User talk:PereslavlFoto/QI-2010

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorshki-para.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Are you able to add an English desription (what kind of cooking pots)? -- H005 08:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorki-lenin-room-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done considering the very difficult lighting conditions. --MattiPaavola 09:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorki-domik-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done considering the very difficult lighting conditions. --MattiPaavola 09:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church-brynchagi-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Meets the QI criteria at all points. --High Contrast 13:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brynchagi-shop-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Meets the QI criteria at all points. --High Contrast 13:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brynchagi-house-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Meets the QI criteria at all points. --High Contrast 13:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pz-sretenskaa-top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 09:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jupiter-37a-5301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - Darius Baužys 18:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candy 6577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Perhaps slightly overexposed. --Cayambe 08:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-sorok-6901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done photo отличная работа --George Chernilevsky 12:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybnaa-070-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely a tilt on this one and less than sharp really. --Herbythyme 16:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment If you mean the left side, that house is falling. Please mind only the main building. --PereslavlFoto 11:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)  Support Quality IMO enough --George Chernilevsky 20:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kulikov-2009-5383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality and good DOF --Dein Freund der Baum 13:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-ptd-3821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, clear and sharp --George Chernilevsky 09:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C-vvedenskaa-6360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Retracted the Promotion because geocode is still missing. --MichaelBueker 12:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment Geocoding done.--PereslavlFoto 12:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Now promoting—I wasn't aware that geocoding was optional. Still, thanks for adding it! --MichaelBueker 13:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pan-pereslavl-2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the geocode. (Same for Presentation of Mary church.) --Iotatau 23:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Geocode done.--PereslavlFoto 12:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks. Slight softness at full resolution but otherwise good and interesting city view. --Iotatau 12:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mimeograf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfectly sharp. I like it! Maybe some crop at the right and top could be useful. --MichaelBueker 22:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N-shaha-elizarovo-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. With some acceptable CA (violet fringes) in the tree branches at top left. --Cayambe 11:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N-shaha-elizarovo-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botik-storojka-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samarovo-2006-back-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, subject has a lot of character. QI to me. --Avenue 02:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terlezky-2010-doloi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Can we get away with this? Russia doesn't have Freedom of Panorama, except for non-commercial uses, so this would need to be considered non-copyrightable. -- by User:Adam Cuerden.  Comment This is not an unique art, but a common and usual bulletin board with typical and simple wooden carving.--PereslavlFoto 22:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment There is anti-Semitic slogan on the board. Wikicommons is not a political tribune. --Bff 06:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)  CommentIt's a pity all the BBs in the park were mutilated this way. The slogan is not anti-Semitic but anti-governmental.--PereslavlFoto 11:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC) The foto is good. Nothing non-copyrightable. The image is useful in illustrating political problems in Russia. Скампецкий 12:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC) Could we have a translation please ?--Jebulon 22:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC) «Down with the authority of greedy or deceitful foreigners».--PereslavlFoto 10:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks.--Jebulon 22:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kupanskoe 8338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botik 9300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image, good composition --Ianare 03:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-krasny-2j-3824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. ZooFari 16:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botik 2846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall well-composed. Exposure is IMO a good compromise between the shadows in the trees and the highlights in the sky. --King of Hearts 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brembola-b-3999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture. WikiLaurent 10:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shaha-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments see annotation please--Jebulon 22:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC) even without knowing more about the red dot and even with the nois, it is QI to me, because I think you can't do it better --J. Lunau 19:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nagorie 4488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --Cayambe 14:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podgora-0830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting, showing DOF effect, can be promoted.--MrPanyGoff 07:30, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyma 1288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI of Aleksandr Mikhailovitch. I think the good word is "representative", instead of "deputy" (I've had same problem in french...)--Jebulon 23:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-danilov-4057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-danilov-4065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 08:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-gorici-nikolskaya-3976.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rybnaa-3116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks very "russian" to my eyes. I like it.--Jebulon 00:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berry 1323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but QI to me.--Jebulon 00:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Autumn photo; how to add some perfection?--PereslavlFoto 08:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goricy-kassa-323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and nice. --Cayambe 16:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)