User talk:Penyulap

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search




Embargo.


All uploads.



Being blocked because some genius cannot sign their own name and refuses to, and some admin blocks me because they want to name-call as if it were some kind of problem solving revelation is an unacceptable working environment. No further work will be uploaded to commons, except (just maybe) awards and human rights work. For other stuff, try the few if any remaining artists, or maybe this place they do some simple stuff free, probably two or three pics before they get wise. For work of this quality, good luck finding anyone willing to do it for less than four figures, let alone for free. Even this logo Penapplelogo.png, which I made in ten minutes for the sole purpose of saying how easy to make, and crappy, this apple logo is Apple iOS.svg, is worth $150 (or $900 on a standard hourly rate). So have yourselves a fun time and a lovely little consensus that 'everything can't be done, can't be drawn, and is impossible'. example, example. Eventually you can just steal work from the Internet like on en.wiki, on the premise that there is nobody who can draw free CGI images. Have to steal this because nobody can draw space stations. "Replaceable ? Not with a free image" it says. Free space station 1, Free space station 2, free satellite. Drive all the artists away to make "not replaceable with a free image" a reality. As a community, commons, like en.wiki can't regulate itself. I have better things to do with my friends and spare time than put up with this shit. The embargo will only be reviewed after that admin's next de-sysop discussion, if at all. Penyulap 07:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


A new image[edit]

Hello, how are you doing :-) its been a while and i was busy on ar. wiki and couldn't answer back about the map of Constantinople. I don't remember i asked for a similar battle map before, this blank map is great and i will add the Arabic tags as soon as i'm done with a few things. Right now i have a new request i applied here can you do something about it plz? thank you--باسم (talk) 12:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Well I can, but as you can see from the section above, some genius at the Graphics lab is unable to use his own name to sign his own templates he alone wants to use, and insists on forging my signature. Mattbuck, who tells me to 'fuck off' if I want to improve commons has blocked me on commons. So even if I was unblocked, I wouldn't be using the lab, where some genius insists on forging my signature on hideous templates. When I have time, I may look into it and upload it over on ar.wiki for you, but I'm not so sure.
After I marked a section resolved here, to indicate it was no longer urgent, but too soon to archive, someone else did extra work on the image, you know, even though the requester was happy, and then an editor managed to mark the section for archiving WITHOUT the necessity to forge my signature, maybe that requires some amount of technical expertise, who knows. Now if someone could ask McZusatz how he managed to do that with his own signature, and then explain it to this guy who according to the edit summary doesn't know what to do to get it to archive, WITHOUT forging MY signature, well, that would make so much common sense that it would be too much for some small minds to comprehend. Penyulap 07:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry for all the trouble you have been through on commons. Don't worry about the picture, if you feel like not doing it now or soon, no problem at all. Wish you all the best in overcoming this--باسم (talk) 09:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding me باسم, there are new projects popping up everyday and it is inevitable that commons and wikipedia shall be replaced. Our work won't go to waste, today I have been busy absorbing coding skills to help build the new sites, I think copying the work from one site to the next shall be easy. Moving the brightest, kindest, most productive editors across will be even easier, for they shall move themselves. Peace. Penyulap 09:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

reply[edit]

Hello. I am not at all happy with that solution that you proposed. The thing is that Ceha does not seem to want to negotiate, and I not really interested in edit-warring. He also is not a guy who is interested in discussing problem - I have seen him bog people down for countless pages just because he is persistent. With edits such as these, [4] , we can see that he does not have good intentions, that his only intention is to push for a map that shows more croats and less serbs. What might be possible solutions to this problem that you can think of? (Lilic (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)).

given recent events, I can only assist by email. Penyulap 19:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Why? Isn't it more transparent to communicate on here? (Lilic (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)).

I am sad[edit]

I appealed against block on you, but the admin simply turned down my request. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC).

