User talk:Rasbak

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi. Could you add copyright tags to the images you uploaded (Image:Sterappel dwarsdrsn.jpg)? For now I have tagged your images as "Unknown". If there are no tags, the images may have to be deleted. It is also necessary to link all your images to a Commons page or to add them to category pages. Thanks. villy 20:13, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)


regarding Image:Eichenprozessionsspinner meyers 1888.jpg: please alwys copy all imformation about an image when you copy it to the commons. Local copies of images may be deleted and thus information obout the source etc. may be lost. Also, regarding this specific image, you used the wrong license: images from Mayers are PD, you can not make them GFDL (which would not make sense anyway as the original author is unknown). -- Duesentrieb 15:57, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

About Image:MetaseqLeaves.jpg: please note that the GFDL requires the author of the image to be mentioned - please provide that info. A link to the wiki you copied the image from is not sufficient, because the image may get deleted there. -- Duesentrieb 10:16, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

dito: please compare Image:Maybug.jpg - you allways have to provide a link to the autor and to copy the history if you´re uploading images from other users:
  • copy full original german info text, translate it if you want
  • link the german user page of the photographer with [[:de:Benutzer:XYZ|XYZ]]
  • copy the history: e.g. first upload at de.wikipedia 22:06, 7. Mai 2004
Thanks --:Bdk: 22:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

Image:Pinus sylvestris1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for improving it! (I am not too good at picture editing :-) MPF 11:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Paulownia fortunei[edit]

Thanks for improving the two pics. I deleted the originals. You may use the same pic names upload to cover them--Fanghong 00:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vicia[edit]

Hello Rasbak! Both your images Image:Heggenwikke Vicia sepium.jpg and Image:Heggenwikke bloem Vicia sepium.jpg do not show Vicia sepium. Their correct ID is Vicia sativa. The leaves of Vicia sepium have a different shape, it has a higher number of flowers per inflorescence and the calyx teeth are much shorter. Best wishes --Franz Xaver 19:07, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your corrections. I am very obligedRasbak 19:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Goodyera repens[edit]

Hi Rasbak. You brightened Image:399px-Goodyera repens.jpg, which is a thumbnail of Image:Goodyera repens.jpeg. Could you re-do your work, starting with the 533px version? Just upload it on top of Goodyera_repens.jpeg. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 22:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

papiervlekken[edit]

Your picture titled papiervlekken shows white spots which are definitely not related to Phytophthora porri, but almost surely indicate inbreeding.

thanks for the information.Rasbak 15:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Your untagged images Commons:Untagged_images#R[edit]

Hi Rasbak, under untagged images there are around 15 untagged photos of yours. Could you please go there and apply the license {{GFDK}}, please, and the other information. Greetings, Longbow4u 18:24, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

uitnodiging[edit]

Hallo Rasbak

Ik wil je graag uitnodigen voor het meest uitdagende project van de hele wikimedia: Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 20:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Chervil[edit]

I am pretty sure that the picture in the chervil article does not show chervil but cicely. Are you aware of the differences between these two plants? 84.189.192.133 21:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your remarks. I am sure that the picture is chervil.Rasbak 09:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Purpersteeltje (Ceratodon purpureus).jpg[edit]

I have re-uploaded Image:Purpersteeltje (Ceratodon purpureus).jpg as Image:Tortula_muralis1.jpg and added the old filename to the Template:Deletion requests. Thank you for changing the article in the nederlands wikipedia. --Mbc 18:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the repairing of my mistake. Rasbak 19:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello Rasbak,

my name is Ulf Dahl and I work for the east-german newspaper called "Freie Presse". I urgently need a teff-gras picture which you gave to wikimedia. I like to download it and print it on a page we call "Ratgeber" which givwes advises to our readers- sorry my english ist very bad! Is it allowed to use the picture ?

Please answer soon, because we need it within the next days.

Thank you very much.

Sincerly yours

Ulf Dahl

Freie Presse Brückenstraße 15 D-09111 Chemnitz Tel: +49 371/ 656-10420 Mobile:+49 151 14 81 72 79

Sehr geehrter Ulf Dahl, Sie können meine Bilder von Teff brauchen wie sie wollen. Bitte vermelden Sie auf jedes Fall http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teff und Rasbak.Rasbak 15:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Fruchtknoten_Mittelständig.jpg.jpg[edit]

Hello, and thank you for uploading your files to Wikimedia Commons. There seems to be some license information missing regarding this particular file, however. Could you please fix this? Thank you--Orgullomoore 12:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rostblättrige_Alpenrose.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

House mouse photo[edit]

Are you sure that house mouse in the photo (at the heading of the Russian-language article) is a house mouse or a white-footed mouse? It looks a bit more like a white-foot or perhaps a deer mouse to me. But then I'm not quite a mouse expert. ;)

