User talk:Rasbak

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi. Could you add copyright tags to the images you uploaded (Image:Sterappel dwarsdrsn.jpg)? For now I have tagged your images as "Unknown". If there are no tags, the images may have to be deleted. It is also necessary to link all your images to a Commons page or to add them to category pages. Thanks. villy 20:13, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)


regarding Image:Eichenprozessionsspinner meyers 1888.jpg: please alwys copy all imformation about an image when you copy it to the commons. Local copies of images may be deleted and thus information obout the source etc. may be lost. Also, regarding this specific image, you used the wrong license: images from Mayers are PD, you can not make them GFDL (which would not make sense anyway as the original author is unknown). -- Duesentrieb 15:57, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

About Image:MetaseqLeaves.jpg: please note that the GFDL requires the author of the image to be mentioned - please provide that info. A link to the wiki you copied the image from is not sufficient, because the image may get deleted there. -- Duesentrieb 10:16, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

dito: please compare Image:Maybug.jpg - you allways have to provide a link to the autor and to copy the history if you´re uploading images from other users:
  • copy full original german info text, translate it if you want
  • link the german user page of the photographer with [[:de:Benutzer:XYZ|XYZ]]
  • copy the history: e.g. first upload at de.wikipedia 22:06, 7. Mai 2004
Thanks --:Bdk: 22:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image:Pinus sylvestris1.jpg

Thanks for improving it! (I am not too good at picture editing :-) MPF 11:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Paulownia fortunei

Thanks for improving the two pics. I deleted the originals. You may use the same pic names upload to cover them--Fanghong 00:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vicia

Hello Rasbak! Both your images Image:Heggenwikke Vicia sepium.jpg and Image:Heggenwikke bloem Vicia sepium.jpg do not show Vicia sepium. Their correct ID is Vicia sativa. The leaves of Vicia sepium have a different shape, it has a higher number of flowers per inflorescence and the calyx teeth are much shorter. Best wishes --Franz Xaver 19:07, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your corrections. I am very obligedRasbak 19:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Goodyera repens

Hi Rasbak. You brightened Image:399px-Goodyera repens.jpg, which is a thumbnail of Image:Goodyera repens.jpeg. Could you re-do your work, starting with the 533px version? Just upload it on top of Goodyera_repens.jpeg. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 22:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] papiervlekken

Your picture titled papiervlekken shows white spots which are definitely not related to Phytophthora porri, but almost surely indicate inbreeding.

thanks for the information.Rasbak 15:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your untagged images Commons:Untagged_images#R

Hi Rasbak, under untagged images there are around 15 untagged photos of yours. Could you please go there and apply the license {{GFDK}}, please, and the other information. Greetings, Longbow4u 18:24, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] uitnodiging

Hallo Rasbak

Ik wil je graag uitnodigen voor het meest uitdagende project van de hele wikimedia: Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 20:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chervil

I am pretty sure that the picture in the chervil article does not show chervil but cicely. Are you aware of the differences between these two plants? 84.189.192.133 21:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your remarks. I am sure that the picture is chervil.Rasbak 09:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Purpersteeltje (Ceratodon purpureus).jpg

I have re-uploaded Image:Purpersteeltje (Ceratodon purpureus).jpg as Image:Tortula_muralis1.jpg and added the old filename to the Template:Deletion requests. Thank you for changing the article in the nederlands wikipedia. --Mbc 18:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the repairing of my mistake. Rasbak 19:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello Rasbak,

my name is Ulf Dahl and I work for the east-german newspaper called "Freie Presse". I urgently need a teff-gras picture which you gave to wikimedia. I like to download it and print it on a page we call "Ratgeber" which givwes advises to our readers- sorry my english ist very bad! Is it allowed to use the picture ?

Please answer soon, because we need it within the next days.

Thank you very much.

