User talk:R-E-AL/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

am 24.01.2009 archiviert

First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

am 12.07.2009 archiviert

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, R-E-AL!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--EugeneZelenko 16:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

re:Category "Cathedral Saint Liborius in Paderborn" (bei COMMONS)

Hallo R. Engelhardt, also bei mir wird diese Kategorie nicht mehr aufgelistet, vielleicht war es ein Cacheproblem (kommt ja immer wieder mal vor). LG., --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Manchmal hilft es bei derartigen Cacheproblemen die Seite ohne Bearbeitung zu speichern (also auf Bearbeiten klicken, dann auf Speichern, ohne was zu aendern). LG., --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Rose windows in Japan

Hallo, ich wollte nur mal darauf hinweisen, was es mit dem | bei Kategoriennamen zu tun hat. Dieses legt die Sortierung fest, das heißt, [[Windows|Rose windows]] sortiert die aktuelle Kategorie unter R ein. Das ist sinnvoll wenn der Kategoriename und der Buchstabe unter dem sie einsortiert werden soll nicht dieselbe ist, wie bei [[Category:Rose windows|Japan]]. Es ist nicht nötig, diese Sortierung auch festzulegen, wenn Kategoriename und gewünschte Sortierung bereits übereinstimmen. (Hilfeseite dazu) --rimshottalk 07:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Oje, ich hatte wohl das Leerzeichen übersehen. Ob diese Einordnung sinnvoll ist, kann man sich streiten, jedenfalls war der Hinweis auf die Bedeutung des | offensichtlich überflüssig. --rimshottalk 07:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

am 03.12.2009 archiviert

Kategorieentfernung

Hallo!

Du muss dringend einen Grund für die Entfernung der Kategorie Category:Dentists from Germany angeben. Dein Handeln erfordert Begründung ansonsten droht Zurückstellung deiner Editierungen. --High Contrast (talk) 22:49, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo, ich will und werde nicht die Category:Dentists from Germany entfernen. Diese Category ist aber dazu ausgelegt, Persönlichkeiten aus dem Dentalbereich aufzulisten, wie z. B. Philipp Pfaff oder Adalbert J. Volck. Bei den von mir entfernten Dateien stehen ja nicht die Personen, sondern die Tätigkeit im Vordergrund, also at work. Für andere Länder ist das ebenso geregelt. Man könnte natürlich die Category:Dentists at work weiter unterteilen, z. B. nach Ländern, Jahrzehnten oder anderen Kriterien, aber ist das sinnvoll? Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Wo steht geschrieben, dass die Category:Dentists from Germany Persönlichkeiten aus dem Dentalbereich vorenthalten ist? Ist das deine Interpretation? --High Contrast (talk) 06:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Wie bei fast allen Kategorien steht das natürlich nirgendwo geschrieben, aber man sollte die Kategorien so einrichten,
  • wie sie sinnvoll erscheinen,
  • wie sie in vergleichbaren Kategorien anderer Länder und/oder Themenbereichen gehandhabt werden. (Daher habe ich es übernommen.)
Hier ist es doch so, dass bei den von mir entfernten Dateien die Bildinhalte in allen Ländern sein könnten. Auf diesen Bildern sind in den meisten Fällen auch nicht nur Zahnärzte dargestellt, sondern auch das weitere Personal.
In der Datei File:Fotothek df n-07 0000235.jpg ist überhaupt kein Behandler dargestellt, deshalb Verschiebung nach Category:Dental units.
Prinzipiell kann man natürlich über jede Zuordnung streiten. Doch was bringt das?
Sinnvoll für diese Dateien wäre vielleicht eine Category:Dentist from Germany at work als Unterkategorie von Category:Dentists from Germany und Category:Dentists at work. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:permission

please rename R. Engelhardt/Template:permission to User:R. Engelhardt/template permission thank you I'll delete this page which is in the main side. Otourly (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I yust had noticed my error. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. Regards, Otourly (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want I could translate this message in fr. Otourly (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thank You, best regards, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 19:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done Otourly (talk) 20:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Brücken

