User talk:Robotje

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Robotje!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:National_Mall_002.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 14:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I tried to upload the file to Image:DC mall capitol.jpg but during the upload procedure something went wrong and the file was uploaded under a new name "Image:National_Mall_002.JPG". Later I succeeded in uploading the file to the correct location, but I cannot delete the file "Image:National_Mall_002.JPG". If it is automatically deleted in 7 days, then the problem is gone. - Robotje 15:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Flickr[edit]

I do know this, but i also know these are my pictures. It's not because they're available on Flickr that they are copyrighted by Flickr. Christophe81 10:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't write that they are copyrighted by Flickr. They are shown on Flickr but the original poster didn't release them under there as Public Domain so the poster still claims some rights. On Wikimedia Commons somebody with the username 'Christophe81' claims that those pictures are his and 'releases' them here under Public Domain. If you're the same person, then why not change the license on Flickr as well? Same remark was made on the Dutch Wikipedia several days ago: "Dan zul je je licentie op Flickr aan moeten passen Christophe. Voor commons geldt hetzelfde: afbeeldingen met conflicterende licenties worden niet geaccepteerd." [1] - Robotje 14:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


Image:Broekhof.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Broekhof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Robotje 11:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


File:Pleuni_Touw_-_.De_glazen_stad.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pleuni_Touw_-_.De_glazen_stad.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Robotje (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Ton_Lensink_en_Annemarie_Oster_in_Hadimassa..png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ton_Lensink_en_Annemarie_Oster_in_Hadimassa..png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Robotje (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Margot_Vliegenthart[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Margot_Vliegenthart has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Robotje (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

SER[edit]

Hoi Robotje,

ik zag dat je de afbeeldingen van de SER-leden hebt geupload met een verwijzing naar [2]. Heb je verder nog contact gehad met ze, want op basis van die tekst kan ik eigenlijk niet 100% tot de conclusie komen dat gebruik vrij is, en dat ook bewerkingen toegestaan zijn. (gratis is niet hetzelfde als vrij). Wellicht dat ze wel bereid zijn tot zo een vrijgave, maar daar zou dan een explicietere toestemming voor moeten komen, liefst met een expliciete licentievermelding. Effeietsanders (talk) 13:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Er waren al enige tijd geleden ten minste 3 andere afbeeldingen
op Common gezet door de gebruikers Familieman en C mon met dezelfde gedachtegang als ik. Namelijk dat als voor de gebruiksvoorwaarde wordt gesteld:
"In deze beeldbank staan foto's van al onze raadsleden (en hun plaatsvervangers). De foto's zijn te downloaden in goede afdrukkwaliteit (2Mb). Gebruik ervan is gratis met naamsvermelding van de fotograaf: Christiaan Krouwels."
dan geven ze aan dat die foto's vrij te gebruiken zijn met als enige beperking het moeten vermelden van de naam van de fotograaf. Dat komt dus effectief neer op CC-BY-SA. Bij foto's van de voorzitter Rinnooy Kan staat [3]
"In deze beeldbank staan foto's van al onze raadsleden (en hun plaatsvervangers). De foto's zijn te downloaden in goede afdrukkwaliteit. Gebruik ervan is gratis met naamsvermelding van de fotograaf: Christiaan Krouwels.
Indien u foto's gebruikt voor plaatsing bij interviews met de voorzitter, verzoeken wij u een bewijsexemplaar naar afdeling Communicatie van de SER te sturen."
en door dat laatste verzoek (al is het geen eis) komt CC-BY-SA minder in beeld. Maar goed, op zich zou het beter zijn als het op de site van de SER wat specifieker als CC-BY-SA wordt vermeld of als ze iets soortgelijks per email willen bevestigen. Ik heb ze hierover niet benaderd, zou jij dat willen doen? Het zijn op zich mooie afbeeldingen die de artikelen zeker verrijken en de intentie waaronder ze op die SER-site zijn gezet is in lijn met de gedachte achter CC-BY-SA dus dat is al een goede start. Op de beeldbank-pagina's voor ondernemersleden en werknemersleden staan trouwens ook nog de nodige foto's die mooi bij de Wikipedia artikelen gebruikt kunnen worden met dezelfde voorwaarden als voor de kroonleden. - Robotje (talk) 06:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Dat gebruik gratis is (waarschijnlijk refererend naar de pers) betekent nog niet dat dit altijd zo zal zijn noch dat de afbeelding bewerkt kan worden. Overigens is het natuurlijk zo dat als iets effectief neerkomt op CCBYSA, dat de afbeelding nog niet onder die licentie valt. De expliciete toestemming zal dan dus moeten worden vermeld in plaats van het template. Dat het waarschijnlijk is dat ze hiermee in geest wel zouden instemmen ben ik overigens met je eens. Ik zal proberen er een e-mail aan te wijden. Effeietsanders (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Alvast bedankt voor je poging ze per email te benaderen om dit te regelen. - Robotje (talk) 11:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Ank-bijleveld-nieuw208x208.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ank-bijleveld-nieuw208x208.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 16:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


File:Ank-bijleveld-nieuw208x208.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ank-bijleveld-nieuw208x208.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Diorama_Gouvernementsplein_Gerrit_Schouten.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Diorama_Gouvernementsplein_Gerrit_Schouten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Editwar[edit]

Do not start an Editwar with me.

At edit Kliek added his name in stead of Vijverln. He did not make this file, neither did he upload an edited version of it. He can't claim the rights of the file in question. I asked you to check the history, and you obniously didn't. Therefor I revert it back again. --Rodejong (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Come on, Rodejong, first of all you did so far 3 reverts on that page (although over a period of about 50 hours) of which the last two were today with only a few hours in between, while I only did 2 reverts on that page with more than 40 hours in between. So if somebody is about to start an edit war, it is you. And why? If you did a little better your best you would have known your statement above about Kliek is a false statement (ever heard about "You must not testify falsely as a witness against your fellowman"?). So if you have no idea why Klied changed it (see "No Idea why he claims the copyrights"), please don't edit that page and leave it to people who obviously know about this so much better than you do. - Robotje (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I have asked user Polarlys to check if my edit was right or wrong, and that your edit was correct or just a lame excuse to irritate me. We have our history. I thought it was fair to let you know. --Rodejong (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)