Tilted maybe? Also odd spot (lens flare?) should be removed imo. Mattbuck 19:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC) Fixed, thanks for the review Poco a poco 18:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 19:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Could do with a crop at the top. Mattbuck 12:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC) Done among other improvements, thanks, Poco a poco 09:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Some CA but still OK for me. --Kreuzschnabel 15:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Sharpen please. Mattbuck 11:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Done, thanks for your comment, I forgot it for this and some other pictures! Poco a poco 09:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC) --CChris 08:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Your images are usually very well processed. but I'm not convinced of this (or the previous image File:Edificios_en_Travessa_Ocidental_do_Lago,_Setúbal,_Portugal,_2012-05-11,_DD_01.JPG). To me it looks like oversharpened (see also the street on the other photo). --ArildV 20:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your words. I have uploaded a new version of both files Poco a poco 22:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Better now.--ArildV 13:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment It looks overprocessed to me, especially clouds are unnatural (they are like lines, not smooth as they should be). -Iifar 18:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Your comment surprised me. The processing was minimal here, but I have updated a new version, though Poco a poco 19:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC). Comment I don't know what do you do, but the clouds look like painted, not a photo. --Iifar 14:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
The picture is not processed at all, I can send you the RAW file if you don't believe me Poco a poco 18:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
There ain’t no such thing as an un-processed JPG :-) the painting effect is due to the camera’s noise reduction. Still it’s sharp and well detailed, QI for me. Maybe you can fix the CA in the steps in the foreground, left hand. --Kreuzschnabel 00:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC) DonePoco a poco 09:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Promotion – sags nicht weiter, aber ich habe es am 3. Oktober schon mal eingestellt, kein Mensch hat drauf reagiert, also wollte ich es nochmal probieren, nachdem es ohne Review rausgefallen war :-) --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Komisch, wahrscheinlich nur deswegen, weil Keiner es sich angeschaut hatte. Als ich es in der Originalgröße angeschaut habe, war für mich die Entscheidung sehr einfach. Ich finde das Bild wirklich gelungen. Viele Grüße! Poco a poco (talk) 02:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Cygnus or not cygnus ?
Hi, Poco ! I've just had a look at the QI page and noticed that I can't see any swan on your picture : "Swan (Cygnus olor), Siauliai, Lithuania". Despite this problem (for me !) Archaeodontosaurus promoted your picture this morning. Is there a bug on my computer (which is not impossible) or a lack in my knowledge (which is always possible) ? -- In any case, no need to answer my question : just have a look at the caption of your (good) photo !-- Best regards.--JLPC (talk) 09:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello JLPC, you are right, there was a mistake (copy & paste problem) in the file description, I corrected it. Best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 02:39, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment Hmmm. Nice shot but the lamp glares look very unnatural – of course they have to be overexposured but what’s that strange gray edge around the blown-out area? --Kreuzschnabel 00:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC) FixedPoco a poco 02:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 07:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
QI for me, despite the three people : good atmosphere. --JLPC 08:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. im so Enjoyed your photos. Thanks for the beautiful moments you Gifted me, and i hope These beauty continues--:)Mahdiztalk 19:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Well, thanks for your words, I am glad that you like my contributions here Poco a poco (talk) 22:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Ola, já ha muito que pensava dizer-lhe algumas palavras de agradecimento, mas o formalismo da wikipedia tem-me impedido de o fazer. Mas ... ultrapassado isso, e sem querer fazer disto uma página social aqui vai o meu comentário: Muito obrigado pelo seu contributo com as fotos de Portugal e nomeadamente pelas do Porto (onde eu moro). Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 23:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hola, foi um prazer. Costumo ir a Portugal (Lisboa e Setúbal), mas a cidade do Porto me cativou, é muito bonita!!. Você viu a foto de hoje? :) Poco a poco (talk) 01:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Good quality. --JDP90 05:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Comment Minor issues, please see the notes. --Iifar 19:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC) FixedPoco a poco 20:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Saludos, Poco a poco. Disculpa la molestia pero quisiera preguntarte lo iguiente. En una de mis imagenes tu colocastes "Blown out sky", pudieras decirme como realizar una foto cuando hay mucha neblina para evitar tal efecto. No se que que parametros ajustar o como tomarla