Ích habe mich hier löschen lassen und werde keine Edits mehr hier in Commons vornehmen sie können also getrost all meine Edits wieder ändern. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Ronaldino --87.176.95.130 18:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Da erübrigt sich jeder Kommentar. Ich hatte und habe gar nicht die Absicht, all Deine Edits zu ändern. Andererseits ist es aber auch nicht Sinn und Usus bei Wiki, dass jemand meint, er habe ganze Kategorie-Strukturen gepachtet. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

am 05.01.2010 archiviert

File:Concessionari_de_ferraris_en_newforest_2008_logo.JPG

File:Concessionari_de_ferraris_en_newforest_2008_logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it is a derivative work of a copyrighted logo. It could have been de minimis on the original picture, but obviously not here. I don't know where it was taken, but since it is not the original work of art, I'm pretty sure that no FOP can save it. Eusebius (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

 Delete The uncropped original is used on User:Carlesmari/UK, so this is en:New Forest - see COM:FOP#United Kingdom, mentioning "signs". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Keep! I have all done, what under this license is necessary, to modify an reload a file. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

If my evaluation is right, there's nothing you can do to make this picture free. There should have been a disclaimer on the original picture, saying that cropping could lead to unfree images. --Eusebius (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

My English is not the best, but there is written: In short: you are free to distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute its author(s) or licensor(s). --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

See COM:DM#Crops of de minimis images for why this modification would not be allowed. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

OK, I agree, to delete the file. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 22:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Acceptable images

File:Bruna Ferraz 2.jpg
Hi, please understand that images as the one at the right are encyclopedic and entirely in the scope of the project. Avoid spurious deletion nominations. --Damiens.rf 19:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for showing this image on my discussionsite once more. Sorry, I have another opinon, especially in no article this image is integrated. But when the majority means .... . But regard, what is in my opinion spurious and what not, that is my very own decision and I let it for me not dictate from You. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Porta

Hab da ein paar neue Bilder eingestellt, ein paar kommen noch. Mach dich nicht tot mit der Georef - mache ich schon wenn alle da sind. Ist ja auch auf meinem Mist gewachsen. Also: ruhig durchatmen. Abhalten will ich dich natürlich nicht. Grüße.--TUBS 20:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Alles ok! Ich hatte mich schon gewundert, dass Du von Dir selbst hochgeladene Bilder mit "Location posible" markiert hast. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

am 9. Januar 2010 archiviert

Hallo R. Engelhardt, Du hattest u.a. hier wieder eine Altenbekener Kategorie eingefügt. Auf dem Foto ist aber nicht mal ein Stückchen Altenbeken abgebildet. Die Gemeindegrenze befindet sich erst weiter rechts vom Fotoausschnitt; der Viadukt steht vollständig auf Neuenbekener Gebiet. Neuenbeken war zwar 1921–1974 Teil des Amtes Altenbeken (≠ Gemeinde Altenbeken), aber bis zur Eingemeindung nach Paderborn immer noch eine Gemeinde für sich, insofern lässt sich auch aus der Geschichte keine entsprechende Zuordnung herleiten. Der kleine Viadukt hat nie zu Altenbeken gehört. Da ich keinen Unmut provozieren möchte, spreche ich Dich erstmal hier darauf an :-) Magst Du das selbst korrigieren? Hinweis: Das einzige Bild aus dem Bereich, das tatsächlich auch Altenbekener Gebiet zeigt, ist dieses (vgl. die Bildnotiz zum Waldzipfel dort, links davon die Fichten stehen noch in Neuenbeken.). Viele Grüße --:bdk: 21:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:1941-Bad-Driburg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--:bdk: 22:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

+ File:1940-Bad-Driburg.jpg – Entschuldige bitte diesen wenig hübschen Bausteinhinweis, aber die beiden Ansichtskarten fallen definitiv nicht unter die Annahme „Ablauf der Schutzfrist 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Urhebers“, zumal Du ja auch gar keinen Fotografen angegeben hast. Angenommen, Du würdest den Namen des Fotografen der 1940er-Karte ausfindig machen können und angenommen, er wäre noch im selben Jahr gestorben, so wäre die Abbildung ab dem 1.1.2011 urheberrechtsfrei. … schade natürlich, denn mit den beiden Dateien hätte ich den Wikipediaartikel gut weiter bebildern können. --:bdk: 22:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Hallo bdk, da hast Du wohl leider recht. Ich habe wohl etwas zu großzügig gerechnet. Aber mit dem Sterbedatum ist das bei anonymen Urhebern so eine Sache. Siehe: Anonymes Werk (Urheberrecht). Ich werde mich künftig auf Ansichtskarten vor 1939 beschränken. Ich habe nämlich gerade wieder welche vorbereitet (allerdings nicht von Bad Driburg). Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

am 21.09.2010 archiviert

Category:Photos by R. Engelhardt (Tegernsee)

