User talk:Raphael.lorenzeto

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
pt
en-1
es-1



en: Please leave your messages in pt:Usuário Discussão:Raphael.lorenzeto.

pt: Deixe suas mensagens em pt:Usuário Discussão:Raphael.lorenzeto.

Olá Raphael,[edit]

preciso de sua ajuda urgente!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

estou entregando minha dissertação de mestrado e não consegui os mapas das cidades na bahia de cachoeira, são félix , santo amaro, saubara e maragogipe que são meu objeto de pesquisa. vc pode me ajudar? também não sei como usar o mapa disponibilizado. vou tenatar agora. de qualquer forma entre em contato, preciso disso urgente!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! por favor, entre em contato. obrigada.

laraoliv00@yahoo.com.br

atenciosamente,

Lara Oliveira

Image Tagging Image:Brasão Guapiara.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Brasão Guapiara.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo 09:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Sourcing or not[edit]

I disagree: how are we supposed to check that those coats are the right ones if you don't provide a source?

Maybe these very drawings of the coats cannot be copyrighted, but that's not a good reason to not acknowledge their authorship... As you can read here, we must always give description, authorship, source, date and place of creation (if known) and license.

So, would you mind to provide all the missing information? I'm sure the coats are in the public domain and we'll keep them. Regards. --Dodo 13:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey, take it easy! :-) We are not in a hurry or something. Let's see...
  • We don't need to know who was the original author. It seems clear to me that this is not needed because of the Brazilian law mentioned in the license plate. I mean: the coat is going to be under the public domain no matter who its original author was.
  • But to comply with the current policies of Commons, we should supply source (that is always known, right?), author (if not of the original coat design, the author of the uploaded drawing, and of course only if known), date (if known), and so on. The only required information is the source. If the author, date, etc. are unknown, well... fill "unknown" if the proper field of the template and you're done.
  • How can you avoid the deletion of the Brazilian coats? Huh. Who is going to delete them? I mean: you can leave a note or something (at the Category: page or at the VP or somewhere) and supply the needed information about the source and such in a reasonable period of time. Again, we are not in a hurry or something.
  • Yes, that coat of Camberra lacks source, so I have tagged it. But we should worry about the tagging of the Brazilian coats and forget about the other ones. If we tag them right, nobody will complain about them.
Regards. --Dodo 15:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Image-PraiadeNatalRN.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-PraiadeNatalRN.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Zzyzx11 03:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Bandeira[edit]

Acho que nesse caso, nada. Ou procurar outra um pouco diferente e dar cabo nessa (procurei rapidamente no Google e não achei), ou deixar essa em silêncio. Esses sites que protestam por copyright de algo que não é deles... Lugusto҉ 23:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Veja se eram apenas essas três
  1. 19:50, 11 December 2006 (hist) (diff) m Category:Rio de Janeiro (state) (Reverted edits by Juiced lemon (talk) to last version by Raphael.lorenzeto) (top) [rollback]
  2. 19:50, 11 December 2006 (hist) (diff) m Category:Rio de Janeiro (Reverted edits by Juiced lemon (talk) to last version by Raphael.lorenzeto) (top) [rollback]
  3. 19:50, 11 December 2006 (hist) (diff) m Category:Municipalities of Rio de Janeiro (state) (Reverted edits by Juiced lemon (talk) to last version by Raphael.lorenzeto) (top) [rollback]
Lugusto҉ 19:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Rio de Janeiro City and Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil[edit]

Hi,

I'm working on subcategories of Municipalities of Brazil, Maps of Brazil, Coats of arms of Brazil and Flags of Brazil and I didn't understand why you reverted this. The main category should be the state, like Category:São Paulo and Category:São Paulo city. Another thing: There's no logic in "Municipalities of Rio de Janeiro (state)" 'cause obviously all municipalities will be of the state, what I'm trying to say is: the City of Rio de Janeiro has no municipalities, no microregions and no mesoregions. The maps, flags and coats of the city can be placed in "Rio de Janeiro City" and those from others municipalities of the same state can be placed in "[Location maps|Coats of arms|Flags] of municipalities of Rio de Janeiro".

I will apreciate if you could place a note in my talk before reverting my edits.

I'm still learning how to write in English and sorry for any gramatical mistake made here.

