User talk:Poeticbent

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Dołęga[edit]

Miło mi, że mam tak znakomitego, profesjonalnego recenzenta. Dziękuję za uwagę. Teraz T.D-M ma piękne oczi czornyja. Robiłem co mogłem, aby złagodzić agresywne ziarno. Żałuję, że jak kiedyś robiłem reprodukcję portretu Dołęgi-Mostowicza (własność jego siostry), to nie zachowałem sobie negatywu ani kopii. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Rozwój_terytorialny_Krakowa_(2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rozwój_terytorialny_Krakowa_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wojteq (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Opera Krakowska 2009 (1).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Opera Krakowska 2009 (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NC-restricted on Picasa, which is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Eugene (Eugeniusz) Lazowski, Poland.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eugene (Eugeniusz) Lazowski, Poland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Plushy (talk) 10:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 3ee46132463a8395024944a480a3ac35[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

move request[edit]

I declined the move you requested of File:Wawel2.jpg. Commons:File renaming#Which files should not be renamed? (reason #3) will explain my decline. If you request the move on en.wiki, myself or another file-mover can do the move for you there. INeverCry 18:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the reply, and your link to policy. I'll try to request the move on en.wiki instead like you suggested. Poeticbent talk 18:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Airport electric fence.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Airport electric fence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Poprad (Leluchów) 16.08.08 p.jpg[edit]

Hej. Nadpisałem raz jeszcze. Balans bieli był przesunięty w stronę zielonego, nie żółtego. Woda w rzece była brązowa po dość ulewnych deszczach. Pozdrawiam. Przykuta[edit] 20:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Jan Matejko - Zawieszenie dzwonu Zygmunta na wiezy katedry w roku 1521 w Krakowie.jpg[edit]

Hej,

Rewert niestety nie załatwia sprawy, ponieważ wcześniej załadowane zdjęcie kopii obrazu wykonane przez Pana Piotra Walerskiego wciąż jest publicznie widoczne. Trzeba to skasować i załadować od nowa - najlepiej pod nieco inną nazwą, bo stara historia zdjęcia ponownie się doklei. Dlatego nie usuwaj szablonu copyvio. Plik musi być albo cały usunięty, albo ew. ktoś kto ma taką możliwość powinien usunąć selektywnie dwie jego wersje stanowiące ewidentne naruszenie praw autorskich. Polimerek (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Mylisz się. Facet nie ma żadnych praw autorskich, ponieważ "podrobił" cudzy obraz. Jedynym prawnym autorem jest autor dzieła oryginalnego, czyli sam Matejko. Oryginalność dzieła jest punktem kluczowym w kategoriach prawnych... a nie machanie pędzlem po płótnie. Prawo autorskie na przykład, nie obejmuje malowania domów i ścian. Drobiazgowe kopie ręczne dzieł stworzonych przez kogoś innego są pozbawione prawa autorskiego nie tylko w Polsce. Pozdrawiam. Poeticbent talk 15:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Jest kontrowersja, jest odpowiednie miejsce do dyskusji, zapraszam. A.J. (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Kościół św. Wojciecha[edit]

Witam. Wiem, że niebo jest silnie brązowe, ale tak właśnie wygląda, kiedy robi się zdjęcie w centrum oświetlonego miasta - wtedy niebo nie jest niebieskie czy czarne, ale właśnie brązowe. Natomiast na pewno nie jest fioletowe, podobnie jak fioletowe nie są budynki ani światło lamp - a tak to wyglądało po Twojej korekcie. Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Przynajmniej jest niebanalne, a to się liczy. Poeticbent talk 21:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Krakow-Old-Town(Stare-Miasto-Planty)Royal-Route.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Krakow-Old-Town(Stare-Miasto-Planty)Royal-Route.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kpalion(talk) 19:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Domena publiczna[edit]

Witaj, zauważyłem że wgrałeś w zeszłym roku obraz należącym do Samuela Finkelsteina zmarłego w 1942. W Polsce prawa autorskie wygasają po 70 latach 1 stycznia następnego roku czyli dla artysty zmarłego w 1942 jest to 1 stycznia 2013. Proszę pamiętaj o tym na przyszłość.Plushy (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Barn Owl (History of British Birds) William Yarrell - Thomas Bewick.jpg[edit]

