User talk:Pudelek/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Pudelek/Archive1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 21:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

aaaapsik

Contents

Frydek Mistek[edit]

Ech, burdel tu maja - jak chcesz to to przerzuc, ja na razie niestety nie mam czasu. Pzdr AvantaR 10:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Festung_Krakau_-_Wawel1.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Festung_Krakau_-_Wawel1.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rotunda_sv._Longina.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Złatna_-_Kościół.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 08:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

{{english}}, {{polish}}... => {{en|English text}}, {{pl|Polish text}}...[edit]

Hi,
I just wanted to inform you that {{english}}, {{polish}}... templates are nom deprecated : they should not be used any more.
Instead, you can use the following : {{en|your English text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, etc.
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Comprachschutz.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 10:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Spišská_Kapitula-Zipser_Kapitel_2.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 20:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Tytul grafiki[edit]

Niestety na chwile obecna MediaWiki nie obsluguje operacji tego typu. Nalezy zaladowac obrazek pod nowa nazwa, a do starego wpisac {{badname|prawidlowa nazwa.jpg}}. Herr Kriss 17:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Ten komunikat znaczy, ze jakis admin skasowal grafike z commons. Herr Kriss 18:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

QI - wyjaśnienia[edit]

So, propozycje na QI może składać każdy - autor zdjęcia również (tak jest najcześciej). Robi się to za pomocą odpowiedniego szablonu (Nomination). Potem dowolny, zalogowany użytkownik może ocenić czy zdjęcie powinno być QI czy nie. Wyraża to za pomocą zmiany szablonu na Decline lub Promotion oraz opisania i uzasadnienia dlaczego tak uważa (każda ocena musi być uzasadniona). Jeśli ktoś się z tą opinią nie zgadza, wówczas może przenieść zdjęcie do tzw. Consensual Review, gdzie głosuje się w trybie większościowym czy przyznac czy nie, tam też czasami pojawiają się opinie co należałoby zrobić żeby otrzymać QI. Dodam jeszcze, że tak naprawde przez Consensual Review Promotion dostaje mniej zdjęć niż mogłoby się wydawać... Jak masz jeszcze jakieś pytania to mów. Pozdrawiam! --Lestat 13:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wölfelsdorf.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 20:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Wölfelsdorf.JPG and Image:Glatz - herb.JPG[edit]

Can you write English description? (Copy from nomination is ok?) Thanks --Beyond silence 23:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I understand you, but if you can write some English at nomination please copy that to the image's summary page! Than other people can read it whoes don't speaking your language. Thanks --Beyond silence 08:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sunflower from Silesia.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunflower from Silesia.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zdjecia[edit]

OK, jedno usunalem, a do drugiego dalem NSD. Herr Kriss 12:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Glatzer Schneeberg 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glatzer Schneeberg 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Planetarium WPKiW1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planetarium WPKiW1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Planetarium[edit]

W wielu miejscach widać lekkie przesunięcia - jakby obraz był składany z mniejszych części, niedokładnie dopasowanych. Zobacz np. to: http://wafel.com/tmp/Planetarium_WPKiW.jpg - takie rzeczy są w wielu miejscach. --Leafnode 13:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Teraz tych uszkodzeń nie ma, ale z kolei zdjęcie jest krzywe ;) Jeśli byś poprawił, to zmienię głos na QI. --Leafnode 14:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Wyprostowałem to zdjęcie i przesłałem nadpisując Twój plik - zdaję się nic nie jest pocięte. Jeśli chcesz, to je zachowaj, jeśli nie, to cofnij zmianę. Co do QI - jeśli chcesz wrzucić inne zdjęcie, to lepiej pod nową nazwą i wstawić je od nowa na QI. --Leafnode 14:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tęcza Rysiankia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tęcza Rysiankia.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Planetarium WPKiW.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planetarium WPKiW.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kopernik pomnik.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kopernik pomnik.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories[edit]

Hi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sunflower 2007.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunflower 2007.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIC: Brona 01.JPG[edit]

Hi Pudelek, After the rotation adjustment, I noticed that the image became less sharp. It concerned me enough that I tried rotating the original myself in Photoshop and it retained the sharpness. See here: 22px. You may want to look into why the rotated version became less sharp.
Feel free to update your nomination with this image if you prefer it.
Best regards,
Darren

