ho dato un'occhiata alla cronologia. Sinceramente posso capire la motivazione di alcune delle tue rimozioni (anche se non credo siano corrette, poi ti spiego), ma altre non tanto. Premesso che le note non sostituiscono mai le categorie, e che in Commons:Categories non c'e' scritto proprio tutto, vediamo le categorie attuali:

Queste mi pare non siano oggetto di edit war.

Queste sono le categorie che vorresti rimuovere; secondo te non sono opportune perche' non riguardano il soggetto principale della fotografia. Di solito pero' in Commons si categorizza non solo in base al soggetto principale, ma anche agli altri elementi della fotografia, se e' utile e se e' appropriato. In questo caso, Category:Lamborghini dealerships mi sembra azzeccato perche' in effetti si nota bene un concessionario Lamborghini sullo sfondo: per farti un esempio, se un domani volessi la foto di un concessionario Lamborghini e non la trovo, potrei tagliare questa. Quindi, anche se non e' il soggetto principale della foto e si non vede benissimo, e' utile, alla fin fine. Anche Category:Lamborghini Gallardo coupes non e' cosi' ridondante: sicuramente si intravedono solamente queste auto, ma se avessi bisogno di una foto in cui compaiono (seppur di sfuggita) una Porsche e una Lamborghini potrebbe venirmi utile questa (esistono strumenti esterni che incrociano le categorie). Category:Buildings in São Paulo City in effetti non e' cosi' appropriata, anche secondo me sarebbe da rimuovere, ma inutile fare un'edit war solo per rimuovere una categoria ridondante (non e' sbagliata, perche' effettivamente l'edificio c'e', si vede ed e' in quella citta').

Questa sinceramente non ho capito perche' la vuoi rimuovere, forse ti e' scappata (mi pare innegabile che la macchina sia fotografata da sinistra).

Ripeto, capisco le tue motivazioni perche' alcune categorie sono un po' "stiracchiate", ma mi pare inutile star li' a convincere l'utente di questa cosa; molti sono convinti che vada categorizzato quasi tutto quello che si vede nell'immagine (un po' come in en.wiki, che categorizzano moltissimo rispetto a it.wiki). Questo e' un progetto a livello mondiale, quindi alcuni utenti, magari abituati a categorizzare a manetta su en.wiki, sono portati a farlo anche qui, ed e' difficile convincerli a cambiare abitudini (e poi chissa' chi ha torto o ragione). Bisogna un po' venirsi incontro e vedere se la cosa e' cosi' dannosa da combattere per ottenerla; questa non mi pare il caso, conviene lasciar perdere.--Trixt (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Poscritto: sempre per il discorso delle abitudini di utenti di altri Paesi, molti rispondono nella loro talk anziche' sulla tua (probabilmente sono abituati coasi' e neanche ci pensano ad avvertirti)

Tra l'altro volevo raccomandarti una maggior attenzione nel categorizzare: qui hai messo a Torino un edificio che sta a Roma. Per il resto, ti ha detto tutto Trixt: non ingaggiare edit-war sulle categorie, è improduttivo e, in fondo, risponde all'uso anglosassone di categorizzare quasi tutto il categorizzabile. Tieni presente che questo è un immenso archivio di 12 milioni tra foto, video e file audio, a disposizione di tutti i progetti Wikimedia. C'è bisogno di categorie il più dettagliate possibile, altrimenti molto materiale rimarrebbe inutilizzato o inutilizzabile perché non si saprebbe come cercarlo (vedi Automobili rosse...). -- Blackcat (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Z Fiat Barchetta lavandino Torino Museo.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Z Fiat Barchetta lavandino Torino Museo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The TV screen depicts a copyright protected work. That makes this a derivative work and thus a copyright violation. Vera (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Fw: Category:Salón del Automóvil de Vigo :)[edit]

Great, I've gotta do it next year. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 17:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked for one week
The reason for the block is incivility, edit warring, abuse of multiple accounts, and vandalism. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | Català | Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Please take the next week to decide whether you want to be a useful member of Commons who will obey the rules or a nuisance who breaks them.

