User talk:Pjt56

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pjt56!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Pjt56!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Your picture on Alcantara[edit]

Hi, your picture on Alcantara is now published on italian magazine FAME DI SUD (www.famedisud.it) Facebook Page

Edible fungi in basket[edit]

Guten Tag!

Lesen Sie, bitte Commons:Kriterien für wertvolle Bilder.

Das Messer ist ein gewöhnliches Instrument für die Pilze. Es widerspricht den Kriterien auf jeden Fall nicht. VI ist nicht FI.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


> Wie kann ich mein Oppose zurücknehmen?

<s> {{oppose}} old info... </s>

new vote and some info...

Zum Beispiel:

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose old info...

Ich bin kein Commons Administrator, nur der Benutzer.

Es ist treu, es ist hier sehr spannend. Es ist die gute Gesellschaft der Freunde und der Gleichgesinnten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 22:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

What are VI[edit]

Hello, Thanks for your interest in Valued Images project. Be aware that Valued Images are not the same as Quality Images. In peculiar, technical quality isn't of such importance. VI rules say: For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The image must look good on-screen at the review size. VI must meet these 6 criteria. A VI is the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination. Note that most valuable does not necessarily imply the best technical quality. Valued images are less about perfect technical quality and more about your ingenuity in finding good and valuable subjects which matter, and about the useability of the information on the image page, see Valued image value for further details. --Myrabella (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schiller edit1.jpg[edit]

Would you reconsider your review in light of the response? Durova (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Rauma 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Rauma, Finland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

LightsVintageMBTruck 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LightsVintageMBTruck 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Lights on vintage Daimler-Benz truck 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lights on vintage Daimler-Benz truck 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Green Beetle[edit]

Maybe Chrysolina herbacea but can you give the length (mm.) and place at lest the country Nce photo Notafly (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chrysolina herbacea-pjt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysolina herbacea-pjt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality image[edit]

Please check sky noise on pictures below my candidate, which are already promoted. Many of them got quiet higher noise, i dont find my noise high at all. I agree with distortion. Regards, Petar. --Mile (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Distortion fixed, thanx. --Mile (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

True, everything can be fixed with software, but in my case sky noise is low. Check other pictures which are already nominated. --Mile (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stuttgart Gasometer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart Gasometer.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stuttgart-Gaisburg Panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart-Gaisburg Panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Leica M1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica M1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Killesberg Tower.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Killesbergturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Killesberg Tower 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Killesberg Tower 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 07:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mercedes-Benz Museum at night.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum at night.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Mating bees[edit]

Your image of the mating bees (and the voyeur ant) is superb. Congratulations! I was also pleased to realize I'm not alone rasing those questions about the women beggar. Cheers -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your support! The fact is I came to your page to comment on your assessment of the beggar picture. But then I saw the promotion template and realized that I haven't payed much attention to your picture when it passed through FPC. That was a serious flaw which I felt should be corrected immediately... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Osmia cornuta copulation.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osmia cornuta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anax imperator-pjt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeshna affinis-pjt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Polistes dominula-pjt2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polistes dominula-pjt2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Beetle-pjt1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Dragonfly-pjt4.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Solitude pan-pjt.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Solitude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tringa totanus-pjt.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tringa totanus in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

KunstmuseumStuttgart-pjt.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, exterior at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

TUSC token b6c3ce6cd2ab8c03e0a0019ad9be1994[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Grüne Spinne falsch bestimmt! ;-)[edit]

Hallo Pjt56,

nachdem du mich auf meiner Disk bezüglich der grünen Spinne angeschrieben hattest habe ich bei Benutzer:Mhohner angefragt und der hat deine Annahme bestätigt! Meine Bestimmung war falsch und deine Vermutung war richtig! Ich habe jetzt auch gleich eine Umbennenung veranlasst und die Beschreibung sowie die Cat angepasst. Nochmals vielen Dank für den Hinweis und bis die Tage, besten Gruß mathias K 15:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

...und da isses auch schon passiert. ;-) Gruß mathias K 15:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Phoenicopterus roseus-pjt1.jpg[edit]

Perfect I changed the caption of the image and the caption in French Wikipedia. (A month before I was in the Venice lagoon to make images of reconstrution of the ecosystem). Can you read the caption in German this picture? Uncarina ankaranensis MHNT.jpg. Because I do not speak any language of Goethe. Thank you for these linguistic exchanges internationals. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Fly-pjt16.jpg[edit]

Hallo Pjt56, das abgebildete Tier würde ich als Platystoma seminiatonis (Familie Platystomatidae) einordnen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Danke, Pristurus! Ich habe die Umbenennung der Datei veranlasst und die Beschreibung geändert. Falls du Zeit und Lust hast: ich habe in meiner Galerie noch eine ganze Reihe weiterer nicht bestimmter Insektenfotos ... Grüße, --Pjt56 (talk) 07:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 18:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hallo Pjt56. Bitte passe deine Uploadvorlage an, damit dieser Parameterfehler nicht mehr vorkommt („Other“ ist in Template:Information nicht als Parameter enthalten). --Leyo 21:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Taormina-pjt1.jpg[edit]

Hello Ptj56, I used part of your image Taormina-pjt1.jpg for a pagebanner on Wikivoyage, and gave it the name Taormina-pjt1_Pan.jpg. Because this is not on Wikipedia, I make this announcement on your discussion page. I hope I did it correct with the license. --FredTC (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Cyclamen hederifolium in Sardinia[edit]

Dear,

It is indeed a Cyclamen hederifolium or its var. confusum (Syn. C. confusum). It is not possible to differentiate them without looking at the leave.

Another possible cyclamen should be C. africanum, which however does not occur in Europe.

If you want, I can rename your file (I am a "filemover").

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Dear,
In the meantime I have renamed it accordingly.
FYI: I have 5 Cyclamen species in my garden (mid-Belgium): C. hederifolium, C. coum, C. cilicium, C. purpurascens and C. pseudibericum. The first two are strong growing and sowed by ants, so that these species are widespread in my garden. C. coum is now blooming with the first crocuses (C. imperati 'De Jager' and C. sieberi 'Bowles White').
Beste Grüße aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)