Thank you for your kind concern. Penyulap 10:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Glad to see you back; I'm still recovering from my travel fatigues. JKadavoor Jee 06:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I am confident that you enjoyed yourself... Penyulap 07:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

FYI (100+2 articles, remember?)[edit]

[5] maybe a head-up? --PigeonIP (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you, thank you. I am happy to know. I wish my words were better. I am happy you like them. Penyulap 01:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
much better than mine could ever have been ;) --PigeonIP (talk) 10:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Let me know if you need more awards. (but not academy awards, see the next section) Penyulap 15:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

My work sux[edit]

See the history of w:Academy Award. The FOP USA issue may be heating up so we may need a better image than mine. Yellow on black may not be the best, I just chose it quickly, and your font collection may be better. In other words I think yours is bigger than mine. Feel free to overwrite that file I doubt we need more than one page of versions. We can seek consensus on which to keep on top. Other projects can fork their own if they don't like ours.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh my, you've put that image into an article ? hmm, I don't know what to think.
Yes, I can do images of any kind, yes I have plenty of fonts, and the embargo has an exception for awards, however I'm sure that the academy award was not what I had in mind when I wrote the exception about awards. I could almost give you an award for making me smile though ;) Penyulap 15:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I may fumble through it myself. I just had to revert someone that removed it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Money job[edit]

I was in w:Vulcan, Alberta recently, days after their annual Trek event. I took a picture of their photo op sign that is overdue for repair. File:Vulcan visitor centre photo op 203.JPG They may pay a couple of bucks for a new image that can replace the old one. I don't know what size would work best or how to transfer it to the plywood. If you talk to a local sign company they may help with ideas. You may wish to grab a copy for your hard drive in case any dork that is stalking my uploads tries to delete it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

My spider-sense is warning me of another tabasco fiasco ;) Penyulap 03:47, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
You could email and ask first. http://www.townofvulcan.ca/contact-us/ Want me to mail you the coffee cup, empty olive jar, or the sealed bottle of sauce I still have? Pick one? They may just send you a postcard with the Vulcan postmark and that may be nice even. Up to you, I just thought I would mention it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 04:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
No that's ok, I would prefer something that is human rights related, award related, (heeheh lol, not that kind of award) and preferable a request that no other editor alive could possibly do :) that's the kind of work I love to do.
Though at the moment, my main art computer is offline and I'm down to a live-cd, it'll be fixed in a jiffy though so don't worry. I was installing network analysis and packet inspection tools and things went horribly wrong. (although not so wrong that I won't be able to fix it in time) Penyulap 04:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Here is a link to a .dae submarine file. I lost the one I made but had this one that someone else did from the same tutorial. Dunno if you care to look at it or not.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Argh! I'm not there yet, I spent hours yesterday doing data recovery from the crashed computer system. 120 thousand files plus and 130 something gigs of JUST 'personal documents', nothing of the operating system files, just pics, art, components, videos, all that stuff that goes in the 'my documents' folder on windoze machines. I'm amazed there was so much, it struck me how you forget so much and can't think of very much inside your mind at once. There is so much in your brain but so little would ever come to mind if you had to make a list. My homicidal robot is back up, I think he only stopped long enough to gloat, the little #$*%^$. He's working as if nothing at all happened. Should take longer to restore the art software and operating system, and these things always take longer whenever there is trolling. Sometimes I wonder just how productive I'd be in a better working environment. I can understand why so many competent professional people avoid this project in their spare time, it's a shame it's so mismanaged. (sigh) Penyulap 04:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions[edit]

  • Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates correction is stupid. Proverbs 12:1 (regardless of if you believe in God, these are wise words)

I realize that sometimes suggestions are not wanted. I realize that even when suggestions are wanted, the vast majority of the time they are ignored by the recipient. However, I hold out for the small percentage of the time that they are received, and taken to heart. Would you be open to some constructive criticism? I read over one AN/U thread about you, and I think I have some things to add which might help ease your stay here on Commons.

Of course, in the meantime, if you have suggestions for me, I will listen to them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

  • It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. Krishnamurti. These are relevant wise words because I am very well adjusted to the community of established artists, content creators, categorizers, good admins, newbies who want to help and so on. The sole sector of the community who I don't care for are the pathological who pursue selfish goals, seeking to use the project as their own virtual tyranny.