Dzien Dobry (sorry, that's about the limit of my Polish!). I think your idea of comparing Yarrell with Bewick via 2 images of Barn Owl a good one, article needs more images. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 00:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Smile Thank you, INeverCry. It's nice of you to notice my continuous efforts to excell. Poeticbent talk 21:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Belgium-Stemp.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Belgium-Stemp.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Belgium-Stemp.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Karl Jäger (1888–1959).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl Jäger (1888–1959).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Amon Göth at his balkony Płaszów 1943.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amon Göth at his balkony Płaszów 1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The Hirtle Chart[edit]

Hello Poeticbent. Here is a good resource for determining the copyright status of an image, and which tag is the appropriate one to use for any that happen to be in the public domain: Commons:Hirtle chart. The Hirtle Chart is based on a similar chart prepared by Peter B. Hirtle of Cornell University. This chart can be used to determine whether or not an image is in the public domain in the United States. In order to be hosted on the Commons, an image must be in the public domain both in the United States and in its country of origin. I hope this chart will help you determine the correct copyright status of images in the future. Best wishes, -- Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Edward Raczynski.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edward Raczynski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Sybiracy (deportacje 1940-1941).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sybiracy (deportacje 1940-1941).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Totomka (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The Holocaust in Lithuania map[edit]

Perhaps you could make a map for the en:The Holocaust in Lithuania article? The current one is not focused well. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I know very litte about the subject, but the current map is bad. That's for sure. Poeticbent talk 07:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I think we could make a better one simply by cutting and pasting a different part from File:WW2-Holocaust-Europe.png? PS. If you reply here please ECHO me. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotr. Problem is that the map of Holocaust in Lithuania is virtually empty, giving the impression that very little actually happened. Nothing could be further from the truth. Please take a look at the map of the Jewish communities targetted by the Final Solution across Lithuania. And a similar map, part of the Atlas of the Holocaust in Lithuania online. Poeticbent talk 10:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Map of General Government[edit]

Hi,

Just to let you know I have reverted your change of my admin map of the General Government. The original map is valid as it stands as it represents post 1941 so your total replacement of it is not appropriate. Your change should either be a derivative work or if you wish I will create another map of the area pre-Barbarossa. I am in the process of re-doing all my maps of German occupied europe so I can do a new map as part of this work. Please let me know what you would like. XrysD (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer. I've done it myself. Your original map is insufficient for my projects, sorry. Poeticbent talk 16:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, no problem! Please add the link to your derived work to keep track of all versions. Thanks, XrysD (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

WLE Austria Logo (no text).svg

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Radegast[edit]

Hi. Stacja Radegast to pomnik. leży sobie w kategorii pomnika Category:Łódź Stacja Radegast (która jest w kategorii dot. getta – Category:Łódź Ghetto). Na tym zdjęciu nie ma getta, to są czasy współczesne, więc nie powinno leżeć w kategorii łódź ghetto. pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 08:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Cześć, jestem innego zdania niż ty. W kategorii Łódź ghetto są inne współczesne zdjęcia, ale związek stacji z gettem jest tak silny że musi być ona uwzględniona w tzw. parent category chociaż raz dla orientacji. Pojecie pomnika jest zbyt wieloznaczne. Pozdrawiam, Poeticbent talk 17:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Współczesne jest jedno (budynek w którym kiedyś było kipo). I mocno korci mnie jego usunięcie – to zdjęcie nie pokazuje getta. (A nie usuwam, bo nie mam pomysłu do jakiej z gettowych podkategorii przenieść.) Owszem, temat łódzkiego getta wymaga pokazania współczesnych jego śladów. Ale tu mówimy o kategoriach, a nie o artykułach. W artykule o getcie jak najbardziej – pomnik-stacja, murale, pole gettowe – współczesne zdjęcia będą na miejscu – i będą opisane. A w kategoriach trzymajmy się nazw poszczególnych kategorii. Zerknij w przykłady na stronie Commons:Galleries – porównanie galerii z kategoriami. Zresztą, co to za orientacja, skoro ginie, bo każdy uploadujący nazywa pliki wedle uznania... czytelnik (oglądacz) nie znajdzie obrazka. (A dodatkowo – wolałbym uniknąć dyskusję, które z dostępnych zdjęć jest lepsze dla orientacji. I jaka tu wieloznaczność? Jeśli pytasz o moje motywy, to są powyżej. Jak dostrzegasz tu coś jeszcze, to wyjaśnij mi proszę co. Dzięki z góry) pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 18:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jeschow beria september 1938 empfang delegation kreml.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jeschow beria september 1938 empfang delegation kreml.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jeschow beria september 1938 empfang delegation kreml.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rudolf Reder.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Reder.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

El Grafo (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)