User talk:Rama

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Archives : 1 — 50 | 51 — 100 | 101 — 150 | 151 — 200 | 201 — 250 | 251 — 300 | 301 — 350 | 351 — 400

Contents

[edit] Happy Holidays!

File:Wikisanta.jpg
Jingle Bells.ogg

Kanonkas(talk) would like to take this opportunity to wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I really do hope this can make your day slightly better, and if it has done, feel free to pass on the WikiLove to anyone you like! :) Friends, random people, and even those you've had disagreements with. Christmas is, after all, a time to forgive any past actions, and move on from them. Again, happy holidays to you all!
merry xmas! Esby (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Food after the CCC

Here's how to get to the food place (Mittmann's) in case we miss each other or you want to come later. [1]

-- Duesentrieb ⇌ 16:56, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please

e-mail cary for identification, so your oversight-request might me closed ;) Thank you and happy new year! abf « Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 02:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes. I've closed it, (congratulations, by the way, on getting 33 unanimous supports!!!) and made the request at Meta, ([2]) but it's pending your identification. I have already emailed you the link to the boilerplate instructions (they are also linked from m:Identification noticeboard) as well as the instructions themselves. So hopefully that's in train. As soon as you're set up, look me up on IRC if you want and I can walk you through oversighting something. It's a bit persnickety but easy enough. Best wishes. ++Lar: t/c 05:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
As the request was done I now can say "Happy Oversighting" ;) abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] copyvio

[edit] File:Evstafiev-Chechnya-BURNED.jpg

Pay attention to copyright File:Evstafiev-Chechnya-BURNED.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

-66.76.160.79 08:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Map

Yeah please check en:International reaction to the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict.--Avala (talk) 20:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Countries you didn't interpret in the right way:
  • Australia as neutral but the statement goes like this "Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said that Australia recognises Israel's right to self-defence"
  • Morocco as neutral but the statement goes like this "The Kingdom of Morocco strongly condemns the massive Israeli military operations which have claimed, this morning, the lives of dozens of Palestinian brothers in Gaza strip, and strongly condemns the disproportionate use of force and the tragic escalation of violence"
  • Canada as neutral but "Canada’s foreign affairs minister, Lawrence Cannon, also issued a statement in which he pointed to Israel’s "clear right to defend itself" against continuing attacks by militants he accused of "deliberately" targeting civilians."
  • USA as neutral but President George W. Bush said "I understand Israel's desire to protect itself, and that the situation now taking place in Gaza was caused by Hamas."
  • Norway as neutral but "On January 4, Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg criticised the Israeli ground offensive into Gaza, calling it "a dramatic escalation"."
  • Sweden as neutral but "Foreign Minister Carl Bildt condemned Israel and said that "The Israeli ground offensive is "basically an admission that (Tel Aviv's) air attacks over the past week have failed to achieve what they had hoped for," Bildt said in a statement late Saturday.. Instead of seeking a possible political solution after this failure they have now chosen to dramatically escalate the conflict with a ground offensive. It is obvious that this will make it harder to find a solution to this serious conflict.""
  • Denmark as neutral even after they summoned the Israeli ambassador.

etc.

I think you should review your sources before accusing me. Cheers.--Avala (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

And if you have any opposing sources for your interpretation you are free to update the image talk page which now has a full list to back up the map. (though it doesn't show up properly so I would advise to check for anything that doesn't show up on English WP page which is constantly updated)--Avala (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