Sincerly yours

Ulf Dahl

Freie Presse Brückenstraße 15 D-09111 Chemnitz Tel: +49 371/ 656-10420 Mobile:+49 151 14 81 72 79

Sehr geehrter Ulf Dahl, Sie können meine Bilder von Teff brauchen wie sie wollen. Bitte vermelden Sie auf jedes Fall http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teff und Rasbak.Rasbak 15:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Fruchtknoten_Mittelständig.jpg.jpg

Hello, and thank you for uploading your files to Wikimedia Commons. There seems to be some license information missing regarding this particular file, however. Could you please fix this? Thank you--Orgullomoore 12:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rostblättrige_Alpenrose.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

[edit] House mouse photo

Are you sure that house mouse in the photo (at the heading of the Russian-language article) is a house mouse or a white-footed mouse? It looks a bit more like a white-foot or perhaps a deer mouse to me. But then I'm not quite a mouse expert. ;)

The photo was taken in the Netherlands where no white-footed mouse or deere mouse lives. Yes it is a hous mouse.Rasbak 11:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Es mannelijke bloeiwijze (Fraxinus excelsior male inflorescense).jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Es mannelijke bloeiwijze (Fraxinus excelsior male inflorescense).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Verkeerde benaming afbeeldingen

Dag Rasbak, zou je in het vervolg afbeeldingen die je onder een foute naam hebt geüpload willen voorzien van het sjabloon {{badname|naam van het goede bestand.xxx}} ipv deze op Commons:Verwijderverzoeken te zetten? Deze pagina is er alleen voor "ingewikkelde" verwijderverzoeken. Door plaatsing van het sjabloon komt de afbeelding in een categorie gezet die door moderatoren wordt nagelopen. Alvast bedankt! Groet, NielsF 20:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving images from de:Wikipedia to the Commons Image:Schnittlauch.jpg

Hello Rasbak, thank you for moving images from the German Wikipedia to Commons. Please remeber that there are some rules which have to be observed. If the needed information is not present on Commons the image can not be deleted in the German Wikipedia.
In general, be careful to preserve all of the information available about the image, always copy the image description and state who created the image. The [1] will create a full summary that you can copy and paste into the Commons upload page. Please review the created summary and correct manually if necessary. Thanks --gildemax 10:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lythrum portula

Hi Rasbak, there is a wrong determination or naming in your pictures! Please see my remarks here: Talk:Lythrum_portula. -- Greetings, Fice 10:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your remark. The right determination is Callitriche platycarpa.Rasbak 13:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Harskampermolen_Mariana.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 16:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Komkommer_valse_meeldauw_(Pseudoperonospora_cubensis_on_Cucumis_sativus).jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Many thanks for organizing my files...

Hello, I am happy that you observed I prepared everything to organize my Vanessa atalanta files yesterday...It is cool from you to do the cut and past wotk for me.... By the way, who are you, I feel you have some skill in biology according to your galleries... you can find some information about me on my page User:Emmanuel.boutet... see you soon. bla --Emmanuel Boutet 10:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Emmanuel, I am a Dutch plantbreeder with interest in biology mostly wild plants and cultivated crops.Rasbak 10:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wait please!

Dear Rasbak, thank you so for classifying my unknown flowers. I'm really very glad about your help. But I'll load them up under the genus name as soon as I know it. If you like to help me, add those "right names" to the description, maybe too the categories, and I'll upload it again with all informations I got. :o) --Wildfeuer 20:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello Rasbak, thank you for classifying Sonchus oleraceus. I uploaded it again under this name. May I ask you for more help? here are all my pictures of those plants I’m not able to classify myself. I asked Franz Xaver for help, because I didn’t know another one who could do this. But he is very very busy everywhere. So, would you like to help us classifying those plants? I would be very pleased about this. Greetings from Germany --Wildfeuer 22:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I will do my best. But classifying from photo without description is often difficult.~~
And I will do my best describing my unknown plants in english. This is pretty difficult to me. I'll try next days. (Where’s my dictionary?!) Please excuse me, if I'm accidentally impolite talking to you.
I own this plant Image:2006-10-16-Salvia8.jpg and think it's Salvia patens. Do you agree? I have some more pics here on my picture page. Thanx for all and kindly regards --Wildfeuer 23:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Potamogeton_crispus_pocr3_003_pvd.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 14:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorbus aucuparia

