User talk:Pollycat

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pollycat!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

QIC review[edit]

Hey Pollycat, I don't know if this was just a simple mistake, but overwriting other people's reviews on QIC is not appropriate. If you disagree with an existing review please set the status to Discuss (rather than Nominate, Promote or Decline), and add your opinion after the existing comment. --Dschwen (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Hello Dschwen appologies, I didnt realise I had done this, this was a mistake and am aware this should not be done I blame computer error ;) .--Pollycat (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Blocked Indefinitely
This user has been blocked indefinitely. See block log. for abuse of multiple accounts.

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(繁體)‎ | Zazaki | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Pollycat, I have unblocked your account. The block happened because your behavior made it appear that you and Danesman1 might be the same person, and since, as I understand it, you edit using his computer, the Checkuser check showed that you were in fact the same. That would be sockpuppetry, which we forbid.
It is certainly permissible for friends to make comments on the same image, DR, or other vote, but when they do, it is a good idea for the later of the comments to have a note along the lines of "(full disclosure: I am a close friend of Danesman)". Without such notice, it is meatpuppetry -- two humans acting in concert -- which is also against the rules. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)