I did before editing your map:
  • USA: The U.S. called for an immediate cease-fire, including the termination of rocket attacks against Israel, also asking that the humanitarian needs of the people of Gaza be addressed.
  • France: "firmly condemns the irresponsible provocations that have led to this situation, as well as the disproportionate use of force"
  • Germany: German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has told Hamas to end what he called its "unacceptable" rocket attacks on Israel, while urging the Jewish state to do everything it could to avoid civilian casualties.
  • Norway: Norway's Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has said that using warplanes against Gaza is unacceptable, as it is impossible to separate civilians from soldiers in this small area. He also says that Hamas must cease the launching of rockets into Southern Israel
  • Sweden: Foreign Minister Carl Bildt (...) also said that he hopes both sides will stop the bombings. He also stated that the current isolation of Gaza should end, calling it "counterproductive" for the Israeli side. Bildt says that Hamas should have agreed to a continued cease-fire agreement.
  • Finland: The Israeli air strikes have demanded a disproportionate amount of civilian victims and they must end immediately. Simultaneously Hamas and other extremist groups must immediately cease their rocket attacks. The parties must reinstate the truce without delay
  • Morocco: The Kingdom of Morocco calls for the immediate halt of the hostilities which, beyond the significant loss of life, exposes the region once again to escalation, violence and divisions"
  • Canada: Canada's junior foreign minister Peter Kent added on Tuesday that there must be a strong, binding resolution to the conflict. "Canada believes there must be an immediate ceasefire, but only if it's durable ceasefire, and if Hamas is prevented or is willing not to rearm and resume its terrorist rocketing at some point down the road
  • Mexico: Mexico "also rejects rockets launched from Gaza on Israeli territory".
Your map is incoherent with these statements - as well as probably other. France and Egypt have famously drafter a cease-fire proposal, and your file also fails to take this into account. Rama (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
When Morocco first says "The Kingdom of Morocco strongly condemns the massive Israeli military operations" and then "The Kingdom of Morocco calls for the immediate halt of the hostilities" I think it is quite obvious that by "hostilities" they mean Israeli attacks. The same goes for the rest of the statements where you can't just take the part saying "immediate halt of the hostilities" without looking at the fact they condemned only one side.--Avala (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Such a map should not be based solely upon what you personally think to be "obvious". And dismissing the "rest of it" like this is not acceptable when there are items like "immediate cease-fire" in US statements for instance. Rama (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes that is why the map has a legend which makes distinction between countries condemning only Israel, only Hamas or condemning both. Morocco condemned Israel only and of course called for the end of violence but not in neutral sense but the end of violence by Israeli side. It's actually not a matter of obvious or not because it is all written in the statement. And you need to put some time perspective there. First statements are sometimes superseded by later ones especially if the later ones come from higher officials then the first ones. If the spokesman of the MFA called for ceasefire but the President came out later and condemned Hamas only, then the second statement carries more weight.--Avala (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
This is unacceptable. The caption puts countries having called for a cease-fire in green, your map gives the impression that the USA are encouraging Israel to carry on shelling, and that France and Egypt are encouraging Hammas to further launch rockets, while the three have called for an immediate cease-fire. Your map is misleading and arbitrary. Rama (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
That is making things up now. Legend doesn't put blue as "States encouraging Israel to carry on shelling" nor orange as "States encouraging Hammas to further launch rockets". You are failing to notice that for an example Morocco condemned only one side - Israel - and that they therefore fall into the group of countries condemning the Israeli action - Orange : States that have condemned the Israeli action. And the USA is not neutral per early statement from the Department of State because you are completely ignoring what Bush said about the situation afterwards - "I understand Israel's desire to protect itself, and that the situation now taking place in Gaza was caused by Hamas" - which makes the US of one of the countries endorsing Israel - Blue: States that have endorsed the Israeli action or condemned Hamas only.
Endorsing Israel =/= encouraging Israel to carry on shelling
Condemning Israel =/= encouraging Hammas to further launch rockets
Hope it's clear now? I have tried to make the map legend as neutral as possible now. Almost all states will call for ceasefire but not all of them are neutral and that is why we have the blue and orange, to differentiate those with stronger positions. Otherwise you could paint them all green.---Avala (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
It remains unacceptable. Green remains caracterised as the colour of countries which have called for a cease-fire, suggesting that other have not called for a cease-fire. The statements of Egypt and of the USA are much closer that those of France and North Korea, for instance, yet your map parts them in a subjective way, and a downright absurd one.
Your statement that "Otherwise you could paint them all green" is also a symptom that you have a pre-concieved notion of the sort of map to which you wish to arrive: if the facts are such that all countries are in green, why would it be a problem? This map is supposed to reflect facts, not how it would be realistic that countries would act according to some ideology.
The caption claims to be based on clear criteria, like calls for a cease-fire, but the categorisation is in fact made on arbitrary judgements of value. This is unacceptable. Rama (talk) 21:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
OK now it says that those are the countries which neutrally called for halt of violence on both sides. I hope that now it's clear that green countries are supposed to be the ones that didn't take sides at all. And endorsement to Israeli position rather than action so to avoid tying it to support to bombing. I think that it is completely usable now.--Avala (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
No, this is unacceptable. First you promised something different than what you delivered. Now, you categorise countries based on your personal evaluation of whether they are doing "enough" to be in such or such category. This is subjective, arbitrary, and ultimately inherently tendentious.
The only way to save this map is to decide on a clear, unambiguous criterion, and stick to it. Labeling for instance Spain and Iran in one category of countries, and the USA in the "opposite side", based on your personal feelings, is not acceptable. Rama (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I am listing them based on their statements. Even Israeli press calls Spain unfriendly country. And them having the similar position with Iran, well Australia voted with Iran against the US on Cuba in the UNGA. So what? It seems you have a problem with that. You can't accept personally this fact that some countries that are usually not similar have similar positions on this issue so you decided to attack the map. You need to address the issue with real not subjective problems. Otherwise it's all bunch of letters on how you can't believe that Spain would be coloured in the same way as Iran. It doesn't mean that Spain shares the position of Iran on obliterating Israel. This map is solely based on reactions to this event and NOTHING else. It's quite clear as well - countries that endorse Israeli position (those that said that they have the right to defend themselves, that it is a defensive position or that it's solely Hamas being guilty), countries that condemned Israel only and called their attack an attack on poor Palestinian civilians etc. and called them to stop it and countries that called for the halt of violence without taking sides. It's very simple and you can see problems there only if you make them up to back up your fear that this map portrais Spain as being on the same side with Ahmadinejad.--Avala (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
You are listing them on a tendentious interpretation of their statements, which you just admitted yourself is in fact parrotting Israeli positions. I believed your map to be subjective, but it is now clear that it is downright partial.
If you want to have such a map, base it in indisputable and clear facts, like the date at which a country asked for a cease-fire. As such, this map meets neither criteria of neutrality, nor of seriousness and verifiability that Wikipedia demands. It is not acceptable. Rama (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Pasdecabale.jpg

Hi, I just now edited the file description, mainly because the "Ben non" should not be translated by Prussian "Nein+EXCLAMATION", but I also changed the order of quotations. In case you disagree, please revert but possibly keep the more recent German text -- the guy who translated first either did not ever read Asterix, or just lacks sense of subtle French humour. Best, [w.] 07:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Retirer mes informations personelle sur une de mes photos

Bonjour, je souhaiterai que mon nom et mon prénom soient effacés de cette page http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Statue_Mellinet.jpg

Mon nom apparait dans Historique du fichier -> Commentaires (oui a l'œil on le voit mal, mais Google voit tout :D )

On m'a dit de vous contacter pour effectuer cette opération. Moktoipas (talk) 14:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Voilà qui est fait. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Ben non il est toujours la puisque ça garde un sorte d'historique :( Moktoipas (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Désolé, il me semblait que l'historique des versions d'images avait été nettoyé aussi. Ca devrait aller mieux maintenant ; si ça n'est pas le cas, n'hésitez pas à me le signaler. Rama (talk) 11:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup, je ne mettrais plus mon nom partout maintenant :D Moktoipas (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Suffren cruiser class

Excellent work. Maybe we should start to think about stetting up rules to limit the length / width of our drawings. 8029 px seems to be quite "daring". Alexpl 10:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image problem

Hello Rama, I need help in creating the page of Indian Naval bases.svg. I am using Inkscape. The problem is that I can view the page in my browser properly, but when I upload it into Commons, it only shows this.[3]. That's the map is missing. Can you tell the reason for this and how it can be corrected? Thank you.--Chanakyathegreat (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
yes, you are linking to an "India_78.40398E_20.74980N.jpg" image which is not included in your file, and is probably linked from a file on your system. Hence, you see no problem in your inkscape, but I get a "linked image not found", and Commons does not display the image. Rama (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
For instance, over File:India-locator-map-blank.svg, it looks like this: File:Naval bases of India.svg. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I tried it again but cannot troubleshoot the problem. The image is this one from Wikimedia commons.
India 78.40398E 20.74980N.jpg