I feel quite comfortable on commons, I have many good friends and colleagues who, like me, pursue the goals of the project. As in RL I appeal to the wise and competent while repelling the evil. The people I don't appeal to, if any, are invariably working towards their own selfish goals. Sure, people can always use more evil friends, possibly I should put more effort into that. I can think of a number of cyber-bullies offhand that I don't get along with. You're welcome to use email if you have any advice. I look forward to chatting with you. Maybe there is something all good editors can do so that evil can triumph, ...or maybe nothing at all. No, but seriously, I'm all ears. Send me a note. Penyulap 04:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

As for advice from me to you, I have none. You're not in my face name-calling in my blocklog, you're not blatantly trying to badge of shame me as transparent-to-all revenge, I don't see brilliant contributors complaining that you're making their work intolerable, so I pay no attention to you. Sorry about that. Maybe fashion advice. Now you're an admin, don't dress like a pimp before you site down at the computer to log into commons, consider a nice cape and mask instead. I dunno, you see, people who aren't in my face I'm like, I have no clue about. ;) Penyulap 04:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Need to know :)[edit]

Hi! I just read a comment you made a few days ago on the De-Admin request. Under the section history of slippery road surface sign you said you haven't noticed me mentioning the problem with sort of editing... Can't say that I can follow you, what did I miss? Face-smile.svg Thanks for your time. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Aston Martin DB7 early model.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aston Martin DB7 early model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy note[edit]

To avoid derailing the de-adminship discussion further, I have taken my concerns about your conduct in that discussion to the discussion talk page. I will make it clear to you here though. My choice to participate in a de-adminship discussion does not give you the right to call me a liar (without evidence), to accuse me of canvassing and collusion (again without evidence) and to make outright threats to me about my "future" here at Commons. You have now moved on to disparagement of people because of their national origins (and you didn't even get that right). You have had the chance to have your say - at length. How about letting others have their say without the constant harrassment. If your case is as strong as you think it is, you shouldn't need to act in the manner in which you have. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 21:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

I haven't called you a liar or a canvasser, show me where I have, if there is some misunderstanding on your part, I will be glad to clarify it for you.
I think you have become far too upset over this, it's quite obvious because you are falsely accusing me of disparaging people because of their national origins, which is false and insulting.
It would help if you can post a few quotes here, so I can discuss it with you. I can hardly just retract or change every comment in the entire discussion, that would be unreasonable.
Actually, that would be kind of impossible to do without removing the entire de-adminship discussion, which would be against process. That would actually be disruptive ;) Penyulap 21:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I just had a look at your remark, I recall you were the one making false accusations about me. You see here, you're calling me a liar. No wait, you're saying I am calling other people liars and giving the wrong diff for the false accusation.
"I am also deeply concerned with the motivation behind this request for de-sysopping and even more concerned about the highly confrontational approach taken by Fry1989 and Penyulap in this discussion. The need to respond aggressively and at length to every dissenting opinion (including calling those with differing opinions "liars"!) makes me very suspicious about the (lack of) good faith being shown by those two editors and the (lack of) objectivity in the case they have brought forth."
I don't actually care that you call me a liar or whatever it was, I guess I could care less if I put in effort, but you say I'm calling people liars without giving a diff. The diff you give in that comment is a diff of a DIFFERENT editor, so where you make false claims like that, and give a diff which is clearly inappropriate it's easy for everyone to see. Hence, I don't care that you make false accusations against me at that point.
About the 'future' stuff, that's just voting in admin elections. That is what people are SUPPOSED to do, to look at the attitudes and history of a candidate and see what they stand for, what they do, and then decide if you think they would make a good admin. Bidgee misused the tools to gain the upper hand in a dispute. This has already been stated and verified by a great many people. I too am amongst them and do not think that if you are an admin in the middle of an edit war in the edit summary alone with one other editor, I don't think you should use admin tools to win your stupid argument. That is not what tools are for. Many people don't think that is what tools are for and I am one of them. There are also many people who think that tools ARE there to be misused and that is what tools are for. There are many people who think Bidgee is doing a great job and look at what he did and support that. I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that people who support Bidgee's behavior, if they were given tools god help us, would do exactly the same thing. Of course they would, they are saying there's nothing wrong with it. They are saying that Bidgee is a good admin.
On what planet, in what policy, does it say that I have to vote for such people ? Where does it say I MUST vote in people who think there is nothing wrong with misusing admin tools ? So of course I'm bloody well not going to vote for them, I'll tell you right now, I'll tell you tomorrow, I'll tell you any time you ask me. Tell you next year if we are both still here, and if I ever see you up for a RfA after saying that Bidgee is a shining example to all admins everywhere then of course I'm going to vote against you, that is the point. That is what voting is for. Durr. Penyulap 22:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