The photo was taken in the Netherlands where no white-footed mouse or deere mouse lives. Yes it is a hous mouse.Rasbak 11:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Es mannelijke bloeiwijze (Fraxinus excelsior male inflorescense).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Es mannelijke bloeiwijze (Fraxinus excelsior male inflorescense).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Verkeerde benaming afbeeldingen[edit]

Dag Rasbak, zou je in het vervolg afbeeldingen die je onder een foute naam hebt geüpload willen voorzien van het sjabloon {{badname|naam van het goede bestand.xxx}} ipv deze op Commons:Verwijderverzoeken te zetten? Deze pagina is er alleen voor "ingewikkelde" verwijderverzoeken. Door plaatsing van het sjabloon komt de afbeelding in een categorie gezet die door moderatoren wordt nagelopen. Alvast bedankt! Groet, NielsF 20:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Moving images from de:Wikipedia to the Commons Image:Schnittlauch.jpg[edit]

Hello Rasbak, thank you for moving images from the German Wikipedia to Commons. Please remeber that there are some rules which have to be observed. If the needed information is not present on Commons the image can not be deleted in the German Wikipedia.
In general, be careful to preserve all of the information available about the image, always copy the image description and state who created the image. The [1] will create a full summary that you can copy and paste into the Commons upload page. Please review the created summary and correct manually if necessary. Thanks --gildemax 10:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Lythrum portula[edit]

Hi Rasbak, there is a wrong determination or naming in your pictures! Please see my remarks here: Talk:Lythrum_portula. -- Greetings, Fice 10:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your remark. The right determination is Callitriche platycarpa.Rasbak 13:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Harskampermolen_Mariana.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 16:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Komkommer_valse_meeldauw_(Pseudoperonospora_cubensis_on_Cucumis_sativus).jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks for organizing my files...[edit]

Hello, I am happy that you observed I prepared everything to organize my Vanessa atalanta files yesterday...It is cool from you to do the cut and past wotk for me.... By the way, who are you, I feel you have some skill in biology according to your galleries... you can find some information about me on my page User:Emmanuel.boutet... see you soon. bla --Emmanuel Boutet 10:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Emmanuel, I am a Dutch plantbreeder with interest in biology mostly wild plants and cultivated crops.Rasbak 10:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait please![edit]

Dear Rasbak, thank you so for classifying my unknown flowers. I'm really very glad about your help. But I'll load them up under the genus name as soon as I know it. If you like to help me, add those "right names" to the description, maybe too the categories, and I'll upload it again with all informations I got. :o) --Wildfeuer 20:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello Rasbak, thank you for classifying Sonchus oleraceus. I uploaded it again under this name. May I ask you for more help? here are all my pictures of those plants I’m not able to classify myself. I asked Franz Xaver for help, because I didn’t know another one who could do this. But he is very very busy everywhere. So, would you like to help us classifying those plants? I would be very pleased about this. Greetings from Germany --Wildfeuer 22:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I will do my best. But classifying from photo without description is often difficult.~~
And I will do my best describing my unknown plants in english. This is pretty difficult to me. I'll try next days. (Where’s my dictionary?!) Please excuse me, if I'm accidentally impolite talking to you.
I own this plant Image:2006-10-16-Salvia8.jpg and think it's Salvia patens. Do you agree? I have some more pics here on my picture page. Thanx for all and kindly regards --Wildfeuer 23:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Potamogeton_crispus_pocr3_003_pvd.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 14:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorbus aucuparia[edit]

Hi there, I may want to use the image Image:Sorbus aucuparia Wilde lijsterbes bloeiwijze.jpg in my diploma thesis. I will publish my work under a creative commons license, which is not compatible with GFDL. Would you consider adding a CC license to this image? That would be a great help! Thanks&bye --Lode (Messages) 10:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

  • No problem. See image.Rasbak 12:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. The next problem: I will not use a ShareAlike license. Could you consider granting me the right to publish this picture in my thesis under CC-BY-NC OR change the license tag to a non-ShareAlice license? That would be great. --Lode (Messages) 08:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

    • No problem. See image.Rasbak 08:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:V2-Air-Force-Eastern-Test-Range-1950-2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2-Air-Force-Eastern-Test-Range-1950-2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Source with URL added and delete-notice removed - Robotje 11:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:V2-wiki-1.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2-wiki-1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:V2rampedelancement.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2rampedelancement.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

bugs and weeds[edit]

Great to see someone else shares my interests! I'm working on a gardening book on en.wikibooks (b:en:A Wikimanual of Gardening)... it's all in English, but you might get a kick out of it (use the categories to find the pest insects and weeds). Do you do any work on nl.wikibooks?--SB_Johnny|talk|books 20:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for informing me. I have made a lot of pictures about vegetable gardening and I started with the book Plantkunde (see http://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Plantkunde). If you need some pictures please inform me, may be I can help you.Rasbak 16:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Engerling1.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Engerling1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yann 12:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Please upload a better resolution if it is your image. Regards, Yann 12:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry but I have no better resolution of this young tiny larva. Older larva with better resolution you can find in Image:Meikeverlarven (Melolontha melolontha).jpg on commons.Rasbak 16:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Licensing[edit]