I have blocked your sockpuppets Pava and Serenato permanently. If you create any more sockpuppets, Pava will also be blocked permanently.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 38.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 38.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:' 12 - ITALY - fìdaty e merchandising Esselunga.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:' 12 - ITALY - fìdaty e merchandising Esselunga.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:' 12 - ITALY - Catalogo Olivari 2012 02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:' 12 - ITALY - Catalogo Olivari 2012 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:' 11 - ITALY - Evento Olivari - nuovo catalogo - Milano.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 42.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 42.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:" 12 - ITALY - Milk Granarolo Only italian Milk high quality fresh milk (whole milk) and Yogur 5 cereals HQ.JPG[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:" 12 - ITALY - Milk Granarolo Only italian Milk high quality fresh milk (whole milk) and Yogur 5 cereals HQ.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 11.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 11.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dino fumaretto elia billoni.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vera (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 29.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 29.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 39.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:- ITALY - Pixar exhibition at the PAC in Milan 39.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 20:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:' 12 ITALY - TURIN - cioccolaTò 26.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:' 12 ITALY - TURIN - cioccolaTò 26.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Pacco automobile.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pacco automobile.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


File:500 Topiary.jpg[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:500 Topiary.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Black_marbles[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Black_marbles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Lysippos (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

License changes[edit]

Please refrain from changing file licenses of other users, only the creator may change a license. You'll be blocked if you don't stop it as it's a copyright violation. --Denniss (talk) 00:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ducati[edit]

Warning This is your last warning. Stop your vandalism!--FAEP (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Hight_Quality[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Hight_Quality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

– Wdchk (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Template permission[edit]

See User talk:R. Engelhardt --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Automobile spoilers[edit]

I answered on my talk page, see User_talk:FAEP#Category:Automobile_spoilers_and_this_image_of_Alfa_Romeo_MiTo

File:"12 - ITALY - Dino Fumaretto al Milano Film Festival 2012 43.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:"12 - ITALY - Dino Fumaretto al Milano Film Festival 2012 43.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jonund (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Yesssssssssssssssss-[edit]

-sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

richiesta informazioni[edit]

Ciao Pava. Hai la mia risposta al bar italiano. Saluti, --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Made_in_Italy[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Made_in_Italy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

FAEP (talk) 01:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Sei partito con lancia in resta :)[edit]

Ma io non sono un mulino a vento. La risposta è si! :) Se guardi i miei contributi sembra che siano stati sparati a sale. Ma... Allora sto sfollando la categoria Black sedans. Se guardi bene prima di apparentemente toglierle da una categoria e non metterla in un altra (come hai pensato tu :) le ho messe nella categoria 2000s black sedans, che è una sottocategoria di Black sedans, quindi mi dispiace nessuna lacuna. La prossima volta riuscirai a beccarmi in castagna questa volta ti è andata male :) A parte gli scherzi siccome nelle auto c'è il caos sto risalendo dal basso per sistemare le categorie e per fare prima sto usando dei template di navigazione che categorizzino automaticamente vedi da category:red Audi sedans in su ed è più semplice inserirli in più categorie contemporaneamente. Per questo tutti quei link rossi. Poi li elimino a gruppi. Comunque grazie per avermelo ricordato. Anzi se mi vuoi dare una mano... :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 02:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Guarda che io scherzavo. Per l'aiuto ti ringrazio, prima devo mettere giù due istruzioni decenti--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikivoyage[edit]

Da regolamento no, però ci possono stare. Comunque perderai dei voti perché gli altri hanno già incominciato. Comunque saranno i votanti a scegliere. Per ora contatto l'organizzatore per informarlo. Penso non ci saranno problemi. grazie per averli proposti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 13:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Si non c'è problema, ma naturalmente parti svantaggiato. grazie --Raoli ✉ (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:" 11 ITALY FERRARI 458 in competition (focus on flap and headlamp).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome)[edit]

