Ok, I have added a link to the user account on the english wikipedia, and I have put the image into categories. I laso tried to find out the correct license for the image, but it is missing on the english wikipedia too: Adamrice did not provide license information or source of this image. I have asked him to add the info, but if no license is known, the image will have to be deleted soon. When copying images to the commons, please always check that they have a correct license (see Commons:Licensing - ther's also Commons:许可协议, but the translation is not finished).
If you don't understand english, ask User:Vipuser or User:Fanghong to help you, thy know chinese. Maybe they can also help you to find an alternative image of this character. -- Duesentrieb 13:10, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
For images you created yourself, you can use any license less or equally restrictive as the GFDL. It is actually recommended to use both, GFDL and cc-by-sa-2.0, at once. You could however also use a completely different license, like the free art license. Look at Commons:Copyright tags for a list of good and bad license.
Also, if you created an image, say so on the description page. If not, state the author and source of the image. Look at Commons:Criteria for inclusion, that page explains what should be on a description page. -- Duesentrieb 13:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
The license for Image:Honey comb.jpg is good now, thank you! I have added the image to Honey, Apis mellifera and Beekeeping. I found those pages simply by searching for "bee" and for "honey" ;) -- Duesentrieb 14:28, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks for fixing it! Dbenbenn 15:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
你好！七兄，欢迎到维基共享资源来！共享资源的规则大部分User:Vipuser都给翻译成中文了，你可以点击阅读中文。共享资源因为是用于所有语言维基的，所以图片版权要求比其他维基更严，不允许有版权的fair use图片，所以从其他维基下载注意一下版权页，如果上传者没有标明，请先在他们的用户页要求他们注明，否则不能在这里使用。他们标明fair use或保留部分版权的也不能在这里使用，自己创作的图片也要注明一下，有什麽问题可以和我们交流。祝你在这里愉快！--Fanghong 01:43, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
|Image deletion warning||Image:Sho.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
Thuresson 12:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)