Hoi Rasbak, could you please adapt the licenses when you upload images by other users? "self" is wrong then as you, being the new uploader, have not made the images by yourself. Also a link to the author's user page is always recommended. See [2] for what has to be changed. Hope this helps :-) --Überraschungsbilder 09:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cercidiphyllum japonicum05s3200.jpg[edit]

I appreciate your compensation. It became a beautiful photograph by your favor. Thanks. However, it returned to the original version. I want to express a plain atmosphere in dark woods. Please do not worsen mind. (Being awkward English I am sorry.) --663highland 00:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:TurkanaboyV.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:TurkanaboyV.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Locutus Borg 23:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


Image:Main page commons.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Main page commons.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Siebrand 07:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Semi-random Corylus avellana links on my uploaded pictures?[edit]

Not complaining per se, but can you let me know what you intend by putting a context-free link on the image page under licensing that points to the wikilink page for Corylus avellana? Wouldn't it be a better idea to simply link to my images in the Corylus avellana page and be done with it? I'd understand it if you added a Category tag to the image, but I don't understand the isolated link text. Can you explain? I'll not do anything about those links for now, but would appreciate you cleaning it up if that's not what you intended.

Thanks. --Malcolm Gin 17:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry to upset you. That was sure not my intention. I put the link to the Corylus avellana page and put the pictures in the gallery, because then you can linked to all the pictures of Corylus avellana in commons with the tag {{commons|Corylus avellana}} or {{commonscat|Corylus avellana}}. For instance see the bottom line of the Dutch page of nl:Corylus avellana.Rasbak 16:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Crategus[edit]

Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC. is not present in Sicily ! --Esculapio 23:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok. But it is not monogyna. Is it may be a Crataegus azarolus?Rasbak 06:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Wild rice[edit]

Hi, thanks for categorising my two wild rice images. I know we're supposed to add our images to categories, so that other people can find them, but it was very late in my time zone, and I wasn't sure where to look for appropriate categories, so I just added the image to the wild rice article at en, intending to come back later and find categories. I've now added one of the images to the article at fr as well. Thanks for saving me a bit of extra work. ElinorD 21:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Juncus_tenuis_seeds_jute_005_pvp.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


Image:Thymus serpyllum2.JPG (and 2)[edit]

You said it isnt Thymus serpyllum, and I was a bit unsure too, but do you know what it is? If I get the name of the flower I will upload them again with the right name. //moralist 14:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't know this flower. It looks like a member of the Caryophyllaceae.Rasbak 14:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
What about Saponaria? It was the flower in the Caryophyllaceae family that looked like it most. //moralist 15:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
It is possible. But to be sure you have to check also the leaves.Rasbak 15:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I put it under the Category:Unknown flowers, so that somone who knows the flower can mark it. //moralist 15:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Red clover[edit]

Hi, i'm sorry about my misteak. I did the change has you can see here. Do you know the name in french? Thanks. CaptainHaddock 04:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Trèfle des prés Rasbak 05:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hi Rasbak,

thanks a lot for your modifications on my pictures. Whoooo, there is so much to do in wikicommons: articles, categoris, taxonavigation.

Cheers, Liné1 19:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you very much for helping name my flower (Dianthus alpinus)! Best wishes --Beyond silence 07:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

And more thanks for the same favor, this time from Bulgaria :) Neva 12:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


You're too quick![edit]

Hi Rasbak, please give me at least half a day to put my fresh uploaded images to the right places. It's very confusing when you put them to galleries (and there to wrong places) while I'm working on them! Thanks. Ies 08:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Categorisering molens[edit]