I even tried changing the name of the file but still it did not work. The svg and the image files are in the same folder and I am uploading it from there. Is it required to upload the Image as well as the SVG files separately? Thank you.--Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, bitmap images are linked by default; you can embed them in the SVG with "Effects -> Images -> Embed all iamges". Then it looks like File:Indian Naval bases.svg (probably close to what you have on your computer). I think that it might be preferable to have a "pure" SVG as much as possible, but well, this does the trick. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much.--Chanakyathegreat (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Classe Bougainville

Bonsoir, sur le schéma que vous avez crée sur la classe Bougainville, vous avez fait un duplicata de l'armement sur le place que vous avez réservé pour le blindage. L'amateur d'aéroplanes

Oui, c'est normal: d'après les plans que j'ai, les avisos coloniaux n'ont ni pont blindé, ni ceinture; le seul blindage est l'écran qui protège les servants des pièces de 138mm. Rama (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Entendu, il faudrait peut être une légende pour préciser le fait ? Je vais déjà écrire votre réponse sur l'image que j'ai mit sur l'article français.L'amateur d'aéroplanes
Ben "armament" et "armour" servent à ça... mais on peut ajouter des données techniques pour renforcer l'aspect délibéré de la chose. Curieux qu'il n'y ait pas de bunker sur un navire de ce genre, j'aimerais bien avoir confirmation de ça. Rama (talk) 09:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Autocunnilingus.jpg

File deletion warning File:Autocunnilingus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Kauczuk (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Daguerre_1.jpg

File deletion warning File:Daguerre_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

84.97.149.44 02:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Pony_play_1.jpg

File deletion warning File:Pony_play_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

83.60.12.217 19:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] In which country/city was the photo taken?

I have seen your photo File:Ci-devant-IMG_1190.jpg. As the description is only "Work by Rama" and the file name does not tell much it and there is no link to a category it is very difficult for others to find your photo. Could you please add to the description in which country and city this photo was taken? And may be also make a link to a category? Thanks, Wouter (talk) 15:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Pluto_Earth_size_comparison.jpg

File deletion warning File:Pluto_Earth_size_comparison.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Mangostar (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah pic.jpg

Hi Rama
Thanks for your answer. I've replied at User talk:Okki#Sarah pic.jpg, to keep the discussion in one place.
Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 18:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Not sure if you have Okki watchlisted, but I've left another reply there. Thanks, Amalthea (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Evstafiev-bosnia-serbs-boy-gun-to-head.jpg

File deletion warning File:Evstafiev-bosnia-serbs-boy-gun-to-head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

76.10.182.56 07:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Image deletion ?

Hi Rama. Ref: ("Draconio.gif", deleted from Commons by Rama because: Copyright violation.) Can you tell me why this was deleted? Is there anything I can do to re-use this image, it was one of my favorites. Regards Steve. Stephen2nd (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
the image was deleted after a discussion between another admin of Commons and myself ; we found that the quality of the drawing and the animation of the GIF did not seem technically consistant with those of the other images uploaded by the user which can reliably be said to be his own. Since the user seemed to be inactive for some time, we decided that it was safer to delete the image.
Sorry about the inconvenience. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rama/copyvioblock/pt

Hi, Rama. I felt free and did the page in portuguese. I did this because you tagged a brazilian user today and he may not understand what's going on. I hope there is no problem. And if you have other templates like this I can translate them to portuguese if you want; Cheers! Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you very much! Rama (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] HELP!

I attempted to upload a picture on Flickr using the flickr bot while logged in, but the picture never showed up and now my IP is recorded in the history of this page. Even though an IP address isn't as big a deal as a home address or phone number (which is why I'm not asking this through email), I would like for it to be oversighted. And what's going on with the picture I uploaded? --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 05:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. I do not know what happened to the image, it seems that wou have hit a little snag with the bot. Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! --Whip it! Now whip it good! 01:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] congratulations

Congratulations on the picture you drew of Suzanne Lachelier. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

André Guignard mg 4860.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:André_Guignard_mg_4860.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] DR sur une photo à toi

Bonjour,

Je t'annonce que j'ai fait une DR sur File:Rue-de-paris-film108jpg.jpg. Cordialement, Coyau (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

PS. Comme je suis très organisé, je fais la même chose pour File:Rue-de-paris-film107jpg.jpg (incapable de faire une seule procédure). Désolé pour le dérangement. --Coyau (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Photo Husserl

Salut,

Tu as jeté un sort définitif à cette photo d'Husserl. Etant donné que le philosophe fondateur de la phénoménologie est mort en 1938 à 79 ans, âge qu'il n'a manifestement pas atteint sur la photo en question, je crois que l'on peut conjecturer sans grand risque que la photo est dans le domaine public, même dans le cadre du droit français. --Gedefr (talk) 02:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Non. La photographie est dans le domaine public si son auteur est mort depuis plus de 70 ans. L'âge du sujet est sans rapport.
A supposer que la photographie ait été prise en 1900 (ce qui est excessivement généreux), l'auteur aurait parfaitement pu avoir 20 ans à cette date, pour mourir à 80 ans (en 1960), auquel cas la photo tombe dans le domaine public en 2030.
Mettre "domaine public" sur une photo de ce genre revient à dire "il est impossible que l'auteur ait vécu au-delà de 1939". Sans avoir d'informations solides sur l'auteur de la photographie, rien ne permet d'affirmer une chose pareille. Rama (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Hello Rama!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Commons images are used by editors on many projects in many languages. Each image is put into categories. This helps other editors find them. Please add categories to each image you upload.

To add an image to a category, add the following code to the end of the page.

[[Category:Category Name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbit of comets, add the following to the image description page:

[[Category:Astronomy diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories: Astronomy diagrams, Comets.

For further information on categories read Commons:Categories.

The CommonSense Tool often helps you find the best category for your image.

Here is a gallery of your images. Please check that each image has a category. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the help desk. Thank you.