Ciao Pava, data la probabile cancellazione di tutte queste immagini ci stavamo chiedendo se potessi creare per l'Auditorium Parco della Musica qualcosa di uguale a questo File:" 12 - ITALY - NO FOP Pirellone in ITALY.png. Grazie. è una battaglia che sto combattendo anche nella vita reale spiegando a molte persone questa questione. Spero di non essere il solo. :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Grazie per l'interessamento. Spero non richieda più di 15 minuti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 04:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Oltre a leggere il consiglio qui Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Auditorium_Parco_della_Musica_(Rome) mi è venuta una grande idea. Tu hai ritagliato quell'immagine delle rovine dalla foto dell'Auditorium no? Perchè non scrivere "Dell'Auditorium è rimasto solo questo" e mostri l'immagine delle rovine sotto. Avrebbe doppio significato e la protesta verrebbe anche accentuata. In pratica se mostri le rovine fai intendere a molti che l'arte italiana è in decadenza e addirittura possono essere rappresentate solo rovine cioè edifici distrutti. Inoltre mostrando le rovine fai anche pensare al fatto quanto sia antica la legislazione italiana e in rovina lei stessa porti con se anche tutti i più bei fiori dell'ingegno italiano. Direi quindi di sfumare un po' sui bordi le rovine e creare due versioni: una senza quest'idea delle rovine come la prima versione che hai fatto solo rendendola più verticale e la seconda sempre rendendola verticale ma anche con le rovine. Dici che è folle tutto questo? --Raoli ✉ (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
No, tutto bene, ho letto solo ora l'intervento. Va bene hai ragione, però bisognerebbe farla più verticale per apparire in più superficie della pagine in modo che si legga il testo. no? :=) Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Questa File:" 12 - ITALY - NO FOP Parco della musica verticale.png è perfetta! Sei stato molto bravo. è venuta davvero bene. Grazie --Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Si è corretto. Basta avere delle alternative per l'immagine, ora ce le abbiamo. Tanto nella voce sull'auditorium ci sono più immagini da rimpiazzare. Vedrai che protesta che facciamo (chi vuole farla, è inteso)! Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Vabbene, solo infobox. ;) Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Re:Caricamento foto da Flickr[edit]

Non tutte le foto che sono su Flickr puoi caricarle su Commons. Puoi caricare solo quelle che nel campo licenza hanno scritto o cc-by o cc-by-sa. Le altre non le considerare se no ci rimani male. La foto della rivista non la puoi caricare poiché non ha nessuna di queste due licenze. Comunque se usi quello strumento praticissimo, se gli dai il link della foto non te la fa caricare. Se vuoi caricare tutti i file di un album non esiste uno strumento. Tocca farlo a mano. Probabilmente però ti sarà utile un software di cui non ti svelo le caratteristiche, ti dico solo che si chiama "Commonist" ma non ha nulla a che vedere con l'ideologia. Appena l'hai scoperto e utilizzato ti invito a scoprire i nuovi gadget di Commons. Molti dei quali nemmeno avresti immaginato che esistessero. Appena hai fatto, fischiami e ti dico uno strumento che roba in massa anche senza amministratore. Buone scoperte, speriamo non ti deludano! :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Se vuoi modificare in massa molte cose e aggiungere o sostituire del testo in più file o categorie di consiglio di copiarti il codice del punto 1 di questa discussione al Bar Commons:Bar_italiano#Traduzioni Ciao Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Nel tuo common.js. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Ti aggiunge un link nella casella degli "Strumenti" (nel menù di sinistra) che si chiama "Operazioni in massa". Se ci clicchi si apre una prima finestra che ti chiede quale categoria o pagina operare e poi scegli quello che ti pare. La risposta è stata tarda, ma stavolta è per una cosa di Wikidata che mi ha rubato tempo. Come sta andando la verticalizzazione di quell'immagine? :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Dico un po' più alta non troppo. Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Acquario di Genova[edit]