Dag Rasbak, je maakt mooie foto's en detailopnames van molens, ik geniet er van, terwijl ik de categorisering van molends bijwerk. Wil je de foto's in Category:Windmills in Gelderland nakijken, of je nog categoriewijzigingen of toevoegingen wenst? In principe gaat een foto alleen in een subcategorie, niet in de bovenliggende categorie. Wat vind je ervan, je fotoseries van molens in en bij Ede ook onder de category:mill work te plaatsen omdat ze er dan opvallender als serie detailfoto's uitspringen. Ook andere categoriesuggesties zijn welkom. Groeten Havang 12:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Wissinks Möl ligt in Overijssel. Verder vind ik het een prima idee om de series in de categorie mill work te plaatsen eventueel onderverdeeld naar type molen, zoals standerdmolen, bovenkruier, poldermolen, oliemolen, watermolen.Rasbak 17:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Ik kan die nadere indeling in molentype niet maken, maar als jij die mogelijkheid wel hebt, prima. Naast de fysieke categorieen:windmolen, watermolen, tredmolen, wind generator zijn er de toepassingscategorieen: meelmolen, oliemolen, zaagmolen, pulp en papiermolen. Dat zijn dan wel parallelle categorieën, die niet naar land hoeven te worden uitgesplitst (behalve als ze nog niet in een andere categorie naar land zijn ingedeeld), lijkt me, maar wel opgenomen moeten worden in de hoofdcategorie category:mills. Overigens ligt er nog een klus m.b.t. Category:Wind park, category:wind generators categorie:windturbines, dat zijn er ook al zo'n 400 die ingedeeld zouden kunnen worden naar land; maar na een week categoriseren wil ik eventjes weer andere dingen doen. Het was wel leerzaam en met die foto's erbij leuk om te doen. Ik zal voortaan af en toe naar de molencategorieën kijken. Ken je de category-tree? Bekijk die maar eens.Groeten Havang 19:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Dag Rasbak, inderdaad, mill work was niet zo'n fraaie benaming. Een betere was al windmill parts, ik heb mill work en windmill parts nu vervangen door één category:Mill parts (alle items zijn ook onder windmolen dus daar is geen onduidelijkheid over en bijv molenstenen zitten ook in watermolens) en die categorie geplaatst onder Category:Molinology en onder Category:Equipment. Jouw molenfoto's kunnen straks dan vanuit drie category-trees gevonden worden. Ik heb een verzoek: als er meer dan 3 à 5 foto's van één molen zijn, kun je die molen het beste een eigen [[:categorie:Template:Plaatsnaam, Template:Molennaam]] geven en dan die categorie (maar niet tevens de individuele fotos) onderbrengen in hogere categorieën. Kijk bijv. bij Category:Lienden, molen de Zwaan. Er zijn enige onderdelen waar de molen niet bij genoemd is; het zou leuk zijn om daar de naam van de molen nog bij te hebben. Groeten, Havang 14:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Making images brighter[edit]

I appreciate that you're trying to make images more legible, but your changes to Image:Cannon Beach 02.jpg and Image:USS Hornet (CV-12) stern.JPG, for example, did not make those look better so I have reverted to the originals. Your edits altered the images' color balance, removed much of the tonal range, and made the pixellation more obvious. Simply boosting the contrast or brightness of an image, instead of adjusting the levels, throws all of the image's other qualities off in this manner. Postdlf 14:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pinus_sylvestris_shelfs.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Making image brighter[edit]

The original image Image:Ribes_sanguineum_B.jpg was indeed quite dark, but your brighter image I found very flat. I uploaded a new version which shows in my opinion the right colors. I use an Apple cinema display, which I calibrated. Groeten Wouter 12:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Maiskuil.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 15:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Image Tagging Image:Ede1_Doesburger_molen.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ede1_Doesburger_molen.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Dolcegab Sommer2004.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dolcegab Sommer2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--User:G.dallorto 21:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wilno 046.JPG.jpg[edit]

Hello Rasbak, could you please categorize this image. I intended to spend a category to it, but didn't know, what is shown there... :o( Kindly regards, --Wildfeuer 03:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ruppia_maritima_fruits_ruma5_003_php.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 09:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Mus Musculus-huismuis.jpg[edit]

Hi!

There has been continuing doubt about this really being a house mouse. Probably it’s a wood mouse (bosmuis). This is especially delicate because of the enormous popularity of the picture, and even the filename would have to be changed …

Greetings --Quilbert 14:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Aditionally: where and when did you get this picture? Do you have additional pictures of this animal? Greetings, --Accipiter 19:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I took this picture unther the roof tiles of my house in the Netherlands on 4th August 2004. Rasbak 17:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
See also Mus Musculus-huismuis zijaanzicht.jpgRasbak 18:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wapen van Barneveld.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Wapen van Barneveld.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Agrostis photos[edit]

Hi. I think your photo of A. tenuis (now A. capillaris) Image:Gewoon_struisgras_bloeiwijze_Agrostis_tenuis.jpg is actually of Poa trivialis. Perhaps you could check the ID. --78.16.12.30 12:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I am 100% sure that it is Agrostis tenuis. Rasbak 13:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Rollcloud.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Rollcloud.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-TheDJ 10:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Integraalgordel.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Plan palette-europe.gif[edit]


Could you please specify where this image comes from? There is a major mistake in it: the height is NOT 166mm but 144!----cmos 12:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/PalletRasbak (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amaril.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


Image:Kwarts1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


Image:Poldermolen_met_vijzel.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Poldermolen_met_vijzel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Multichill (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

use of images[edit]

Dear Rasbak, I am writing to ask about the use of an image of yours from Wikimedia. I am working for a non-commercial biodiversity group “Biochange” in Ireland, making a web-based identification key of the plants of West Ireland. We would like to have images of plants next to their text descriptions.