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brona 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brona 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brona 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brona 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brona03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brona03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

OL - monument1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OL - monument1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI nomination of Image:Cerkiew w Wierchomli1.jpg[edit]

I saw you've moved your QI nomination of that picture to the "Consensual review" without contesting it so I wanted to tell you that's not a thing to do. If you really contest a review, you must be clear about it. If it's just a wish of other people's opinions, it's not following the rules! Indeed, a non-contested reviewed image is automatically declined or promoted (depending on the review of course). The way you behaved could be seen as a way to break the rules by leaving your picture longer than the rules say. Please try not to do that again. Either you accept a review, either you contest it clearly (which was not the case here). Thanks for your comprehension. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Shrine in Beskid Sądecki.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine in Beskid Sądecki.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ochotz - cementery.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochotz - cementery.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Muzeum Bierkowice-piwnica XIX wiek.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muzeum Bierkowice-piwnica XIX wiek.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Muzeum Bierkowice-kuznia 1726.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muzeum Bierkowice-kuznia 1726.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Muzeum-Bierkowice spichlerz chlopski XVIII-XIX.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muzeum-Bierkowice spichlerz chlopski XVIII-XIX.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bierkowice Muzeum - dwa wiatraki.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bierkowice Muzeum - dwa wiatraki.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Isergebirge.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isergebirge.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Isergebirge-view from Heufuder.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isergebirge-view from Heufuder.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Street light-hrad bratislava.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street light-hrad bratislava.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIBot was confused I think and left this for me. -- carol 12:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

It is actually a little late to be asking this, but are these electric lights? -- carol 12:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Willa w Katowicach.[edit]

Witam! Mam prośbę: czy mógłbyś zobaczyć i powiedzieć co sądzisz o tym zdjęciu i głosowaniu? -> [1] Byłbym bardzo wdzięczny, bo jest nie rozstrzygnięte, a moim zdaniem to dobre zdjęcie... Pozdrawiam serdecznie! --Lestat 21:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Wielkie dzięki za Twój głos. Mam nadzieję, że pomoże :-) Pozdrawiam i życzę miłej niedzieli! --Lestat 10:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Street in old town in Bratislava.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in old town in Bratislava.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gross Iser.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gross Iser.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Isergebirge Carlsthal.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isergebirge Carlsthal.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schweizerei am Schneeberg.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweizerei am Schneeberg.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Expedition: Everest picture[edit]

Hi Pudelek,

You declined one of my images for Quality Image status because it was tilted. However, I've now fixed the tilt, so I was hoping that you would reevaluate the image. Its nomination is at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#Expedition: Everest. Thanks a lot! bdesham  15:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Silesia - Coat of arms in Breslau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesia - Coat of arms in Breslau.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tyldy[edit]

Niestety nie wiem co jest grane z tymi podpisami, ale mam ten sam problem... --Lestat 17:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beskid Żywiecki - winter 2008.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Żywiecki - winter 2008.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ostrau - ulice 28 rijna in the evening.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrau - ulice 28 rijna in the evening.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Babia Góra - view from Hala Miziowa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Babia Góra - view from Hala Miziowa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image:Kezmarok_CoA.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Kezmarok_CoA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek 10:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Ostrau_-_ulice28_rijna_in_the_evening.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Ostrau_-_ulice28_rijna_in_the_evening.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek 10:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Miniuni Ostrava - train.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miniuni Ostrava - train.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Koribelów-orawa 138.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koribelów-orawa 138.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karwin-Freistadt - foutain.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karwin-Freistadt - foutain.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Comprachtschütz - zentrum.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 14:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek 20:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Larix x marschlinsii cones.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larix decidua cone.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Larix x marschlinsii cone - 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larix decidua cone - 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Scilla siberica (Cebulica syberyjska).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blekitny kwiatek.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schronisko Kamieńczyk[edit]

Witaj,

Zauważyłem, że Siebrand skasował zdjęcie Image:Kamieńczyk schronisko.JPG jako duplikat zdjęcia Image:Kamieńczyk.JPG, jednak załadowałeś je ponownie. Te zdjęcia faktycznie wydają się identyczne. Jest jakiś cel dla którego obydwa mają być na commons? Pozdrawiam Red 81 08:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Shrine in Sudetes.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine in Sudetes.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Rocks - Große Heuscheuer..jpg[edit]

