User talk:Poulpy

Category:Hôtel_de_Saint-Aignan

 

Category discussion notification

Category:Hôtel_de_Saint-Aignan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GFreihalter (talk) 17:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Château de Rieux-Minervois, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  

Prof. Professorson (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Château de Miramont, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  

Prof. Professorson (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Manoirs et MH

Bonjour Poulpy. Bravo pour ton travail de classification. Quelques petites remarques: j'ai transféré des catégories depuis Category:Manors in Charente de "MH (houses)" vers "MH (manors)" car ce sont des logis (manoirs). Dans la mesure de notre temps disponible, ce sera regroupable par département, au moins pour la Charente (comme il y en a beaucoup, en particulier les églises MH). D'autre part, sur le modèle Mérimée, il y a la place à la fois pour la notice de classement (PAxxx) et aussi la notice IAxxx (voir diff), qu'il faut conserver aussi si elle y est. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done J'ai séparé les catégories de châteaux et de manoirs de la Charente MH dans des catégories départementales. Il restera les églises, gros morceau... Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah oui, je n'avais pas vu, pour les manoirs. Merci d'être repassé derrière. Pour la notice IAxxx, je le note. Je m'occupe de séparer les églises. :) — Poulpy (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Merci Poulpy ! Commment as-tu fait pour être si rapide, tu édites les catégories à la main ? J'avais réfléchi à AWB, ou cat-a-lot... Jack ma (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

AWB, tout simplement. Pour ce genre de maintenance, c'est presque indispensable. — Poulpy (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Je commence à utiliser AWB (1 fois, sur wiki:fr), c'est super. Pour les églises de Charente par exemple, tu as utilisé en mode Advanced, Multiline et Regexp (pour remplacer 2 catégories par 1 ? Jack ma (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

En fait je me suis rendu compte qu'elles avaient toujours Category:Churches in Charente; peux-tu le supprimer avec AWB si déjà dans Category:Monuments historiques in Charente (churches) ? Merci d'avance, Jack ma (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Pour AWB, j'ai utilisé le mode de remplacement "Normal settings", mais avec des regexp. Enfin, je crois, j'ai fait ça un peu à la volée. Je m'occupe de virer la catégorie en trop, sinon. — Poulpy (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Église Saint-Jacques-Saint-Christophe de la Villette, Paris - Benchmark.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me --PierreSelim 18:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Ancien hôtem du Maine a Fontainebleau DSC 0101.jpg

Bonjour Poulpy,

Could you check the categories on this one? I believe it to be the Hotel de Londres, which is not the same as the other pictures in the category from the hotel de maine (they are on a different city of the place).

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, it was the Hôtel de Londres, not the Hôtel du Maine. Corrected! Thank you. — Poulpy (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Coup d'œil

Salut, En passant, juste te dire que j'aime bien ton œil (1, 2, 3, mais aussi 4 par exemple). --Myrabella (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, merci. — Poulpy (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Doubs Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Dordogne Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Côtes-d'Armor Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Côte-d'Or Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Creuse Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Corrèze Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Cher Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Charente-Maritime Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Charente Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Cantal Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Calvados Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Bouches-du-Rhône Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of Aveyron Department, France, with Communes.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Blank Map of XXX Department, France, with Communes.svg Aller à : Navigation, rechercher

Salut,

Je souhaite vraiment te remercier, ces cartes sont vraiment super. Elles pourront être très utiles. Si j'arrive à les manipuler, je pourrais faire une carte pour chacune des élections.

Par contre, cela attise ma curiosité et j’ai deux-trois remarques sur File:Blank Map of Morbihan Department, France, with Communes.svg. D'abord, visuellement, la carte n'occupe plus tout l’image. Ensuite, dans le code, saurais-tu m'expliquer la différence entre déclarer le style dans la balise du groupe et le faire en style-css ? (ou plutôt, lequel préférer et pourquoi ? personnellement, j'utilise toujours la première méthode mais plus par habitude que par raison). De même pourquoi utiliser des polygons et non des paths ? Sinon un détail et je ne vois pas trop comment faire mais serait-il possible de séparer le code commune INSEE du nom de la commune (ie? chacun dans son paramètre) ?