Hi there, I may want to use the image Image:Sorbus aucuparia Wilde lijsterbes bloeiwijze.jpg in my diploma thesis. I will publish my work under a creative commons license, which is not compatible with GFDL. Would you consider adding a CC license to this image? That would be a great help! Thanks&bye --Lode (Messages) 10:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

  • No problem. See image.Rasbak 12:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. The next problem: I will not use a ShareAlike license. Could you consider granting me the right to publish this picture in my thesis under CC-BY-NC OR change the license tag to a non-ShareAlice license? That would be great. --Lode (Messages) 08:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

    • No problem. See image.Rasbak 08:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:V2-Air-Force-Eastern-Test-Range-1950-2.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2-Air-Force-Eastern-Test-Range-1950-2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Source with URL added and delete-notice removed - Robotje 11:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:V2-wiki-1.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2-wiki-1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:V2rampedelancement.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V2rampedelancement.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 00:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] bugs and weeds

Great to see someone else shares my interests! I'm working on a gardening book on en.wikibooks (b:en:A Wikimanual of Gardening)... it's all in English, but you might get a kick out of it (use the categories to find the pest insects and weeds). Do you do any work on nl.wikibooks?--SB_Johnny|talk|books 20:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for informing me. I have made a lot of pictures about vegetable gardening and I started with the book Plantkunde (see http://nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Plantkunde). If you need some pictures please inform me, may be I can help you.Rasbak 16:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Engerling1.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Engerling1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yann 12:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Please upload a better resolution if it is your image. Regards, Yann 12:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry but I have no better resolution of this young tiny larva. Older larva with better resolution you can find in Image:Meikeverlarven (Melolontha melolontha).jpg on commons.Rasbak 16:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Licensing

Hoi Rasbak, could you please adapt the licenses when you upload images by other users? "self" is wrong then as you, being the new uploader, have not made the images by yourself. Also a link to the author's user page is always recommended. See [2] for what has to be changed. Hope this helps :-) --Überraschungsbilder 09:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cercidiphyllum japonicum05s3200.jpg

I appreciate your compensation. It became a beautiful photograph by your favor. Thanks. However, it returned to the original version. I want to express a plain atmosphere in dark woods. Please do not worsen mind. (Being awkward English I am sorry.) --663highland 00:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TurkanaboyV.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:TurkanaboyV.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Locutus Borg 23:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Main page commons.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Main page commons.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Siebrand 07:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-random Corylus avellana links on my uploaded pictures?

Not complaining per se, but can you let me know what you intend by putting a context-free link on the image page under licensing that points to the wikilink page for Corylus avellana? Wouldn't it be a better idea to simply link to my images in the Corylus avellana page and be done with it? I'd understand it if you added a Category tag to the image, but I don't understand the isolated link text. Can you explain? I'll not do anything about those links for now, but would appreciate you cleaning it up if that's not what you intended.

Thanks. --Malcolm Gin 17:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry to upset you. That was sure not my intention. I put the link to the Corylus avellana page and put the pictures in the gallery, because then you can linked to all the pictures of Corylus avellana in commons with the tag {{commons|Corylus avellana}} or {{commonscat|Corylus avellana}}. For instance see the bottom line of the Dutch page of nl:Corylus avellana.Rasbak 16:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Crategus

Crataegus laevigata (Poir.) DC. is not present in Sicily ! --Esculapio 23:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok. But it is not monogyna. Is it may be a Crataegus azarolus?Rasbak 06:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wild rice

Hi, thanks for categorising my two wild rice images. I know we're supposed to add our images to categories, so that other people can find them, but it was very late in my time zone, and I wasn't sure where to look for appropriate categories, so I just added the image to the wild rice article at en, intending to come back later and find categories. I've now added one of the images to the article at fr as well. Thanks for saving me a bit of extra work. ElinorD 21:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Juncus_tenuis_seeds_jute_005_pvp.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Thymus serpyllum2.JPG (and 2)