Hi,

würdest du bitte die Beschreibungen der Fotos in der Kategorie Category:Photos by R. Engelhardt (Tegernsee) überarbeiten bzw. die Bilder nochmal unter einer sachlich richtigen Bezeichnung hochladen. Leider sind dort viele der Bilder falsch beschrieben, haben einen falschen Dateinamen und falsche Koordinaten. So sind beispielsweise Fotos mit Rottach-Egern bezeichnet, die in Tegernsee entstanden sind. Und wo du die Fotos mit der Wallbergbahn gemacht hast, ist mir noch etwas schleierhaft. Die Wallbergbahn ist das in jedem Fall nicht. Dürfte wohl am Brauneck gewesen sein. Bist du versehentlich den falschen Berg hochgefahren? Hoffentlich lässt du bei deinen anderen Bildern etwas mehr Sorgfalt walten! Grüße --Teilzeittroll (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Teilzeittroll, normalerweise gebe ich mir sehr viel Mühe, richtige und ausführliche Angaben zu meinen Uploads zu machen, wie Du Dich gern unter Category:Files by R. Engelhardt überzeugen kannst. Bei den Bildern vom Tegernsee hatte ich allerdings das Problem, alles aus dem Gedächtnis machen zu müssen und ich kenne mich in dieser Region nur schlecht aus. Wenn Du willst, kannst Du gerne Korrekturen vornehmen - Du kennst Dich da ja offensichtlich aus. Ich bin im Moment dazu kaum in der Lage. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Würde vorschlagen, du lädst die Bilder in der nächsten Zeit mal unter einem passenden Namen hoch. Anders verschieben geht ja leider nicht und wenn ich sie unter einem richtigen Namen hochlade und die alten löschen lasse, ist das mit der Urheberschaft komplizierter. Muss ja nicht gleich morgen sein. Zum Vorgehen siehe auch hier. Um folgende Bilder geht es:





  • File:2008-05-25 Tegernsee1.JPG - Blick von der Kurpromenade Bad Wiessee nach Tegernsee - Standort: NS=47/42/47.501437/N|EW=11/43/37.056475/E Blickrichtung: Ost




  • File:2008-05-25 WallbergKarte.JPG - Karte Skigebiet Brauneck - Standort (evtl. wie Bergstation (siehe gelber Pfeil auf Karte)): NS=47/39/46.126751/N|EW=11/31/38.347841/E


--Teilzeittroll (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

_______________________________

Hallo Teilzeittroll, danke für Deine Mühe. Ich habe die Beschreibungen und Lokalisierung der Bilder:

korrigiert ud werde sie demnächst noch unter besserem Namen neu hochladen. (Habe ich inzwischen gemacht --R. Engelhardt (talk) 11:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC))

Mit Deinen Angaben für meine "Wallbergbilder" komme ich aber nicht klar.

Die Koordinaten

Camera location47° 41′ 34.53″ N, 11° 43′ 15.7″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

für z.B. File:2008-05-25 Bad Wiessee-Bauer in der Au2.JPG und

Camera location47° 39′ 46.13″ N, 11° 31′ 38.34″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

für Deine Angaben für die "Brauneckbahn" liegen so weit aueinander, dass man diese Strecke sicherlich nicht in ca. 90 Minuten zu Fuß zurücklegen kann.