BotMultichillT 06:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] U.S. military bases

Your U.S. military presence image has been removed from articles due to some accuracy issues. I'm sure these could be fixed quickly. Just letting you know, considering you created it. --24.203.238.130 14:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Done, I think. Rama (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Si j'avais fait une recherche avant de bosser...

Monet - Étretat, la Porte d'Aval.jpg
Claude Monet-Etretat the Aval door fishing boats leaving the harbour mg 1819.jpg

Note pour plus tard : ne plus jamais visiter un musée dans lequel tu es déjà passé, ça me déprime. (Oui, je sais, balance des blancs à l'arrache, mais j'avais pas le matos pour faire ça proprement à l'époque) --Eusebius (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Alvesgaspar and Lycaon

These two do not like Commons:Meet our restorationists. Fair enough. However, their behaviour has spilled out into a harassment campaign, actively disrupting FPC.


Both are active on Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Gasshukoku_suishi_teitoku_kōjōgaki_(Oral_statement_by_the_American_Navy_admiral).png, Alvesgaspar alone on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:First flight2.jpg.

Alvesgaspar's last (as of this writing) comment on Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Gasshukoku_suishi_teitoku_kōjōgaki_(Oral_statement_by_the_American_Navy_admiral).png comes after both me and dDurova deleted our names from Meet our restorationists in individual attempts to show that, unlike their accusations on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates, this was not about us, it was an attempt to promote restoration. Indeed, I have documented evidence that User:GerardM asked me to start Meert our restorationists as a personal favour to him.[4]

I'm tired of being Wikimedia Commons' chew toy. I'm tired of Lycaon being allowed to make whatever attacks he wants to about me unchecked. (Another recent example: [5])

I come to Commons because it's supposedly mellow. In fact, I'm being actively harassed, and noone seems to care enough to stop it. Please help. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File Tagging Image:Mines-p012102.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Mines-p012102.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File Tagging Image:Bofors-p004596.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Bofors-p004596.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Rue-de-paris-film110jpg.jpg

Coucou Rama, ta photo File:Rue-de-paris-film110jpg.jpg représente l'immeuble Passy-Kennedy (mon ex-bureau), qui est clairement un bâtiment récent... Je ne te fais pas le dessin. Au cas où, je te rappelle que ces images sont acceptées sur fr avec le modèle {{fair use bâtiment récent}}. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

C'est aussi classieux à l'intérieur ? Rama (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Chez nous, c'était un peu moisi, mais j'avais vue sur la tour Eiffel. Mais il y avait un Fauchon devant (le bâtiment qu'on voit en bas à gauche). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Valued Image Promotion

Leonard Cohen 2187-edited.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leonard Cohen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
review

[edit] Scan oeuvres de Le Breton

Salut Rama

je cherchais une image du cuirassé Magenta, j'ai vu que tu avais scanné les gravures à partir d'un livre publié en 1993 en France au Chasse Marée, Or la jurisprudence sur la reproduction en 2 dimensions d'une oeuvre du domaine public ne vaut pas, si je ne m'abuse, en France. Jeffdelonge (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Tu formules le problème de façon étrange: soit il y a une jurisprudence, soit il n'y en a pas. De plus, la France étant un pays de droit romain, etc. Par ailleurs, je ne vis pas en France, ça pourrait encore compliquer la donne. Rama (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


[edit] SVG Help needed

I have drawn a png-file of a russian military vehicle (1740x1050, 5,2MB), but it is not really useful without explanatory comments in it. Can you tell me how effective it is to integrate a .png in an .svg file ? Or would you recommend to create a "true" .svg as addition to the .png instead ? Thank you. Alexpl

It would be better to have the entire image as a SVG, but it might be possible to convert the PNG into a SVG. Maybe the best thing to do would be to upload the drawing and see what we can do from there. Cheers! Rama (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Allright. I scaled it down as much as possible and modified the palette to make the file smaller. It turned a bit into a monochrome-nightmare, but here we go: [6]. I´ve about 10 different points to explain in that graphic and I want to add a scalebar. I still have the wireframe base for this drawing (all the outlines) maybe it can be helpful to extract an svg file. Ideas? Alexpl (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
The wireframe can probably be imported as SVG automatically, could you upload it too? The colour might take a while to recreate as gloriously as you did on the png, tough.
But we can always do it quick and dirty like in File:Black Eagle Obj640-embedded.svg. Rama (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow! Just 300KB more. Looks good for me. And it would be possible for people in others wikis to easily modify it to any language they need? I made a .png with explanatory text [7] - if your time allows, would you please make the "quick and dirty" svg? Thank you very much. edit: I guess it would be best to use it as an addition to the original .png Alexpl (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
It could look liks something like File:Black Eagle Obj640-embedded-b.svg. It is very easy to change the language from there. Let me know if the colours are confusing, this can be changed too. Cheers and thank you for your drawings! Rama (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Excellent. The only problem is that the driver´s position, below the gun, got lost somehow. If you can fix that, we´re trough with this project. With best regards.Alexpl (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Here it is: English and French. If you give me translations of the terms in German, I can do this one as well -- I would not venture into trying to translate myself, though. Cheers! Rama (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
No problem. From top to bottom [8]:
125mm 2A46 Kanone
Luken für die Besatzung
Platzhalter für Turmausrüstung
Transport-Lade-Container
"Kontakt 5" ERA
"Kaktus" ERA
verlängertes Laufwerk
Alexpl (talk) 09:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
And there we are. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. That was efficient! I modified the .svg files descriptions and linked them to the original .png file. I think we can now post deletion requests for [9], [10] and [11] as they were replaced by your svgs. Do you agree?Alexpl (talk) 09:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Done. To bad there's nothing reliable about the T-95 concept, I'd love to have a good illustration of it. Cheers! Rama (talk) 10:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
T-95 research is more like reading tea leaves :D Alexpl (talk) 06:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] revue maritime

Salut,

Zil m'a dit que tu souhaitais te poster à Toulon pour prendre des photos des bateaux. As-tu des précisions sur les horaires de départ et les horaires d'arrivée des bateaux sur le site de Sainte Maxime.