You said it isnt Thymus serpyllum, and I was a bit unsure too, but do you know what it is? If I get the name of the flower I will upload them again with the right name. //moralist 14:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't know this flower. It looks like a member of the Caryophyllaceae.Rasbak 14:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
What about Saponaria? It was the flower in the Caryophyllaceae family that looked like it most. //moralist 15:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
It is possible. But to be sure you have to check also the leaves.Rasbak 15:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I put it under the Category:Unknown flowers, so that somone who knows the flower can mark it. //moralist 15:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red clover

Hi, i'm sorry about my misteak. I did the change has you can see here. Do you know the name in french? Thanks. CaptainHaddock 04:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Trèfle des prés Rasbak 05:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hi Rasbak,

thanks a lot for your modifications on my pictures. Whoooo, there is so much to do in wikicommons: articles, categoris, taxonavigation.

Cheers, Liné1 19:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you very much for helping name my flower (Dianthus alpinus)! Best wishes --Beyond silence 07:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

And more thanks for the same favor, this time from Bulgaria :) Neva 12:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] You're too quick!

Hi Rasbak, please give me at least half a day to put my fresh uploaded images to the right places. It's very confusing when you put them to galleries (and there to wrong places) while I'm working on them! Thanks. Ies 08:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Categorisering molens

Dag Rasbak, je maakt mooie foto's en detailopnames van molens, ik geniet er van, terwijl ik de categorisering van molends bijwerk. Wil je de foto's in Category:Windmills in Gelderland nakijken, of je nog categoriewijzigingen of toevoegingen wenst? In principe gaat een foto alleen in een subcategorie, niet in de bovenliggende categorie. Wat vind je ervan, je fotoseries van molens in en bij Ede ook onder de category:mill work te plaatsen omdat ze er dan opvallender als serie detailfoto's uitspringen. Ook andere categoriesuggesties zijn welkom. Groeten Havang 12:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Wissinks Möl ligt in Overijssel. Verder vind ik het een prima idee om de series in de categorie mill work te plaatsen eventueel onderverdeeld naar type molen, zoals standerdmolen, bovenkruier, poldermolen, oliemolen, watermolen.Rasbak 17:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Ik kan die nadere indeling in molentype niet maken, maar als jij die mogelijkheid wel hebt, prima. Naast de fysieke categorieen:windmolen, watermolen, tredmolen, wind generator zijn er de toepassingscategorieen: meelmolen, oliemolen, zaagmolen, pulp en papiermolen. Dat zijn dan wel parallelle categorieën, die niet naar land hoeven te worden uitgesplitst (behalve als ze nog niet in een andere categorie naar land zijn ingedeeld), lijkt me, maar wel opgenomen moeten worden in de hoofdcategorie category:mills. Overigens ligt er nog een klus m.b.t. Category:Wind park, category:wind generators categorie:windturbines, dat zijn er ook al zo'n 400 die ingedeeld zouden kunnen worden naar land; maar na een week categoriseren wil ik eventjes weer andere dingen doen. Het was wel leerzaam en met die foto's erbij leuk om te doen. Ik zal voortaan af en toe naar de molencategorieën kijken. Ken je de category-tree? Bekijk die maar eens.Groeten Havang 19:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Dag Rasbak, inderdaad, mill work was niet zo'n fraaie benaming. Een betere was al windmill parts, ik heb mill work en windmill parts nu vervangen door één category:Mill parts (alle items zijn ook onder windmolen dus daar is geen onduidelijkheid over en bijv molenstenen zitten ook in watermolens) en die categorie geplaatst onder Category:Molinology en onder Category:Equipment. Jouw molenfoto's kunnen straks dan vanuit drie category-trees gevonden worden. Ik heb een verzoek: als er meer dan 3 à 5 foto's van één molen zijn, kun je die molen het beste een eigen [[:categorie:Template:Plaatsnaam, Template:Molennaam]] geven en dan die categorie (maar niet tevens de individuele fotos) onderbrengen in hogere categorieën. Kijk bijv. bij Category:Lienden, molen de Zwaan. Er zijn enige onderdelen waar de molen niet bij genoemd is; het zou leuk zijn om daar de naam van de molen nog bij te hebben. Groeten, Havang 14:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Making images brighter