Unsere Tour sah so aus, dass wir mit der "Wallbergbahn" (Kabinenbahn) hochgefahren sind. Ca. 150 m oberhalb entstanden dann die Bilder, die ich jetzt als "Wallberg-Bergstation" deklariert habe und wo auch die Gleitschirm-Flieger aktiv waren - allerdings wohl in ein anderes Tal hinunter, als wir mit der Seilbahn hochgefahren sind. Ich habe auch noch ein anderes Bild, auf dem ein Rundbau zu sehen ist, wie er ja wohl zur Wallbergbahn gehört. Kann sein, dass in dem Tal mit dem Gleitschirmfliegern noch eine weitere Seilbahn installiert ist. Von da aus sind wir gewandert und dann mit derselben "Wallbergbahn" zu Tal gefahren. Das alles in etwa einem halben Tag. Ich weiß genau, dass wir bei unserem dreitägigen Trip nur einmal mit einer Seilbahn gefahren sind, wobei auch noch ein in Waakirchen wohnender Kollege die Führung übernommen hatte. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Ihr habt da vermutlich zwei verschiedene Touren gemacht:
  • Eine Tour mit der Brauneckbahn zur Bergstation. Der Rundbau gehört wohl zur Brauneckbergstation. Das Tal, das man unterhalb auf den Fotos sieht, ist das Tal der Isar vor Bad Tölz mit der Ortschaft Lenggries. (Die Bahn ist übrigens heute stehengeblieben: [1])
  • Eine Tour - evtl. eine kurze Wanderung - von Bad Wiessee (Ortsteil Buch) zum Bauer in der Au. Liegt ungefähr 45 Minuten mit dem Auto entfernt am Tegernsee. Ist aber ohne Seilbahn erreichbar, weils kein wirklicher Berg - eher eine Anhöhe ist. Dieser Ort wäre aber auch von der Wallbergbergsation nicht in 90 Minuten zu Fuß erreichbar.
Bei dem ersten Bild vom Bauer in der Au hab ich mich wohl missverständlich ausgedrückt - dieses Bild zeigt im ggs. zum zweiten Bild sehrwohl den Bauer in der Au. Habs korrigiert - der Dateiname ist ja jetzt neutral. Ansonsten bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Koordinaten so passen:
Standpunkt des Fotographen:
Camera location47° 41′ 18.09″ N, 11° 42′ 53.29″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
Die Abgebildeten Gebäude stehen hier: NS=47.685758 EW=11.710342


Standpunkt des Fotographen
Camera location47° 41′ 34.53″ N, 11° 43′ 15.7″ E  Heading=90° Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
Die Abgebildeten Gebäude stehen hier: NS=47.697553 EW=11.719
Wenns noch Fragen gibt - melde dich einfach. Grüße --Teilzeittroll (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


Hallo Teilzeittroll, so, ich glaube, ich habe jetzt alles Deinen Angaben entsprechend umgesetzt - auch die Kategorien. Du kannst ja noch einmal alles überprüfen und ich würde dann sehen, dass ich die Dateien noch einmal neu mit besserem Namen hochlade, bzw. umbenennen lasse. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, passt soweit alles! Viel Spaß weiterhin --Teilzeittroll (talk) 13:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Tipps

Ich habe dir die nette Vorlage entdeckt und auch mir mich (User:Atamari/contrib) adaptiert. Mittelfristig werde ich die Dateien noch umsortieren. Bei der Vorlage sind mir einige Probleme aufgefallen....