Per la stessa ragione penso che anche queste (forse però qui qualcuna se ne salva) debbano essere eliminate. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Acquario di Genova Caricheresti l'immagine base cosicché non ti dovrò più rompere e far perdere tempo in futuro? Per esempio ora per l'acquario di genova un bel pescetto tipo questo non è male File:Genova akwarium 16.jpg. In peschi non sono in Copyright ancora! :) Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Ma porcamiseria! Ci sono anche queste foto che ho raccolto in questa pagina personale. Ti giuro sono sfinito, continuo domani. Con queste che ci facciamo? La mancata libertà di panorama vieta anche foto di interni. Quindi anche tutte quelle foto. L'assurdo comunque è che ho scelto solo quello che mi è capitato, non tutto. Se continuassi verrebbe eliminato circa il 70% delle foto sull'Italia attuale. Rimarremmo con foto del 1850 o comunque prima del 1975, tranne le chiese appunto (a meno che non siano in territorio italiano). Sono rimasto shockato e non riesco ancora a pensare come sia possibile ciò. La cosa assurda è che finchè non ti rileggi cosa comporta la mancanza della libertà di panorama pensi che puoi caricare tutte le foto che vuoi, invece puoi caricare solo quelle autorizzate dal Ministero dei beni culturali. In Italia vi sono poche eccezioni. A parte, come già detto i palazzi d'epoca in foto d'epoca poco altro. Naturalmente lo scopo di quell'elenco non è proporle tutte in botto. Mi ammazzerebbero, ma capire se rimanendo fermamente con la legge davanti si riescono a trovare delle foto che possono andare. Quelle in quella categoria sono spacciate, ma milioni e milioni di altre foto con lo stesso problema. Finora nessuno ha fatto niente. Mi domando perché? Comunque tutti i file cancellati potranno sempre essere ripristinati. Sono dispiaciutissimo di aver scoperto che tutti questi file sono da cancellare. Ci stanno anche i miei in mezzo, ma "dura lex, sed lex". Finchè ci sta bisogna rispettarla, ma ripeto che a me sembra sempre più una legge solo per farci guadagnare le lobby o i nostri cari politici. è pazzesco. Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Però le foto degli interni come degli esterni non sono consentite. Avendo la propria fisionomia radicalmente è soggetto al copyright sul diritto d'autore. Per le macchine non saprei. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Se l'intervento fosse conservativo sarebbe perfetto. A ben guardare prima e dopo non sembra essere conservativo. Non ci perdere tempo. A me non sembra conservativo però se ci credi tu ci voglio credere anch'io. L'elenco comunque non si muove da là. Vorrei raccogliere altre immagini prima di effettuare la maxi richiesta. Adesso lasciando da parte il museo dell'automobile che non è proprio un caso FoP chiarissimo mi metterei a trovarne altri più plateali. Ti andrebbe di aggiungere in quella sottopagina altri possibili casi in cui l'immagine non è in libertà di panorama? --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Ho trovato quello che serviva e fortunatamente non devi leggere un testo unico ma una voce di Wikipedia (che è pure solo in italiano): Intervento di restauro e risanamento conservativo. Leggi da "riportare l'edificio ad un preciso momento della sua epoca .... mai costruite (variazione di forma, sagoma, volume e superficie)", però se vedi questa figura noterai che in Italia il diritto di Panorama proprio non esiste, quindi Commons non accetta nè foto di interni, nè esterni prima del decesso dell'architetto o progettista di essi. C'è sempre qualcuno che l'ha progettato. Per quanto riguarda le auto Pininfarina ha disegnato e progettato molte auto. Bisogna stare attenti Pava. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, rimosse. Ora ne sto aggiungendo altre alla pagina Deletion requests/FoP Italy che non saprei dove spostare su Commons. Puoi aggiungerci anche tu quello che trovi. In caso di dubbio su altre cose confrontiamoci come ora. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
La Libertà di Panorama è abbastanza semplice da verificare. Su Napoli non sono sicuro, ma non è mica detto che tutte quelle che stanno nella pagina verranno eliminate. Saranno proposte per l'eliminazione. L'arco di Torino ha anch'esso il copyright essendo stato costruito da un architetto in occasione dei giochi invernali. Le foto sull'Ara pacis (museo) non possono stare. Bada che finora mi sto concentrando solo su edifici moderni, ma sarebbero da mandare in cancellazione per la non-libertà di panorama anche Colosseo e l'Ara Pacis stesso. La semplicità del disegno non conta. Si valuta la semplicità del disegno per immagini come loghi e 2D. Vulcano buono è di Renzo Piano. Noi le segnaliamo. Altri rivedranno e correggeranno dove sbagliato. Penso di sapere il necessario sulle licenze di Commons (tranne, vabbè.. le varie norme di ogni paese) dopo tanto esperienza anche a mie spese. Però certo, se becchi l'amministratore corretto è un conto, altrimenti se ne becchi uno che non gli va, è stanco, è pure arrabbiato ed è prepotente, nulla va come avevi pensato. in linea di massima non mi metterei a fare queste cose se non mi sentissi abbastanza sicuro di quello che faccio, come te anche, credo. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Si anche il Colosseo perchè è un bene tutelato da un Ente in questo caso il Ministero dei Beni Culturali. Per pubblicare una foto degli edifici sotto la tutela di un ente è necessario pagare una quota o andare in contro a multe. Comunque quello del Colosseo è un altro esempio dell'ampio ventaglio composto da più casi. Per ora non vorrei trattare questi casi, ma da legge anche foto del Colosseo (per fare un esempio) vanno cancellate da Commons. La soglia dell'originalità non si applica a opere 3D. L'arco di Torino è stato costruito troppo recentemente e siccome l'Italia non ha una legge che permetta di pubblicare foto sotto una licenza libera (con copyright si) di opere recenti allora andrebbero eliminate tutte le sue foto. Questo è il problema: una legge inadatta al nuovo millennio. Lo scotto lo paghiamo naturalmente noi (l'insieme dei cittadini italiani). --Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC) p.s.Dimenticavo di dirti: l'unico caso per palazzi moderni di rimanere su Commons è quello in cui l'immagine mostra l'edificio in costruzione.