I wanted to use some of your images from Wikimedia (Humulus lupulus female inflorescence, Panistaca sativa flowering plant and Rorippa microphylla inflorescence and leaves). These are accompanied by a GNU licence. In this licence it states that any “derivatives to be available under the same license”. Our identification key will be freely available for the public to use, however for various reasons I am unable to release it under a Creative Commons / GNU licence. Would you be able to grant me permission to use this image in the identification key nonetheless? (I would of course attribute it appropriately and the GNU licence would accompany the picture).

It would be very valuable for us if I could use these images as they are of plants I have not yet been able to find to photograph.

Yours sincerely

Chloé Galley

  • Please use the pictures as you like. I have no problems with your proposal.Rasbak ( ) 17:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Hippuris vulgaris seeds hivu2 005 php.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hippuris vulgaris seeds hivu2 005 php.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Papaver somniferum seeds paso2 002 php.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Papaver somniferum seeds paso2 002 php.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

|Description=Papaver somniferum seeds

|Source=http://plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?keywordquery=Papaver+somniferum&mode=sciname&submit.x=11&submit.y=5 |Date= |Author=Steve Hurst |Permission=http://plants.usda.gov/java/usageGuidelines?imageID=paso2_002_ahp.tif |other_versions= }} This image is not copyrighted and may be freely used for any purpose. Please credit the artist, original publication if applicable, and the USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. The following format is suggested and will be appreciated:

Steve Hurst @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database

If you cite PLANTS in a bibliography, please use this citation: USDA, NRCS. 2007. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 7 July 2007). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.


Licensing[edit]

Public domain This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright.

Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See 206.02(b) of Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.


Please read nextime better. You see above clearly that the image is in the Public domain.Rasbak (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Callitriche palustris cave2 001 php.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:DNA structuur1.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:DNA structuur1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 15:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Molen_De_Koe_Ermelo_romp_met_bovenas.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Molen_De_Koe_Ermelo_romp_met_bovenas.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Sterkebaktalk 18:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I have already send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

with a copy of the file link.Rasbak (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, ik zie nu pas dat je nederlands bent.. Ik haal sjabloon weg voor je. Zou je de volgende keer even {{OTRS-pending}} erop willen zetten. Dan weet je gelijk zeker dat hij niet genomineerd word. Groetjes, Sterkebaktalk 18:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Walderveense_molen_regulateur.jpg[edit]

Hi, your picture of a governor seems to be the only one depicting a windmill governor. Have you got a date of installation for the governor? I am asking this, because it would be nice to actually have a picture of a pre-steam-engine/pre-James-Watt governor for the governor article. Thanks for your help. --DrJunge (talk) 08:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

This one is from 1912 but I have read somewhere that in an english museum it was stated that the first governor way before the steam-engine was found in a windmill. Unfortunately I don't know anymore which museum it was.Rasbak (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I just thought I got an easy find of a poof. Thanks for the quick reply. --DrJunge (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Rasbak!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes the category disappear during uploading. I assume this is an error in the software. By the way I find the uploading sheet very unfriendly specially when I have to upload more images. Rasbak (talk) 07:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Klin.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Apodemus sylvaticus bosmuis.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Apodemus sylvaticus bosmuis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Tryphon (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Is this a joke? It is very clearly that I take the picture and I licend it as GFDL.Rasbak (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
May be you ment File:Mousjje.jpg Rasbak (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Luftmassenmesser und Luftfilterkasten VW Golf TDI-ARL.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


The quality of the chemical structure Image:Base pair hydrogen bonding.jpg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Base pair hydrogen bonding.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker  21:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


File:PBMonozyt.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:PBMonozyt.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jappalang (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Helleborus_viridis3.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helleborus_viridis3.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Original book source: Prof. Dr. Otto Wilhelm Thomé Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 1885, Gera, Germany Rasbak (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Categorie[edit]

Rasbak, bedankt voor het categoriseren van mijn foto deze. Hoop dat ik nog op je kennis mag beroep doen :-) Groet en zalig Pasen! Paul Hermans (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Graag gedaan.Rasbak (talk) 12:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Rasbak, nog eens bedankt voor je hulp. Wil je dit eens bekijken? Groet Paul Hermans (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Image transfer[edit]

Hello Rasbak!

If you transfer images from another Wikimedia project, like en.wikipedia to Commons please use the CommonsHelper tool with which you can easily transfer images. Advantageous is that no information of the original image gets lost, especially the revision history of the image or its source. Thank you very much with the best regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

That is too difficult for me. Rasbak (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Your copyrihts may be violated[edit]

Please take a look at this. --ST 15:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Could I use your photo for a medicinal plant guidebook I am making? I am a student from the States and it is part of my project. I would site you of course. Please let me know!