Il me semble qu'il y a 70km a vol d'oiseau entre les deux, ce genre d'engin n'etant capable de franchir les zones terrestres ils doivent faire le tour. Zil m'a parlé d'une vitesse de 10 noeuds, soit 18km/h... ce qui donne environ 4-5h pour qu'un bateau parte de toulon et arrive au lieu.

Ne serait il pas judicieux d'être a la fois au départ de toulon et a sainte maxime, étant donné qu'il faut 1h15 en voiture pour se rendre a sainte maxime par l'autoroute.

Esby (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] IMO system and namegiving

I think you misunderstood the IMO system and the namegiving of ships. The reason to group ships in categories by name is that the category by name is used to group ships by country, by name and so on. That is impossible if your system of all files in one category is used. The system used here for most of the ships is to group the ship under her own name in a category and to group these names under the IMO number. The hull is the same and via the IMO system you can find all ships. I categorised MS Color Festival under its IMO number and via that system you'll find the other used names by category. Will you please be so kind to revert. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Mistral mg 6102.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Mistral mg 6102.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Fort de Balaguier mg 5520.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Fort de Balaguier mg 5520.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Toulon harbour mg 5358.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Toulon harbour mg 5358.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] to yezofy:

File:Blake_Lively.jpg Rama (talk) 20:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Moth image

Hi Rama, The images of HB-UPE are labelled Cirrus Moth but this aircraft is actually a DH60.GIII Moth Major, with a Gipsy engine. I've added a note on the discussion page of one of them with a bit more detail.TSRL (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Spectacular, thank you very much. I have moved the file to File:De Havilland DH 60.GIII Moth Major img 0504.jpg for better naming. Thanks again and cheers! Rama (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Blog

Coucou Rama,

dis, personne n'a l'air de réagir à ma proposition de post sur le blog de Wikimédia France sur le bistro. Tu ne voudrais pas faire un petit quelque chose sur Commons ? Bises, --Serein (talk) 17:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Triumph Bonneville IMG 2728.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Triumph Bonneville IMG 2728.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Oversight

Salut,

J'ai vu que tu fais partie des oversighters de ce wiki. On s'apprête à lancer des oversighters locaux sur frwiki. Pourrais-tu nous dire comment se déroulent les élections chez vous ? Merci par avance de répondre directement ici : w:fr:Discussion Wikipédia:Prise de décision/Oversight#Comment les xénophones choisissent-ils leurs oversights ?. À bientôt. Elfix ↗talk ⋅ discuter 18:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Merci ! Elfix ↗talk ⋅ discuter 19:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Additional French translation reqs

Hi! I put some more French translation requests here in the Bistro: Commons:Bistro#Additional_translations_requested - Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 00:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Tes photos de la Géode

J'ai supprimé tes photos de la Géode pour des questions de FOP. C'est dur, ces vieux fichiers qui traînent ;-) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, merci beaucoup ! Un jour, il faudra que je vérifie cette histoire de lieu de publication faisant foi, mais d'ici à ce que j'aie le temps, mieux vaut pécher par excès de prudence.
Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Nyctosaurus

Hi, Rama! I've seen you've changed the picture of the fossil of Nyctosaurus. I appreciate that you tried to eliminate the ugly reflection, but the problem is that in doing so the picture lost much detail and acquired a lot of false colours — both undesirable in an image that should have the highest possible scientific accuracy; it is not just some "illustration". The criterion here should be "science", not "aesthetics". Of course the original can still be found, but why not simply have uploaded it as an alternative so that people can choose?

Greetings,--MWAK (talk) 12:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

Barnstar of Diligence.png The Barnstar of Diligence
for your hard work on the French translations of Category:Air France Flight 447 WhisperToMe (talk) 23:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Caricature de Coluche

Bonjour, vous avez cru bon devoir supprimer mon fichier au motif qu'il s'agissait d'une "copiviou". J'ai pourtant précisé qu'il s'agissait d'un dessin personnel que m'avait fait Cabu et qui relève de ma collection particulière. Je trouve honteux votre suppression. --Dinkley (talk) 20:41, 21 juin 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour,
la possession matérielle du dessin ne vous rend pas dépositaire des droits sur l'oeuvre. Les droits restent à Cabu, à moins que vous n'ayiez un contrat signé à cet effet, auquel cas je vous invite à en envoyer copie à l'OTRS.
Quand à ce que vous trouvez honteux ou pas, je m'en contre-fiche. J'agis en fonction du droit en vigueur -- pour vous protéger -- et non en fonction de je ne sais quelles considérations morales. Rama (talk) 21:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Iran

http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhashemi/

[edit] File:M9_and_AN_PEQ-14.jpg M9_and_AN_PEQ-14_in_action.jpg

Could u plz proof any copyrightvialtion?--Sanandros (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

You are reversing the charge of the proof. It's not my place to prove anything at all, it is you who must provide a verifiable source for the images. They look very, very much like promotional photographs made by the maker, and in this case, even hosted on a US military site, they are not public domain. With the links dead, they are equivalent to images apparently snached from a random commercial site. Rama (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
But it isn't a friendly way to delete these pics without any discussions.--Sanandros (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Hippalectryon

Salut Rama, je passe aussi au Louvre aujourd'hui, on risque de se croiser :) En tout cas, j'avais prévu de passer aux figurines en terre cuites, donc n'hésite pas à te concentrer sur ce que tu voulais faire. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