I appreciate that you're trying to make images more legible, but your changes to Image:Cannon Beach 02.jpg and Image:USS Hornet (CV-12) stern.JPG, for example, did not make those look better so I have reverted to the originals. Your edits altered the images' color balance, removed much of the tonal range, and made the pixellation more obvious. Simply boosting the contrast or brightness of an image, instead of adjusting the levels, throws all of the image's other qualities off in this manner. Postdlf 14:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pinus_sylvestris_shelfs.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

[edit] Making image brighter

The original image Image:Ribes_sanguineum_B.jpg was indeed quite dark, but your brighter image I found very flat. I uploaded a new version which shows in my opinion the right colors. I use an Apple cinema display, which I calibrated. Groeten Wouter 12:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Maiskuil.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 15:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Ede1_Doesburger_molen.png

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ede1_Doesburger_molen.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dolcegab Sommer2004.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Dolcegab Sommer2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--User:G.dallorto 21:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wilno 046.JPG.jpg

Hello Rasbak, could you please categorize this image. I intended to spend a category to it, but didn't know, what is shown there... :o( Kindly regards, --Wildfeuer 03:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ruppia_maritima_fruits_ruma5_003_php.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Français | Galego | עברית | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 09:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

[edit] Image:Mus Musculus-huismuis.jpg

Hi!

There has been continuing doubt about this really being a house mouse. Probably it’s a wood mouse (bosmuis). This is especially delicate because of the enormous popularity of the picture, and even the filename would have to be changed …

Greetings --Quilbert 14:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Aditionally: where and when did you get this picture? Do you have additional pictures of this animal? Greetings, --Accipiter 19:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I took this picture unther the roof tiles of my house in the Netherlands on 4th August 2004. Rasbak 17:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
See also Mus Musculus-huismuis zijaanzicht.jpgRasbak 18:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wapen van Barneveld.png

Image deletion warning Image:Wapen van Barneveld.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Agrostis photos

Hi. I think your photo of A. tenuis (now A. capillaris) Image:Gewoon_struisgras_bloeiwijze_Agrostis_tenuis.jpg is actually of Poa trivialis. Perhaps you could check the ID. --78.16.12.30 12:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I am 100% sure that it is Agrostis tenuis. Rasbak 13:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Rollcloud.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Rollcloud.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

-TheDJ 10:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Integraalgordel.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Plan palette-europe.gif


Could you please specify where this image comes from? There is a major mistake in it: the height is NOT 166mm but 144!----cmos 12:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/PalletRasbak (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Amaril.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Kwarts1.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Poldermolen_met_vijzel.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Poldermolen_met_vijzel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Multichill (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] use of images

Dear Rasbak, I am writing to ask about the use of an image of yours from Wikimedia. I am working for a non-commercial biodiversity group “Biochange” in Ireland, making a web-based identification key of the plants of West Ireland. We would like to have images of plants next to their text descriptions.

I wanted to use some of your images from Wikimedia (Humulus lupulus female inflorescence, Panistaca sativa flowering plant and Rorippa microphylla inflorescence and leaves). These are accompanied by a GNU licence. In this licence it states that any “derivatives to be available under the same license”. Our identification key will be freely available for the public to use, however for various reasons I am unable to release it under a Creative Commons / GNU licence. Would you be able to grant me permission to use this image in the identification key nonetheless? (I would of course attribute it appropriately and the GNU licence would accompany the picture).

It would be very valuable for us if I could use these images as they are of plants I have not yet been able to find to photograph.

Yours sincerely

Chloé Galley

  • Please use the pictures as you like. I have no problems with your proposal.Rasbak ( ) 17:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Hippuris vulgaris seeds hivu2 005 php.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hippuris vulgaris seeds hivu2 005 php.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Papaver somniferum seeds paso2 002 php.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Papaver somniferum seeds paso2 002 php.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

|Description=Papaver somniferum seeds

|Source=http://plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?keywordquery=Papaver+somniferum&mode=sciname&submit.x=11&submit.y=5 |Date= |Author=Steve Hurst |Permission=http://plants.usda.gov/java/usageGuidelines?imageID=paso2_002_ahp.tif |other_versions= }} This image is not copyrighted and may be freely used for any purpose. Please credit the artist, original publication if applicable, and the USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. The following format is suggested and will be appreciated:

Steve Hurst @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database

If you cite PLANTS in a bibliography, please use this citation: USDA, NRCS. 2007. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 7 July 2007). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.