No problem. Please mention also the licence GFDL.Rasbak (talk) 06:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Gras[edit]

Hi Rasbak, thank You for help + specifications. Greatings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Hotelschakeling.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Hotelschakeling.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Molen Het Noorden, Texel, wiek vastgelegd.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Molen Het Noorden, Texel, wiek.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Walderveense molen sneeuw (2).jpg[edit]

Een hele mooie sfeerfoto, collega! groet, MartinD (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:De Hoop Garderen.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:De Hoop Garderen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

---- Deadstar (msg) 12:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Walderveense molen sneeuw (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walderveense molen sneeuw (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

renamen van een category[edit]

Hoi Rasbak, renamen van een category gaat handiger via {{move|category:newname|<reason>}}. Akoopal (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Love the picture of Ede in the snow. I went there as a 17 year old in 1981. It is lovely to see it again! Thank you!

Not Myodes glareolus[edit]

Hello Rasbak, you have many nice pictures. But your «Rosse woelmuis Myodes glareolus.jpg» is belonging somewhere else, this must be from the Muridae family and certainly not a Myodes. I think this is a Apodemus, probably Apodemus sylvaticus as flavicollis is not common found in the Netherlands. Could you move this to the correct place or delete it and put it back with a correct name? Magne Flåten (talk) 16:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your remark. I have change the name in Apodemus sylvaticus bosmuis dood.jpg and reupload it.Rasbak (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token c63acebf7ee4b98759b9a7a9d1a6371c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Xanthomonas populi op Populus spp.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Xanthomonas populi op Populus spp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard the Bard 13:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Xanthomonas populi op Populus tremula.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | 中文 | +/−

--KTo288 (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo[edit]

Hello Rasbak,

My name is Rita. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photos we would like to use, for free, are the following:

apodemus sylvaticus - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mus_Musculus-huismuis_zijaanzicht.jpg apodemus sylvaticus -http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apodemus_sylvaticus_bosmuis.jpg CROSSIDURA RUSSULA - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crocidura_russula_%28Huisspitsmuis%29.jpg Robinia pseudoacacia - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robinia_(Robinia_pseudoacacia).jpg

If you provide us these photos, we will refer your name in the bibliografy, just like we do with the other photographers and we need to know if Rasbak its the name you want we refer on the route bibliography?

If you could, please respond to: rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt

Thank you very much.

Best Regards.

Rita Neves

Several misidentified images[edit]

Dear Rasbak,

your images File:Trifolium dubium inflorescence, kleine klaver bloeiwijze.jpg, File:Trifolium dubium inflorescence, kleine klaver plant (1).jpg, File:Trifolium dubium inflorescence, kleine klaver plant (2).jpg and File:Trifolium dubium inflorescence, kleine klaver plant.jpg show Medicago lupulina, not Trifolium dubium. This is easily recognizable from the typical bent fruits of the plant, which are visible on some of the images, and also from the typical Medicago tips visible in some of the leaves. In addition, the flower pedicels of Trifolium dubium are somewhat longer than those of Medicago lupulina. Therefore the inflorescence of Trifolium dubium looks somewhat less dense (as in File:TrifoliumDubium-bloem-hr.jpg, which shows actual Trifolium dubium). By the way: File:Trifolium_dubium_seeds,_kleine_klaver_zaden.jpg should be Medicago lupulina as well. I am not sure about File:Trifolium_dubium_seeds,_kleine_klaver_zaden_(1).jpg, but if these are the seeds from the Medicago fruits, then they are also misidentified.

Best regards, Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

  • I have changed the names. Thank you for your remarks.Rasbak (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Gnomonia leptostyla on Juglans regia Buccaneer (1).jpg[edit]

Hi, your picture is used in a german magazine

-- Cherubino (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Vielen Dank.Rasbak (talk) 06:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Swtgrs.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Swtgrs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vearthy (talk) 20:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Image use[edit]

Hi

We are writing a book on spices and herbs.

The title is “Krydderleksikon med urter og smakstilsetninger” (Encyclopedia of spices and herbs). Print run is 5000 copies and the book will be published in May this year. It will be illustrated with photos of all the plants.

Most of the photos are already provided for but we still miss some picture.

We have found your photo of Glechoma hederacea on the Internet and we wonder if you kindly will let us use the photo in our book.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glechoma_hederacea,_Hondsdraf.jpg

For more information about us and the book please contact us on: post(a)vegaforlag.no - www.vegaforlag.no

Best regards Gitte

  • You may freely use this photo in your book.Rasbak (talk) 07:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Heme_A.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Heme_A.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cellobiose_chaise.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cellobiose_chaise.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Xanthomonas_populi_op_Populus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Xanthomonas_populi_op_Populus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

innotata 22:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Plio/Pleistoceengrens[edit]

Beste Rasbak, Ik zie dat je een Nederlandse versie van Hominin_species.png hebt aangemaakt. Het heeft wel niets met de taal te maken maar misschien is het zinvol om de Plio-Pleistoceen grens op de juiste plaats te zetten. Deze grens ligt niet (meer) bij 1.8 maar bij 2.588 Ma. Vriendelijke groet, Tom Meijer (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:VitaminC.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:VitaminC.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Ranunculus_repens image[edit]

Hi Rasbak

could you contact me via the e-mail on my user page regarding use of your image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kruipende_boterbloem_bloem_(Ranunculus_repens).jpg


Ringpicker (talk) 09:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for the reply, I was hoping to get to you by email as I need a higher resolution copy than that on commmons

rgds Ringpicker (talk) 08:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Tuinboon zaden in peul.jpg[edit]

Hi again Rasbak

just checking that it is okay to use this image

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuinboon_zaden_in_peul.jpg

for Cheryll's book

I will advise when it is published and if I can get an email for you I will send pdf copies of relevant pages

rgds Ringpicker (talk) 04:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Molen De Hoop, Zierikzee maalkoppel balanceerrijn (1).jpg and others[edit]

Hello Rasbak!

