User talk:Raimundo Pastor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
Mis archivos

File:Isaac Puente Amestoy (1936).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Isaac Puente Amestoy (1936).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 00:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Festival de Cine de Alcalá de Henares 2014 (ALCINE 44) cartel.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Festival de Cine de Alcalá de Henares 2014 (ALCINE 44) cartel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 09:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Logotipo del SERMAS (RPS 10-03-2012).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Logotipo del SERMAS (RPS 10-03-2012).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 09:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:San Sebastián (RPS 14-09-2014) Torreón del Monte Igueldo, escalera de subida.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:San Sebastián (RPS 14-09-2014) Torreón del Monte Igueldo, escalera de subida.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nature of Madrid[edit]

Hola Raimundo, lo que cuentas es casi, casi lo que estuve pensando yo mismo. La verdad es que yo simplemente estaba buscando un contenedor que pudiese contener a lo que no son ni humanos propiamente dichos ni obras humanas (edificios, calles, plazas... pero también instituciones...). Dudé sobre ello, así que simplemente me puse a mirar qué se había hecho en otras ciudades, anglosajonas a ser posible, por eso del matiz de las palabras. Y vi que en ambos casos (Nature of London y Nature of New York City) no se circunscribía a elementos no manipulados por el hombre, por lo que adopté ese enfoque. De todas formas, si tienes una alternativa mejor, estaré encantado de discutirla contigo :-) Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 07:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Category:Modernist architecture in Spain[edit]

Hola Raimundo. Esta es una traducción equivocada. Lo que llamamos Modernismo en Espana, en inglés se conoce como Art Nouveau. El Modern Movement es la arquitectura moderna (racionalismo, funcionalismo, etc) del siglo XX. Saludos, tyk (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Si miras las imágenes que contienen esas categorías verás que son de arquitectura moderna (del movimiento moderno), no modernista (art nouveau), que es el estilo del edicifio de Alcalá que tu has incluido en la nueva categoría. Saludos, tyk (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)