User talk:Ronaldino

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

ENDE[edit]

--Ronaldino (talk) 20:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 12:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:San Francisco Bay Bridge[edit]

Hello, why did you delete the Category:Longest cantilever bridges on the San Francisco Bay Bridge ? this bridge can be on the two categories, one for a particular cantilever bridge and one for bridges records ?

Also, the east part is a cantilever bridge, this category should be divised into two part (the west bridge : suspension , whenbridge and the east bridge), have a look to Sfoair.jpg--Glabb (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for my mistake. I did not know that there is also a second part of the bridge that is an cantilever bridge. I will change it. --Ronaldino (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Ronaldino--Glabb (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Kitzingen Nordbrücke 10.JPG[edit]

Hallo Ronaldino, ich habe File:Kitzingen Nordbrücke 10.JPG aus der hier auf Commons verwaisten Bilderwerkstatt gekramt, wo du einen Monat vergeblich auf Antwort/Bearbeitung gewartet hattest. Aus diesem Grund habe ich diese Bilderwerkstatt, die eine gute Idee gewesen ist, aber wohl einschlief überall (auf ein paar (ebenfalls eingeschlafenen) Hilfeseiten) entlinkt, damit nicht jemand auf die Idee kommt und dort seine Bilder einstellt.

Ich arbeite bei der de:WP:Fotowerkstatt mit. Wenn du möchtest, kann ich, oder ein Mitarbeiter dort deine drei Bilder nun (ein paar Jahre später) besser zusammenzubauen.

Ich habe gesehen, dass es hier bei dir zuletzt nicht ganz so glücklich aussah, bin aber sehr froh zu sehen, dass du wohl doch nicht das Handtuch geschmissen hast und dich für immer verabschiedet hast! Zu deiner letzten Anmerkung hier, dass deine Benutzerseite so "schnell" schnellgelöscht wurde: nun, das ist eben der Wunsch des besitzenden Benutzers und der kann viele Gründe haben, das solltest du nicht als Geringschätzung deiner Arbeit bewerten.

Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:Schleuße_im_Eidersperrwerk[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Schleuße_im_Eidersperrwerk has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mef.ellingen (talk) 10:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Hotels_by_owner[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Hotels_by_owner has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

PrinceGloria (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Glass_Towers[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Glass_Towers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Nyttend (talk) 04:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Modern_movement_in_the_United_States[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Modern_movement_in_the_United_States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Jmabel ! talk 22:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)