Just a thought - if you could identify the mineral of the alrge rocks at the focus of this picture, its encyclopedic value would shoot up - it would be showing mineral X in its natural environment. It might be granite, but I'm no geologist. Adam Cuerden 01:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't think Sandstone - sandstone tends to be muich more layered-looking than that. I could believe some sort of Granite, but thn, that's my default guess for any greyish rock. Adam Cuerden 13:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Who am I to argue, then? Let's add it to articles on Sandstone! =) Adam Cuerden 19:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rocks - Große Heuscheuer..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Große Heuscheuer..jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Małe pytanko[edit]

Cześć, mam takie małe pytanko. Nie mówie zbyt dobrze po angielsku, a pod moim zdjęciem nominowanym do QI był komentarz w którym nie rozumiem zdania: "But sadly, these images has serious C/A". Mógłbyś mi to przetłumaczyć, żebym wiedział, co jest nie tak? Z góry dziękuję.--Wisnia6522 09:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, dzięki za pomoc --Wisnia6522 07:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rock Twarożnik.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Twarożnik.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Question: Is Twarożnik/Tvarožník the name of this rock or omething else? Regards --Berru 20:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Mapa[edit]

...więc wyślij mi na e-maila lub do "fotosika" tę mapę, na której "wyraźnie" jest zaznaczona granica. Wciąż uważam, że Szczyrk to śląska miejscowość. LUCPOL 21:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Napisałeś "to Oświęcim też jest na Sląsku i Siewierz?" - Oświęcim i Siewierz to byłe ważne śląskie miasta i są tym samym co dla Polski/Małopolski - Lwów. Niby Lwów to ukraińskie miasto, dawniej miasto polskie, obecnie bez polskiej ludności którą wysiedlono, lecz wielu uważa to wciąż za polskie miasto - akurat znajdujące się w obrębie Ukrainy. Siewierz i Oświęcim były zbyt ważnymi miastami dla Śląska aby o nich zapomnieć i się ich (wręcz) wyrzekać. To też nasza historia. To tyle jeśli chodzi o te dwa miasta. Jeśli chodzi o Szczyrk to już tak się przyjęło, że to śląska miejscowość. Tak mnie nauczono, znam wielu co myśli podobnie. Czy to zbieg okoliczności? Nie znam się dokładnie na historii Szczyrku - dlatego nie tworzę tu większych wojen edycyjnych - ale dopóki nie poznam w pełni wiarygodnych źródeł lub map (lub twojej szczerej wypowiedzi - na zaufanie) będę się trzymał mojej wersji. Mimo, że już drugi raz dyskutujemy o Szczyrku to wciąż nie podałeś lat w których Szczyrk znajdował się na terenie Śląska. Zapewne masz mapy Śląska i okolic na przestrzeni 1000 lat, więc możesz sprawdzić, może masz gdzieś jakieś książki gdzie ładnie (i kompetentnie) jest to wyjaśnione. Proszę tylko o tą uczciwą odpowiedź: w jakich latach Szczyrk był na Śląsku. W tej chwili nie wiem czy Szczyrk mam uważać za typową śląską miejscowość czy za odpowiednik Oświęcimia (czyli tylko jakiś okres (jaki?) był na Śląsku). LUCPOL 15:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Malá Úpa - Klein Aupa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malá Úpa - Klein Aupa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Śląskie Kamienie - Dívči Kameny.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śląskie Kamienie - Dívči Kameny.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canal lock in Oppeln1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal lock in Oppeln1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Canal lock in Oppeln.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal lock in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image:Universitäts_Brücke_in_Breslau.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Universitäts_Brücke_in_Breslau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek (talk) 11:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kamienica pod Siedmioma Elektorami.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamienica pod Siedmioma Elektorami.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zobtenberg - hostel.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zobtenberg - hostel.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Roofs in Breslau.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roofs in Breslau.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Geocoding[edit]

