User talk:Prosopee

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:Prosopee/archives


File source is not properly indicated: File:Heinrich Zimmer 1933.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Heinrich Zimmer 1933.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rama (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Galvanomètre.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Galvanomètre.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rama (talk) 09:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Eranos meeting 1938.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eranos meeting 1938.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rama (talk) 09:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

pastebin[edit]

tente www.pastebin.com.
Pas la peine de faire des captures d'écrans, sélectionne le texte (sous windows, il faut appuyer sur le menu de le fenêtre, sélectionner, faire la sélection puis utiliser le même menu pour copier)
Esby (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

As tu tenté de le télécharger, de le décompacter dans un repertoire puis de le lancer manuellement comme indiqué ici ? Esby (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
J'ai pourtant l'impression que le log que tu as pasté, c est un lancement via un jnlp(le truc web) et pas une extraction de l'archive zip. La page fr, parle d'extraire l'archive zip, et de lancer le .bat dans le répertoire bin. Si tu peux me confirmer que tu as bien tenté cette méthode avec la version de java (1.5) et Commonist 0.4.22 Esby (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Peux tu me dire ta version de java ? [1]? Esby (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
A priori, le développeur te demande de vérifier si cela fait toujours ca avec la version 0.4.22 [2] (le log que tu as pasté correspond à la version 0.4.20, qui n'est pas la dernière version.) Esby (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Prosopee!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Article Chimie Encyclopédie[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de tomber sur ce fichier : File:Article Chimie Encyclopédie.jpg qui indique comme source Google et précise article "chimie" dans l'Encyclopédie de Diderot et d'Alembert. Or, je viens de regarder sur s:Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers et je ne l’y retrouve pas… Pourrais-tu préciser la source ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 21:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Grâce à ton lien, je viens finalement de retrouver lesdites planches : File:Encyclopedie volume 2b-074.png, File:Encyclopedie volume 2b-075.png, File:Encyclopedie_volume_2b-076.png, etc.
Merci de ton aide, je vais pouvoir maintenant m’atteler à la mise en forme sur la Wikisource. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 09:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


Comment souhaitez vous etre cité?[edit]

Bonjour, Je fais parti d'une équipe scientifique et nous souhaiterions utiliser une de vos photos pour l'affiche d'un atelier de travail que nous organisons. En effet, dans la license CC-SA il est précisé de citer l'auteur. Ma question est donc, comment souhaiteriez etre cité? Vous pouvez me contacter à l'adresse suivant Arnaud.Masson at esa.int Cordialement Masson75 (talk) Photo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canaux_de_Bruges,_Belgique.jpg

Bonjour Masson75,

Je suis flatté que l'une de mes images vous ait plue. Selon la licence choisie, il vous suffit de citer mon pseudonyme : Proposee, de la manière que vous l'entendez. S'il vous plaît, pouvez-vous aussi citer la source, à savoir : Wikimédia Commons, afin de faire rayonner le projet. Juste par curiosité : de quel atelier s'agit-il? Bien cordialement, prosopee (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

/* Bug sous Commonist */ re[edit]

A priori, tes images n'ont d'extension, serais tu sous mac? Esby (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

OSM[edit]

Bonjour. Il y a {{OpenStreetMap}}. Apparemment il inclut la description et la licence, mais je ne peux pas t'en dire plus car je ne l'ai jamais utilisé. Amitiés. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 12:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour l'astuce. Sais-tu quoi faire pour les données GPS (comment les avoir par OSM, et comment les signaler dans le fichier image)? prosopee (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
J'ai fait de mon mieux [3]. Mais il manque les coordonnées de bord de carte (top=, bottom=, left=, right=), je ne sais pas comment les trouver sur OSM. Pour celles du centre (mises dans {{location dec}}) c'était facile, elles sont dans l'url. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 14:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Je ne serais pas contre un petit feedback de ta part (genre "c'est nul ce que tu as fait"), tu sais ? Pour faire mieux la prochaine fois. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 17:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Classification des images[edit]

Bonjour, J'ai vu que vous faisiez actuellement un classement de monuments historiques de Côte-d'Or, travail fastidueux, merci pour cette participation. Il faut néanmoins éviter de surcatégoriser les images ou catégories. Par exemple, comme 'monuments historiques de Cote d'Or' est en soi déjà une sous-catégorie de 'monuments historiques in France', il n'est pas nécessaire de faire apparaître les deux catégories, la première suffit entièrement. Donc, cela fait moins de travail. Bien cordialement Christophe.Finot (talk) 22:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Par rapport au message que tu m'as laissé, c'est la catégorie "monuments historiques en Côte d'Or" et non la plus générale "monuments historiques in France". En effet, la règle est de toujours utiliser la catégorie la plus précise. Bon courage pour cette catégorisation. Christophe.Finot (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Musée_des_instruments_de_musique_de_Bruxelles.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Musée_des_instruments_de_musique_de_Bruxelles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

M0tty (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Prosopee,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, School newspapers, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)



English: Galleries must contain media files. Please see the guideline for creating galleries. Your content was speedy deleted according to speedy deletion criteria. (Section 'Namespace-specific', sub-section '(Gallery)', criteria 1 and 2.)
Français : Galeries doit contenir des fichiers multimédias. S'il vous plaît voir le guide pour créer des galeries. Votre contenu a été rapide supprimées en fonction de critères de suppression rapides (. 'Espace de noms spécifique «Section, sous-section» (Galerie) », les critères 1 et 2)

--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Muséoparc d'Alésia vue du centre d'interprétation.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Muséoparc d'Alésia vue du centre d'interprétation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Léna (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Plans poudrerie de Vonges en 1884.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done est-ce correct ? prosopee (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Use of your picture for a book[edit]

Hi,

We’d like to use one of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On wikimedia, it says that the picture is copyright free.

The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.

We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use this picture. If you accept, what is the exact name of the source that we must write beside the picture?

Here are the link of the picture.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rheum_rhaponticum.JPG

Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL

stephane@jcl.qc.ca

✓ Done prosopee (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Logo agenda libre.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo agenda libre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)