[edit] Licensing

Public domain This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright.

Note: This only applies to works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See 206.02(b) of Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices).


العربية | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | ไทย | Vèneto | 中文 | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg


Please read nextime better. You see above clearly that the image is in the Public domain.Rasbak (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Callitriche palustris cave2 001 php.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:DNA structuur1.png

Image deletion warning Image:DNA structuur1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 15:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Molen_De_Koe_Ermelo_romp_met_bovenas.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Molen_De_Koe_Ermelo_romp_met_bovenas.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Sterkebaktalk 18:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I have already send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

with a copy of the file link.Rasbak (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, ik zie nu pas dat je nederlands bent.. Ik haal sjabloon weg voor je. Zou je de volgende keer even {{OTRS-pending}} erop willen zetten. Dan weet je gelijk zeker dat hij niet genomineerd word. Groetjes, Sterkebaktalk 18:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Walderveense_molen_regulateur.jpg

Hi, your picture of a governor seems to be the only one depicting a windmill governor. Have you got a date of installation for the governor? I am asking this, because it would be nice to actually have a picture of a pre-steam-engine/pre-James-Watt governor for the governor article. Thanks for your help. --DrJunge (talk) 08:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

This one is from 1912 but I have read somewhere that in an english museum it was stated that the first governor way before the steam-engine was found in a windmill. Unfortunately I don't know anymore which museum it was.Rasbak (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I just thought I got an easy find of a poof. Thanks for the quick reply. --DrJunge (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


Hello Rasbak!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes the category disappear during uploading. I assume this is an error in the software. By the way I find the uploading sheet very unfriendly specially when I have to upload more images. Rasbak (talk) 07:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] File:Klin.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Apodemus sylvaticus bosmuis.jpg

Pay attention to copyright File:Apodemus sylvaticus bosmuis.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

-Tryphon (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Is this a joke? It is very clearly that I take the picture and I licend it as GFDL.Rasbak (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
May be you ment File:Mousjje.jpg Rasbak (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Luftmassenmesser und Luftfilterkasten VW Golf TDI-ARL.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


[edit] The quality of the chemical structure Image:Base pair hydrogen bonding.jpg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Base pair hydrogen bonding.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --NEUROtiker  21:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:PBMonozyt.jpg

Pay attention to copyright File:PBMonozyt.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Jappalang (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File source is not properly indicated: File:Helleborus_viridis3.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helleborus_viridis3.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-1.0+}} or {{PD-self}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Original book source: Prof. Dr. Otto Wilhelm Thomé Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 1885, Gera, Germany Rasbak (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Categorie

Rasbak, bedankt voor het categoriseren van mijn foto deze. Hoop dat ik nog op je kennis mag beroep doen :-) Groet en zalig Pasen! Paul Hermans (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Graag gedaan.Rasbak (talk) 12:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Rasbak, nog eens bedankt voor je hulp. Wil je dit eens bekijken? Groet Paul Hermans (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image transfer

Hello Rasbak!

If you transfer images from another Wikimedia project, like en.wikipedia to Commons please use the CommonsHelper tool with which you can easily transfer images. Advantageous is that no information of the original image gets lost, especially the revision history of the image or its source. Thank you very much with the best regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

That is too difficult for me. Rasbak (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Your copyrihts may be violated

Please take a look at this. --ST 15:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Could I use your photo for a medicinal plant guidebook I am making? I am a student from the States and it is part of my project. I would site you of course. Please let me know!

No problem. Please mention also the licence GFDL.Rasbak (talk) 06:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Gras

Hi Rasbak, thank You for help + specifications. Greatings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File Tagging Image:Hotelschakeling.png

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Hotelschakeling.png. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Molen Het Noorden, Texel, wiek vastgelegd.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.


This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Molen Het Noorden, Texel, wiek.jpg

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.


This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)