User talk:Ratatosk
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Archive: 01
Contents |
[edit] Image:USVA emblem.svg
| Image deletion warning | Image:USVA emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--Lugusto • ※ 19:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] deprecated function in your monobook.js
Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.
This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.
To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- done. --Ratatosk ✍ 11:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
I like your images! Greets, Tarek
- Thank you :) --Ratatosk ✍ 21:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Boradcasting vans in Berlin-Tiergarten.jpg
Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:RAF-Logo.svg
| File deletion warning | File:RAF-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
Prezbo (talk) 21:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Dei RAF-Logo
Hallo Ratatosk,
ich habe bei WP:Grafikwerkstatt etwas zu deinem Logo geschrieben, ich glaube nämlich dass es nicht ganz dem Original entspricht. Bin leider zuerst nicht drauf gekommen, dich direkt anzusprechen. Vielleicht interessiert dich das. Pittigrilli (talk) 12:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Danke, aber einmal anschreiben hätte eigentlich gereicht ;) --Ratatosk ✍ 10:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)