99of9 closure[edit]

You missed a trick by not demanding that X be a real number. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wrongly placed comment[edit]

Hi, just wanted to say I'm sorry for this mistake - it seems that for some reason I thought these were two separate comments, hadn't seen that your first paragraph wasn't signed. darkweasel94 21:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

think nothing of it. I didn't know what to do with the positioning and indention so I just shoved it at the end to be less confusing, hope you don't mind. Penyulap 22:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons talk:SVG guidelines[edit]

In response to your message, I haven't gone and used smilies (not that I have anything against them; I use emojis all the time), but I have replaced the goods and bads with black check marks and x's for now. If I can find some good minimalist smilies I might use them there (Obviously the guideline page design should set an example with a clean modern design).—Love, Kelvinsong talk 19:20, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Argh ! they look contentious ! {sigh} yes, if there is a way, that would be brilliant. Penyulap 20:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the top of your Usertalkpage, I thought you might like this block from the SVG guidelines page—

Examples
Copyrighted source to tracing.svg
Negative smiley.svg
Only a vectorization—it does not improve on the (poor quality) source, and is in this case probably a copyvio.
Copyrighted source to original.svg
Positive smiley.svg
Makes an improvement on the non-free original that is sufficient to avoid copyright problems.

—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh that is PERFECT ! Farm-Fresh emotion happy.png just perfect, and you made new faces for everyone to suit as well, Bravo ! you've won me over. The arrows are perfect as they depict policy.

This is precisely the kind of docs that people need for copyright, there is exactly nothing at the moment, all the pages that are here are F.A.Q.s for people with cameras. Just the other day at the village dump it came up about drawings and avoiding copyright. This is sorely needed. Penyulap 22:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Verry sorry...[edit]

... my Internet Connection today is verry slow. :-(-Steinsplitter (talk)

is not my connection, why you do this? --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

For your information[edit]

Commons:Mascots/Requests/Penyulap (de-Mascot) -mattbuck (Talk) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

An attack page, how original, did you come up with the idea yourself, or did Fae help out like he is helping out now. Impressive behaviour and I'm sure you'll find anyone who supports it, or not. Penyulap 21:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quoting redacted content[edit]

Hi Penyulap, you quoted content which was redacted before. You may question why something has been redacted but you are not free to restore that material. Simply talk first to the admin who removed offensive material. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

If I saw that directed at a person, I'd have removed it myself. It was not. That editor was critical of an organization this obviously has nothing to do with that editor and everything to do with my sound reprove of your partisan closure of a discussion about Tomas. Any editor can look at the actual diff, which I give here and you don't. That editor even used the exact word in bold marks. "organisation" he said. Unless Russavia is an organisation, then this is about you getting corrected on your biased closure at ANU. Penyulap 12:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Penyulap, the offending text was obviously targetted at Russavia (this man, followed by an offense). Anyway, if you object to redactions talk to the redacting admin, do not revert or quote it. Regards, --AFBorchert (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
THIS IS WIKIPEDIAAArr.png
Sounds a whole lot like "Is too!!!". The diff is there, people can read what he thinks of the "organisation" themselves, and in the face of indisputable evidence you figure to replace my brain with repetition alone ? Oh please, I've made art to criticize that kind of bullshit. You can repeat the same argument as many times as you like it's just going to look all the more silly in my opinion, there is not really a point at which I vomit, it just gets sillier, it's bleeding obvious that you're calling Russavia an "organisation". Yeah, maybe they'll de-Bureaucrat Commons and shove another server into Russavia's pants. HA! Penyulap 20:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

hey[edit]

I didn't look at who changed it from left to right before putting it back as I had it, there has been so many people messing with my remarks there, or just destroying them in general as an attack on me, like this lot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 followed by an outright attack page mentioned at the bottom of my talkpage, so I was just ignoring it as more of the same.