(il faudrait vraiment que l'on fasse un atelier graphisme sur Paris cette année…)

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:2012 French presidential election - First round - Majority vote (Metropolitan France, communes).svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very nice and surely hard work, but not sourced, and the file description page is unsufficient for now. It appears the administrative or electoral subdivisions are "communes", but it is visible only in the file name. A very higher resolution could be helpful too. Great job anyway.--Jebulon 15:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I sourced the data and expanded the description (which, indeed, was clearly insufficient). As for resolution, not sure what you mean: as a SVG, it can be scaled up till MediaWiki gives up (eg 5000px) --Jean-Fred 15:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Good work. --Yann 16:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC) I think it'd be good to add the relationship between colours and candidates INSIDE the image, with a spot of each colour next to the names. It makes it easier to understand. Thank you. --Kadellar 22:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Hey so I saw your 2012 French presidential election - First round - Majority vote map and was pretty impressive. I just wanted to know if you had a copy of your spreadsheet that you used to make that map? I see the source data but I don't have a scraper to compile it. If you can help me please email me jeremymodell@gmail.com. Thanks for any help Doctorrobert13 (talk) 03:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey! The easiest way would be to download the results here. Click on "Télécharger" on the right side of the page and you should end up with a nice csv spreadsheet. — Poulpy (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Natura 2000

Salut Poulpy, Merci 1753 fois pour tout le travail effectué sur WP pour lister les zones Natura 2000 en France (+ xxx pour les autres pays européens). Une question : y a-t-il un moyen simple (et quasi-automatique) de vérifier si une image géocodée appartient à une des zones référencées et laquelle ? Celle-la par exemple ? --Myrabella (talk) 07:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hmm... J'ai bien peur que non. :/ — Poulpy (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Je suis bécasse, il existe deux couches "Sites Natura 2000" dans le Géoportail. Peut-être pas aussi à jour que les listes dont tu viens de t'occuper, cependant... --Myrabella (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Carte vierge Marne

Bonjour Poulpy,
J'aimerai réutiliser la carte File:Blank Map of Marne Department, France, with Communes.svg, pour en faire mais je n'arrive pas à « Modifier ce fichier en utilisant une application externe ». En plus , je ne comprends absolument rien aux « instructions d’installation » à côté. Alors je me demandais s'il était possible de m'envoyer direcement par mail la carte au format .svg. Cordialement. October^Ends 12:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:2012 French presidential election - Second round - Majority vote (Metropolitan France, communes).svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality and valuable image --Taxiarchos228 15:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

No abbey

As far as I know, and I made the image, the church in Boisney (Difference between revisions of "File:Église Saint-Aubin Boisney.jpg) is not an abbatiale. The according Mérimée page is linked to the image and it says nothing about an abbey either. Kind Regards, --Stanzilla (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Oh, and it's not called Notre-Dame.--Stanzilla (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Looks like I made a complete mess. I can't even understand what I was doing there. I'm sorry for the changes, since they were wrong. — Poulpy (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Np :)--Stanzilla (talk) 23:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Wooden Cobblestones, Passage Saint-Maur, Paris - 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Réutilisation d'une image

Bonjour Poulpy, je suis un petit éditeur de l'Oise. Je travaille actuellement sur un projet de livre sur la ville de Senlis. Pour illustrer efficacement un texte traitant de la sauvegarde du patrimoine, je souhaiterais utiliser votre carte de la "Densité des monuments historiques par départements", créée sur un fond de carte de Sting, que j'ai déjà contacté et qui est d'accord. Tout ceci avec mention de la source et des auteurs bien entendu. Si vous êtres d'accord, acceptez vous de me communiquer votre nom pour la mention du copyright ? C'est plus clair et plus parlant qu'un pseudo. Pouvez aussi me dire quelle base de données vous avez utilisé pour monter cette carte très claire ? Les monuments historiques ? Merci de votre réponse. Cordialement.--Koudou999 (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh, mais vous n'avez même pas besoin de ma permission, vu qu'elle est en sous licence CC-BY-SA (mais c'est gentil d'avoir prévenu, après tout) ! Pour plus d'infos, vous pouvez vous reporter à cette page : Commons:Réutilisation de contenu hors de Wikimedia. — Poulpy (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Benchmark on Collégiale Saint-Aubin, Guérande, Loire-Atlantique, France.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. Ludo29 12:40, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tomb of Philippe Pot, Right Side - Louvre, Room 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. Ludo29 12:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Saint-Michel de Gignac