Pareri giunti[edit]

Stamattina sul presto ho chiesto ad un amministratore di revisionare i file di quella pagina e ha detto che va bene eccetto per alcuni file e categorie di file che ho cassettonato o rimosso. Ti invito quindi a riguardare la pagina e leggere i consigli a lato, che sono poi i motivi principali che consentono anche in paesi senza libertà di panorama di pubblicare un'immagine senza contravvenire alla legge. Ciao :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 48 hours, along with FAEP. I'm sorry I have to do this, but this and this are simply not acceptable, regardless of who is right. -- King of ♠ 11:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

LdP[edit]

Ti ho scritto su Wikipedia per chiarimenti. Raoli ✉ (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Si ok, ci tengo a chiarire. --Raoli ✉ (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Hatchbacks[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––FAEP (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

User:FAEP[edit]

It appears that you two have not learned any lesson from your blocks. Therefore I am indefinitely restricting you from edit warring with FAEP until you can demonstrate that you can work with him. To be more precise (from a technical standpoint), you are disallowed from adding or removing categories on a file description that FAEP has previously edited. -- King of ♠ 12:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Holiday greetings[edit]

Christmas Barnstar2.png Wishing you the happiest of holidays
and the best new year!
Vera (talk), December 2012

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | +/−

Cfry Holly.svg

categorie di marmo per colore[edit]

Ciao, dato che sto caricando delle lapidi di colore nero sono capitato nella Category:Black marbles ed ho seguito la discussione in atto ferma da giugno scorso. Per quanto ritengo sensata l'obiezione IMHO se chi carica è certo che si tratta di marmo di un determinato colore non credo sia una cosa così insana creare una cat per colore diverso (ho appena trovato una lastra di marmo rosso giapponese chiamata rosso corallo...). certo, avendo una competenza specifica si potrebbe dedurre anche che non è marmo nero ma che ne so ardesia (che poi è un marmo o una semplice pietra?) e comunque sarebbe interessante andare a fare una ricerca e scoprire quanti monumenti in pietra (se non in marmo) nera esistono. Che ne dici? Intanto carico la Category:Black stones così ci trovi le "mie" lapidi e ti fai un'idea. Attendo news :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Tra l'altro vedo una Category:Stone plaques abbastanza sguarnita per la quantità industriale di lapidi caricate in Commons...--Threecharlie (talk) 11:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Palermo tram on a truck[edit]

Ciao, Pava! Why did you call this a Concept vehicle? It is not such, it is a standard unit of a of an established model and brand, the Bombardier Flexity. Unless you warn me otherwise, I'll remove that category. -- Tuválkin 12:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)