When I had a look and saw it was you I thought, whoops, still in the anti-nasty mode. Feel free to change it back to the other side, I do not mind as it's a genuine editorial thing you're up to. I think I started getting away from the 'everything on the righthand side' thing back in the days of featured articles on en.wikipedia, someone mentioned 'why are all the images on the right hand side, you can alternate them a bit' and I thought about it, and thought, hey, why are they all on the right hand side, it's just a default, not a rule or style. After that yeah, I put a little more thought into not following the default. Meh, but if it annoys you by all means change it back, there are plenty more pictures for me to talk with. I'm not so much a text-only person, I'm video pictures and sounds when I talk. Penyulap 02:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I merely moved/realigned it so that comments do not stack up (so that three structure is maintained). :)
It is a heated discussion. IMHO people are getting too worked up either way. Things should be discussed in length but instead they are being rushed.
-- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 18:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Penyulap[edit]

FYI, --Slaunger (talk) 15:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Gaufre biscuit.jpg Hello Penyulap! It's a wild world here on Commons. Thank you for defending me during the discussion. Some of your comments are very wise and perceptive. I also like the picture of the lady with a donut of Doom. You are very talented. I hope, when the fuss over the de-crat is over, you and Russavia will be friends again. Greetings. Seleucidis (talk) 12:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Onam greetings![edit]

Have a nice Onam tomorrow! JKadavoor Jee 17:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Missing you[edit]

I miss you, and I hope that you return to a more comfortable Commons one day. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

+1. JKadavoor Jee 14:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

+1:D----Oursana (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you still around? I think that it's safe to return now. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

"Happy Diwali!"[edit]

While Diwali is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Satcitananda (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Diwali and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!"JKadavoor Jee 06:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Email[edit]

I've sent you an Email. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Bob2002.svg
Hi Michael, thank you for the kind note. I have been out of touch since the last round of battling organ failure (no fun!) but I would say that I am "well" at the moment, and all the better for being remembered.
I hadn't thought of posting on wiki for ages. If you asked me yesterday I would have said 'no way, no time'. Yet here I am 718smiley.svg I shall have to thank all the people who left me notes on and off wiki ! Penyulap 09:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Oh, wow. I wasn't aware that you were having such problems. I'm glad that you're better now. Don't push yourself too hard. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry that the image was deleted. I'm currently working on having a copy of the image uploaded onto Encyclopedia Dramatica. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

why sorry ? I don't care about things I can churn out so fast and easy like artist shit, I like that you like it, and that everyone likes it, but I don't care that trolls want it deleted so obviously out of policy. At the moment, I can't upload because of internet connections, that worries me more, but again not much, as there are too many other actual things to be worried about. Plus, I is learning stuff too ! more than drawing. :) If you like a copy of the image, I have it on my hard-drive, and it's easy to make two more useful images from the one gif, for whomsoever would like it. Penyulap 01:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
I enjoy your work and would like to share it with others. I had a copy of the GIF on my hard drive, but I lost it recently along with some other files. Do you still have my Email address? Can you please Email me a copy of the GIF? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Michael, you are very kind. I was surprised to see all the works on my HD, I only every uploaded a tiny fraction of my work, and forgot a lot of it. Interesting to look over some of it. Penyulap 14:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:Wikipedia1984.gif (NSFW) – Thanks for sharing your work. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Oh I roared with laughter when I went to see where it was used and saw this at the top of the page. It captures so well the hallmark of the trolls on here, uploading the nearest and dearest to their hearts.
well, the commons trolls put another nail in the projects coffin. The supreme Irony of proving beyond doubt the commons regime of trolls cannot tolerate even the mildest critique by acting out the intolerant regime in the artwork. People would wonder if their appalling behavior is orchestrated by a higher comical force.
"Wp proves it is not a regime completely intolerant of mild criticism, by being intolerant of mild criticism."
I can't recall this guy's name, but I think he's the greatest CEO ever. I model myself after him. Penyulap 04:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
The guy is called Hank Scorpio, just FYI. darkweasel94 08:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm glad Encyclopedia Dramatica has made someone here laugh. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Ha! yeah, it can be tiring being dragged down by the bottom-feeders. Being able to deal with critique as a site, or as leadership (as in Jim's public figure) is woefully lacking. If someone criticized me or my site, I'd either take it on board or slam dunk them by criticizing myself properly. I'd show them how it is really done by criticisng myself better than they ever could and where would that leave them but speechless. Nope, people like Fae and mattbuck have the most disgraceful and appalling public images on and off commons, and with people like that and what they do, it just drags everyone in the only possible direction it CAN go, which is to end with a reputation crafted by the same people who crafted theirs for them. So with Fae's skills at public relations at work on commons, we will end up as popular as....Fae. Attack pages, name-calling in blocklogs, constant abuse of any and every kind, people will try to escape to more civilized academic environments like 4-chan for example.
Don't worry Michael, there are cheerful and sometimes even humorous people like me with the skills and backing needed, to think for a moment and say to themselves that there isn't a website out there they REALLY like and enjoy, and so they build one ! Penyulap 18:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Before the entry of the Chinese New Year, I bestow upon thee this Star of Hope. Cheers. Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 02:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Ramon, I did enjoy it. Penyulap 09:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