Hello Pudelek, I noticed your recent photos from Oslo, you have many nice shots. It is nice that you geocode them, but there are some things that could be improved. One should preferably use the header parameter to show which direction the photo is taken from. And note that you should geocode the location of the camera, not the location of the object you are photographing. See this diff for an example. Regards, --Kjetil_r 07:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oslo - Christian Frederiks plass.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oslo - Christian Frederiks plass.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Royal Guardsmans (Hans Majestet Kongens Garde) in Oslo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Guardsmans (Hans Majestet Kongens Garde) in Oslo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roundabout in Oslo.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oslofjord - view from beach in Oslo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oslofjord - view from beach in Oslo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image:Haakon_VI_Magnusson_statue.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Haakon_VI_Magnusson_statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek (talk) 16:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ship in Oslo harbour.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ship in Oslo harbour.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wooden house in Bryggen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden house in Bryggen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hans Majestet Kongens Garde - soldier-edited.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hans Majestet Kongens Garde - soldier-edited.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haakon VII of Norway statue.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

It is a QI photo but unfortunately under FOP in Norway the image cant have a free license as FOP doesnt permit commercial use of Artworks where its the clearly the main motive. Gnangarra 15:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Haakon_VII_of_Norway_statue.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Haakon_VII_of_Norway_statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kjetil_r 13:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Men at the airport - Pyrzowice.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Men at the airport - Pyrzowice.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Water taxi in Oslo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water taxi in Oslo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Spiterstulen campsite.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiterstulen campsite.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trail blazing in Jotunheimen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trail blazing in Jotunheimen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bergen - Lille Lungegårdsvannet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen - Lille Lungegårdsvannet .jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Bridge over Visa river.JPG[edit]

Sorry, I made it wrong not intentionnally when I put the link to the french article. Thanks for the corrections. --B.navez (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bridge over Visa river.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over Visa river.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jotunheimen mountains - view from Spiterstulen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains - view from Spiterstulen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image:Visa_valley_in_Jotunheimen.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Visa_valley_in_Jotunheimen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jotunheimen mountains.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image:Churche in Kvam.jpg[edit]

Hi Marcin,

I did some minor tweaks on your beautiful image. Feel free to revert if you don't like them. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 09:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:Stained_glass_in_Saint_Wenceslas_cathedral,_Olomouc.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Stained_glass_in_Saint_Wenceslas_cathedral,_Olomouc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pudelek (talk) 10:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Knut Voles hytte1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knut Voles hytte1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Knut Voles hytte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knut Voles hytte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Harbour in Hovedøya.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbour in Hovedøya.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jotunheimen mountains3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Churche in Kvam.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Churche in Kvam.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

New Opera in Oslo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Opera in Oslo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Planetarium WPKiW.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Planetarium Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Motorboat in Oslofjord.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motorboat in Oslofjord.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tower in Tønsberg.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower in Tønsberg.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tønsberg - tower and ruins.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tønsberg - tower and ruins.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Visdalen valley in Jotunheimen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visdalen valley in Jotunheimen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Akershus festning.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akershus festning.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tower in Tønsberg1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower in Tønsberg1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jotunheimen - view from Galdhøpiggen1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jotunheimen - view from Galdhøpiggen1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Castle in Olsztyn1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Olsztyn1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Castle in Olsztyn.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Olsztyn.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tønsbergfjorden in Tønsberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tønsbergfjorden in Tønsberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Reenactors in Austerlitz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reenactors in Austerlitz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tram in Brünn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram in Brünn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mohyla míru - Austria.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohyla míru - Austria.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Květná zahrada - galerie.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Květná zahrada - galerie.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Opolska Wenecja - kamieniczki.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opolska Wenecja - kamieniczki.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arcibiskupský zámek Kroměříž -1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcibiskupský zámek Kroměříž -1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View from Galdhøpiggen to east.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Galdhøpiggen to east.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tatra 603 MB.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatra 603 MB .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stained glass in Saint Maurice churche, Olomouc.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass in Saint Maurice churche, Olomouc.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Geocoding[edit]

Witam! Rano miałem mało czasu, ale teraz mogę na spokojnie odpowiedzieć. Szczerze powiedziawszy pierwszy raz spotkałem się z czymś takim jak heading w geocodingu. Rano poprostu porównałem swój do Twojego i zmieniłem tak żeby było podobnie, ale nie o to chodziło... Teraz już chyba obaj wiemy w czym rzecz, ale kurcze... czy to naprawdę jest konieczne... ja myślę, że nie ma co przesadzać. Pozdrawiam! --Lestat (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mühlgraben in Oppeln.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlgraben in Oppeln.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Wanderer W51S.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W51.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Branná - nova radnica.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Branná.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

River Bøvra in Lom.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bøvra river.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_27.2C_2008[edit]

Hi,

I've tried correcting the tilt of Image:Appartment buildings at Praia da Rocha, Portimão.jpg, could you review it again on COM:QIC?