Bonsoir,

Ne suivant pas régulièrement cette page, je découvre seulement aujourd'hui que tu as renommé Category:Saint-Michel de Gignac en Category:Chapelle Saint-Michel de Gignac.

Je ne pense pas que ce soit une bonne décision. En effet la chapelle n'est pas le seul élément du site de Saint-Michel de Gignac : comme il est dit sur la base Mérimée, et comme le décrit l'article associé, c'est l'ensemble des ruines du château et de la chapelle qui constitue le site classé. D'ailleurs la moitié des photos de la catégorie concernent le château.

La dénomination "Chapelle de ..." n'est donc pas pertinente. Comme je n'aime pas "reverter" les modifications des autres contributeurs, je me borne à te faire part de mon désaccord. A toi de décider si tu rétablis la situation antérieure, à mon avis seule convenable.

- Fr.Latreille (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Poulpy et Frédéric,

La base de données Mérimée mentionne en effet « Chapelle Saint-Michel et ruines du château ».

Cette catégorie a l'avantage de descendre de Category:Chapels in Bouches-du-Rhône.

Quid de recréer une catégorie Saint-Michel de Gignac pour les photos des ruines du château, et laisser dans la catégorie actuelle les photos de la chapelle ? --Dereckson (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

On peut créer une catégorie pour le château et placer la catégorie de la chapelle dans celle-ci, non ? — Poulpy (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Robert Delaunay - Le Poète Philippe Soupault.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Milestone on Route Départementale 45, Le Croisic, France.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Défense d'afficher Plaque - Paris, Rue Hermel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour cette photo qui envoie bien du lourd, quand même. O2 (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Transferer des fichiers avec un bot

Bonjour,

J'aurais besoin d'aide pour transférer vers Wikilivres des fichiers menacés de suppression sur Commons. Il faudrait un bot. Pourrais-tu m'aider ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:France - Density of Monuments historiques by commune, with departments.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good and useful.--Jebulon 15:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Pas mal ! J'aurais bien aimé avoir tes sources sur le fond carto utilisé (je parie sur GeoFla de l'IGN, non ?), et les données du nombre de MH par commune. En fait j'aimerais faire une carte similaire mais pour le nombre de MH rapporté au nombre d'habitants des communes. Et aussi changer la projection, peut-être. Damouns இ 12:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Musée des arts et métiers - Astrolabe - Rennerus Arsenius.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:12, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Love Padlocks - Pont des Arts - Paris.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very good. --Kreuzschnabel 00:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Pierre Droite - Milly-la-Forêt - 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Poulpy, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Lauréat de Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 en France

Votre photo File:Pierre_Droite_-_Milly-la-Forêt_-_07.jpg fait partie de la sélection du jury français pour participer au concours international et se classe 8e dans le concours en France. Vous avez gagné un chèque cadeau d'une valeur de 100€ pour acheter du matériel photographique et vous êtes invité à la cérémonie de remise des prix qui aura lieu de 30 novembre 2012 à Paris. Pour plus d’information n’hésitez pas à contacter Wikimédia France par e-mail à l'adresse info@wikimedia.fr.

--PierreSelim (talk) 19:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Standard time zones of the world (2012).svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Usefull. Good work. --Esquilo 09:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:France - 2011 population density - 200 m × 200 m square grid.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Impressive work. --Jastrow 22:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Villa_Tempe_a_Pailla

 

Category discussion notification

Category:Villa_Tempe_a_Pailla has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

86.217.66.72 20:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)