RE: Hi Michael[edit]

I'm not sure why it's down. I'm only involved in the curation of content and the moderation of the community. I'm not responsible for hosting. This sort of thing happens all the time, so it'll probably reappear eventually. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

ahh! well I thought it was best to say just in case. Now who is responsible for the pop-ups, my Grandma wants to slap them and I want to help :) lol. Naah, not really, your bat and ball I guess. It's just erm!! Penyulap 04:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
ED is back up. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Please be civil[edit]

العربية | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | Українська | +/−


Stop hand nuvola.svg You are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. If your behaviour is not moderated, you may be blocked from further editing.

This is not an acceptable comment. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Yann (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your reasoning for this delete at Fae's request has no policy content at all. Sven Manguard, The Devil's Advocate, Michaeldsuarez, Cirt and INeverCry all found it in scope, and 'non-notable" shouts a deletion that has nothing to do with policy and exposes your own personal motivations. In regards to edit warring, people can see for themselves how baseless and typically back-to-front your false accusation is. You placed this warning minutes AFTER I discussed up your out-of-process deletion at the village pump. I discuss the public disgrace you create and then minutes later your here handing out baseless accusations and multiple threats. Penyulap 12:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

(cur | prev) 16:44, 4 February 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,510 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (No.) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 16:36, 4 February 2014‎ Penyulap (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,468 bytes) (-42)‎ . . (Undo, no consensus for this on the talkpage, and a clear consensus against it.) (undo)
(cur | prev) 16:32, 4 February 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,510 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (Undo revision 115563057 by Penyulap (talk)) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 14:25, 4 February 2014‎ Penyulap (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,468 bytes) (-42)‎ . . (Undo revision 115495886 by Mate2code (talk) per tp) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:03, 3 February 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,510 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (Undo revision 115459509 by Liftarn (talk)) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 12:31, 3 February 2014‎ Liftarn (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,468 bytes) (-42)‎ . . (Restore sanity per talk.) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 18:53, 31 January 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,510 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (Replace Liftarn's version by NPOV version again.) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 00:25, 26 January 2014‎ Liftarn (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,468 bytes) (-62)‎ . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 00:24, 26 January 2014‎ Liftarn (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,530 bytes) (+20)‎ . . (added Category:Racism using HotCat) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 02:22, 8 January 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,510 bytes) (+3)‎ . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 02:22, 8 January 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,507 bytes) (+10)‎ . . (use definition from w:Islamophobia) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 02:19, 8 January 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,497 bytes) (+73)‎ . . (Edit the note on racism (which had been hijacked by Litfarn)) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 00:14, 8 January 2014‎ Mate2code (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,424 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (Removed Category:Racism for NPOV reasons.
Category:Xenophobia may be appropriate - that's also how w:Islamophobia is categorized.) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 10:01, 1 September 2013‎ Liftarn (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,420 bytes) (-9)‎ . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 06:15, 23 August 2013‎ Túrelio (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,429 bytes) (-28)‎ . . (-discrimination per djr13 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Anti-Christianity&curid=11209172&diff=102493934&oldid=102448465) (undo | thank)