En fait la section d'antiquités orientales est fermée, j'ai passé mon dépit sur la Grèce de l'Âge du Bronze. Mais je ne t'ai pas vue :p Rama (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Euh... moi aussi j'ai fait la Grèce de l'âge du Bronze... Bon tant pis, on uploade tout, ça fera du choix. Sinon non, les Antiquités orientales n'étaient pas fermées, tu voulais aller dans quelles salles ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
J'aurais voulu refaire correctement les textes ougarites, ils sont à Sully, rez-de-chaussée Levant : Syrie côtière, Ougarit et Byblos Salle B [12]. J'ai eu l'impression que c'était fermé en regardant un plan, mais peut-être aurais-je dû vérifier par moi-même.
Dans la série des certitudes à remettre en doute, j'ai aussi vu plein de gens photographier au flash, y compris un type avec un gros flashgun orientable, et des gens qui se baladaient ouvertement avec un trépied. Peut-être que je ferais bien de prendre au moins un monopode la prochaine fois. Rama (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Les gardiens sont moins bornés qu'à Cluny, par exemple, donc ils te laissent photographier au flash ce qui ne craint rien, typiquement les statues. Pour les trépieds, j'ai vu aussi des gens se balader avec, mais se faire engueuler s'ils le déployaient. Pas vu, pas pris : un monopode discret dans une salle peu fréquentée, ça doit passer. Les vieux sortent bien des sièges pliants alors que c'est interdit...
Sinon, les salles dont tu parles étaient bien ouvertes, je suis moi-même passée par là pour sortir hier. Mais c'est vrai que c'est un peu confus, j'ai l'impression que l'ouverture ou la fermeture des salles varie pas mal en fonction des travaux.
J'ai vu ton SMS bien après l'heure. C'est con qu'on se soit loupés. La prochaine fois, on peut peut-être s'arranger à l'avance ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Mes excuses pour le SMS. Je ne savais a priori que j'allais rester ainsi immobile, c'est pourquoi je n'ai pas tenté de te contacter plus tôt, et comme je n'ai pas de GSM, ça a été peu souple. C'était une bouteille à la mer ou cas où, j'espère que ça ne t'a pas mise mal à l'aise.
Bien volontier pour la prochaine fois. Bon développement de photos de terres cuites d'ici là ! Rama (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Hipalectryon bis

Salut,

Très belle photo (ici), surtout pour du 0,2 s :) J'ai un peu réorganisé la page de description à la sauce musée habituelle, et j'ai demandé un renommage à la même sauce (File:Terracotta hippalektryon Louvre CA1792.jpg), j'espère que ça te convient. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Parfait, je vais renommer les fichiers, alors. Bonne continuation! Rama (talk) 10:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Au poil ! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Au poil et à la plume. ^.^ Rama (talk) 11:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Achille mg 6916.jpg

Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Amin pedia

Hello dear Rama i have unblocked the user since he promised not upload copyvios anymore , so if you have found any other copyvios from now please feel free to re-block. thanks --Mardetanha talk 09:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you very much. Goog continuation! Rama (talk) 21:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Vaisseau-1er rang Morel-Fatio-2.jpg

Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Schéma pour l'artillerie navale

Bonsoir, concernant l'article sur l'artillerie navale, pouvez traduire en français la description de la tourelle des cuirassés de la classe Iowa pour remplacer celui actuellement sur l'article : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iowa_16_inch_Gun.svg l'amateur d'aéroplanes

Plus ou moins fait, mais perfectible. Rama (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Naked woman-Louvre-E27429.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Naked woman-Louvre-E27429.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


[edit] File source is not properly indicated: File:Chenier2.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chenier2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-1.0+}} or {{PD-self}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--malo (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Main pouétique mg 6664.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Main pouétique mg 6664.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Images flous des Arts et Metiers

Bonjour,

Je pense mettre quelques images trop flous ou avec des reflets des vitres visibles à supprimer : Commons:Deletion_requests/CNAM-flou.

En même temps j'ai marqué l'image File:CNAM-IMG_0567.jpg "corrompu", pouvez-vous y jeter un coup d'œil, est-ce le problème de mon poste, ou l'image ne s'affiche vraiment pas ?

Et merci pour les images, même s'il est très difficile de s'y retrouver, vu la manque de description des objets photographiés.

Green fr (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Il faudrait sans doute que j'y retourne. Les reflets peuvent dans certains cas se corriger -- le manque de profondeur de champs, par contre, évidemment pas. Quoi qu'il en soit, la demande que tu as faite est toujours utile, ne serait-ce que comme liste de photos à refaire. Rama (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
PS: pour File:CNAM-IMG_0567.jpg, je n'ai pas de problème. Il y a eu quelques ennuis avec les serveurs d'images ces derniers temps, ce genre de contre-temps n'est donc pas surprenant. Rama (talk) 21:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Pour 0567 - cela fait au moins 2 mois que j'arrive pas la visualiser. Même si c'est la configuration de mon poste, il y a qqch qui cloche avec cette photo.
Sinon, tu pourrais sinon faire les annotations aux photos, au moins photographier les pancartes des objets des musées ? Surtout quand il y a des volumes (encore une fois, merci pour les photos :-)), c'est super difficile de retrouver la "machine à tisser" qu'il faut parmi les dizaines exposées au CNAM.--Green fr (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Purge le cache de ton navigateur. (Ctrl shift R sous firefox ou alt F5 sous ie) Esby (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rapier Photos

In the English Wikpedia article on Rapiers, you are credited with four black and white photos of rapier hilts. Can you recall where these photos were taken? I would appreciate it if you could let me know.--Nimbus rutilus (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

This was taken during a weapon fair in Lausanne. Most of these rapiers are modern replicas used for fencing (there are genuine weapons but i di not remember which ones, sorry). Do let me know if I can be of further help. Cheers! Rama (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Joan_Baez_TIME_23_November_1962.jpg

Pay attention to copyright File:Joan_Baez_TIME_23_November_1962.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

feydey (talk) 09:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Facebook

U know that they use pics on Facebook?--Sanandros (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

I am certain that they use lots of things on Facebook. Dear me, not the tastiest photograph I ever made, either. Cheers! Rama (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
yea also wondered that they used this one.--Sanandros (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit]  :D

Quality Image Barnstar.svg The Quality Image Barnstar
Thanks for uploading such great images. Huib talk 11:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Photos de net marine

Bonjour, j'ai reçu votre message concernant les photos de netmarine. Je n'avais pas fait attention au "Template", plusieurs personnes qui m'ont envoyé des messages concernant de menues erreurs lors de ces premiers uploads, n'y ont vu que du feu. Vous aviez émis un certain nombre de messages concernant la possiblité d'utiliser ces photos qu'il faudrait préciser afin que personne d'autre ne tombe dans le panneau. J'ai trouvé l'autorisation sur une de vos pages (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rama/NetMarine-licence) sans plus de commentaires sur la durée de validité, et d'autres infos sur la page de discussion de l'article french navy du wiki anglais. Sans ces infos, Je n'aurais rien chargé.