Wenn man "Bax pixel" nimmt, wird der Balken pro Datei um ein Pixel größer, also bei 10.000 Files ist so ein Balken mal so eben 10000px breit. Ich habe dies mit einer Prozentrechnung umgestellt und auf 200px multipliziert (evtl. könnte man dafür eine Variable nehmen). Weiter macht das Magic Word "PAGESINCAT" den Fehler neben den Dateien auf Kategorien mit zählt. Ich habe die Kategorien entsprechen korrigiert (wieder subtrahiert). Weiter macht PAGESINCAT den Fehler die Zahlen mit Tausendertrenner darzustellen, damit kann man mit deutscher Einstellung schlecht rechnen. Mit dem Parameter "R" stellt "PAGESINCAT" "den rohen" Wert ohne Format da - und schon kann man mit Zahlen ab 1000 rechnen. Mit dem Magix word "formatnum" wird eine Zahl wieder in dem eingestellten Format (also landesüblichen Tausendertrenner dargestellt). --Atamari (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari, ich habe zufällig (über die Diskussion mit "Ies") schon gemerkt, dass Du Dich dieser Vorlage angenommen hast. Ich hatte bisher das Problem, die einzelnen Zahlen nicht addieren zu können, aber das Problem hast Du ja nun in "count/all" geköst. Weil ich bisher (und das ist auch schon eine Weile her) immer nur mit "Clipper" unter DOS programmiert habe, ist mir die Umwandlung String in Zahl und umgekehrt hier nicht geläufig. Es gibt aber noch ein hiermit verwandtes Problem: In der Gesamtsumme werden zwar die Kategorien abgezogen, nicht aber in der Rubrik "Files" in der Graphik "contrib". Ich habe mir zunächst eine Hilfskonstruktion zurechtgelegt - ist aber unbefriedigend. Siehe: User:R. Engelhardt/contrib. Für Dich ist es bestimmt ein leichtes, das noch zu lösen. Theoretisch glaube ich zwar zu wissen, wie man es angehen müsste, aber die Praxis... , Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Schau zum Vergleich in meiner Vorlage. Zum Rechnen braucht es die Funktion {{#expr: xy1 - xy2 }}, diese fehlt bei dir. --Atamari (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ich habe einiges noch mal überarbeitet... formatnum funktioniert hier nicht so richtig, der Tausendertrenner wird hier als Komma dargestellt - was falsch ist, also ganz weg. Die Breite ist jetzt anpassbar und die prozentuale Stärke der Balken wird berechnet. Eine Korrektur (um die Unterkategorien) muss ich nur an einer Stelle pflegen. --Atamari (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ich habe {_{#expr: xy1 - xy2 }_} gerade eingesetzt. Funktioniert wohl. Danke! Mit den Tausendern habe ich zur Zeit noch nichts zu tun. Ebenso komme ich zur Zeit mit der Länge der Balken hin. Aber ich werde Deine Programmierungen im Auge behalten. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Übrigens, mit einer Max-Funktion richtet sich mein Diagramm nun an dem größten Balken (größter Balken = ganze Breite). --Atamari (talk) 22:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Wenn du jetzt was angepasst hattest... ich hab' schon mal gemeldet, das bei mir nun die Balken immer an dem maximalen angepasst werden. --Atamari (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Ich hab das noch nicht so ganz kapiert, weil ich bei Dir kein Beispiel finde. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Die eigentlich Vorlage des Diagramms ist unter: User:Atamari/contrib. Die Breite des Diagramm ist als "Variable" (als Konstante) unter User:Atamari/contrib/Breite abgelegt, und damit durch einem Edit änderbar. In der "Variable" (also "VarA") User:Atamari/contrib/VarA steckt der kleine Kniff. Dort wird ein Faktor berechnet aus Breite und den längsten Balken (= größte Anzahl von Dateien). Dieser Faktor wird zur Balkenerstellung (in User:Atamari/contrib) jedes Mal mit der Anzahl (diese sind ja als selbst berechnende Variable, beispielsweise User:Atamari/contrib/Photos/Gambia, abgelegt), multipliziert. --Atamari (talk) 22:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari, vielen Dank für Deine Erläuterungen. Ich werde das bei Gelegenheit umsetzen. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Atamari, ich habe die Balkenlänge jetzt etwas anders definiert - sicherlich nicht so elegant wie Deine Lösung, aber einfacher und wie ich meine, ebenso effektiv. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Kleinstädte nach Jahren kategorisiert...