Thanks, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 09:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

River Bøvra in Lom.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Bøvra in Lom.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Image:Image-Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz)1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Image-Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz)1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


Image:Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz).jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Branná - nova radnica.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branná - nova radnica.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tatra T2 603 Rallye.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatra T2 603 Rallye.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saint Joseph in Neisse.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph in Neisse.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Akershus festning.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akershus fortress.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Sternberg - city center.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Šternberk, Moravia, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Gerulata.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gerulata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

MP[edit]

Gościowi się coś pokręciło, ale chyba już zmienił głos... --Lestat (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eingang in Neisse Kathedrale.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingang in Neisse Kathedrale.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Altvater - OT.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altvater - OT.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue in Oppeln.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Oppeln - Altstadt.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Drogi Pudelku[edit]

Dziękując za poparcia oraz za konstruktywną krytykę :-) chciałbym dwiedzieć się jak tam twoje umiejętości lingwistycznej. Pod moim zdjęciem pojaił się komentarz, którego nie mogę zrozumieć: Have you got the allowance to take pictures inside the museum? Może jesteś wstanie mi pomóc? Albertus teolog (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pomnik Harcerzy Września 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Harcerzy Września 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Beskid Żywiecki - view from Leskowiec.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żywiec Beskids.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pigeon - sculpture in Ober Lazisk.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigeon - sculpture in Ober Lazisk.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jesień w Sądeckim3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesień w Sądeckim3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Spiterstulen mountain hostel.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spiterstulen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bergen - Torget panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen - Torget panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jesień w Sądeckim1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesień w Sądeckim1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Visdalen valley in Jotunheimen.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Visdalen valley, Jotunheimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cathedral in Opole (Oppeln).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral in Opole (Oppeln).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Opolska Wenecja nocą1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opolska Wenecja nocą1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oppeln by night1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oppeln by night1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Panorama of Częstochowa.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Częstochowa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Thanks for the Christmas review![edit]

Rayon de soleil et hirondelle 2.jpg

Hi Pudelek/Archive1. I would like to thank you for the interest you have shown in my request for adminship, and for the time you have taken to review my profile. As a Christmas present I've just been given the admin tools, for which I'm thankful as well. I have understood all the remarks that have been made during the review period. I will take them into account and begin using the tools with much care, until I gain more experience and self-confidence. Thanks again, and Merry Christmas! --Eusebius (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pharmacy in Plzeň.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pharmacy in Plzeň.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chrám svaté Barbory - Kutná Hora.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrám svaté Barbory - Kutná Hora.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Andrzejówka bufet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrzejówka bufet.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Zawołanie[edit]

W rzeczy samej :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 09:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

zdjęcie roku[edit]

Szczerze powiedziawszy jeszcze nie próbowałem głosować, więc nie wiem, ale jak to zrobię i mi się uda to dam znać! Pozdrawiam serdecznie i gratuluję ładnego witraża! --Lestat (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Prague Castle Guard - winter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prague Castle Guard - winter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Neisse - Kathedrale und Belfried.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jacob's and St. Agnes' Church in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St. Vitus Cathedral - Stained glass.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Vitus Cathedral - Stained glass.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chata Skalka.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chata Skalka.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Great photos, Pudelek!
Some color corrections

original -- seems a bit dark
suggested

Featured Picture promotion[edit]

Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

GnM[edit]

Witam. Rzuciłem okiem na Twoją galerię, uważam, że robisz genialne zdjęcia. Zgłosiłem jeden z Twoich witraży do Grafiki na medal na plwiki. Poza tym, bardzo mi się podoba ten gwardzista, zamierzasz nominować? Pozdrawiam.--Adi (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Praying Virgin[edit]

Hi Pudelek, your image of the praying Virgin statue has been used, with many thanks to you, in a video on YouTube:
Prayer to the Virgin
I hope you like the result.
Kind regards
David
Dwsolo (talk) 20:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moravskoslezské Beskydy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moravskoslezské Beskydy.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.