User talk:Sorenhk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Søren1997)
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive: September 11th, 2011 - January 1th, 2014

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sorenhk!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Copyright status: File:Oversigtsplan Hadsund Butikscenter.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oversigtsplan Hadsund Butikscenter.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Jeg lægger ikke en fil op hvis jeg ikke har fået lov til det. Tilladelsen er givet af Jan Vestergaard, Service- og aktivitetsansvarlig i Hadsund Butikscenter. E-mail: e-mail: jatime@jatime.dk. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 16:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Statue-ophavsretsproblemer[edit]

Der er problemer med foto af skulpturer, jvf. Ophavsretsloven 24.2 Se Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen). Jeg har sat nogle 'copyvio' ind flere steder. — Fnielsen (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Der er ingen problemer da tilladelsen er givet af butikscenteret. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Stenfiguren i Storegade.jpg er langt fra en skulptur. Det er en der blev givet til gågaden af Hadsund Stenhugger i 1900. Vi bør måske lige kikke Category:Fountains in Denmark igennem da der er rigtig mange skulpturere. Vh --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Skulpturerne er kunstværker hvor ophavsretten sandsynligvis ikke er udløbet (de ser da ihvertfald moderne ud). Rettighedshaveren er kunstneren eller evt. arvinger. Det er ikke butikscentret, - selv om de har købt en kopi. Desværre :-(. Se evt. [1]Fnielsen (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Prøv en gang lige at tage et kik på File:Støvring 02 ies.jpg, File:Støvring 03 ies.jpg og File:Hobro - Adelgade 02 ies.jpg --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 19:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

your tagging of artworks in Denmark[edit]

Hi Søren1997, when you tag files for suspicion of copyvio, please use the copyvio-link in the toolbox (left side of screen) or notify the uploaders manually about the problem. Otherwise, the uploaders remain without notice or the deleting administators first have to check whether the uploaders were notified and eventually notify them, which adds unnecessary workload. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll see if I can figure out to use it. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 17:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Simple geometriske former?[edit]

Hvordan kan du mene at Post Danmarks logo (her især det kronede posthorn) falder under simple geometriske former? --Palnatoke (talk) 10:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Post Danmark logo.svg.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Post Danmark logo.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palnatoke (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


File:Internet Explorer 7 and 8 logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Internet Explorer 7 and 8 logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fma12 (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Luffe1810[edit]

Hello. I have deleted all the obvious copyvios. For simple logos, I have started regular deletion requests, because they could be below COM:TOO. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

No, you have done nothing wrong. I just think regular deletion requests are more appropriate for simple logos because it is not obvious copyright violation, so it should be discussed. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
It was as fortunate. It is you who decide whisper templates to be on. It's probably a good idea to discuss the logos you refer.

It should be emphasized that User: Luffe1810, a few hours ago was blocked off en: wiki for a week. The reasoning sounded "Copyright violation: and vandalism" See here. Best regards --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 18:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)