... halte ich übrigens für bedenklich, insbesondere wenn es aus einem jahrzehnt oder gar jahrhundert nur ein Bild gibt und mehr auch nicht zu erwarten sind, ebenso die Vorlage "Altenbeken by century" wo der ort im 1. Jahrhundert noch überhaupt gar nicht existierte, usw. Oder auch ein Bauwerk erbaut im Jahre xy dies unter xy in Altenbeken zu kategorisieren. Kannst du bitte mit dem Unsinn aufhören? --anro (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo AnRo0002, gut, Du nennst es "Unsinn", aber wo sollen denn Bilder von diesen Orten nach Jahren eingeordnet werden? Es sind von Altenbeken sicherlich mehr Bilder eingestellt als von manch einer viel größeren Stadt und es werden noch weitere folgen. Wo willst Du denn da die Genze ziehen? Die Einordnung nach den frühen Jahrhunderten mag tatsächlich nicht sinnvoll sein, aber ich habe es parallel zu den schon bestehenden Vorlagen gemacht. Die Einordnung der Bauwerke stammt übrigens zum Teil nicht von mir, aber der Altenbekener Viadukt ist zum Beispiel ein Bauwerk, das in dieser Ausführung europaweit einmalig ist: die größte aus Sandstein erbaute Eisenbahnbrücke Europas. Aber ich bin für sinnvolle Anregungen durchaus offen. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Category discussion notification Category:Sounds by country, Category:Sound by country and some of their subcategories have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−
--ŠJů (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo R. Engelhardt,
wie du vielleicht schon erwartest hast, habe ich dein speedy von der low-res-Version deines Grand-Canyon-Videos herausgenommen, weil es, wie hier vom Uploader erläutert, für User mit nicht so fettem Internetzugang brauchbarer sein kann als die eigentlich bessere Version. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, ich bin jetzt erst aufgrund Deines Hinweises darauf aufmerksam geworden, dass die "low quality.ogv"-Version nicht von mir stammt. Ich hatte mich auch schon gewundert, weil ich bisher nie das "ogv"-Format verwendet habe. Außerdem war ich zum Zeitpunkt dieser Konvertierung in Urlaub und Mahanga hat mich, obwohl Administrator, auch nicht informiert, ja nicht einmal anständig kenntlich gemacht, dass ich der Autor bin. Deshalb habe ich es wohl nicht bemerkt.
Weil meine ersten Versionen auch im Format 320x240 waren. Damals konnte man wohl so große Dateien noch nicht hochladen (zumindest war es mir nicht gelungen - ebenso nicht bei meinen ersten Versionen von File:MonumentValley.ogg). Deswegen hatte ich nun angenommen, dass irgendwie eine meiner älteren Versionen wieder ins Spiel gekommen war. Das ärgerlichste an der Angelegenheit ist aber, dass bei der Konvertierung von Mahanga der Soundtrack abhanden gekommen ist. Das halte ich für nicht ok.
Ich habe File:Grand canyon.ogg nun nochmals downgeladen, erneut in das Format 320x240 konvertiert und unter Erhaltung des Soundtracks eine Datei erhalten, die zwar etwas größer ist als die von Mahanga, aber immer noch wesentlich kleiner als die "640x480"-Version.
"640x480"-Version: 45.885 KB
"320x240"-Version von Mahanga ohne Soundtrack: 12.662 KB
meine neue "320x240"-Version mit Soundtrack: 17.764 KB
Ist es ok, wenn ich Mahangas Version durch meine neue ersetze? Gruß und danke, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Da die "alte" low-res-Fassung ja eigentlich auch deine ist, wäre es m.E. völlig o.k., sie zu überschreiben. Wenn dir der Dateiname "low quality" nicht zusagt, kannst du gerne einen Änderungsvorschlag (z.B., low res) machen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:1940-um-Bismarckturm-Jakobsberg.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1940-um-Bismarckturm-Jakobsberg.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:1940-um-Bismarckturm-Jakobsberg.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
--:bdk: 14:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Ich bin eigentlich davon ausgegangen, dass
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).

bei dem Alter dieses Bildes ausreicht. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hm, bei einem Bild mit Datierung „um 1940“ ist das nicht so einfach. PD-old gilt 70 Jahre nach Tod des Urhebers. Für die Gemeinfreiheit muss jemand momentan (2010) spätestens 1939 gestorben sein. Das müsstest Du also schon benennen können. Ähnliches gilt übrigens bei anonymen Werken, wobei die „Beweislast“, dass wirklich kein Urheber herausgefunden werden kann, beim heutigen Veröffentlicher liegt.
Anschauliches Praxisbeispiel: Du hast ein altes Foto von 1909, also eine Aufnahme die schon über 100 Jahre alt ist. Der Fotograf war damals 30 Jahre alt und starb im Alter von 68 Jahren 1947. Gemeinfrei ist das Foto demnach erst ab 2018.
Fragen: Hast Du das Foto im Original (in einem Buch oder als Postkarte) vorliegen? Falls ja, steht dort sonst nichts? Wie sicher bist Du bei der Datierung?
Ich hoffe, das hilft weiter. Wie immer nichts für ungut :-) --:bdk: 19:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Ich war jetzt wohl irrtümlich von 70 Jahren nach der Aufnahme augegangen. Das Bild habe ich mal aus dem Internet heruntergeladen. Dabei übernehme ich immer die Zeitangabe in die Bildbezeichnung, also um 1940. Ich habe nämlich meine Jugend am Fuße des Jakobsberges genau unterhalb des später an dieser Stelle stehenden Fernsehturmes verbracht. Aber unter diesen Umständen ist es wohl besser, wenn Du das Bild wieder löschst. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