Bien amicalement Pontus AL

Bonjour, et merci beaucoup pour vos remarques. J'ai mis des avertissement j'espère immanquables à ces endroits. Si vous repérez d'autres endroits trompeurs, n'hésitez pas à me les signaler.
Merci aussi pour votre photo de la vedette côtière, qui prouve que nous pouvons faire nos propres photos quand nous en avons l'occasion.
Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Questions sur vos dessins

Voir Commons:Village pump#Possible copyright violation. Pourriez-vous expliquer là-bas comment vous avez crée ces dessins? Merci. Lupo 21:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Harpist hands img 4997-b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image File:Harpist hands img 4997-b.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] US PD Question

Hi Rama, I´ve uploaded this [13] based on the libary of congress. I´m not sure if there is anything, regarding copyright, I did forget to mention. Could you please take a quick look? Alexpl (talk) 10:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Look absolutely perfect, thank you! Rama (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Insulfation2.jpg

This image is incorrect, in regards to correct hand position, and should deleted.

Source: American heart assiciation, European resuscitation consil.

Note: The hand position, was used 10 years ago in the netherlands, but is incorrect by current standarts!

--93.167.210.222 08:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Notify uploaders please

You should always notify uploaders when you delete their images. You seem to have forgotten this. See Commons:Undeletion requests#Afghanistan images for some recent examples. Multichill (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

  • I wonder if this has anything to do with the deletion script being broken. -Nard the Bard 16:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Oversight

Your thoughts and comments are welcome here: [14]. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 01:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Institutions_europeennes_IMG_4307.jpg

File deletion warning File:Institutions_europeennes_IMG_4307.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

–Tryphon☂ 15:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Some of your inages

Hi! Sorry to bother you. I made my bot mark some images with the text "Flickr" for a {{flickrreview}}. Some of the images has you as author:

Maybe you would like to remove the Flickr-tag or what you prefer as a sort of proof of permission? Not a big deal I just thought it would look better that you had made an edit on the images :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Good thinking, thank you! Rama (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kunar-looting-body-1.OGG

Hello, You can't delete an image as you fancy. The decision of the DR was kept. If you have an objection, open another DR. Yann (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Файл: Ruine Berghof.JPG

Уважаемые Рама! Me при размещении Ruine Berghof.JPG, ошибка (в первой версии файла) Опубликованный фотография Mate, он не хотел бы иметь в вики. Вся другая информация, и последняя версия файла является правильным. Можно ли удалить фотографию моего друга с указанного файла? - Kolchak1923 ( Talk </ SPAN>) 20:10, 26 октября 2009 (UTC)

Сделано, я думаю. Позвольте мне знать, если вам нужно что-то другое, и хорошее продолжение! Рама ( Talk </ SPAN>) 20:17, 26 октября 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Midshipman

One of your images was brought to my attention in my FAC review; File:Thomas Rowlandson-midship.jpg. The source is current listed as: scanned from Vaisseau de Ligne, Time Life, 1979, but I can't find that book via the title. Can you check the source and put a full citation with an author and ISBN#? Thank you very much! I found it, Vaisseaux de ligne. 140.182.208.54 15:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulation, thank you! Rama (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] # 16:07, 3 November 2009 Rama (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Taliban in southern Afghanistan 10-12-06.jpg" ‎ (No SERIOUS srouce)

# 16:07, 3 November 2009 Rama (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Taliban in southern Afghanistan 10-12-06.jpg" ‎ (No SERIOUS srouce)

I find this very disturbing as you were already chastised by a number of other administrators for unilaterally deleting images coming out of Afghanistan that you personally felt should not be included. Again, I notice you have not notified the uploader of your concerns, and you have not opened a request for deletion or sought others' input in any fashion. Regardless of the source of the image, you were wrong to have simply tried to make the file disappear.

As this is the third time I am having this identical issue with you, I regret to inform you that I am going to open a request to have your adminship revoked. Sherurcij (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deadminship request

Hi Rama, not sure if you've already been informed, but your use of the sysop tools is currently under scrutiny; see Commons:Administrators/Requests/Rama. Best regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 20:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File deletion warning

File deletion warning have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these files, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

–Tryphon☂ 14:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cher Ami!

C'est formidable! Du bist ja regelrecht polyglott!!!

"Wer bereit ist, seine Freiheit zugunsten der Sicherheit zeitweise einzuschränken, schützt keines und verliert beides!" - ist diese Übersetzung Deines Wahlspruches richtig? Und was bedeutet das Griechische?

Hergelotst hat mich übrigens Deine herrliche Verschwörungs-Graphik...

Herzliche Grüße --Skipper Michael (wikipedie.de) --82.113.121.24 22:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Ja, die Übersetzung is gut. Das Griechische ist das Wahlspruch von Griechenland, "Freiheit oder Todt" ("Elefteria i tanatos"). Grüße ! Rama (talk) 08:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File Tagging File:FS_Redoutable.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FS_Redoutable.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] question (oversight possible)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bistro#Suppresion_de_3_images

Est ce qu'on est bien dans les cas définis pour une action d'oversight? (Effacer un nom de l'historique des descriptions d'un fichier)

Esby (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] dude

in the picture of the blokes wanking each other off, why does one of them have green hair? wtf?