Thank you,

Raphael Lorenzetomsg 15:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Just another pair: Category:New York for the state and Category:New York City for the city. Raphael Lorenzetomsg 15:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
In Commons, categories are in English. The reference for place names is the English Wikipedia. As you can see there, São Paulo is the name of the city in English. Therefore, Category:São Paulo is a category for the city, and I'll create a new category for the state. --Juiced lemon 20:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
FYI Juiced lemon is fantasizing. There is no such rule here on Commons. Commons:Language policy specifically says "Wikimedia Commons is a multilingual project" - any language is acceptable. ¦ Reisio 22:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Eu pedi ajuda no #wikimedia-commons sobre o assunto (prefiro deixar para fazer as guerras de edições apenas na Wikipédia hehe) e encontraram estes dois links: User:NielsF/Arbitration e [1]. Infelizmente acho que você vai ter que tentar encontrar outra coisa para fazer no Commons até ele se esquecer dessas categorias, esse é dos que aceitam em categorização só o que aparenta estar certo a ele mesmo (afff). Lugusto҉ 01:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

IMHO que sem dúvida que o que menos está correto é ele. Mas ele já está em outras brigas por conta de categorias e até me parece ser alguém daquele tipo que gosta de apenas brigar (sabe aquele termo em inglês que eu acho melhor não mencionar, ou ele pode entender e ficar mais irritado ainda?). Eu sugeriria deixar ele quieto alguns dias quanto a isso, para ver se ele não encontra o que fazer em outro lugar e para ver como andam as discussões dele com outras pessoas. Por enquanto ele implicou apenas com São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, talvez nem saiba que existem outras vinte e seis unidades da federação e comece a brigar com outro depois disso. Alguns dias não é um mês ou até o mês que vem, e nem necessariamente uma semana. Pode ser três dias, por exemplo. E, reverter é algo bem rápido, se ele destruir eu restauro ;) Lugusto҉ 02:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
"Hi, I could use a little help here. Raphael Lorenzetomsg 23:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)"
As you can see from the rest of User talk:Juiced lemon, he does not respond to reason or even short-term bans. I have found him out and call him on any misinformation I find him posting, so he's taken to deleting my comments from his talk page. So far postings about him at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard have been mostly fruitless, so I continue to simply revert his poor changes; I imagine, however, that if enough users complained, the administrators would do more to keep him in line. ¦ Reisio 14:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Commons rules[edit]

Even though you said that you did not know the Commons rules, you reverted my changes. Do you see where is the problem?

So, stop reverting my edits, and learn the rules. --Juiced lemon 13:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The main rules about categories are Commons:Language policy#Language for categories and Commons:By location category scheme. --Juiced lemon 13:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
States of Brazil have the same treatment than other areas for the naming of categories: the English Wikipedia is the reference, as stated in Commons:By location category scheme.
Commons Wikipedia is a single project with common rules, not a collection of smaller projects in various languages. Therefore, a distinct small group of users cannot state their own rules, unless the Commons community approve them. --Juiced lemon 16:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

US states[edit]

Though I don't live in the United Stated, I have worked on many US state categories and I knew that “New York” and “Washington” were US states, then “New York City” and “Washington, D.C.” were the names of the famous US cities.

You should notice that we had to use parenthesis for the State of Georgia (Category:Georgia (U.S. state)), because Georgia (Category:Georgia) is an Asian country. I created subcategories for both the state and the country, using the standardized forms:

  • Georgia (U.S. state) for the US state
  • Georgia for the country.

So, I regard Brazilian states as much as other states of the world, and I apply to them the same Common rules. --Juiced lemon 17:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Eu preciso desesperadamente de ajuda: Juiced lemon (talk · contribs)[edit]

Esteve eu olhando o problema, mas para mim é dificílimo por dois motivos: o meu nível de inglês é muito baixo e, ademais, não compreendo muito bem a estrutura das categorias das páginas brasileiras (nem as portuguesas). Creio que User:555, administrador brasileiro, estará em melhores condições para actuar do que eu posso estar. Agradeceria que se pusesse em contacto com ele. Eu mesmo vou comunicar com ele--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 17:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Brazilian states[edit]

The article Rio de Janeiro has always concerned the city. See [2]. São Paulo was initially an article about the city, then user:Jurema Oliveira moved it. So, I have only restored the previous situation, after some users, in particular user:FML and user:Jurema Oliveira, put the mess with Brazilian place names.