am 29.08.2012 archiviert

Just a Thought

You have a box that says that you are a dental surgeon. However, it only says "this user is dental surgeon". You might want to change it to "this user is a dental surgeon". I'm just saying... Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 01:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank You, You are right. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Zur eigenen Erinnerung

Category:Tunisia in the 1990s

Hallo, es will mir nicht gelingen, Tunisia in Template:Facts/Countries bzw. in Category:Tunisia in the 1990s einzubauen. Für die Category:Turkey in the 2000s gilt dasselbe. Kannst Du mir helfen? --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo R. Engelhardt, die Vorlage ist vollständig, du musst sie nur ausklappen. Gruss --anro (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Hallo, evtl. habe ich mich nicht deutlich genug ausgedrückt: Ich meinte: "Tunisia" in der Navigationsleiste "Navigating the 1990s" unter "Countries, 1990s". Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Ahso, du musst hier die Länder noch eintragen damit sie in der Vorlage erscheinen, und zwar je zwei mal, wenn du auf "bearbeiten" gehst siehst du dann wohl schon wo genau. --anro (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe das schon x-mal versucht und jetzt erneut (und diesmal auch so abgespeichert). Aber es klappt trotzdem nicht. Kann das daran liegen, dass die Kategorien Category:Tunisia in the 1930s und Category:Turkey in the 1930s noch nicht existieren? Ich glaube, ich gebe auf. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Das Template hat nur eine Verzögerung, um die zu überspringen speichere die betreffenden Seiten erneut ohne sie zu ändern, ich habs schon für Category:Tunisia in the 1990s gemacht. Gruss --anro (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Gewusst wie! Eigentlich kannte ich diesen Trick schon, aber mit dieser Verzögerung habe ich nicht gerechnet. Danke und Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Überflüssiges Klickibunti

Hallo!

Kannst du einen sinnvolle Begründung abgeben, die diese Bearbeitung rechtfertigt? --High Contrast (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Weil man so viel schneller die gewünschte Sprache im Blick hat. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 18:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Besser ist, auf Special:Preferences#preftab-8 im Abschnitt Sprachunterstützung bei [ ] MyLangNotify einen Haken zu setzen. Dann hat man persönlich die gewünschte Sprache im Blick, ohne dass eine störende Grafik ablenkend wirkt. Die Analogie deutsche Sprache ↔ deutsche Fahne wird schon beim Beispiel englische Sprache ↔ britische Fahne sonderbar aufgeweicht (gilt die britische Fahne dann auch für die schottische und die walisische Sprache?) und dürfte spätestens bei Regionalsprachen wie der asturleonesischen Sprache problematisch werden. Davon abgesehen, kannst du auf einen Blick die dänische Fahne von der norwegischischen unterscheiden? --32X (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo 32X, Dein Vorschlag schien mir zunächst ok. Es gibt dann aber Probleme bei der Anwendung von Vorlagen, z. B. {{Taken with AIPTEK DV 6800 S}}. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Auch wenn es nur eine Meta-Kategorie ist würde ich doch eine optische Korrektur präferieren: Die Bundesländer sollten geblockt am Anfang stehen in alphabetischer Reihenfolge (Sortierung z.b. "| B]") , die Sortierschlüßel für die Dekaden sollten vierstellige Jahreszahlen sein um nicht ein Durcheinander mit den dreistelligen Jahreszahlen zu bekommen. Kurzum stimme ich der Änderung nicht zu. --Martin H. (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Also, ich sehe zuerst die Zeitachse und dann dann die Ortsachse (es heißt ja "by decade"). Gerade durch meine Änderungen habe ich das Durcheinander zwischen 3- und 4-stelligen Dekaden beendet. ("870" war z. B. wohl am Ende unter "8" gelistet.) Und die Orte waren auch nicht alphabetisch. Ob man nun die Sortierung mit Extra-Großbuchstaben vornimmt oder nicht, ist Ansichtssache. Man könnte auch Saxony einreihen. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Die Nummerierung der Jahre ist auf jeden Fall gut, siehe dein 870er Beispiel. Bei den Bundesländern präferiere ich wie gesagt den Block am Anfang, also Sonderzeichen+Großbuchstabe. Aber du magst recht haben, wenn die Sortierung von allen Dekaden-Kategorien erfolgt ist kann es eigentlich egal sein ob die Länder nun vor oder nach den Unterkategorien stehen. --Martin H. (talk) 21:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Category discussion notification Category:Videos_by_display_resolution has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−
Multichill (talk) 14:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Category discussion notification Category:Ersttagsblätter_der_Deutschen_Post has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 23:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