First of all, thank you for your contributions!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of "Rasbak (talk) 15:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)". This is essential for keeping this image on Commons because this shows explicitly that this photograph is your own work.

Thanks in advance for your support. --High Contrast (talk) 10:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand the problem. When I use the uploader it insert Own work (bron) and Rasbak (Auteur). I have this done for thousands of photographs and never got complains.Rasbak (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Name for a photo[edit]

Hello! I needed some photos for a book that I'm doing at the work, and I chose on of yours (this one). It could be possible to know your real name to put it in the attributions' page? (it's a kind of book where it looks far better a complete name&surname than an user name). Thank you anyway, -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

  • My name is J.(Jan) J. Bakker.Rasbak (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 12:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Used your media file[edit]

This is a courtesy note. One of your media files is featured in a new commercial eBook in Apple’s iBooks store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs/id497852225?mt=11

I’ve contributed images to Wikipedia for over seven years now (including several POTD and Featured Images) and I designed the WikiSpecies logo. I respect your work here and the CC-BY-SA license we all labor under.

I know commercializing Wikipedia work is tricky and so I’ve taken great pains to follow your CC-BY-SA license requirements. I also plan to donate 10% of my proceeds to the Wikimedia Foundation directly. This is the very first self-published e-book created with Apple’s new tools and sold in the store.

I’ve given your file a credit line in the “Image and Video Credits” section starting at page 24 as required here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License

This compilation features many of the finest Wikipedia media files in their exact form and not as derivative works. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL#Making_verbatim_copies_of_images

If I did alter your work -- such as cutting out an insect part or adding a video sound track -- I shared a Share Alike version of the new media in a DRM-free format and listed the web address in the credits section.

Thank you very much for uploading your work to Wikipedia and releasing it for the world to use in enriching educational formats.

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp

Location?[edit]

Hi Rasbak - could you add a location to File:Klimop bloeiend (Hedera helix) (2).jpg please? (and for any other plant images without locations, too!). Is it natural, or cultivated? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Also this one, this one, and this one, please! - MPF (talk) 08:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Gallussaeure.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gallussaeure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

More locations, please! ;-)[edit]

File:Athene noctua, steenuil.jpg, File:Athene noctua, steenuil (1).jpg - Thanks, MPF (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi Rasbak!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your Wikimedia Commons page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your Wikimedia Commons nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.

The 5 photos which I would use are: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bitterzoet_Solanum_dulcamara.jpg http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Asperge_planten_Asparagus_officinalis.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poa_pratensis_(Veldbeemdgras).jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gewoon_roodzwenkgras_Festuca_rubra_var._commutata.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lolium_perenne_Engels_raaigras.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com

Bye, Edoardo

Edoardo.bit (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I give you permission to use my pictures for your book. Success.Rasbak (talk) 09:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Knikmops fabrikant De Schans.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Knikmops fabrikant De Schans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Knikmopsfactory (talk) 12:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

==

File:Knikmops fabrikant De Schans.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Knikmops fabrikant De Schans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Knikmopsfactory (talk) 13:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC) ==

Er staat een fout in uw artikel. De Schans is niet de fabrikant van Knikmops, enkel de verdeler ( importeur ) voor Nederland. De enige fabrikant is Gebr. Geens N.V. uit Hoogstraten, België

Myrrhis not Anthriscus cerefolium[edit]

Hi! Long time ago you uploaded the following photos:

As far as I can see, this plant is Myrrhis odorata, not Anthriscus cerefolium. The fruits are too big and to strongly ribbed for Anthriscus. Although having been uploaded at different times, I suppose all four photos belong to the same plant. Unfortunately these photos are widely used in many wikipedias to illustrate the wrong plant. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 08:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your comment. The plant smell like anise so I think you are right. I will rename the photos as soon as possible.Rasbak (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission for photo usage[edit]

Dear Rasbak, for our student textbook about Charles Darwin we want to use your nice photo of a Sorbus tominalis. We kindly ask you for permission to use your photo. Of course your name appears in the list of figures together with a hint of the licence conditions. With best regards Paul

Paul Wrede Charité-Universitätsmedzin Berlin Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) paul.wrede@charite.de --Paul wrede (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I don't have made this picture just improved it. The auteur of the originally picture is Sten. Of course you may use the improved picture but you must mention Sten as fotographer.Rasbak (talk) 06:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Rasbak - could you add a location for File:Populus tremula, ratelpopulier stam.jpg please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA[edit]

An image that you uploaded to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Station_Eindhoven_kunstwerk.jpg was removed based on the receipt of a takedown notice made pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 512 (the “DMCA”). The Wikimedia Foundation (“WMF”) takes alleged copyright infringement very seriously and carefully examines each takedown notice received and the image in question for compliance with U.S. copyright law. This image was one of 59 photographs included in a DMCA takedown notice received by WMF of various publicly-installed sculptures around the world created by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen.