You have informed me about 2 other anomalies regarding Brazilian states. However, I think these cases are not a matter of urgency, so you can yourself take care of them for the moment.

Finally, I also noticed you operate a bot which notably moves location maps. So, you could be interested in this talk in the village pump. --Juiced lemon 11:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Mapas vetoriais georreferenciados?[edit]

Olá Raphael,

Desenvolvo o site http://dataipso.utopia.com.br/ e estamos tentando agregar funcionalidades de mapas para o site. Para isso, queremos colocar no nosso banco de dados os polígonos de municípios, microrregiões e estados de acordo com o padrão OpenGIS.

Precisamos de um shapefile ou formato equivalente de todos os municípios do Brasil. Você sabe onde podemos conseguir?

Obrigado, Luis


Image Tagging Image:MinasGerais_Municip_Itaipe.svg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MinasGerais_Municip_Itaipe.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. odder 07:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


Image:MinasGerais_Municip_Divinopolis.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MinasGerais_Municip_Divinopolis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

200.155.107.194 13:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Tags do Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Olá,

Diversos mapas presentes no Commons estão com mensagem sobre a padronização de mapas na Wikipedia lusófona. Pelo que compreendo, a Wikimedia Commons não deve seguir padrões da Wikipedia lusófona. Peço que você confirme isto e remova os comentários do Commons.

Obrigado,

BTW, mova os mapas para pt.wiki, caso necessário.


Image:MinasGerais Municip Divinopolis.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MinasGerais Municip Divinopolis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(deletion fix) --Deadstar 07:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Mapa da Microrregião de Guanhães.[edit]

Saudações wikipedianas!! Favor verificar a possibilidade de mover a imagem Image:MinasGerais Micro Guanhares.svg para MinasGerais Micro Guanhaes, ou seja, na grafia correta. Um abraço!!!--Conrado 13:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Mapas do Pernambuco[edit]

Oi!
Não tem ainda nehum mapa do estado de Pernambuco. Para quando ? Abraço, FrancoBras 10:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC).


Image:Bahia_Micro_Guanambi.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Bahia_Micro_Guanambi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

201.92.158.20 17:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:MinasGerais_Municip_PiedadedoRioGrande.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MinasGerais_Municip_PiedadedoRioGrande.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

200.217.84.244 21:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Brazil_Region_Nordeste.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Brazil_Region_Nordeste.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

200.201.112.32 15:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


Image:MinasGerais_Meso_CentralMineira.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:MinasGerais_Meso_CentralMineira.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

97.33.1.159 15:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Raphael.lorenzeto!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

oi[edit]

vc poderia me dizer como fazer os mapas, eu queria fazer um com as subdivisões de Pernambuco mais especificadamente para o município de Goiana, ou vc faz ou me diz como fazer, por favor, me ajude, a Wikimedia está precisando um pouco de mapas,

Agradece, Mauro Costa (talk) 03:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Translation of DerivativeMaps[edit]

Here's an English translation of User:Raphael.lorenzeto/DerivativeMaps. Please consider adding it to that template. Thank you. 68.165.77.243 03:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

English: Feel free to create derivatives of this work, but if you want to illustrate a Wikipedia article with a statement such as "city / metropolitan area in focus" please carefully follow the visual pattern, nomenclature and classification used here because all the maps subdivisions of Brazil are in the process of adapting or being created in this way. We do not want to inhibit creativity but the standard adopted here was presented and accepted by the Lusófona (Portuguese-speaking) community and must be followed whenever possible.

Bairros de Viamão[edit]

Estou tentando fazer mapas dos bairros da cidade de Viamão. Poderias me ajudar a faze-los dentro do padrão estabelecido pelo Commons? Este foi minha primeira tentativa File:Mapa Bairro Viamópolis.JPG. Se puder indicar um programa e um tutorial seria ótimo.Desde já, grato.--Paulo rsmenezes (talk) 13:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

File:SaoPaulo Meso Aracatuba.svg[edit]

Could you adjust the color of this map as you have already did for the others Mesorregião? Thanks, --Andyrom75 (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2014 (UTC)