templates and wiki software

Just a few additional thoughts and observations.

The length of the video appears in the file description provided by the wiki software. (from the file you linked to: 2007_07_01_altenbeken_vivat_viadukt_ohne_wm.ogg‎ (Ogg multiplexed audio/video file, Theora/Vorbis, length 4m 6s, 640×480 pixels, 1.7Mbps overall) right under the image.

The camera location template, if applied correctly, will join the information template. I have yet to move it to the correct position so that it joins the template though.

I have a question regarding the use of flags for language. If DE used an Austrian flag, what would you think about that? England was quite promiscuous with her language, but it was so long ago -- perhaps it is time to give her a break from her flamboyant behavior of the past. Australia, the United States and most of Canada speak English.

Consider this:

Description
Deutsch:    Privates Video vom Viadukt-Fest 2007 in D-33184 Altenbeken
English:    Private video from viadukt-festival 2007 in D-33184 Altenbeken, Germany
Date
Source Own work
Author R-E-AL (talk | contribs | Gallery)  (German Wikipedia)
Other versions
Camera location51° 45′ 58.91″ N, 8° 56′ 33.22″ E  Heading=90° Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo


Hmm, usually the gallery in the other versions area of the template shows a row of four thumbnails.... -- Queeg (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

My problems finding the important message on your file pages are nothing compared to the amount I enjoyed those videos of dampflokomotiven, both large and small, real and modeled. Even in the rain it looked like a great and good occasion and caused for me more than a few moments of remembering my happy childhood which often enough looked like those poor festival people looking at that steam engine in the rain.
I am still very much looking forward to the 2013 viaduct festival :) -- Queeg (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
File:DBP 1989 1411-1414-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1989 1411-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1989 1412-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1989 1413-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1989 1414-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1991 1554-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:DBP 1992 1638-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:2009-varusschlacht-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

History of Panama Canal Zone has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


AxeEffect (talk) 00:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Deciduous teeth by David Shankbone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    22:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

And also:


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 12:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Jarekt (talk) 12:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 11:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

File:DBP 1991 1569-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Correlatio (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:DBP 1991 1561-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Correlatio (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Correlatio (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 23:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Ogv files has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Liliana-60 (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Teeth_sealing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Partynia (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
File:1997-ersttagsstempel-deutscher-wald.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
File:1993-ersttagsstempel-kinder.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
File:DBP 1994 1754-R Kindermarke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 12:25, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
File:1994-ersttagsblatt-kinder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
File:DBP 1992 1607-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 12:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
File:2000-kindermarke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
File:DPAG 2004 Kindermarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Videos by display resolution has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


TheDJ (talkcontribs) 12:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Superstructures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2015.ww (talk) 04:04, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
File:2010-06-07-Golf-Senne-11-Drossel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 22:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Funkturm im Schönbuch has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 11:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 04:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

File:DBP 1989 1422-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
File:1975-BL-Brunnen-Postkarte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:908:121:9900:0:0:0:C78D 06:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
File:1974-BL-Heilbad-Postkarte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:908:121:9900:0:0:0:C78D 06:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
File:DBP 1991 1576-1577-R.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 10:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

File:1994-ersttagsblatt-bilder-aus-deutschland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 08:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Idw/layout Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)