You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 2 weeks for the following reason: vandalis.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

We are fed up with your junk. Would you please find another playground? Yann (talk) 12:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

(my comment at the village pump) I see your efforts to crush the lighthearted environment of self-critique of wikipedia has backfired badly and publicly too. The last in you long line of attempts to delete my work out of process here turned a completely unknown work into a popular tool to criticize Wikipedia, the irony of crushing lighthearted criticism by having an artwork comparing wiki to an intolerant regime has not been lost on the public in your latest public disgrace of the project. It's on wikipediocracy it's on encyclopediadramatica, its on Jimbos talkpage. It has gone from internal jest to public disgrace with your personal attention.

that was at

12:01, 5 February 2014

then you, the closing admin on that DR, blocks me at

12:29, 5 February 2014

nice work Yann. Penyulap 12:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

RE: A Barnstar for you![edit]

Thanks, and you're welcome. That's a pretty neat GIF. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I am glad that you like it. Penyulap 12:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Rigoletto in the opera "Rigoletto" by Giuseppe Verdi in Lviv Opera House.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rigoletto in the opera "Rigoletto" by Giuseppe Verdi in Lviv Opera House.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.66.63.102 08:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Award for Adam.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Award for Adam.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

24.134.38.128 09:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A340-500; 9V-SGE@LAX;08.10.2011 620dq (6298252597).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A340-500; 9V-SGE@LAX;08.10.2011 620dq (6298252597).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 12:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Penlaunch part 2.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Penlaunch part 2.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Discrimination against atheists[edit]

There is now a world-wide version, your version is File:Discrimination against atheists.png, new version File:Discrimination against atheists by country.svg.--Muhammed Kabir (talk) 23:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop it[edit]

Please refrain from personally insulting other users in order to derail discussions at COM:AU[6]. I have now notified Fastily. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

@Penyulap: There really isn't any need to talk about Fæ anymore. His time has come and gone. Incorporating criticism of Fæ into every discussion is pointless and silly, and it only creates more trouble for you. Don't get yourself blocked again over this. If the discussion is about Fastily, then please stick to discussing Fastily. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
brilliant advice Michael. Yes, I had made the natural mistake because I wanted to point out a bad example to everyone, to contrast against the stellar record of Fastily. I don't particularly think the guy needs an award or anything, but looking at his workload, he seems to do, along with INC, most all of the adminning work around here. Naturally the in-my-face harassment by Fae and Yann and public disgrace that Yann & whatsisname provide is difficult to ignore. Just have to do what I can to care even less than I do now about such nobodies. Considering that I'm breaking out in a sweat with all the not caring and not giving a rat's ass that I'm doing now, it won't be easy. I should see if I can get some help, a team effort to not give a dam. Meh. But actually come to think of it I can't be bothered. Too apathetic to redouble my not giving a crap efforts.
Do you know, I was just thinking today to write a nice book. Do some authoring. I think that'd keep me occupied.. Ha ! occupied. OccuPen.gif You know you always remember where you were the moment big things happened. Like 9.11. or the occupy movement. I was in the toilet at the time the occupy movements broke out. All over the world,... in many places. I did my part too. I occupied that toilet. For a while. Penyulap 12:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 2 weeks for the following reason: Intimidation/harassment: on COM:AN/U - oldid=119960204. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Penyulap, becoming blocked over incidents such as this really isn't worth it. You're hurting your own credibility, not Fæ's, by making such comments. As I've said in my previous message to you, Fæ isn't really that important anymore. You should let bygones be bygones. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

They don't want you to be missed or for your work to be appreciated[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AWe_miss_you&action=history&year=2014&month=5 – What gives them the right to decide who should be missed and who should be forgotten? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Champasak montage.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Champasak montage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

37.5.2.120 05:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Penbicara062012.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Penbicara062012.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Anim for Canoe1967.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anim for Canoe1967.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

McZusatz (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Great white shark south africa with Teeth by David Shankbone sml welcome.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Great white shark south africa with Teeth by David Shankbone sml welcome.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

McZusatz (talk) 11:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

File:FIFA Logo(2010).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FIFA Logo(2010).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 02:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)