Hola, en casos en los que el contraste es muy alto o bien algún área de la foto está quemada, lo que hago es recuperarla (en formato RAW antes del "revelado") o bien reducir la luminosidad de las áreas más brillantes. Vamos, que a la hora de hacer la foto hay situaciones en las que no se puede evitar, pero sí se puede corregir más tarde. Saludos, Poco a poco (talk) 03:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
¡Hola! ¿Qué tal? ¿Puedes echarle otro vistazo a una foto mía de QI que rechazaste, por favor? (es de la Almudena) He intentado arreglarla y quería saber si ahora así estaba bien. ¡Yo que estaba tan orgulloso de la simetría, pues no me fijé en el ruido! jeje ¡Un abrazo! --Kadellar (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Hola Kadellar, como habrás podido ver la he llevado a la sección de CR, porque, si bien es verdad que está mejor, aún no estaba del todo convencido sobre la cantidad de ruido. Un abrazo, Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I don't remember my comments then, but this version is not ready for QI neither. I miss sharpness which is probably gone thru some denoising. Sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
3 small spots in the sky on the left. Otherwise very good --Archaeodontosaurus 07:38, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Dust spots cleanedPoco a poco 20:28, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Support QI &Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment Try to add more contrast and exposure. --Iifar 07:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint, I forgot to process it properly Poco a poco 03:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Support --Iifar 05:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
CA on the sky wire, and an insect or something at the top which should be removed. Mattbuck 18:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC) FixedPoco a poco 02:34, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 00:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Ciempiés muerto (Blaniulus guttulatus), Huérmeda, España 2012-05-19, DD 01.JPG
the name of this arthropode that you give to it is incorrect. You may see real species of that arthropod - adult. Please move name and change the category in the page. Thank you, AfroBrazilian (talk) 19:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the message. I changed title, category and description, but unfortunately to Unidentified Diplopoda, since I don't know the scientific name of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm still not happy with this photo, it's still just... dull. Was it originally overexposed, and you remapped the white point to make it grey? I'll have a go at a new version myself later.
By the way, mind reviewing some of my images? I've been making an effort to review every image past 4 days old, but that just means only mine get neglected rather than everybody's. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the picture you are not happy with...sorry!, I had re-uploaded the same version as before. Now I got the right one! Please, let me know.
Yes, I have seen your tireless effort for reviewing mostly everything, I will go through your pictures before the bot wipes them away, Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
New version uploaded, I think that brightens it but keeps the nice contrast. Of course now I can't promote it. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks good, clear to me that we need a thir opinion Poco a poco (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!
Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!
Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!
Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei email@example.com melden.
Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!
Dear Poco a poco,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!
Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).
If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.
Hi, Poco a poco ! -- Just a few words about your file : "Universidad de Tallin, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPG". I reviewed it yesterday evening, asking for a removal of the slight distorsion of the roof ; you uploaded a new file with the mention "dust" and I don't see any difference concerning the roof. -- I know you do a lot for commons and I don't want to bore you in an useless way. Just have a look at your file and send me a few words about it, please. (Maybe the roof is really curved : in this case tell it me too.) -- Thanks for your attention and for your work. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello JLPC, I saw your comment yesterday, and agreed inmediately that a correction was needed, but it looks that I uploaded the wrong file (again the older version) addressing the distortion problem (I wrongly wrote "dust" because I was kind of doing 3 things at the same time). Hopefully you like the new version.
More important: please, don't suggest that you bore me. The most precious things in Commons are the people, the hints of other colleagues to improve and the media we upload, in this order.
Thank you and all the best! Poco a poco (talk) 16:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Good. But please try to give different names to your pictures and nominations, thanks. "18" vs "07" (the only difference) is not enough for my poor old brain to distinguish...--Jebulon 16:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
The white clouds are rather distracting IMO. Not overexposed I think, but not sold on this. The crosses are good quality though. Mattbuck 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Improved with a new crop and reduction of brigthness of brigther areas Poco a poco 17:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 12:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)