[edit] Need help

Could you help us here, please? --Aboalbiss (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

That is an archive of a discussion of the English Wikipedia. Rama (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Undeletion

FYI, Commons:Undeletion_requests#Two_files.2C_both_American_Govt_files Sherurcij (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:BurjDubaiHeight.svg

Your diagram File:BurjDubaiHeight.svg has been used in a slideshow by the UK newspaper the Daily Telegraph, without proper attribution

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/6662675/A-first-look-inside-Burj-Dubai-the-tallest-skyscraper-in-the-world-as-it-nears-completion.html?image=13

[edit] request

Hello! I know you can't share deleted material, but do you think you could tell me what the source was for this image so I can obtain it myself? I can't read the page since it's deleted. Thanks!! 130.49.5.182 21:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

The original file that was on Commons was taken from the PDF here [15] and rasterised. A small example is on en at en:File:Minarets poster 1.jpg, as fair use. -- Rama (talk) 22:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!130.49.5.182 05:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] FOP The Netherlands

Hello Rama, you deleted a few images from Henri Laurens, Fernand Leger etc. in The Netherlands and elsewhere. Perhaps you don't know or understand that, though the copyright from images is protected by French law, in countries with Freedom of Panorama those rules does not apply. I ask you, as this discussion is held a few times in the past, to undelete them immediately. You have absolutely no right to delete images taken in FOP countries. Read the rules on Wikimedia Commons. Gr. --Gerardus (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

What files are you thinking about? Rama (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
I will look up the File names on nl. wikipedia: Rotterdam and The Hague and Venezuela/Caracas as well:
  • File:Henri Laurens 01.JPG
  • File:Denhaag kunstwerk grande fleur.jpg
  • File:Henri Laurens-L'Amphion-Leger-Bimural 1953.JPG
  • File:L'Amphion at UCV Caracas Venezuela.jpg

This are the ones on my list, but I don't know whether more images were deleted in the same action(?).--Gerardus (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Restored File:Henri Laurens 01.JPG and File:Denhaag kunstwerk grande fleur.jpg. We do not have information about Venezuela, so I am assume the 70-year rule. Rama (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
If you don't have the full info, well do not delete. If you are sure, delete. Venezuela and other South American countries were never a problem, like Spain and Portugal. Where can I find a complete list of your deletions?--Gerardus (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Eh, no, that's the other way around: if you are pretty frigging certain that you have the right to take people's work, do it. Else, don't. You find the list of deletions at [16], of course. Rama (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
You said no info, but Commons:Freedom of Panorama says: VENEZUELA: OK. You have to go to the end of the long list but Venezuela is on it. Please: undelete!--Gerardus (talk) 17:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Ah yes, correct. I got mixed up between COM:L and COM:FOP. My bad. Restoring. Rama (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, but what a problems we get by this thoughtless action. CommonsDeLinker removed all information and I have to reconstruct it all. What a shame! And, I still miss File:FernandLeger02.JPG, what happened to that image. Was that Venezuela as well? Oh boy, what a mess. --Gerardus (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
File:FernandLeger02.JPG is a photographic reproduction of a promotional poster for an exhibit, taken in Switzerland. That surely can't fall under Freedom of Panorama. Rama (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
You're absolutely right, but how could I control that? One question if you were so sure about Venezuela: why only delete French artists?? Are they so special to you that you did not bother the other artists? Strange action from an admin!!!! And not knowing where to find the FOP-regulations. Friendly greetings from,--Gerardus (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kunsthalle Bielefeld.JPG

Hi Rama, in case you delete and (some time later, for whatever reason) undelete a file, could you please check CommonsDelinker's log then and see if you have to revert some of the bot's removals? If you don't do that, usually nobody else on the affected projects notices that a removed file is still/again there. In this case the file was used on Commons (in one gallery) and on de.wikipedia (on 8 pages, including FPC pages), and I only checked the file by accident (and reinstated the image). Thanks --:bdk: 18:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Noted, thank you. Glad we have this file, it is an interesting photograph. Cheers! Rama (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
ok :-) --:bdk: 19:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg

Hello. It was my impression that while almost everything by Duchamp remains under copyright until 70 years after his death, File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg was a different case as the work was created, exibited, photographed, and the photo first published, all in the United States before 1923, and hence US copyright law was applicable. Is there something I missed which required it to be speedy deleted? Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

In doubt, restored. Rama (talk) 19:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. If you think the licnese is questionable or the image may be a problem, I'd suggest listing for deletion discussion. I think this one is ok, but I might be wrong. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Fichiers Bertrand Créac'h

  • 1 décembre 2009 à 17:51 Rama (discuter | contributions) a supprimé « File:Bertrand Créac'h Lavis.jpg » ‎ (Copyright violation)
  • 1 décembre 2009 à 17:51 Rama (discuter | contributions) a supprimé « File:Bertrand Créac'h Enlacement.jpg » ‎ (Copyright violation)

Pourquoi avoir effacé ces fichiers, sans prévenir en plus son créateur, c'est-à-dire moi-même ?... !!! Aucun "copyright violation" puisque et le sculpteur et le photographe (nous habitons à quelques kilomètres...), sont plus que d'accord ! Merci de répondre, et si possible, de remettre en ligne lesdits fichiers (les copyright sous wikimedia commons sont plus qu'obscurs à comprendre... : comment faire ? Plutôt que censurer il serait plus utile de poser les questions au préalable) Alalca (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Il ne s'agit pas de censure, mais de respect des droits d'auteurs -- qui sont définis par les lois nationales et non par Commons. Photographier une oeuvre protégée par le droit d'auteur n'en n'annule pas la protection; aussi, pour la publier sur Commons, l'autorisation de son auteur est-elle indispensable.
L'ayant droit de l'oeuvre originale (i.e. l'auteur ou ses descendants) devrait envoyer un mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org , confirmant son accord. De plus amples informations sont disponibles sur Commons:OTRS/fr, mais je reste à votre disposition le cas échéant.
Bonne continuation. Rama (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Freedom of panorama in Guernsey

Bouônjour! I notice from this edit that an image of a statue of Victor Hugo in Guernsey was deleted by you on the grounds that there is no freedom of panorama in Guernsey. However, COM:FOP#Guernsey clearly shows that Guernsey legislation provides for freedom of panorama. Could you explain, please? Man vyi (talk) 22:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The explanation is simple, I goofed. Restored, sorry. Rama (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for prompt action. Man vyi (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
@Rama: Sorry for insisting on a side issue, but this is what had to be checked after undeletion in this case. I only noted Man vyi doing some of the needed reverts, e.g. here. I later reverted the rest, e.g. there. Well, … especially because you deleted the file ad hoc without any deletion request or so (you decided on your own), it would be very nice if you could take care of required reverts yourself the next time, see also my little request above. --:bdk: 19:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Chicago spire.svg

File deletion warning File:Chicago spire.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

DR04 (talk) 01:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rama"