Some of these sculptures are located in countries that recognize “freedom of panorama” for sculptures, while others are not. Currently, U.S. copyright law does not recognize freedom of panorama for works of art, such as sculptures, and thus the copyright holder of a sculpture has the right to exclude others from publishing images of that sculpture, so long as it still enjoys copyright protection. While it is true that some of the sculptures in question here are located in countries whose copyright regime conflicts with the U.S’s regime, current U.S. conflict of law principles indicate that U.S. copyright law would apply in evaluating the scope of a copyright holder’s rights.

WMF strongly supports a change in U.S. copyright law that would extend freedom of panorama to artwork so that more people can experience beautiful and thought-provoking works of art that they would not otherwise be able to enjoy. However, WMF is a U.S.-based organization that must comply with U.S. laws as they presently exist, including U.S. copyright law, conflict of law principles, and the DMCA.

What can you do?[edit]

If you want to express your support for the extension of freedom of panorama to works of art (and you are a resident of the United States), you can write your U.S. senators and/or representative.

If you feel that this particular image does not infringe the alleged copyright holder’s rights, you can contest the takedown notice by submitting a “counter-notice” to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that WMF will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that WMF is unable to provide you with legal advice.

More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Filing a Counter-Notice[edit]

If you choose to submit a counter-notice, you must send a letter to legal@wikimedia.org asking WMF to restore this image. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:

  • A link to where the content was before we took it down;
  • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
  • Your name, address, and phone number;
  • If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
  • Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, WMF must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore this image within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Molen Walderveense molen steenkraan spindel trapeziumdraad.jpg[edit]

De tekst is correct het gaat hier om een vierkante draad.

Echter de naam van de foto is trapeziumdraad en dat is het niet.

hierdoor komt bij google deze draad onterecht als trapeziumdraad tevoorschijn


File:Char D1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Char D1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

UserB (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Use of your pictures[edit]

Hi,

We’d like to use some of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On the Internet site that we consulted, it says that the pictures are copyright free.

The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.

We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use those pictures.

Here are the links of the pictures.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Echinochloa_crus-galli_fruits,_Europese_hanenpoot_vruchten.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Echinochloa_crus-galli,_hanenpoot.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chenopodium_album_inflorescence,_Melganzenvoet_bloeiwijze.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glechoma_hederacea,_Hondsdraf.jpg

Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL

stephane@jcl.qc.ca

poa pratensis[edit]

Note:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Veldbeemdgras_Poa_pratensis_ligula.jpg

[[3]] : The ligule is extremely short and square ended, making a contrast with Annual Meadowgrass (Poa annua) and Rough Meadowgrass (Poa trivialis) in which it is silvery and pointed.

So, I don't see that on your image. See this: http://agrozoo.net/jsp/Galery_one_image.jsp?id_galery_obfuscated=f39b0ea6365642b7a6c7a194864c7f37

that would qualify as ligule is extremely short and square ended

Regards.

  • Thank you for your remarks. I am sure that it is Poa pratensis. The plant has also rhizomes.
    Veldbeemdgras.jpg
    Rasbak (talk) 07:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

More locations, please![edit]

Hi Rasbak - could you add locations to these, please:
File:Melganzenvoet plant Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Melganzenvoet bloeiwijze Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Melganzenvoet bloemen Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Melganzevoet vruchten Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Chenopodium album seeds, Melganzenvoet zaden.jpg
File:Melganzenvoet zaad Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Melganzenvoet eivormige bladeren Chenopodium album.jpg
File:Melganzenvoet lancetvormige bladeren Chenopodium album.jpg
I'm trying to improve the species' gallery, and location data are very important in botanical presentation. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Done Rasbak (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


File:ACreverseHoog.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ACreverseHoog.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


File:AUHoogsteen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AUHoogsteen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:AUreverseHoog.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AUreverseHoog.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Molen Kerkhovense molen, maalkoppel maalbak pasbalk (1).jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Molen Kerkhovense molen, maalkoppel maalbak pasbalk (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Triticum dicoccum bruinkafemmertarwe.jpg[edit]

I think I got the mess out. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Molen Sint Jan mengketel.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Molen Sint Jan mengketel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Wekeromse Zand Plattegrond GL.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wekeromse Zand Plattegrond GL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Woodcutterty (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)